<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return Fire: Olbermann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s Thanks &#38; Reflections On Hot Air</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-3286302</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s Thanks &#38; Reflections On Hot Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-3286302</guid>
		<description>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann’s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann’s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; A note on the acquisition of Hot Air</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-3284557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; A note on the acquisition of Hot Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-3284557</guid>
		<description>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann&#8217;s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann&#8217;s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thanks &#38; reflections from The Boss Emeritus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-3284537</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thanks &#38; reflections from The Boss Emeritus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-3284537</guid>
		<description>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann&#8217;s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cindy Sheehan Diet Plan, creating a conservative alternative to The View, and smacking back at Keith Olbermann&#8217;s smears. We also featured original video from several guest show hosts, special correspondents, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; David Neiwert Protege Blames Bernard Goldberg for the Actions of a Lunatic</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-2457046</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; David Neiwert Protege Blames Bernard Goldberg for the Actions of a Lunatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-2457046</guid>
		<description>[...] right-wing media sent people fake anthrax in the mail, Neiwert tut-tutted when Malkin (sensibly) denied responsibility &#8212; and Sadly No literally could not stop talking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right-wing media sent people fake anthrax in the mail, Neiwert tut-tutted when Malkin (sensibly) denied responsibility &#8212; and Sadly No literally could not stop talking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: films online ru</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-925498</link>
		<dc:creator>films online ru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-925498</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;films online ru...&lt;/strong&gt;

cool site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>films online ru&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cool site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-598550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-598550</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

You should check out www.ipod-iphone-mp3.com if you think this interesting....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You should check out <a href="http://www.ipod-iphone-mp3.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipod-iphone-mp3.com</a> if you think this interesting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Audio: Levin crushes Olbermann</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-219636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Audio: Levin crushes Olbermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-219636</guid>
		<description>[...] There is just one tiny correction I would offer to The Great One: he&#8217;s not the first to return fire to Olbermann, Michelle did it In November and boy did she return fire. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is just one tiny correction I would offer to The Great One: he&#8217;s not the first to return fire to Olbermann, Michelle did it In November and boy did she return fire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmcjetpilot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-113570</link>
		<dc:creator>gmcjetpilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-113570</guid>
		<description>Pablo take a chill, I am worried you are going off the deep end. Peace, I agree with you mostly, but just lets not be hypocrites. You have been very civil and appreciate your point of view, we just don&#039;t agree. You seem to have some resentment or predujust, and YES both &quot;sides&quot; do it. Its all the complaining about it from those involved in the spewing. If you dish it out, blaa blaa.... 

Take care and watch your blood pressure. Let&#039;s put it in perspective, Lance Cpl. Jeremy S. Shock, 22, of Tiffin, Ohio, died TODAY from his Nov. 19 wounds he received in Iraq. You, me, Michelle, Olber-weenie, not a big deal or very special. However my Mommy told me I was special when I was a kid, so there.  Lets bring the DRAFT back! Yea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo take a chill, I am worried you are going off the deep end. Peace, I agree with you mostly, but just lets not be hypocrites. You have been very civil and appreciate your point of view, we just don&#8217;t agree. You seem to have some resentment or predujust, and YES both &#8220;sides&#8221; do it. Its all the complaining about it from those involved in the spewing. If you dish it out, blaa blaa&#8230;. </p>
<p>Take care and watch your blood pressure. Let&#8217;s put it in perspective, Lance Cpl. Jeremy S. Shock, 22, of Tiffin, Ohio, died TODAY from his Nov. 19 wounds he received in Iraq. You, me, Michelle, Olber-weenie, not a big deal or very special. However my Mommy told me I was special when I was a kid, so there.  Lets bring the DRAFT back! Yea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-112754</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-112754</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I said reasonable rational people, not retards. Calm down.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No, you did not. You said &quot;First no one, liberals, independent centrist or anyone thinks Olbee is brilliant; no one says that.&quot; Scroll up. Then wise up. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Michelle is hot that someone implied she influenced this disturbed man?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No, it was not implied. The &#039;tard Olberman put on the air stated it, albeit with an apparent mouthful of marbles or something.
&lt;blockquote&gt; It’s not what you say but how you say it?

