<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CREW posts transcript of 1988 Hastings impeachment proceedings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigma00825</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-121714</link>
		<dc:creator>enigma00825</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-121714</guid>
		<description>gryphon202:

The President is the final arbitor on who &quot;deserves&quot; a security clearance to do his job.  Hastings is being foisted on us for political reasons, W can deny him his clearance for the same political reasons.  It would then become a constitutional question, with open hearings on Mr. Hastings history and personal finances. Maybe the MSM would even report on some/all of his picadillos. Then again, this is such an egregious security risk, the Dems may be playing the race card here, expecting to be confronted, before selecting someone else.

FWIW, I don&#039;t think W has the political will to confront the DEMs at this point.

I would hope that the congressional leaders would take a page from the DEMs playbook when organizing both house and boycot rule changes that don&#039;t reflect the tie in the Senate
and minority power sharing in the House that have been enacted since 1994, including an even splits on the ethics committees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gryphon202:</p>
<p>The President is the final arbitor on who &#8220;deserves&#8221; a security clearance to do his job.  Hastings is being foisted on us for political reasons, W can deny him his clearance for the same political reasons.  It would then become a constitutional question, with open hearings on Mr. Hastings history and personal finances. Maybe the MSM would even report on some/all of his picadillos. Then again, this is such an egregious security risk, the Dems may be playing the race card here, expecting to be confronted, before selecting someone else.</p>
<p>FWIW, I don&#8217;t think W has the political will to confront the DEMs at this point.</p>
<p>I would hope that the congressional leaders would take a page from the DEMs playbook when organizing both house and boycot rule changes that don&#8217;t reflect the tie in the Senate<br />
and minority power sharing in the House that have been enacted since 1994, including an even splits on the ethics committees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gryphon202</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-119184</link>
		<dc:creator>gryphon202</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-119184</guid>
		<description>A question that has popped up in these comments, and in other places, has been thus (and I&#039;m not directly quoting anyone, here):

&quot;With such a ripe opportunity for blackmail, how can Alcee Hastings get the security clearance necessary to hold such a sensitive position?&quot;

The short answer:  He doesn&#039;t need it.

By virtue of the fact that he would chair the Select Intelligence Committee, Hastings would be &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;entitled&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; to eyes-only, top-secret intelligence information by virture of his job.  Although I do not know necessarily from firsthand experience, I have known people that served as D.C.-bound pages and interns, and it is &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;assumed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; that being elected makes one trustworthy enough to deal in such information.

&lt;em&gt;Get the snorkel, John-John.  Uncle Teddy&#039;s going swimming again!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question that has popped up in these comments, and in other places, has been thus (and I&#8217;m not directly quoting anyone, here):</p>
<p>&#8220;With such a ripe opportunity for blackmail, how can Alcee Hastings get the security clearance necessary to hold such a sensitive position?&#8221;</p>
<p>The short answer:  He doesn&#8217;t need it.</p>
<p>By virtue of the fact that he would chair the Select Intelligence Committee, Hastings would be <strong><em>entitled</em></strong> to eyes-only, top-secret intelligence information by virture of his job.  Although I do not know necessarily from firsthand experience, I have known people that served as D.C.-bound pages and interns, and it is <strong><em>assumed</em></strong> that being elected makes one trustworthy enough to deal in such information.</p>
<p><em>Get the snorkel, John-John.  Uncle Teddy&#8217;s going swimming again!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118949</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118949</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just as race should never disqualify a person from office, race should never insulate a person from the consequences of wrongful conduct.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;*Where* is the logic in thaaaat?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just as race should never disqualify a person from office, race should never insulate a person from the consequences of wrongful conduct.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>*Where* is the logic in thaaaat?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janos Hunyadi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118947</link>
		<dc:creator>Janos Hunyadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118947</guid>
		<description>RushBaby, you nailed it.......but sometimes you take what you can get, as The Rolling Stones oldie says</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RushBaby, you nailed it&#8230;&#8230;.but sometimes you take what you can get, as The Rolling Stones oldie says</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118363</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118363</guid>
		<description>A question that needs to be answered is: Why is Soros opposed to Hastings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question that needs to be answered is: Why is Soros opposed to Hastings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Nazh's Daily Ramble</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118182</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Nazh's Daily Ramble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Women(Pakistan), Pelosi, Madonna, Schumer, Berkle...&lt;/strong&gt;

