Nutroots blame Coulter for attempted SCOTUS poisoning
posted at 2:48 pm on November 18, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
There’s just one problem with their logic. Okay, two problems. Okay, three.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
AP, you err in your argument. How can there be a problem with their logic when they don’t use logic in the first place?
Benaiah on November 18, 2006 at 2:54 PM
That’s a little bit funny, watching Allah try to attack liberals over the fact that a conservative tried to assassinate the entire Supreme Court? Even the conservatives? LOL.
God, listening to you guys call liberals “loons” or “nuts” is pretty funny. I don’t recall any Republicans being targeted for assassination lately. You bomb abortion clinics, you bomb federal buildings, you break the law by jamming the phonelines of Democratic get-out-the-vote centers during election days, you shack up in compounds and shoot ATF agents and you try to assassinate judges you don’t agree with.
And we’re the ones who are “unhinged”?
Grebrook on November 18, 2006 at 2:58 PM
So you didn’t even read Maguire’s post. Great. Thanks for contributing.
Allahpundit on November 18, 2006 at 3:05 PM
More on the case here.
OK, I figured out the connection. March is from Connecticut and Coulter grew up in Connecticut.
So easy being insane!
JammieWearingFool on November 18, 2006 at 3:24 PM
Ms. March, the sender of those cookies, is the sort of person that liberal activists regularly work at getting out of prison. I wonder if the ACLU is already working on her case…
Grebrook, you continue to make liberals look bad when you post ignorant nonsense in their behalf. I am glad that you are no sort of Republican, and I would hope that you aren’t an American as you give everything you associate with a bad name.
DannoJyd on November 18, 2006 at 3:25 PM
Grebrook you really need to read a little before you begin to type.
On second thought, just keep doin’ what you’re doin’
TheBigOldDog on November 18, 2006 at 3:25 PM
I read up on the woman. Nowhere does it identify her political leanings.
JammieWearingFool on November 18, 2006 at 3:25 PM
It’s all in the timing… what? 9 months?
Zorro on November 18, 2006 at 3:29 PM
That post above by “Grebrook” rather puts the bow on the whole package, doesn’t it. Talk about a left-wing Archie Bunker.
Kevin R on November 18, 2006 at 3:34 PM
I always thought Coulter was ahead of her time.
JammieWearingFool on November 18, 2006 at 3:34 PM
I ran a Google News Search on Barbara Joan March, and while I found very little info on the woman one thing struck me as being odd…
DannoJyd on November 18, 2006 at 3:37 PM
I believe that you are right.
DannoJyd on November 18, 2006 at 3:40 PM
Uh … Bush … assassination movie … just a little memory lapse? Sure. Maybe your definition of latelyis the key here.
IrishEyes on November 18, 2006 at 3:45 PM
Typical Left tactic on abortion protestors – ignoring thirty years of uneventful sidewalk sign-carrying, to focus on a literally handful, of unknowns to the regulars, who made violence against abortion providers. If the anti-abortion movement was intrinsically violent, it would have been evident in 1974. Smearing all, and repeating ad nauseum.
If the shoe fits …
naliaka on November 18, 2006 at 4:06 PM
AP, he adds nothing to the debate here. Just another nutroot who makes specious claims on most every thread.
Do us all a favor and pull the plug on him.
BacaDog on November 18, 2006 at 4:34 PM
Hubby’s back in Iraq so I’ve missed a few weeks-who is this Grebrook character? I have seen a few of his posts and this clown is treated much better than any of us would be on his leftwing websites. Checked in last week and saw that he he didn’t bother to do his research then either. Maybe this is the latest reincarnation of Greg H.
Aloha!
catie
Catie96706 on November 18, 2006 at 4:39 PM
Gaybrook, you might want to look at the numerous reports of GOP headquarters being shot up in the run up to the 2004 election. Also, if you want to look in to this sort of behavior, rumor has it Michelle has a book filled with tales for yout to enjoy.
RightWinged on November 18, 2006 at 4:40 PM
Good point Catie. Whenever I post a comment at HuffPo or Kos, it’s only a few minutes before it’s removed.. and it’s never vulgar or rude or anything like that. It’s usually simply mentioning something they omitted that makes the premise of their post look silly.
RightWinged on November 18, 2006 at 4:42 PM
If only conservatives had as much power as the loons claim us to have.
SouthernGent on November 18, 2006 at 4:43 PM
New Liberal MEME:
Ann Coulter: Plagiarist. She stole the idea of poisoning SCOTUS.
rw on November 18, 2006 at 4:43 PM
Incidentally, what happened to GregH?