To complain about it rings a little hollow if you’re in the name calling game yourself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Name calling is not the same thing as making ridiculous allegations of RESPONSIBILITY. For instance, I could call you a fool without implying that you&#039;re responsible for anything at all.
&lt;blockquote&gt;However call people liars, unhinged, bullies, lapdogs and slimy, they’ll get mad. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Really? How about &quot;Worst Person in the World&quot;? Do you think that rubs the wrong way?
&lt;blockquote&gt;If Iraq falls into enemy hands, think of it as a toilet full of crap, we can always flush it later.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, aren&#039;t you special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I said reasonable rational people, not retards. Calm down.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, you did not. You said &#8220;First no one, liberals, independent centrist or anyone thinks Olbee is brilliant; no one says that.&#8221; Scroll up. Then wise up. </p>
<blockquote><p>Michelle is hot that someone implied she influenced this disturbed man?</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it was not implied. The &#8216;tard Olberman put on the air stated it, albeit with an apparent mouthful of marbles or something.</p>
<blockquote><p> It’s not what you say but how you say it?</p>
<p>To complain about it rings a little hollow if you’re in the name calling game yourself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Name calling is not the same thing as making ridiculous allegations of RESPONSIBILITY. For instance, I could call you a fool without implying that you&#8217;re responsible for anything at all.</p>
<blockquote><p>However call people liars, unhinged, bullies, lapdogs and slimy, they’ll get mad. </p></blockquote>
<p>Really? How about &#8220;Worst Person in the World&#8221;? Do you think that rubs the wrong way?</p>
<blockquote><p>If Iraq falls into enemy hands, think of it as a toilet full of crap, we can always flush it later.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, aren&#8217;t you special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itzWicks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111935</link>
		<dc:creator>itzWicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111935</guid>
		<description>The intellectual dishonest of the New Left no longer surprises me. If the newly elected Congressional officials take those ever takes those folks seriously, they will end up being one-term-charlies.

Michelle gave as she got, and I was impressed, which wasn&#039;t surprising at all. ;-)

More please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intellectual dishonest of the New Left no longer surprises me. If the newly elected Congressional officials take those ever takes those folks seriously, they will end up being one-term-charlies.</p>
<p>Michelle gave as she got, and I was impressed, which wasn&#8217;t surprising at all. ;-)</p>
<p>More please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darleen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111900</link>
		<dc:creator>Darleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111900</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who is the they in, “they are not going to stop us.” &lt;/i&gt;

you haven&#039;t been paying attention to the Censorship Dems who want to, for instance, bring back &quot;The Fairness Doctrine&quot; to shutdown talk radio. Look at the Dems that threatened the broadcast LICENSE of ABC over the film &quot;The Path to 9-11&quot;. Look at the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who is the they in, “they are not going to stop us.” </i></p>
<p>you haven&#8217;t been paying attention to the Censorship Dems who want to, for instance, bring back &#8220;The Fairness Doctrine&#8221; to shutdown talk radio. Look at the Dems that threatened the broadcast LICENSE of ABC over the film &#8220;The Path to 9-11&#8243;. Look at the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ward View &#187; Michelle Malkin takes on Keith Olberman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111497</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ward View &#187; Michelle Malkin takes on Keith Olberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111497</guid>
		<description>[...] See it here.  Michelle Malkin straightens out Keith Olberman. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See it here.  Michelle Malkin straightens out Keith Olberman. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111449</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111449</guid>
		<description>Completely unrelated to this weeks&#039; Vent - that&#039;s a stunning picture of Michelle!  Is it the pink sweater?  The hair?  The expression on her face?  All these things?  It&#039;s very distracting.  What was the Vent about again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely unrelated to this weeks&#8217; Vent &#8211; that&#8217;s a stunning picture of Michelle!  Is it the pink sweater?  The hair?  The expression on her face?  All these things?  It&#8217;s very distracting.  What was the Vent about again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infidel4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111379</link>
		<dc:creator>infidel4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111379</guid>
		<description>If Michelle was looking at me like that...

I surrender! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Michelle was looking at me like that&#8230;</p>
<p>I surrender! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrvass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111366</link>
		<dc:creator>jrvass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111366</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Michelle walked on water, it seemed.

Heaven’s to Betsy. 

doingwhatican&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She steps on the puny brains of her greatful acolytes!

James (acolyte in training... Dickey-do award winner!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Michelle walked on water, it seemed.</p>
<p>Heaven’s to Betsy. </p>
<p>doingwhatican</p></blockquote>
<p>She steps on the puny brains of her greatful acolytes!</p>
<p>James (acolyte in training&#8230; Dickey-do award winner!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doingwhatican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111258</link>
		<dc:creator>doingwhatican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111258</guid>
		<description>Michelle walked on water, it seemed.

Heaven&#039;s to Betsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle walked on water, it seemed.</p>
<p>Heaven&#8217;s to Betsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bootheel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111244</link>
		<dc:creator>bootheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111244</guid>
		<description>greetings  michelle,  my first time to comment  your friday vent was absolutley  great.   you are like as lady rush limbaugh.   hit the liberals  hard   hit them often  keep them off balance  they deserve it.       bootheel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greetings  michelle,  my first time to comment  your friday vent was absolutley  great.   you are like as lady rush limbaugh.   hit the liberals  hard   hit them often  keep them off balance  they deserve it.       bootheel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmcjetpilot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-111058</link>
		<dc:creator>gmcjetpilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-111058</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You don’t actually believe that, do you? Allow me to disabuse you of that incorrect notion. The retard he had on as a guest certainly seemed to think so, as he tried so desperately to explain it while tripping over his tongue.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I said reasonable rational people, not retards. Calm down.

Both &quot;sides&quot; do this. No offense or to compare Michelle to Bill O&#039;reilly, but in Bill&#039;s &quot;talking points&quot; last night:  

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Far left loons are out in force as there Internet MASTERS bid them..........&quot;  

AND

&quot;Kool-aid Zombies doing the BIDDING for the left fanatics who just want to disparage me.&quot;

AND

Michelle Malkin: &quot;Left wing blogger LAPDOGS&quot;??&lt;/blockquote&gt;


So are we saying only left wing bloggers have control and influance of mindless people? 

Both sides use rhetoric: lying, slimy puppet master blogger controls mindless unhinged zombie, zealot, lapdogs. 

Michelle is hot that someone implied she influenced this disturbed man? &quot;Left wing blogger lap dogs&quot;? I guess someone could say this crazy guy was a right wing bloggers lap dog? It&#039;s not what you say but how you say it?

To complain about it rings a little hollow if you&#039;re in the name calling game yourself. Yes? No? Mommy THEY started it first?

Sure people are influenced by blogs and it goes both ways. Michelle does influence people with her ideas and views. You think? I hope and think for the best.

I don&#039;t know who THEY are. Who is the they in, &quot;they are not going to stop us.” I don&#039;t think anyone is stopping anyone&#039;s free speech, and yippee for the internet. Name calling and their are out to get us paranoia, is a waste. We&#039;re all Americans. 

You can label them as THEM, liberals, radical left, left wing or Progressive secular, but that&#039;s just too simplistic. Olbermann is harmless. This is a big country; it takes all kinds. You have to be a little tollerent. No? Screw them? Ok just checking.

Good ideas float to the top. Pepper a good idea or point with insults and vitriol, it gets lost.

Michelle&#039;s language is pretty harsh and critical at times, so she is going to draw fire. You think? Than to act surprised and say how dare they, is surprising to me. 

Frankly it&#039;s good for Michelle and Hotair, to get exposure to a 1/2 million people on MSNBC. Michelle is a strong voice, and bravo to her. However call people liars, unhinged, bullies, lapdogs and slimy, they’ll get mad. You think?

I watch Countdown occasionally because the first 20 minutes usually has very smart guest, serious people, with serious backgrounds who speak without interruption, about serious issues, mostly in a non partisan way. Olbee&#039;s drama commentaries are lame, yes we can agree, so don&#039;t watch.

Enough, lets get mad about Iraq!!!! Terrorist!!! Michelle&#039;s a big girl and can take care of her self. 

To Mr. My Mommy is a Lawyer, please, nothing is actionable. Lets not SUE free speech out of each other. You sound like a liberal. (Ouch did I say that) GET A GRIP, it&#039;s not a big deal. You&#039;re whipped into an indignant frenzy over very little. FOCUS CLASS, EYES STRAIGHT AHEAD.


Pres Bush is visiting Vietnam, first time ever, RIGHT NOW, about 38 years late, but never the less more bombs where dropped there then in all of WWII. Over 58,000 Americans died there. We pulled out of SE Asia! All of civilization did not end! Our security did not disappear! Now China and SE Asia is going capitalism! IF WE DID NOT PULL OUT OF ASIA, WE WOULD NOT HAVE WON THE COLD WAR! STAY THE COURSE? 

NO ONE REALLY knows for sure what will happen when we bug out of Iraq. NO ONE. Gloom and doom is not an intelligent debate. We really have screwed the pooch in the middle east for a long long time. I mean really stupid stuff. It WAS or at lest seemed like a good idea to go in to Iraq at the time, but we need to save face, declare victory and change the course. What does that mean? I don&#039;t know, but lying about how great it is, stay the course and losing lives and treasure at a tremendous rate will ruin us. We have tools other than bombing and ground wars to win over terrorism, smarter ways. I&#039;m as hawkish as any, but this is a cluster f@%#*.


If Iraq falls into enemy hands, think of it as a toilet full of crap, we can always flush it later.


Attacking each other with words like &quot;INTERNET PUPPET MASTERS&quot; or &quot;Left wing blogger lapdogs&quot; sounds insulting for the sake of insult. It implies lefty internet blogger’s are inciting or influencing mindless zombies? OM GOSH! target them , how dare they.... 

It&#039;s easier to trash each other and harder to really study issues and problems and talk about solutions. It takes effort and intellect. Trash talk just distracts us. Its entertainment for some I guess.

America is still strong, will continue to be strong and be the greatest country, nobel and overall good, BUT it&#039;s only as strong as the union. Remember &quot;united we stand divided we fall&quot; and &quot;a house divided can not stand&quot;. All this petty crap and partisan bickering weakens us. 

Who cares if some blogger has a theory Michelle influenced a disturbed man to commit domestic terrorism, we, reasonable rational people, know its not true. Comments like slap Olbermann w/ a lawsuit, lynch him, take him out back and beat the crap out of him is silly, and those comments  support accusations by THEM of YOU being &quot;unhinged&quot;.

Did Michelle influence a crazy person? No, no no no no, but move on.

Let&#039;s not be ignorant of history. &lt;strong&gt;People can be incite with just words&lt;/strong&gt;, so lets use words and TONE carefully and responsibility. Michelle&#039;s rebuttal did not need the slimy lapdog comments. LAPDOG? Zombies of Internet Masters? BOTH SIDES DO IT, so if you are going to dish out truculent rhetoric, than you have to take it or not take it too seriously or </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You don’t actually believe that, do you? Allow me to disabuse you of that incorrect notion. The retard he had on as a guest certainly seemed to think so, as he tried so desperately to explain it while tripping over his tongue.</p></blockquote>
<p>I said reasonable rational people, not retards. Calm down.</p>
<p>Both &#8220;sides&#8221; do this. No offense or to compare Michelle to Bill O&#8217;reilly, but in Bill&#8217;s &#8220;talking points&#8221; last night:  </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Far left loons are out in force as there Internet MASTERS bid them&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;  </p>
<p>AND</p>
<p>&#8220;Kool-aid Zombies doing the BIDDING for the left fanatics who just want to disparage me.&#8221;</p>
<p>AND</p>
<p>Michelle Malkin: &#8220;Left wing blogger LAPDOGS&#8221;??</p></blockquote>
<p>So are we saying only left wing bloggers have control and influance of mindless people? </p>
<p>Both sides use rhetoric: lying, slimy puppet master blogger controls mindless unhinged zombie, zealot, lapdogs. </p>
<p>Michelle is hot that someone implied she influenced this disturbed man? &#8220;Left wing blogger lap dogs&#8221;? I guess someone could say this crazy guy was a right wing bloggers lap dog? It&#8217;s not what you say but how you say it?</p>
<p>To complain about it rings a little hollow if you&#8217;re in the name calling game yourself. Yes? No? Mommy THEY started it first?</p>
<p>Sure people are influenced by blogs and it goes both ways. Michelle does influence people with her ideas and views. You think? I hope and think for the best.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know who THEY are. Who is the they in, &#8220;they are not going to stop us.” I don&#8217;t think anyone is stopping anyone&#8217;s free speech, and yippee for the internet. Name calling and their are out to get us paranoia, is a waste. We&#8217;re all Americans. </p>
<p>You can label them as THEM, liberals, radical left, left wing or Progressive secular, but that&#8217;s just too simplistic. Olbermann is harmless. This is a big country; it takes all kinds. You have to be a little tollerent. No? Screw them? Ok just checking.</p>
<p>Good ideas float to the top. Pepper a good idea or point with insults and vitriol, it gets lost.</p>
<p>Michelle&#8217;s language is pretty harsh and critical at times, so she is going to draw fire. You think? Than to act surprised and say how dare they, is surprising to me. </p>
<p>Frankly it&#8217;s good for Michelle and Hotair, to get exposure to a 1/2 million people on MSNBC. Michelle is a strong voice, and bravo to her. However call people liars, unhinged, bullies, lapdogs and slimy, they’ll get mad. You think?</p>
<p>I watch Countdown occasionally because the first 20 minutes usually has very smart guest, serious people, with serious backgrounds who speak without interruption, about serious issues, mostly in a non partisan way. Olbee&#8217;s drama commentaries are lame, yes we can agree, so don&#8217;t watch.</p>
<p>Enough, lets get mad about Iraq!!!! Terrorist!!! Michelle&#8217;s a big girl and can take care of her self. </p>
<p>To Mr. My Mommy is a Lawyer, please, nothing is actionable. Lets not SUE free speech out of each other. You sound like a liberal. (Ouch did I say that) GET A GRIP, it&#8217;s not a big deal. You&#8217;re whipped into an indignant frenzy over very little. FOCUS CLASS, EYES STRAIGHT AHEAD.</p>
<p>Pres Bush is visiting Vietnam, first time ever, RIGHT NOW, about 38 years late, but never the less more bombs where dropped there then in all of WWII. Over 58,000 Americans died there. We pulled out of SE Asia! All of civilization did not end! Our security did not disappear! Now China and SE Asia is going capitalism! IF WE DID NOT PULL OUT OF ASIA, WE WOULD NOT HAVE WON THE COLD WAR! STAY THE COURSE? </p>
<p>NO ONE REALLY knows for sure what will happen when we bug out of Iraq. NO ONE. Gloom and doom is not an intelligent debate. We really have screwed the pooch in the middle east for a long long time. I mean really stupid stuff. It WAS or at lest seemed like a good idea to go in to Iraq at the time, but we need to save face, declare victory and change the course. What does that mean? I don&#8217;t know, but lying about how great it is, stay the course and losing lives and treasure at a tremendous rate will ruin us. We have tools other than bombing and ground wars to win over terrorism, smarter ways. I&#8217;m as hawkish as any, but this is a cluster f@%#*.</p>
<p>If Iraq falls into enemy hands, think of it as a toilet full of crap, we can always flush it later.</p>
<p>Attacking each other with words like &#8220;INTERNET PUPPET MASTERS&#8221; or &#8220;Left wing blogger lapdogs&#8221; sounds insulting for the sake of insult. It implies lefty internet blogger’s are inciting or influencing mindless zombies? OM GOSH! target them , how dare they&#8230;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easier to trash each other and harder to really study issues and problems and talk about solutions. It takes effort and intellect. Trash talk just distracts us. Its entertainment for some I guess.</p>
<p>America is still strong, will continue to be strong and be the greatest country, nobel and overall good, BUT it&#8217;s only as strong as the union. Remember &#8220;united we stand divided we fall&#8221; and &#8220;a house divided can not stand&#8221;. All this petty crap and partisan bickering weakens us. </p>
<p>Who cares if some blogger has a theory Michelle influenced a disturbed man to commit domestic terrorism, we, reasonable rational people, know its not true. Comments like slap Olbermann w/ a lawsuit, lynch him, take him out back and beat the crap out of him is silly, and those comments  support accusations by THEM of YOU being &#8220;unhinged&#8221;.</p>
<p>Did Michelle influence a crazy person? No, no no no no, but move on.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not be ignorant of history. <strong>People can be incite with just words</strong>, so lets use words and TONE carefully and responsibility. Michelle&#8217;s rebuttal did not need the slimy lapdog comments. LAPDOG? Zombies of Internet Masters? BOTH SIDES DO IT, so if you are going to dish out truculent rhetoric, than you have to take it or not take it too seriously or</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110957</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110957</guid>
		<description>For the record...&quot;they&quot; &lt;em&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; gonna walk all over us anymore.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record&#8230;&#8221;they&#8221; <em>aren&#8217;t</em> gonna walk all over us anymore.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110942</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110942</guid>
		<description>blockquote&gt;It also reminds me why I’m not married any more and not to do that again.

Michelle&#039;s personality reminds you not to get married again? Nice. Well, I&#039;m sure your ex and millions of other ladies out there thank Michelle for this, another service to her nation.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d like to stick with facts and less name calling: liars, bullies, lapdogs and slimy to name a few, but that’s her style, take it or leave it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahh, but there&#039;s a difference, and it isn&#039;t one of degree. She backs up EVERY characterization she employs with substance, unlike her detractors.

Another difference, she isn&#039;t presuming the mantle of reporter or journalist in her work, but editorial commentator. Olby would have us consider him a serious reporter of news, when he is anything but.

And the self-righteousness is on you, I&#039;m afraid. Your comment was chastising of Michelle regarding her choice of blog post material. You didn&#039;t do a moment&#039;s work to find out the background. I spent the five minutes it took to recover the links to those posts, and some background, and respond.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought it was a fair question on my part, but IF the group’s own general press release was posted in whole, not OUT OF CONTEXT, with the contact info, than you are right, it was unavoidable and they’re stupid for doing it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well done, you&#039;re a better man than John Kerry.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Olbermann made it sound like she posted a LIST out of context, HERE ARE THE PROTESTERS (wink wink nod nod), but Olbermann is a wrong and should retract it, if this is the case.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And this is really the whole point. Taking Olbermann&#039;s words at face value is unwise at best. This is the beauty of the blogosphere, it&#039;s so very easy to check on what others say. That was my point, and it wasn&#039;t self-righteousness.

Thanks for playing, come back again soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blockquote&gt;It also reminds me why I’m not married any more and not to do that again.</p>
<p>Michelle&#8217;s personality reminds you not to get married again? Nice. Well, I&#8217;m sure your ex and millions of other ladies out there thank Michelle for this, another service to her nation.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’d like to stick with facts and less name calling: liars, bullies, lapdogs and slimy to name a few, but that’s her style, take it or leave it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahh, but there&#8217;s a difference, and it isn&#8217;t one of degree. She backs up EVERY characterization she employs with substance, unlike her detractors.</p>
<p>Another difference, she isn&#8217;t presuming the mantle of reporter or journalist in her work, but editorial commentator. Olby would have us consider him a serious reporter of news, when he is anything but.</p>
<p>And the self-righteousness is on you, I&#8217;m afraid. Your comment was chastising of Michelle regarding her choice of blog post material. You didn&#8217;t do a moment&#8217;s work to find out the background. I spent the five minutes it took to recover the links to those posts, and some background, and respond.</p>
<blockquote><p>I thought it was a fair question on my part, but IF the group’s own general press release was posted in whole, not OUT OF CONTEXT, with the contact info, than you are right, it was unavoidable and they’re stupid for doing it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well done, you&#8217;re a better man than John Kerry.</p>
<blockquote><p>Olbermann made it sound like she posted a LIST out of context, HERE ARE THE PROTESTERS (wink wink nod nod), but Olbermann is a wrong and should retract it, if this is the case.</p></blockquote>
<p>And this is really the whole point. Taking Olbermann&#8217;s words at face value is unwise at best. This is the beauty of the blogosphere, it&#8217;s so very easy to check on what others say. That was my point, and it wasn&#8217;t self-righteousness.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing, come back again soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110879</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110879</guid>
		<description>Pffft, I&#039;m betting more people watched Michell&#039;s vent than watched Olberman&#039;s show.  Possibly even his entire season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pffft, I&#8217;m betting more people watched Michell&#8217;s vent than watched Olberman&#8217;s show.  Possibly even his entire season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110814</guid>
		<description>Sue his lying ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue his lying ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110788</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110788</guid>
		<description>Herr Ubermann is a ripe turd and a media laughing stock. His ratings are in the toilet and anyone with a pulse has already made a decision on his spew of crannial diarrhea. 

Why you felt the need to &#039;return fire&#039; at (and draw attention towards) a big brown pile is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herr Ubermann is a ripe turd and a media laughing stock. His ratings are in the toilet and anyone with a pulse has already made a decision on his spew of crannial diarrhea. </p>
<p>Why you felt the need to &#8216;return fire&#8217; at (and draw attention towards) a big brown pile is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110765</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110765</guid>
		<description>Take notice of the pure green envy coming from Olbermann.

He&#039;s so jelous of O&#039;Reilly he can&#039;t stand it.  And I know he is jelous of Michelle.  Michelle doesn&#039;t even have her own TV show but still gets better TV ratings than he does.

The fact that O&#039;Reilly&#039;s ratings to up when Michelle is on is telling.  The fact that Olbermann can&#039;t touch these same ratings on his best day has just got to be eating him up inside.

Poor guy.  I pitty him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take notice of the pure green envy coming from Olbermann.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s so jelous of O&#8217;Reilly he can&#8217;t stand it.  And I know he is jelous of Michelle.  Michelle doesn&#8217;t even have her own TV show but still gets better TV ratings than he does.</p>
<p>The fact that O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s ratings to up when Michelle is on is telling.  The fact that Olbermann can&#8217;t touch these same ratings on his best day has just got to be eating him up inside.</p>
<p>Poor guy.  I pitty him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/comment-page-2/#comment-110750</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/17/return-fire-olbermann/#comment-110750</guid>
		<description>Michelle (and hotair folk)...

It would be very helpful to have written transcripts of many (if not all) of your great works - particularly this one! 

Exposing these lefties for what they are is great fun - and absolutely essential to maintaining civilization itself, because as you well know, lefties are incapable of being civil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle (and hotair folk)&#8230;</p>
<p>It would be very helpful to have written transcripts of many (if not all) of your great works &#8211; particularly this one! </p>
<p>Exposing these lefties for what they are is great fun &#8211; and absolutely essential to maintaining civilization itself, because as you well know, lefties are incapable of being civil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