Summary of various blogs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Women(Pakistan), Pelosi, Madonna, Schumer, Berkle&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Summary of various blogs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118098</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118098</guid>
		<description>Puritan,

Your rant at 2:27PM is completely right on. Allow me to comment on this portion:

&lt;blockquote&gt;When, if ever, will we then signal to the engineer to get up an adult head of steam? Are we to ground the whole mess to a halt until *EVERYONE* can limp, crawl, slither or step onto the beast to ride on together? 

If so, sell the engine for scrap, because we’ll *NEVER* have everyone up to speed. We, as individuals, can reach out for the halt, the bewildered, the frightened, but the train has to travel on.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is exactly how socialists want it. They will always craft a &quot;dependent&quot; segment of society, and demand that the haves take more care of the have-nots. It is their channel to money and power. If each person were told (and believed)that they are and must be responsible for their own choices, outcomes, and consequences, the Marxists would lose their source of political pull. It is, and always has been, a massive shell game.

If it isn&#039;t minorities, it&#039;s women, or the handicapped, or the elderly, or college students, or immigrants, or the GLBT huddle, or the underemployed. And it&#039;s ALWAYS &quot;the chirren&quot;.

You ask when? When people stop accepting the lies that it is the government form whom all blessings flow, in the form of taxes. America is the most benevolent, charitable nation on the face of the Earth. But when it is forced by taxation it is no longer charity, it is legalized theft under the Marxist motto of &quot;from each according to his ability, to each according to his need&quot;.

The sooner Americans learn to abhor that concept and all of the actions that follow it, the sooner that train gets to open up full power.

The next two years will see that motto enforced more and more, with or without Alcee Hastings in a position of power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puritan,</p>
<p>Your rant at 2:27PM is completely right on. Allow me to comment on this portion:</p>
<blockquote><p>When, if ever, will we then signal to the engineer to get up an adult head of steam? Are we to ground the whole mess to a halt until *EVERYONE* can limp, crawl, slither or step onto the beast to ride on together? </p>
<p>If so, sell the engine for scrap, because we’ll *NEVER* have everyone up to speed. We, as individuals, can reach out for the halt, the bewildered, the frightened, but the train has to travel on.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is exactly how socialists want it. They will always craft a &#8220;dependent&#8221; segment of society, and demand that the haves take more care of the have-nots. It is their channel to money and power. If each person were told (and believed)that they are and must be responsible for their own choices, outcomes, and consequences, the Marxists would lose their source of political pull. It is, and always has been, a massive shell game.</p>
<p>If it isn&#8217;t minorities, it&#8217;s women, or the handicapped, or the elderly, or college students, or immigrants, or the GLBT huddle, or the underemployed. And it&#8217;s ALWAYS &#8220;the chirren&#8221;.</p>
<p>You ask when? When people stop accepting the lies that it is the government form whom all blessings flow, in the form of taxes. America is the most benevolent, charitable nation on the face of the Earth. But when it is forced by taxation it is no longer charity, it is legalized theft under the Marxist motto of &#8220;from each according to his ability, to each according to his need&#8221;.</p>
<p>The sooner Americans learn to abhor that concept and all of the actions that follow it, the sooner that train gets to open up full power.</p>
<p>The next two years will see that motto enforced more and more, with or without Alcee Hastings in a position of power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puritan1648</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118031</link>
		<dc:creator>Puritan1648</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118031</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...but also for lying under oath at his trial and for disclosing the contents of a confidential court ordered wiretap that affected 2 ongoing criminal investigations.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...except that the bar&#039;s been lowered to subterranian levels on the matter of &quot;lying under oath&quot;, thanks to Slippery William...and the whole &quot;disclosing contents&quot; of anything confidential has been compromised by the light treatment of Leaky Pat Leahy and several of the folks at the CIA who&#039;ve picked and chosen which parts of their oaths they feel bound by.  

The motto of the Democratic Party since Clinton:  &quot;Everybody does it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;but also for lying under oath at his trial and for disclosing the contents of a confidential court ordered wiretap that affected 2 ongoing criminal investigations.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;except that the bar&#8217;s been lowered to subterranian levels on the matter of &#8220;lying under oath&#8221;, thanks to Slippery William&#8230;and the whole &#8220;disclosing contents&#8221; of anything confidential has been compromised by the light treatment of Leaky Pat Leahy and several of the folks at the CIA who&#8217;ve picked and chosen which parts of their oaths they feel bound by.  </p>
<p>The motto of the Democratic Party since Clinton:  &#8220;Everybody does it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bones47</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-118022</link>
		<dc:creator>bones47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-118022</guid>
		<description>My only real question which seems to really bother me is this, &quot; How does he get the security clearence he needs to hold this major post??&quot; I would really like to know before I start firing off emails to my senators and congressmen. Thanks for any input and for HotAir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only real question which seems to really bother me is this, &#8221; How does he get the security clearence he needs to hold this major post??&#8221; I would really like to know before I start firing off emails to my senators and congressmen. Thanks for any input and for HotAir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beens21</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117987</link>
		<dc:creator>beens21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117987</guid>
		<description>note that Hastings was not just impeached for bribery,as the MSM reports, but also for lying under oath at his trial and for disclosing the contents of a confidential court ordered wiretap that affected 2 ongoing criminal investigations.He&#039;s going to be chair of the Intelligence committee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note that Hastings was not just impeached for bribery,as the MSM reports, but also for lying under oath at his trial and for disclosing the contents of a confidential court ordered wiretap that affected 2 ongoing criminal investigations.He&#8217;s going to be chair of the Intelligence committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117971</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117971</guid>
		<description>Heavy lifting? More like heavy GRIFTING. Don’t be thinking that CREW is on our side, or nonpartisan, or even bipartisan.

CREW’s founder/ Executive Director is Melanie Sloan, a former staffer of both John Conyers and Chuckie Schemer. She  was a regular guest on the Al Franken Show, and is allied with Joe Wilson. 

Financing for CREW is brought to you in part by &quot;Democracy Alliance,&quot; a group of progressive donors including George Soros, Peter Lewis, and Rob Reiner. Its purpose: to counter conservative Judicial Watch.

These people have calculated that Hastings’ ouster had better be affected by their side than expose themselves to the huge political liability that Hastings represents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavy lifting? More like heavy GRIFTING. Don’t be thinking that CREW is on our side, or nonpartisan, or even bipartisan.</p>
<p>CREW’s founder/ Executive Director is Melanie Sloan, a former staffer of both John Conyers and Chuckie Schemer. She  was a regular guest on the Al Franken Show, and is allied with Joe Wilson. </p>
<p>Financing for CREW is brought to you in part by &#8220;Democracy Alliance,&#8221; a group of progressive donors including George Soros, Peter Lewis, and Rob Reiner. Its purpose: to counter conservative Judicial Watch.</p>
<p>These people have calculated that Hastings’ ouster had better be affected by their side than expose themselves to the huge political liability that Hastings represents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117954</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila (Pillage Idiot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117954</guid>
		<description>My favorite:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps the most damning evidence of Judge Hastings&#039; involvement is the judge&#039;s flight from Wasington on October 9, 1981, after he learned that Mr. Borders had been arrested.  It is undisputed that the judge left the L&#039;Enfant Plaza Hotel immediately.  He turned down an offer to be driven to the airport and instead took a taxi.  But rather than going to National Airport, about ten minutes from where he was staying, he went to Baltimore-Washington International -- an hour away, a $50 cab ride away.  He flew, not back to Miami, at which airport he had parked his car, but rather to Fort Lauderdale, where he had to rent a car.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite:</p>
<blockquote><p>Perhaps the most damning evidence of Judge Hastings&#8217; involvement is the judge&#8217;s flight from Wasington on October 9, 1981, after he learned that Mr. Borders had been arrested.  It is undisputed that the judge left the L&#8217;Enfant Plaza Hotel immediately.  He turned down an offer to be driven to the airport and instead took a taxi.  But rather than going to National Airport, about ten minutes from where he was staying, he went to Baltimore-Washington International &#8212; an hour away, a $50 cab ride away.  He flew, not back to Miami, at which airport he had parked his car, but rather to Fort Lauderdale, where he had to rent a car.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Deth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Deth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117946</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WooHoo!!!&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s nice to see CREW doing the heavy lifting.

The Blogosphere&#039;s got this one by the tail and should hammer it home with the aid of FNC.

Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WooHoo!!!</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see CREW doing the heavy lifting.</p>
<p>The Blogosphere&#8217;s got this one by the tail and should hammer it home with the aid of FNC.</p>
<p>Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puritan1648</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117904</link>
		<dc:creator>Puritan1648</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; A black public official must be held to the same standard as every other public official...Just as race should never disqualify a person from office, race should never insulate a person from the consequences of wrongful conduct.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...let this ring from the mountain-tops...let it be heard amid the pealings of bells...let the children learn this in their cradles...let the plowman sing this at the blow and the weaver at his shuttle.

...OK, that last was the Bible, but I&#039;m on a roll here....

If we are equal, we are *EQUAL*, not just for the good.  Proof of equality *ISN&#039;T* the &quot;first black whatsit&quot; or the &quot;first black female whosits&quot;, it&#039;s holding blacks equally accountable for their citizenship...no more, and certainly no less.

There is no &quot;remedial citizenship&quot;.  Justice demands who people who haven&#039;t suffered are our equals, and not allowed to swing from the women&#039;s tee, are allowed to do their pushups from their knees, while the rest of us have to gut it out as adults.  Anything less is denying these &quot;junior citizens&quot; full responsiblity, which is what you do with &quot;junior humans...children.

Who *ARE* these black Americans who can&#039;t keep up?  Who *ARE* these &quot;other&quot; Americans for whom the entire train has to be slowed down so&#039;s they can hitch a ride?  When, if ever, will we then signal to the engineer to get up an adult head of steam?  Are we to ground the whole mess to a halt until *EVERYONE* can limp, crawl, slither or step onto the beast to ride on together?  

If so, sell the engine for scrap, because we&#039;ll *NEVER* have everyone up to speed.  We, as individuals, can reach out for the halt, the bewildered, the frightened, but the train has to travel on.

If he&#039;s allowed to slide by, Mr. Hastings will be another of those dreary &quot;first black thingamajigs&quot;...the first black mistake to head a vitally important Congressional oversight committee.  We&#039;ll have him forced down the national throat.  It will be proof that you don&#039;t have to be good enough...you only need to be black enough.

That&#039;s as bad as attacking people with fire hoses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> A black public official must be held to the same standard as every other public official&#8230;Just as race should never disqualify a person from office, race should never insulate a person from the consequences of wrongful conduct.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;let this ring from the mountain-tops&#8230;let it be heard amid the pealings of bells&#8230;let the children learn this in their cradles&#8230;let the plowman sing this at the blow and the weaver at his shuttle.</p>
<p>&#8230;OK, that last was the Bible, but I&#8217;m on a roll here&#8230;.</p>
<p>If we are equal, we are *EQUAL*, not just for the good.  Proof of equality *ISN&#8217;T* the &#8220;first black whatsit&#8221; or the &#8220;first black female whosits&#8221;, it&#8217;s holding blacks equally accountable for their citizenship&#8230;no more, and certainly no less.</p>
<p>There is no &#8220;remedial citizenship&#8221;.  Justice demands who people who haven&#8217;t suffered are our equals, and not allowed to swing from the women&#8217;s tee, are allowed to do their pushups from their knees, while the rest of us have to gut it out as adults.  Anything less is denying these &#8220;junior citizens&#8221; full responsiblity, which is what you do with &#8220;junior humans&#8230;children.</p>
<p>Who *ARE* these black Americans who can&#8217;t keep up?  Who *ARE* these &#8220;other&#8221; Americans for whom the entire train has to be slowed down so&#8217;s they can hitch a ride?  When, if ever, will we then signal to the engineer to get up an adult head of steam?  Are we to ground the whole mess to a halt until *EVERYONE* can limp, crawl, slither or step onto the beast to ride on together?  </p>
<p>If so, sell the engine for scrap, because we&#8217;ll *NEVER* have everyone up to speed.  We, as individuals, can reach out for the halt, the bewildered, the frightened, but the train has to travel on.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s allowed to slide by, Mr. Hastings will be another of those dreary &#8220;first black thingamajigs&#8221;&#8230;the first black mistake to head a vitally important Congressional oversight committee.  We&#8217;ll have him forced down the national throat.  It will be proof that you don&#8217;t have to be good enough&#8230;you only need to be black enough.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s as bad as attacking people with fire hoses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117901</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117901</guid>
		<description>I think Conyers got one thing wrong.  A lower standard for blacks is not only patronizing but racist as well.  And it&#039;s a truly evil policy.  Let&#039;s take race out of it for a moment and consider this scenario:

Consider identical twin sons, Walter and Brian.  For some inexplicable reason, they are raised them in different ways.  Walter is consistently told what high standards of behavior you expect of him; when he fails to meet those standards, his parents punish him accordingly; they reward him when he exceeds the standards.  Brian, however, is allowed to behave in whatever way he wishes, and only suffers negative consequences for his bad behavior when the behavior is so immediately self-destructive that his (s)mother is unable to shelter him from it (his father is absent from his life, and only has time for Walter).  In that case, she assures Brian that the reason for his predicament is that Walter has somehow caused it, not because of anything Brian may have done to himself.

Imagine how these young men will grow up.

Not only can Walter and Brian be Whites and Blacks, but Jews and Moslems, Men and Womyn, or any other pairing of Evil Oppressors and their Victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Conyers got one thing wrong.  A lower standard for blacks is not only patronizing but racist as well.  And it&#8217;s a truly evil policy.  Let&#8217;s take race out of it for a moment and consider this scenario:</p>
<p>Consider identical twin sons, Walter and Brian.  For some inexplicable reason, they are raised them in different ways.  Walter is consistently told what high standards of behavior you expect of him; when he fails to meet those standards, his parents punish him accordingly; they reward him when he exceeds the standards.  Brian, however, is allowed to behave in whatever way he wishes, and only suffers negative consequences for his bad behavior when the behavior is so immediately self-destructive that his (s)mother is unable to shelter him from it (his father is absent from his life, and only has time for Walter).  In that case, she assures Brian that the reason for his predicament is that Walter has somehow caused it, not because of anything Brian may have done to himself.</p>
<p>Imagine how these young men will grow up.</p>
<p>Not only can Walter and Brian be Whites and Blacks, but Jews and Moslems, Men and Womyn, or any other pairing of Evil Oppressors and their Victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117868</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117868</guid>
		<description>McFLY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McFLY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117867</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117867</guid>
		<description>Oh the powerful ubiquitous (and timeless) spirits of our lovely Michelle, who also carries many decks of cards.... Play your hand, you &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; lose either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the powerful ubiquitous (and timeless) spirits of our lovely Michelle, who also carries many decks of cards&#8230;. Play your hand, you <em>will</em> lose either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MamaAJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-117865</link>
		<dc:creator>MamaAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/24/crew-posts-transcript-of-1988-hastings-impeachment-proceedings/#comment-117865</guid>
		<description>She must have borrowed Ann Coulter&#039;s time machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She must have borrowed Ann Coulter&#8217;s time machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
