Jimmy Carter, menace

posted at 11:17 am on November 17, 2006 by Bryan

All of these links fell in my inbox in the last day or two, and they do a nice job of setting up the end of the state of Israel.

First, take a look at this American Thinker piece on Jimmy Carter’s latest book.

It is not difficult to understand why Democrats wanted the publication of Jimmy Carter’s slim new book (216 pages of text, large print and no footnotes), with its tendentious title and its superficial analysis, delayed until today, a week after the election. The anti-Israel bias is so clear, the credulous description of Arab positions so cringe-producing, the key “facts” on which Carter relies so easily refuted by public documents, that the book is an embarrassment to Carter, the Democrats, the presidency and Americans.

Read the whole, gory thing. The sum is, former President Carter, great friend of Michael Moore and credulous Arabist, has written a tome full of half-truths and nonsense about Israel and the Middle East problem. Carter takes a side, and it’s not the side of the only thriving democracy in the Middle East.

Once you’ve read that, ponder this:

As Palestinian Arab rockets struck two Israeli towns yesterday, U.N. bodies prepared to launch no fewer than two overlapping “fact-finding” missions to second-guess Israel’s anti-terrorist tactics. President Carter could head one of those missions.

The U.N. General Assembly is expected to convene a special emergency session tomorrow to deal with the November 8 Israel Defense Force artillery strike on the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun, which killed 19 civilians. A draft resolution for the assembly session calls on the U.N. secretary-general to establish a fact-finding mission into the event and requests that he report back to the assembly in a month.

And yesterday in Geneva, the U.N. Human Rights Council, which in its five months of existence has failed to pass one resolution on any country other than Israel, concluded its third emergency session on the Jewish state. In the session’s resolution, the council called on its president, Ambassador Alfonso de Alba of Mexico, to establish a fact-finding mission to investigate the incident at Beit Hanoun.

A diplomat in Geneva who requested anonymity said the sponsors of the resolution are planning to ask Mr. Carter to head the investigation. Other candidates include the diplomats Martti Ahtisaari of Finland and Sadako Ogata of Japan.

The opening sentence of that article tells it all–the Palestinians can’t build rockets without outside help. Where is that help coming from? Why doesn’t the UN investigate that? What would Jimmah do?

Such an investigation would turn over such a huge rock it might start a world war. Iran and Syria, along with probably two or three other Islamic states, are supplying and re-supplying the terrorists in the PA and in southern Lebanon. You can bet Carter’s investigation won’t go there, though. He’s too busy being credulous in the face of terrorists. Returning to the American Thinker article:

“When I met with Yasir Arafat in 1990, he stated, ‘The PLO has never advocated the annihilation of Israel. The Zionists started the ‘drive the Jews into the sea’ slogan and attributed it to the PLO. In 1969, we said we wanted to establish a democratic state where Jews, Christians, and Muslims can all live together. The Zionists said they do not choose to live with any people other than Jews’

“When I asked Arafat about the purposes of the PLO, he seemed somewhat taken aback that I needed to ask such a question. He gave me a pamphlet that stated, “The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) is the national liberation movement of the Palestinian people….”

The Zionists made them do it! And this libel, Carter passes off whole.

Now, for dessert. Here’s what the Iranians, whom the UN treats with kid gloves, are doing:

TEHERAN – Iran has donated $120 million to the Palestinian Hamas-led government and has said it is ready to give more, Palestinian Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar said on Thursday.

Iran said in April it would donate $50 million to help make up a shortfall left when the West cut off aid to the government led by the Palestinian Islamic group, which seeks to destroy Israel.

”Iran has so far given $120 million to the Palestinain government and they have told us that they will provide more financial help,” Zahar told reporters in Teheran after talks.

Iran’s Islamic government has never recognised Israel and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad peppers his speeches with anti-Israel remarks. Last year, he called for Israel to be ”wiped off the map”.

Iran’s president didn’t just pledge to wipe Israel off the map last year. Editorials in the Iranian press called for the very same thing this week:

“On that day… Jordan will not be able to prevent the Jordanian Islamists from operating through the long Jordan-Palestine border, and the millions of Egyptian Islamists… will not let the Sinai-Israel border remain quiet, and the Syrian Golan Heights will not remain as a [mere] observer of the battle. That day is not so far off.”

Resalat: “The Great War is Ahead of Us, [And Will Break Out] Perhaps Tomorrow, or in Another Few Days, or in a Few Months, or Even in a Few Years… Israel Must Collapse”

Where are Carter and the UN on that?

All while Hezbollah is reportedly just waiting on the green light to topple Lebanon’s democratic government:

The recent Democratic takeover of the U.S. Congress emboldened Syria, Iran and Hizballah (Iran’s proxy) because they view it as the defeat of President Bush, said Walid Phares, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Even before the U.S. elections, Hizballah’s political faction was demanding more power in the Lebanese government. Earlier this week, six pro-Syrian members of the 24-seat Lebanese cabinet, including all of the Shi’ite members, resigned.

Hizballah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah said on Monday that the current Lebanese government would “go” and a new one would take its place. He did not say how that would happen, but his statement seemed to signal that Nasrallah will call for massive street protests — as he threatened to do last month.

Toppling Lebanon in favor of Hezbollah would set the stage for an all-out war against Israel very nicely, from an Iranian point of view. Lebanon would convert from Syrian parking lot to Iranian forward base.

Again, where is Jimmy Carter on that?

Revisions and Extensions: It turns out that the Palestinians in Gaza do build their own rockets. It also turns out that the advanced C-802 missiles that Hezbollah used against the Israeli navy in the 33-day war this past summer were export models of a Chinese rocket, sold to Iran and then handed off to Hezbollah. Both of those nuggets and a few others are here.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Great post.

WriterMom on November 17, 2006 at 11:22 AM

How do we find out more about the possible Carter-led UN investigation?

RushBaby on November 17, 2006 at 11:25 AM

Is he getting paid off or is he just simply insane?

bbz123 on November 17, 2006 at 11:26 AM

Is he getting paid off or is he just simply insane?

bbz123

Yes.

Benaiah on November 17, 2006 at 11:43 AM

trea‧son

–noun 1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

Ringmaster on November 17, 2006 at 11:45 AM

Why can’t Carter just stay with building houses?

MikeyB on November 17, 2006 at 11:50 AM

Resalat and Kayhan are the two big conservative papers in Iran, both backed the Islamic hard-liners. Kayhan is one of the oldest Iranian newspapers. Resalat is newer (started in 1985). But both had substantial circulation as mouthpieces of the conservative clerics.

So don’t think these two papers are the “High Times” and “Mother Jones” of Iran, both in terms of ideology and circulation size. They’re mainstream and hardcore Islamist.

Nethicus on November 17, 2006 at 11:51 AM

Ihonestly like it. Carter is going to do the “moonbat” diplomacy that brings everlasting peace to the work by TALKING over and over and over again.

Im sure the only thing preventing the Middle East from being peaceful is Jimmy Carter standing up to Israel. (snicker)

Unfortunately the dems won. We have to give their insane policies a chance. The promised us total peace brought about with MLK and Ghandi like protests. I want to see that tried on the streets of Iran or Iraq now.

William Amos on November 17, 2006 at 11:59 AM

Toppling Lebanon in favor of Hezbollah would set the stage for an all-out war against Israel very nicely, from an Iranian point of view.

I would suggest that Lebanon is already fully controlled by Hezbollah as it is. It would actually benefit Israel and the U.S. to have them somehow make that official.

Part of me is pulling for Iran and Syria to be more aggressive. I’m tired of watching our government and Israel’s sitting on their hands while these animals mock us. The next major attack attributed to these regimes will most likely be the final straw we need to rid the planet of this nonsense once and for all.

China is the key. If China decides to stand on the side of civilization … World War 3 might be exactly what we need.

Gregor on November 17, 2006 at 12:02 PM

Jimmy is the rube and strawman that the UN needs to reinforce their views on Israel & the Middle East. Jimmy already has an agenda before starting his “inspection”. Under the current state of affairs at the UN, who else would you choose as your front man?

USN6872 on November 17, 2006 at 12:13 PM

China is the key. If China decides to stand on the side of civilization … World War 3 might be exactly what we need.

Gregor on November 17, 2006 at 12:02 PM

Red China stands on its own side, and it’s closer to the Islamists than us.

steveegg on November 17, 2006 at 12:38 PM

China has its own Islamic threat. but China loves the money it gets from arms sales.

They veiw backing Iran the same as us backing Taiwan.

William Amos on November 17, 2006 at 12:39 PM

Damn, but we’re full of good news today </sarcasm>

steveegg on November 17, 2006 at 12:42 PM

Red China stands on its own side, and it’s closer to the Islamists than us.

China has its own Islamic threat. but China loves the money it gets from arms sales.

Both statements are true when speaking financially, but it remains to be seen what China would do if it came to war between terrorist nations and the rest of the world.

We saw how quickly things changed with North Korea last month. China is not interested in war and they’re definitely smart enough to know that the spread of Islamic extremism is not far from their door.

