Republicans should be very afraid if he gets the nomination…he could be serious competition because he doesn’t automatically crystallize our opposition like Hillary and the plastic-faced Wes do.

Plus, he’s got the Greg Stillson thing going on. Somebody should keep an eye on Chris Walken.

At least he was committed enough to his campaign to give up his seat for it. That showed me he wasn’t all about hedging his bets in a blatant quest for power .

Republicans should be very afraid if he gets the nomination…he could be serious competition because he doesn’t automatically crystallize our opposition like Hillary and the plastic-faced Wes do.

I completely agree with your assessment above. And you raise interesting points. From what I’ve seen the dems are empty fragile husks. Easy to shatter with past actions and facts.

I almost wish he’d run and come close so more of the truth would come out about him. He escaped much of it in the last round because he was just another prima donna, along with Kerry and the rest of the parade…

And edwards is a simpering ambulance chaser with a photogenic doo. But that’s about it.

techno_barbarian on November 20, 2006 at 11:07 PM

You still give him too much credit. As for any suggestion that he might be considered again for a run at the presidency, all I can say is “bring it on”! He can be Hil’s running mate…or Weasely Clark’s!

Which was bad enough, but on November 6, retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf appeared on CNBC’s Capital Report, hosted by Gloria Borger and Alan Murray, who asked him what he thought of Clark. “I think the greatest condemnation against him . . . came from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when he was a NATO commander. I mean, he was fired as a NATO commander,” Schwarzkopf replied, “and when Hugh Shelton said he was fired because of matters of character and integrity, that is a very, very damning statement, which says, `If that’s the case, he’s not the right man for president,’ as far as I’m concerned.”
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/031124/usnews/24notes_2.htm

I gotta go with Stormin’ Norman on this one. wesley clark is a bad joke. Actually much much worse than that.

Yeah, I’m sure the terrorists will be thrilled to have the former Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO to be president of the United States as opposed to a gutless redneck chickenhawk that joined the air national guard to avoid Vietnam and spent his time AWOL snorting crack because even that was an inconvience to him.

Snorting crack? Maybe in 1970, off the casing of a magical IBM Selectric Typesetter…

Courage!

Edwards could channel the Democrat Party A-Team. In times of crisis, he could call on John Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt. Elderly voters who are still voting for the memory of Roosevelt could vote for the real thing, fireside chats and all. I don’t know if Edwards can do it extemporaneously, or if there would have to be some semi-creepy seance thing involved, but it might be worth a try. What if Dems could vote for the real JFK?!?!

DOUCHE BAG

Snared ya on that one though! ha!
(In a snarky mood today, sorry.)

NTWR on November 20, 2006 at 7:25 PM

Not quite…. This still ignors all those people that are ‘average’. Like the average weight is 122lbs, so all those weighing 122lbs cannot be counted as either above or below average.

Hey, don’t mind me, it’s just a habit to disect information to determine accuracy or omissions. Used to be that I needed to pay attention to details since the details could determine whether I flew home First Class or in a box.

Cheers

Cigarman.

See how little effort it takes to speak with relevance?

…as opposed to a gutless redneck chickenhawk that joined the air national guard to avoid Vietnam and spent his time AWOL snorting crack because even that was an inconvience to him.

Is it possible for you to actually make an effing argument, Grebrook, or are you content just to wallow in the weak ad hominems of the fever swamps?

Grow up.

Must be a Democrat fact..
Consider this:
1000 people take a test with a possible score of 100.
The average score is 50. It appears that 500 people are below average. However, 900 scored 50 and the other 100 scored either above or below 50. The average is still 50, but half are not under average.
I find that statements containing percentages or averages without supporting data are usually misleading..like de..

News2Use on November 20, 2006 at 5:40 PM

Actually, it’s just the definition of “average.”
Average is like the “mean” the point at which half are above and half are below. If you take all Americans, or all humans, half will be above the “average” weight, IQ, income bracket, anything, and half will be below.
Snared ya on that one though! ha!
(In a snarky mood today, sorry.)

Now, this really gives me a secure feeling – Messrs Smiley and Weasel. Just what the terrorists ordered.

Yeah, I’m sure the terrorists will be thrilled to have the former Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO to be president of the United States as opposed to a gutless redneck chickenhawk that joined the air national guard to avoid Vietnam and spent his time AWOL snorting crack because even that was an inconvience to him.

Yeah, I’m sure they’re absolutely giddy about Clark.