Slublog on November 18, 2006 at 4:44 PM
No idea.
Allahpundit on November 18, 2006 at 4:45 PM
Huh. That’s too bad. I kind of liked the guy. He was civil and if nothing else, dependable.
Slublog on November 18, 2006 at 4:48 PM
Yep! I stated on another thread that I refuse to engage him anymore. As soon as you nail him on the “point” he tried to make, he changes the focus and moves to a different point. I think Puritan said it best: “…you can’t argue with a brick wall”. As for adding “nothing to the debate”, at least ignoramuses like him help solidify WHY we believe WHAT we believe.
thedecider on November 18, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Now that W has shown how (apparently…?) willing he is to compromise, the Left may have to find someone else to blame all the evils of the world upon. Will it be Coulter? Michelle? Barney and Miss Beasely?
Halley on November 18, 2006 at 5:06 PM
Well this is the same liberal logic the NAACP used when it ran that ad that blamed Bush for the dragging death of James Byrd Jr. because Bush failed to support a hate crime law that was created after Byrd was murdered.
mlong on November 18, 2006 at 5:19 PM
Grebrook, were you “educated” in the public schools? Are you the “little Johnny” that can’t read? I know you enjoy getting hat-tipped so often with you lunacy, but come on, if you really want us to engage you, you’ve got to make your arguments at least somewhat plausible. Why don’t you try again ?
Maxx on November 18, 2006 at 5:23 PM
…anyone check on Hinckley’s voter registration and political contributions pre-1981? What difference does it make? He’s a loon.
…anyone check on Oswald’s voter registration and political contributions pre-1963 (if any)? What difference does it make? He was a loon.
…anyone check on “Squeaky” Fromme’s voter registration and political contributions pre-Manson? Sara Jane Moore’s? What difference does it make? More loons.
…and Leon Czołgosz was a Lefty and John Wilkes Booth was probably a Democrat.
See a pattern here? Loons.
The Left will do *ANYTHING* to neutralize opposing speech, particularly when it’s clever…because, as a class of people, they have no discernable sense of either proportion or of humor…with a few recent exceptions here.
Puritan1648 on November 18, 2006 at 5:26 PM
Besides Grebrook,
Ms. March sound much more like a Democrat to me.
Maxx on November 18, 2006 at 6:01 PM
Besides Grebrook,
Ms. March sounds much more like a Democrat to me.
Maxx on November 18, 2006 at 6:06 PM
Ha! You must have missed yesterday’s Vent. They’ve already gone after Malkin… at least Olberman… The rest have been at it for a while though.
RightWinged on November 18, 2006 at 6:28 PM
You guys just don’t get it. Even if this loony had sent these cookies back during the Carter administration and they just got lost in the mail for a few decades, it’d still be Coulter’s fault. Or Michelle’s. Or Karl Rove’s. Take your pick, because it doesn’t really matter. Some hateful conservative is to blame.
Sean M. on November 18, 2006 at 7:53 PM
Just a guess, here: SCotUS, military Chiefs of Staff…could she maybe be…a liberal?
Yes, Grebrook, you are the ones…
Jaibones on November 18, 2006 at 8:00 PM
Didn’t Clinton blame Rush Limbaugh for the Oklahoma City bombing?
Seems to me it’s always Democrat types like the unibomber and Oswald who kill for political reasons.
Perchant on November 18, 2006 at 9:52 PM
Again, everyone gets it except the troll. Again the troll Grebrook lies and distorts and makes a complete ass of itself. Again, the only purpose the troll has is to sabotage any worthwhile debate.
please, DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.
Janos Hunyadi on November 18, 2006 at 9:58 PM
s
I knew that Miss Beasley was up to no good… I think It was the glasses that tipped me off
Gwillie on November 19, 2006 at 2:01 AM
Not sure about that, but Tom Daschle accused Limbaugh of trying to kill him….. in so many words. Of course, poor Tom isn’t with us anymore, at least not as Senate Majority Leader.
Maxx on November 19, 2006 at 2:23 AM
Why do you bother trying to “debate” with Grebrook, the troll?
He just highjacked THIS thread the way he usually does. And he did it with a lie, the way he usually does.
And some of you fell for it.
Words of wisdom from Janos Hunyadi on November 18, 2006 at 9:58 PM. Well said, Janos.
The real issue here is how the “brownshirt party” demonizes its enemies through the use of the Big Lie. This episode (the attempt to poison the USSC, the armed forces Chief’s of Staff, and the Director of the FBI and his deputy) was, as pointed out, thoroughly investigated and the guilty party had no connection with Coulter, whatsoever.