Gregor on November 17, 2006 at 1:13 PM

I don’t care what anybody says. Jimmy Carter is still #1!…on my Please Hurry Up And Die list.

Teddy on November 17, 2006 at 1:16 PM

Wait, wait, wait….

Yasir Arafat said:
In 1969, we said we wanted to establish a democratic state where Jews, Christians, and Muslims can all live together.

I recently saw (again) the documentary on the Olympic games of 1972 (Not the new one either).

I “think”, although I’m not really sure, that those athletes were Jewish AND they were targeted as such. Wasn’t that started by one of those PLO groups (sarcasm).

I’m still amazed that the Israeli hostages were killed in 1972 and 4 years later when Carter is elected, it’s completely forgotten by him.

I’m amazed, simply amazed!!!

HarryStar on November 17, 2006 at 1:18 PM

Time for Jimmah to join Yassah…

seejanemom on November 17, 2006 at 1:25 PM

Somewhere, there is an Iranian blogger selling tshirts that feature the image of Mr. Carter and that say in Farsi, “444 days, B*tch!”

rw on November 17, 2006 at 1:37 PM

…after 30 years of having to listen to this liver-lipped pop-up target, I’ve arrived in a happy place in my life: when I hear the words “Jimmy Carter”, and my brain begins playing porno-movie music *REALLY LOUDLY*, drowning out whatever’s said for the next 30 seconds.

This way, somebody can begin to extol the virtues of the *WORST* president this nation’s had since…er…Pierce?…and I don’t have the stomach-churning waves of disgust sending ripples into my chi anymore.

Then again, there’s, “Hear about Jimmy Carter? (music starts)(*BHWOW-BIP-BIP-BHWOOOOW-BHWOOOOw*) Anyway, the brakes on your truck are hosed, and I wouldn’t recommend driving it. Have a nice day.”

…I hate when that happens….

This guy is proof that democracy is not infallible.

By a fluke of history and inattention on the part of the electorate, we’ve been stuck listening to drivel from this jumped-up former nuke-you-lerr scientist for a generation and a half. The worshipful treatment he unerringly receives from the “unbiased” press and academia would, had he the ability to process things mentally, cause a normal man to go into diabetic shock.

This guy was once the *WORST* of men: a weak man in a position of great trust.

Since then, he’s been that most dread of creatures: a Leftist icon. He seems “down-home”, but he’s really “down with the revolution”. To put it in Southern rural argot, he’s a “Trojan hog”.

As it is, overseas and at within precincts of the UN, he’s trading on his international status as an arbiter of what’s fair, open and gullible. He’s like a political Jerry Lewis…the French think he’s a *GENIUS*, but the folks back home know him better.

(Apologies to Mr. Lewis for the comparison. Loved you in Cinderfella, man.)

Richard Nixon could write. He could really write. That makes him unique among Republican ex-presidents. He didn’t take the saccharin tacks that Mr. Carter seems to think the linchpin of his “legacy”. That’s one of the problems with conservatism. Reagan didn’t write. Bush pere really didn’t write (except for that book by his dog). I doubt that Bush fils will write. But, Carter and Clinton both wrote (and will no doubt continue to write) self-fascinated, self-excusing tripe until the man with the scythe take them out of our misery.

When he finally becomes eligible to have his mug put onto a coin or stamp, count on the eulogies to be full of what he *TRIED* to do. Like a plucky little salmon, he braved the uphill, upstream tide of human nature, power politics, and the violent tendencies of his time, and — brave little fishy that he was — waggled his tail powerfully…until he finally fell flat on it.

Once upon a time, when anyone really cared, mimics used to tease him unmercifully. Dan Ackroyd I remember had a good take on him. Mr. Ackroyd’s need no longer bother losing the weight nor fixing his face in that idiotic smile, as the man’s a walking/talking parody of himself.

Worst of all…he accepted that Nobel after the committee had itself *ANNOUNCED* that it was a protest vote against Mr. Bush. He’s since violated every rule of post-presidential protocol (to say nothing of common decency), and capped it off by accepting that poxy, meaningless award.

Mind you, Le Duc Tho, Arafat and Rigoberta Menchu also received that award, Comrade Cindy’s been considered, and bin Laden’s probably up for a Nobel or a Cannes Palm d’Or next year, so the word “laureate” has little practical meaning anymore.

James Earl Carter…former governor, former president, Nobel Peace Prize laureate, renowned of stage and screen…and, ground into little tiny bits, he wouldn’t be useful as chum.

…success with the book, bud…there’s one born every minute, I hear….

Puritan1648 on November 17, 2006 at 1:40 PM

Can still use some help on my “most obnoxious democrat/moonbat/Foreign leader” poll

http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/abp_forum/viewtopic.php?t=2978&start=30

Here is current results

Who is more obnoxious ?

Henry Waxman (2) 14%
Al Sharpton (12) 86%

Jimmy Carter (8) 53%
Ted Kennedy (7) 47%

Al Gore (9) 60%
John Murtha (6) 40%

Hillary Clinton (9) 56%
John Kerry (7) 44%

Micheal Moore (16) 100%
Madonna (0) 0%

Sean Penn (2) 13%
Cindy Sheehan (13) 87%

Rosie O Donnell (13) 87%
Barbara Streisand (2) 13%

Jane Fonda (9) 60%
Baldwin Brothers (6) 40%

Osama Bin Laden (10) 67%
Nasrallah (5) 33%

Fidel Castro (3) 20%
Saddam Hussien (12) 80%

Ahmadinejad (11) 73%
Kim Jong Il (4) 27%

Hugo Chavez (5) 33%
Kofi Annan (10) 67%

Al Franken (13) 100%
Eleanor Clift (0) 0%

Markos Zuniga (6) 43%
Bil Mahir (8) 57%

Ted Rall (5) 38%
Keith Obermann (8) 62%

Helen Thomas (6) 40%
Dan Rather (9) 60%

William Amos on November 17, 2006 at 1:47 PM

jimie carterfailure…worst prez every…he has no respect from anyone…

who voted for that nutso…

areseaoh on November 17, 2006 at 2:16 PM

Dhimmi Carter makes me glad I have a peanut allergy.

infidel4life on November 17, 2006 at 2:20 PM

worst ex president ever

Defector01 on November 17, 2006 at 2:20 PM

Could we ask him to give that asteroid a little nudge?

bloggless on November 17, 2006 at 2:22 PM

Not crazy. Not naive. Not gullible. Not insane.

Evil.

Coyote D. on November 17, 2006 at 2:32 PM

…that American Thinker article ends very, very well, summing up not only Carter’s new book but the man himself.

As for this book, it will be of no use to those interested in a responsible discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But it may be useful to historians pondering the perspective of a U.S. president who presided over the 1979 fall of a strategic ally in Iran and his replacement by a theocracy now pursuing nuclear weapons. At the time, Carter may have been impressed by the new leaders’ deep religious convictions.

…good read about a man who was able to overcome his inconsequentiality to become one of the real petty annoyances of the 20th Century.

Puritan1648 on November 17, 2006 at 2:56 PM

Jimmy Carter. A terrorist terrorist.

Required reading in terrorist school. How to take advantage of a former peanut farmers view of world events. Extra credit for understanding why he wasn’t elected to a second term.

Kini on November 17, 2006 at 3:04 PM

So, basically, Carter has updated and re-published the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion?”

Or is it just that he’s so mind-warpingly, bone-shateringly stupid that neither he nor anyone else can tell the difference?

I suggest a test… find a small group of people and give them IQ tests on three separate days to establish a baseline. Then have them engage in a “town-hall-style” discussion with Carter for no less than three hours. Then re-test.

Any bets on average IQ loss?

Merovign on November 17, 2006 at 3:06 PM

How to take advantage of a former peanut farmers view of world events. Extra credit for understanding why he wasn’t elected to a second term.

I don’t think we can blame his profession, but I do think it is at least important for the farmer to have more sense than the peanut.

Coyote D. on November 17, 2006 at 3:08 PM

I don’t think we can blame his profession, but I do think it is at least important for the farmer to have more sense than the peanut.

Coyote D. on November 17, 2006 at 3:08 PM

Alas, I think his dog buried it somewhere in the field.

At least I can add this nugget to my Billy Beer collection.

Kini on November 17, 2006 at 3:11 PM

Are peanuts not Kosher or what?

Drtuddle on November 17, 2006 at 3:59 PM

Carter is a filthy animal and should be put in a home, but I must say that — as a full throated supporter of Israel –my heartbreak for Israeli Jews is tempered by the knowledge that my American Jewish friends vote 85%+ to support the Democrats, who take a more nuanced view of Israel.

Granted, most of these liberal Jewish voters are secular “Jews”, but frankly, I don’t know what that means; there is no such thing as a “secular” Christian, is there?

Jaibones on November 17, 2006 at 4:04 PM

It is not difficult to understand why Democrats wanted the publication of Jimmy Carter’s slim new book (216 pages of text, large print and no footnotes)

Cause it has lots of pictures and no big words?!

Kini on November 17, 2006 at 5:44 PM