Yet, it doesn’t stop the brownshirts from inventing a charge up out of whole cloth. After all, the meme that the Democrats are trying to create is that conservatives, who dare to speak out, are co-conspirators with attempted murderers and terrorists.
They truth is that the only actual instances of political terrorism in the last 2 and half years were instigated by DEMOCRATS, not Republicans.
This type of posting won’t be the last. It is what the “brownshirt party” does best, after all.
georgej on November 19, 2006 at 7:37 AM
I’ll be brief, since the internet connection here at the compound (where I await ATF agents to shoot) is a bit spotty. It’s those damn feds and their diabolical wire cutters!
I miss honora.
Liberal, yes. But he/she at least could present reasoned positions and reality-based responses. There is something about sweeping generalizations, hyperbole and an inability to stick to a single point of debate that makes me question the poster’s intellect.
Grebrook, I’m looking in your general direction.
SailorDave on November 19, 2006 at 7:52 AM
Maxx,
The Democrats and their media used the Oklahoma City bombing to demonize conservatives through false association. The whole “angry white man” campaign was a by-product of that event.
These are the same people who are loathe to make associations about the “kinds of people” responsible for 9/11.
Perchant on November 19, 2006 at 9:47 AM
georgej,
I don’t want to be a spoilsport but couldn’t referring to Democrats as brownshirts be interpreted as a form of demonization? I mean Al Gore upset conservatives with his “digital brownshirts” comment.
aengus on November 19, 2006 at 11:10 AM
I think we’ve stumbled across a great new party game: name the affiliation of newsworthy sociopaths.
The fact of the matter is that there will always be homicidal nuts. The difference is that responsible western thinkers (liberal and conservative alike) will always denounce the crazies when they purport to act for a particular cause that resembles their own. Where are the responsible Muslims?
I’d spit on McVeigh’s grave if I had the chance. Are there any Muslims that would do the same to their lunatics?
SailorDave on November 19, 2006 at 11:12 AM
Aengus, this isn’t just my opinion.
It is the opinions of former democrats like Zell Miller and Bob Just. Miller referred to the actions of Rockefeller and Durbin in that leaked October 2003 memo that described how there were going to inject politics into the war to deliberately weaken the Bush Administration with calls for congretional investigations, as if not treason, the 1st cousin to it. Miller said:
In his book A National Party No More: The Conscience of a Conservative Democrat, Miller takes his party to task for the many of the same reasons that Bob Just does: the “gotcha’s” the leaks, the spin doctors and the extremist positions that are the hallmark of the modern Democratic Party, not the party of Truman and FDR.
Bob Just wrote an article back in 2000 titled Fascism, corruption and my ‘Democratic’ Party, where he describes how the party he grew up in became fixated on winning at ANY cost, to the detriment of patriotism and fair play.
For example, he describes a plot by two Democratic activists who hired a prostitute to claim that a Republican office holder raped her, in an attempt to knock him out of the race for all intents and purposes.
He describes how the New York State Democratic Party, in their 2000 state convention, spit on the flag and called the Albany police color guard “Nazis.”
He writes:
And he added:
and
Subsiquent to this article being written, at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles, on the Thursday that Gore was to make his acceptance speech, a group of Eagle Scouts were asked to participate in the color guard — and THEY WERE BOO-ED OFF THE STAGE by the delegates.
In the 2004 election, Michelle amply documents the VIOLENT behavior of Democratic activists in her book “Unhinged.”
It got so bad in 2004, that Democrat activists were firing guns into Republican offices, and were also staging take-over invasions by Union members, and breaking in and stealing the Republican desktop computers.
The SON of a DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSMAN slashed the tires of a Republican party leased vehicle
Aengus, when they ACT LIKE BROWNSHIRT NAZIS, I am going to call them Brownshirt Nazis. It is NOT “demonization” when it is true!
We have just lived through an election where the party that won did so throught outright lies (both their own and those of their media allies) desigend to sabotage the war, and you think that calling them on their tactics and labeling them as what they are is unfair?
Their treatment of Lieberman, including photoshopping his picture into a charature of a man in “blackface”, their treatment of Michael Steele (also photoshopped) by calling him an OREO, and the words of their “leaders” (for example, Cindy Sheehan) blaming America’s participation in the war on terrorism as some kind of ZIONIST Jewish plot, was exactly the kind of tactics that the 1933 Brownshirts did to grab and maintain power.
So, the shoe fits. They are the “brownshirt party” not because of demonizaton, but because of their behavior.
georgej on November 20, 2006 at 1:46 AM
Comment pages: