Breaking: Mel Martinez to replace Ken Mehlman as RNC chairman
posted at 3:08 pm on November 13, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Just across at CNN. Looking for details. Standby.
Update: Presumably this means he’s leaving the Senate and Florida Gov.-elect Charlie Crist will appoint his replacement. If so, that’s all to the good: Martinez has been a disaster on immigration. Kyl’s prospects for a filibuster just increased by one vote, assuming Crist chooses wisely.
Update: I figured it was too good to be true. He’s accepted the position — but he’s not leaving the Senate.
Under the arrangement, Martinez will remain in office and serve as the party’s lead spokesman as well as take a major role in fundraising and political outreach, while RNC General Counsel Robert (Mike) Duncan will oversee the committee’s day-to-day responsibilities.
Update: As for the DNC, get used to Dean-o. Harold Ford says he’s not interested.
Update: Hot Air commenters agree: it’s an awful pick, transparently aimed at appealing to pro-amnesty Hispanic voters. If the GOP goes ahead and puts Boehner and Blunt back in place in the minority leadership, you’re looking at a very dire electoral situation in 2008.
Update: Via reader Enoxo, I think Darth Vader speaks for all of us.
Update: The boss says nooooooooooo…
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
1.) Rick Santorum, Conrad Burns, James Talent and George Allen were not RINOS. Anyone in this country who thinks Santorum is a “moderate” or a “liberal” clearly needs their head examined.
2.) Once again, you’re relying on the myth that the Dems who won were all conservatives. Tester wants out of Iraq and wants to repeal the patriot act. McCaskill is a liberal, pro-choice and pro-embryonic stem cell research (obviously). Whitehouse and Sheldon Brown are both VERY liberal. Bob Casey is the only recognize conservative Democrat. Jim Webb is socially liberal, he’s said multiple times that he “always had a problem with the GOP on the social issues”, and thinks the Iraq War was a “massive blunder”. Simply being a military man does not make you a conservative by any means. He’s not. He’s essentially a centrist. And in the House, most picks up were in NY, CT, NH and PA. All liberal pick ups. Ron Klein in Florida, Yarmuth in Kentucky, Lampson in Texas, 2 liberals out in Arizona who campaigned for comprehensive immigration reform (amnesty) against firebrand anti-illegal immigrant J.D. Hayworth. Even Nacy Boyda out in Kansas. Liberal. Only 6 or 7 Dems who won were actual conservatives. Schuler in NC and the three Dems in Indiana. The rest were mostly liberal.
So don’t maintain anyhope that the Dems are going to govern from the centre-right. We’re not. We’re investigating the president, raising the minimum wage, negotiating with drug companies, passing amnesty and withdrawing soldiers from Iraq.
3.) Also, when you ask people if they support allowing illegal immigrants to become citizens by paying fines, learning English, taking background checks, etc… they actually say yes by about 60%. So yes, the American people support amnesty as long as you don’t call it amnesty. Every single poll has shown that.
Grebrook on November 13, 2006 at 4:53 PM
The GOP tried to pass that a couple months ago.
The Dems killed it in the Senate.
Douche bag.
natesnake on November 13, 2006 at 4:58 PM
A third party would be suicide but if several conservatives in congress joined together to leave the party and call themselves “Independent Conservatives” or something, that would make the Republicans reconsider their direction and also make the Democrats appear as extreme left as they actually are.
Perchant on November 13, 2006 at 4:59 PM
might be time to take the republican party outside and put her to rest
Defector01 on November 13, 2006 at 5:00 PM
I call Bullsh*t.
Don’t know who you golf with (if anyone), but the American people most certainly do NOT support amnesty under any name you care to use!
Hayworth’s opponent ran on a platform that was even more anti-illegal immigration than he did (if that’s possible).
Arizonans approved by huge margins about 5 referenda that denied illegals various public services.
We’re tired of paying for the schools and hospitals for these people while they murder us and have car wrecks with us.
You get this crap from O’Reilly, too, Grabbrook?
Those who voted Dem (and who would that be, because nobody I know except for Grabrook admits to pulling the D lever…?) thought they were voting for anti-illegal immigration and anti-amnesty candidates.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 5:01 PM
Bush and his circle of republicans believe they lost on the immigration issue this last election cycle. He WILL try and work with Dems on this issue and try and push a “look at the left hand while the right hand signs an amnesty bill”, hoping the American public doesn’t notice. Did republicans lose Hispanic votes over this issue…I’m sure they did. Did Republicans lose votes because of the squishiness of the republican party as a whole on the immigration issue…YOU BET THEY DID. Their last minute 700 mile fence that will never be funded or built didn’t fool as many of their base as they would’ve hoped.
b4itsover on November 13, 2006 at 5:01 PM
1 hour 54 minutes old, this thread has 96 unanimous comments — left and right — opposing Mel Mel Martinez.
Has this ever happened before?
Christoph on November 13, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Thank you, americanpundit. I just sent a sparking mad email.
RushBaby on November 13, 2006 at 5:06 PM
That’s exactly what happened in Durham County, NC with that sorry ass D.A. Mike Nifong won because the local Republican party chairman would NOT step aside, and he split the vote, so Nifong won with 49% of the votes cast. He (Fred Monks) knew full well there was no way he could win in Durham County (it’s a liberal bastion of eliteists and poor ghettos…like most liberal enclaves). Grrrrrrrrrr!
SouthernGent on November 13, 2006 at 5:08 PM
Euro MSM spin:
bspoogeferd on November 13, 2006 at 5:09 PM
So they still haven’t figured out that they got a thumping because they support amnesty? Screw this. My disdain for the Republican party has reached a tipping point. I shall be a registered independent by weeks end.
Kevin M on November 13, 2006 at 5:09 PM
Don’t play dumb, they tried to pass a bill that would have raised the minimum wage but included a provision eliminating the estate tax. Weasel tactics.
Oh, really? Let’s have a look then:
This is a Gallup poll taken nationwide:
Answer, 66% said they could stay if they met the requirements, the requirements being they pay fines, learn English, undergo background tests, etc…
So clearly the American people have said NO to deportation. Only 16% said yes to “Deport them all”.
This listing of polls includes about a half dozen national polls that all found the same thing. LA Times/Bloomberg found the exact same thing, 67% supported allowing them to stay under those circumstances.
http://www.pollingreport.com/immigration.htm
Dick Morris even agrees, most Republican voters are ok with the senate manesty bill:
http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/DickMorris/070506.html
Grebrook on November 13, 2006 at 5:09 PM
Sorry, try again:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/james_crabtree/2006/11/the_republican_hispanic_crisis.html
bspoogeferd on November 13, 2006 at 5:10 PM
In my country, Canada, we had a “Progressive Conservative” Party (that really was the name) that betrayed its base, got decimated, we sat in the electoral wilderness for over a decade, and now under the renewed leadership of Stephen Harper the “Conservative Party” is governing.
Maybe there is a better way…
Just saying.
Christoph on November 13, 2006 at 5:11 PM
What the hell! What the hell! What the hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
batperez on November 13, 2006 at 5:13 PM
spoogemonkey, is that you Grabrook? Yoo-hoo!
You are citing The Graudian to me? BWAHAHAHAHA-most Leftist paper on the planet short of the old Pravda!
And Dick Morris hasn’t had a clue since 1998.
Try again.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 5:14 PM
That’s from Red State.
Editor on November 13, 2006 at 5:16 PM
The inmates of the DUmmieland are cheering for this. Not only because Martinez is a moron, but because he’ll be a part-time Senator, part-time RNC chairman moron.
I’ll give one last fight to save the RNC and Republican party… but if they are so gun-ho to doom themselves, then I’ll just go back to the libertarian party and hold my nose on their views about the war.
Enoxo on November 13, 2006 at 5:16 PM
Seems like most of the posters at lucianne.com agree with us here.
thirteen28 on November 13, 2006 at 5:17 PM
I, for one, welcome our new Islamic overlords.
You gonna eat that hummus?
Pablo on November 13, 2006 at 5:17 PM
No, I’m not Grebrook. Just posting a link showing how the Euro MSM was spinning the issue, messed up on the first attempt. Just a coincidence that it mirrored and came after Grebrooks comments. Sorry for the confusion…
bspoogeferd on November 13, 2006 at 5:19 PM
I don’t know if anyone already posted this but, if the money stops flowing from us no-account conservatives in response to the phone calls asking for money from the national Republican Party, Congressional committee, Senate committee, etc. like before the election maybe someone will listen. If enough of us who are angry quit paying the way maybe there will be a response.
confused on November 13, 2006 at 5:20 PM
Dude. Its hispanic overlords. And:
I, para uno, dan la bienvenida a nuestros overlords hispánicos nuevos.
You gonna drink that tequila?
lorien1973 on November 13, 2006 at 5:23 PM
You HAVE to read RedState.org’s Mel Martinez piece.
Well, no, you don’t have to. But it’s awesome.
Can we mount a big campaign to oppose him?
Christoph on November 13, 2006 at 5:23 PM
confused, I’m there, my friend.
I will not be giving to an RNC headed by Martinez–what a wimp loser!
What happened to Steele?
Mel M. was not even an asset in the Senate and now he’s going to do double duty as a milquetoast head of the GOP?
Sounds as if those at the top (like Rove) still haven’t gotten the lesson of last Tuesday’s results.
I’m not even sure if those stats on the Hispanic vote going Dem are even true.
Did Mehlman even know who and where our base is?
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 5:25 PM
Hey what has to happen to get Drudge to change his headline to:
Christoph on November 13, 2006 at 5:27 PM
Kralizac said it best for me, it is clear at this point that Bush is selling us all out so that he can keep his Mexican friends close.We just don;t matter to the GOP anymore.
bbz123 on November 13, 2006 at 5:27 PM
Michael Steele would have made a great senator, but unfortunately African-Americans didn’t vote for him and liberals sure as hell didn’t.
I thought Steele would make an excellent RNC chief, but I don’t get this deep depression that Martinez has been chosen. The whole point of RNC chief is to influence Americans to vote Republican. If you don’t think the job of RNC is to “pander” to voters, you are not living in reality.
Mel Martinez is as “conservative” as Michael Steele. Martinez is staunchly pro-life. On immigration and affirmative action, is Steele more conservative?
Republicans need to market themselves better to Hispanics, and pro-life Martinez is one way to do it.
januarius on November 13, 2006 at 5:33 PM
The good news is that at least I don’t have to dress in drag to get kicked out of the party.
Editor on November 13, 2006 at 5:33 PM
No more money for the RNC. Give to individuals who support conservative values. For amnesty info on all the congressional players, including vote records, go here.
If you’re a libtard only concerned with garnering votes, you are obviously against Mother Earth and the environment as a whole.
NTWR on November 13, 2006 at 5:35 PM
This is just unbelievable. Tell the GOP how you feel about this:
http://www.gop.com/ContactUs/
I did, and it wasn’t very nice.
WisCon on November 13, 2006 at 5:37 PM
Santorum was a douche. I know several conservatives that voted against him, as much as for Casey. What are Casey’s views on abortion? Do you think he’d confirm a constructionist Justice? Don’t count your chickens before they are hatched. Allen BARELY lost. What do you think voters in Northern VA who are awash in illegals all of a sudden want them to be able to vote? Methinks not. And amnesty could and most likely probably will be the death nail for Dems lock on the black vote. I tell you as a Black man we are watching the Dems push us to the side and serve the Hispanic community. Bad, bad move. All the voters that thought Michael Steele was out to “trick them” will get a rude suprise. Amnesty will flood poor black voters first, I’m sure their reaction to losing jobs to immigrants willing to work for the new minimum wage that will still be below actual wages will be met with grand kudos in the Black community. Without Blacks, Democrats are done.
Um that sounds Libertarian, not liberal. I would repeal or at least significantly change the patriot act myself. Again Montanans did not vote Tester to be Pelosi’s proxies. Do you think jihadis echoing Democratic talking points is going to help you? Tester’s voting record will have to reflect the conservative views of his state, if not the “Don’t elect Democrats or you’ll get San Francisco values mantra will be proven true.
Did these liberals actually run on liberal issues or just beat the Anti Bush drum? They cannot hide from their voting record. When the votes get cast and people realize who they voted into office they will be displeased. The Republicans got voted out for the same thing. Run on one thing and vote another, that will be great, I hope they do just that.
HAHA. Exactly as long as you do not call it amnesty. How did the phrase “comprehensive immigration reform” work out the first time. What a new buzz word will fool the people? I guess CNN will have to get whatever you are going to call it more airtime, or put Glenn Beck on a leash.
Its called backlash Grebrook. The same backlash against illegals marching will happen again. Do you think Grandma’s in Missouri will not notice Hispanics spreading and voting in monolithic blocks? When
illegal aliens“new citizens” pay in state tuition and are getting financial aid when her grandson has to pay full price, and is just “rich” enough to not qualify for financial aid but not “rich” enough to actually pay for college? And the HUGE factor of what happens when the next wave of illegals comes in and competes with the last crop to get amnesty. The whole country wants to come here, do you think we can absorb the tens of millions that are sure to come when they know they are not any consequences? Go ahead pass amnesty and see what that gets you.Voting for amnesty will set the Dems back nicely. Just hope Pelosi can get Murtha in, because if The Dems are as liberal as you say then someone as conservative as Jack is a hard sell.
Theworldisnotenough on November 13, 2006 at 5:38 PM
That’s it, I’m outta here…Chuck Hagle’s buddy on immigration…let’s pick a good Libertarian Candidate and get this show on the road…we have just been screwed and we didn’t even get kissed.
DoctorDentons on November 13, 2006 at 5:38 PM
I’m registering as a liberitarian tomorrow. Screw the fact it’s a useless gesture, I’m just sick of this crap.
Ringmaster on November 13, 2006 at 5:40 PM
One more thing: Has anyone really looked at what Steele’s positions were on the issues? He was articulate, intelligent, appealing, but he was hardly a rock solid conservative.
I don’t get it: Some people here are pissed off that a Hispanic pro-life “moderate” was chosen as RNC chief, but would have been ecstatic that an African-American pro-life “moderate” was. That is not consistent if it is about the issues.
januarius on November 13, 2006 at 5:41 PM
Januarius – is that you, Karl?
Editor on November 13, 2006 at 5:44 PM
Hmmm…
My hopes of Republican wins in 2008 are starting to dim.
{sigh}
Lawrence on November 13, 2006 at 5:46 PM
You guys said the same thing when Steele, Blackwell and Swann got the nominations to run, and when the gay marriage debate surfaced in its full intensity back in 2003. All three of them lost, and none of them earned even 30% of the black vote. 90% of African-Americans voted for Dems in the midterm elections.
Ok, what it will get me is 20 million new voters. Sounds just fine. And the public supports earned citizenship, so there will be no backlash. And, if they do get mad, they can’t blame the Dems, since Bush is going to sign the bill. Once again, you’re ignoring every poll that has showed Americans are ok with comprehensive immigration reform, the same way you ignored polls showing you would be defeated in the midterm elections.
Would you care to be proven wrong, twice?
You guys are the ones that coined the term. Your party is the one that came up with the idea in the first place. The Dems simply signed onto your plan. Even Fred Barnes supports it, and the Wall Street Journal.
Blacks voted 90% for Dems in this election, and aren’t going anywhere. Demographics are shifting and white Protestants are disappearing rapidly. In the 70’s they comprised a good 70% of the nation. Now? 54%. Have a look at the trends:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_united_states#Popular_affiliation
Protestants declined, Catholics basically stayed the same, and seculars (atheists/agnostics) almost doubled, from 8-15%. Now, at this rate, you’ll be decimated and permanently out of commission by about 2030. You can’t survive without white Protestants. Right now it looks like they’re not even a majority. Protestants make up about 54%, but that includes black-Americans, who are about 13% of the overall population and a good 8-9% overall are black Protestants. So right now something along the lines of 45% is white Protestant. What will that be by 2010? 40%? 30%?
Not much of a base.
Grebrook on November 13, 2006 at 5:49 PM
I think the recent election proved that a political party can be a mess, but will an election if the other party is visibly worse. The Democrats did not win; the Republicans lost. The good news: even before being in power, the Demos are being themselves again, choosng far-left, corrupt, arrogant, socialist, and criminal whores as their leaders in the House: revealing themselves as the party of John “not at this time” Murtha, convicted felon Alcee Hastings….the list will grow each day.
Is that solcace enough? Now that the Demos have a whiff of power, they are already screwing up far more than the Republicans screw up. Politics is poker, among other things: we can deal a Martinez, they’ll come back with a Hastings, ad nauseum……
Janos Hunyadi on November 13, 2006 at 5:50 PM
Like I said. Done deal. We’re finished.
Stupid is is stupid does.
I was in here last month making predictions on what would happen if you all voted independent or skipped the vote in your ingenious plan of “sending a message.”
I wrote that the amnesty plan would immediately be passed without opposition. And I also wrote that it would NOT send the message you were looking for. I wrote that instead of the “message” causing the GOP candidates to move to the right … that they would instead move further to the left.
It’s not rocket science. Now you see that’s exactly what is happening, but you still don’t get it. Now you want to go out and do the same thing in 2008.
If you look at my posts, you’ll also notice that I stated back then that Grebrook was a Koskid troll attempting to convince you all to vote against the GOP. Only a few believed it. Most defended Grebrook and obviously many actually took the advice. And now we seem to have more of them in here doing the same thing, realizing that it worked perfectly. Are you all going to fall for it again?
For those that keep writing “I don’t get it” and “why are they not seeing what we want” …
The answer is that they are not interested in winning elections right now. They have an agenda that’s called open borders and they are willing to give up their seats to get it.
They all have lifelong seats with various corporations who are pumping billions into obtaining low wage workers. They are set for life.
They hear you. They see you. They know you’re pissed.
They simply don’t care.
Gregor on November 13, 2006 at 5:52 PM
Editor- No, but I can understand his logic. If you want to be taken seriously, you need to be consistent. Why would you be gung-ho for Michael Steele who is a “moderate” and then be dead against Mel Martinez who is a “moderate?”
Theworldisnotenough-
Here is some exit polling data from Maryland 2006:
White (72%) 48% Cardin 50% Steele
African-American (23%) 74% Cardin 25% Steele
I live in NOVA and I can tell you they did vote. All you need to register to vote is a driver’s license and a residence.
januarius on November 13, 2006 at 5:55 PM
Gregor, unfortunately, you are correct, sir.
Some people who should have known better outsmarted themselves, only without the ’smart’ part
Janos Hunyadi on November 13, 2006 at 5:56 PM
It’s called OPEN BORDERS. One is for. One is against. It’s the single biggest issue on the table today.
Gregor on November 13, 2006 at 5:58 PM
For starters, Steele opposed amnesty for illegals and was in favor of securing the border first before attempting any other reforms. In favor of school choice. In opposition to the NCLB Act. Pro-life. Pro-2nd amendment. Fiscally conservative. In favor of making the tax cuts permanent and repealing altogether the death tax.
I don’t agree with him on the death penalty (he opposes), but at least he is always consistently pro-life.
Overall, a set of positions that would make him palatable to a very wide range of conservatives. And no poison pill positions like Martinez has with his pro-amnesty, pro-open borders position.
thirteen28 on November 13, 2006 at 6:04 PM
Gregor, Amen. Everyone I know, including myself, thinks so, too.
(Fighting the war in Iraq wasn’t even the main issue, except that most people want to see our soldiers take the gloves off and stop getting killed so easily.)
The fact that both political parties keep ignoring our outrage about illegals is almost unbelievable…
that’s why the election was so strange.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 6:05 PM
You know Grab-a-book (take that hint), you’re not doing yourself any favors by dividing people into Catholics, Protestants, and atheists.
But of course, no one can Balkanize an electorate like the DemocRATS.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 6:07 PM
…he’s none-to-great a senator in the opinion of his constituents…but he’ll get to stay on *AND* take up the mantle over at the RNC, where leadership is in short supply…as a part-time job?
…it’s sort of like “This restaurant’s terrible! The food is lousy, and the portions are so small!”
What’s next? We’ll sign Kyoto? We’ll let Jefferson keep his freezer full of cash? Anything to appease the “victorious” Left?
…they’re ridin’ a non-mandate to the big house, folks.
I’ve got it! Bernie Sanders for RNC chair! Why the heck not!?
Puritan1648 on November 13, 2006 at 6:17 PM
I hate to say it, but even Michelle is believing they just aren’t hearing us.
It should be painfully obvious to everyone by now that they aren’t confused about what we want. They’ve just chosen to ignore us. They aren’t doing this because they THINK it’s what will get them elected. They’re doing it because they have more important things set up for their future that depend on amnesty rather than votes.
This is not going to be solved by letters to the GOP. It’s only going to be solved by conservatives actively protesting in the streets.
And to Grebrook and others who will suggest I’m inciting violence, it is obvious that we are not like your kind. A million conservatives walking the streets or blocking traffic nationwide during rush hour ought to send the message we want. Much louder than emails which will never be read.
They aren’t interested in our votes. Maybe their interested in preventing chaos.
Gregor on November 13, 2006 at 6:20 PM
Crap. “They’re”
That was my Grebrook impersonation.
Gregor on November 13, 2006 at 6:23 PM
I just checked Steele’s campaign positions on immigration and he is really solidly conservative. For some reason I was thinking he was a “moderate” on those issues. All in all, I would have preferred Steele, but I can see why Rove wants Martinez as RNC chief. It is a public relations position not a legislative position, and he is going after socially conservative Hispanics.
Gregor- We lost this election because the Dems pretended to be conservative in red states and in the West. As Ann Coulter says:
januarius on November 13, 2006 at 6:25 PM
Done.
Grunt2Jag on November 13, 2006 at 6:25 PM
Even though AP isn’t a Coulter fan, I am!
Ann nailed it, no matter what KOS trolls like Grabrook say.
Now if only those Dem voters would realize what they’ve done…
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 6:30 PM
AllahPundit is not consistent at all. He is upset about Mel Martinez being chosen as RNC chief.
AllahPundit supports Giuliani 2008. So I guess by his logic, because Martinez is pro-amnesty, it will be a very dire situation in 2008. People are going to stay home because they will not accept a pro-amnesty Republican politician. That is why AllahPundit supports Giuliani, a pro-amnesty politican. What?
Here are Giuliani’s positions on immigration from a RealClearPolitics article:
I wonder how many people here support Giuliani and are bitching about Martinez. At least Martinez is pro-life.
januarius on November 13, 2006 at 6:52 PM
The first 100 hour implosion … continues.
Gregor on November 13, 2006 at 6:53 PM
I don’t support Giulliani. No sir.
So, now I get to continue bitching about Martinez.
Editor on November 13, 2006 at 7:01 PM
…my old Dad had an expression for ever’thing…he had an expression for this profligacy with imagined political capital. He used to use it in reference to people who don’t know when to quit:
Puritan1648 on November 13, 2006 at 7:05 PM
Mel Martinez is my Senator. I sent the following e-mail to the RNC. I then forwarded it to Sentator Martinez under the title, “Please resign from the RNC Chairmanship.”
It won’t change anything, but it made me feel better.
Anton on November 13, 2006 at 7:17 PM
GLOOMSVILLE
MEL MARTINEZ, RNC CHAIRMAN.
Another shot in the foot by George W. Bush. Creepers, doesn’t this dolt for a president learn from his past mistakes…I think not?
byteshredder on November 13, 2006 at 7:24 PM
I’m done with the GOP.
I read on GoDaddy that GOPREPLACEMENT.COM is available! Somebody start a blog for the replacement of the GOP. Online petition anyone?
beatcanvas on November 13, 2006 at 7:32 PM
I think Gregor has it nailed, there is no way that they cannot understand how we feel on these issues,but they do not have to answer to us anymore to get their bread buttered.We no longer have true representation,they all say whatever they need to say to get elected and then they just do whatever the hell they intended on doing in the first place.These career politicos are a criminal class IMHO,we need to get this ship back on the course that the founding fathers set.
bbz123 on November 13, 2006 at 7:35 PM
Bush made a comment last week (or the week before?) that he was head of the Republican Party. So, doesn’t the RNC work for him? Seems like an appointment that Bush would have chosen, as the two biggest things he wants to accomplish in his last 2 years in office is saving face in Iraq and granting amnesty to illegal aliens. Martinez will carry his water regarding amnesty, amnesty, amnesty (oops, sorry, “earned legalization.”)
If the RNC must be approved by the GOP state chairmen, me thinks the state chairmen better TAKE BACK the Republican Party from the Bush/Rove crash-and-burn party destroyers. It’s the people’s party, not Bush’s.
That means pubs making a HUGE ruckus with the state chairmen. (They are more likely to listen, anyway.) They will be looking to the future,, recruiting candicates and winning elections, while Bush is concerned about his next two years. Maybe if the people get thru to the state chairmen, the RNC can once again be the people’s party….
Maybe there’s hope….?
TwoCents on November 13, 2006 at 7:39 PM
Damnit, Who fed the ZOO Animals? There loose and running amok.
DONT FEED THE ANIMALS.
shooter on November 13, 2006 at 7:39 PM
Lost some of my post…????
AP does this quietly, plus he runs the zoo. All others are feeding the animals the wrong food. Now they’re loose and running amok.
shooter on November 13, 2006 at 7:42 PM
I’m switching to Independent as soon as I can.
marianpaul on November 13, 2006 at 7:45 PM
Does the idea of Impeaching Bush look like such a bad idea today? If so then I promise you that it will gain support as Bush continues to give way to the liberals.
DannoJyd on November 13, 2006 at 7:45 PM
This today, is not the Republican party my dad told me about.
Where have they gone?
shooter on November 13, 2006 at 7:49 PM
Danno, seriously. Put a sock in it. We’re divided enough without adding an impeachment wing to the Conservative movement.
Trying to impeach the President would tear this country wide open and it’s pretty bad as it right now.
The Dems are still pissed as hell, even though they won and the Right’s unhappy as well because they either voted R and weren’t happy about it or stayed home and felt unhappy about it and now are really mad.
Don’t borrow trouble. Stop with that kind of talk right now.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 7:55 PM
I don’t think I’d want to go that far. But if the dems were to pursue that route, it might be difficult for conservatives to get motivated to defend him.
thirteen28 on November 13, 2006 at 7:57 PM
RESERVE YOUR SPACE NOW!
LIMITED TIME OFFER!
LAST CHANCE!
My broad, conservative back only has room left for two more knives to be stuck in it. All the other spaces are now filled.
In fact, I’m going to have to limit the two spaces to stilettos (or epees should you favor a sword.), Not enough room left for Bowies, bolos or machettes.
Yes indeed, past time for a VIABLE 3rd party. Screw the RNC
LegendHasIt on November 13, 2006 at 8:02 PM
They just received my farewell notice. The last line read:
If you want me back, return to moral values, a constructionist view of the constitution, and a passion to obey your oath to uphold it.
The Constitution Party will be receiving my membership, and I heartily recommend that any Americans who believe in the original values of this nation do likewise.
I held out this time in the hope that the national Republican party would recognize that a major plurality, if not a simple majority, of Americans still believe in those values that made this nation what it was, what it could be again. They missed it by a mile, and with the President’s apparent glee that a Democrat majority will get him the amnesty he desires for illegals, yet not a peep from the party, it’s obvious that they haven’t the guts to even try.
I am sick to death of political expediency. I will not offer my loyalty to a traitor, and the national Republican party has betrayed what I believe in. I also will not make the mistake of hoping that they can or will change in the next two years. “Throw out the RINOs in the ‘08 primaries“, is a pipedream at this point. Incumbent RINOs have little chance of being successfully challenged by honest conservatives. Add that the White House left hanging out to dry virtually every candidate that didn’t fall in line on their globalist policy, and it becomes an even weaker prospect.
I will not wait another day hoping that a failed political party can get their act together. They have completely forgotten what “their act” was supposed to be, and have instead embraced as “politically expedient” far too many points of the liberal agenda.
Clinton won two elections by pretending to be more conservative than the national Democrat party. Why? Because more Americans are more conservative than the Democrat party was willing to believe. Now the national Republican party has assumed that the reverse is also true. That they can only keep winning by moving closer to the left. But the facts are against them, which can be seen by the vast majority of the statewide ballot initiatives.
As I see it, the national Republican party has treated its hard-right base exactly as King David treated Uriah the Hittite. They’ve adulterated our love, ordered us to the most dangerous position in the battle, and then pulled back to leave us stranded. Our values are under fire in every form of media, be it music, movies, TV, or news. The only place left to us to talk about God is inside our church, lest we be accused of hate crimes. Is that the America of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, or Monroe? Well, that is more and more becoming the America of the Republican party.
You can have it.
Conservatism’s Death Throes?
The Perfect Drizzle
Rejected RINOs
Holding our for a hero
Freelancer on November 13, 2006 at 8:33 PM
Let me explain something to you Grebook. There are these things called trends. Trends show us what is going to happen in the future. Looking up statistics with no real knowledge of the real politik behind them only shows your ignorance and increases my hope. Hopefully the DNC thinks just like you do. “Hey we got 90%” we are safe. I’m sure you know what a tipping point is, and wouldn’t you know it most tipping points come at around 10%. Let me explain the real politik of the black community.
1)Illegal Immigration
You think Republicans will get blamed for amnesty in the Black community? Really? I hope the DNC remains in that line of thinking. Illegal immigration was bipartisan until Nov 7th. Dems will own amnesty, and Bush who by the way your 90% does not like in the first place. The only party that stood in the way was the…? That’s right the Republican controlled Congress.
I asked a coworker from L.A., a coworker that recites liberal talking points like they are tattoed on his body, “What do you think aboout illegal immigration?” Answer: “I remember every Black man that wanted a job had one” What happens when amnesty floods the black community and black men are left looking for work, have to speak spanish to get a job? What happens when schools that are now predominantly Black succomb to the tsunami of illegals. I can’t wait to hear “There were only 25 students in my sons class 2 years ago?!?” You are fooling yourself if you think this will not have a huge impact in the near future.
The schism is already there. L.A. had some Mexican gangbangers on trial for trying to intimidate Black people out of the neighborhood.
2) Gay marriage and abortion
Solidly against, even the large majority of Democratic voters. Do you know what race has the most abortions percentage wise? You guessed it. What happens in the Black community when “Abortion is killing us” becomes the mantra?
Gay marriage? A real nonstarter. My relatives vote Republican for that reason alone. What America does not want is gays calling what they do the same thing as what we do. Civil unions maybe, marriage never. That will not sit well with us, ever.
3) Janice R. Brown
She makes Scalia loook like a commie, except on guns.
Heh. I would LOVE to see Dems put a Clarence Thomas style hit job on her. The best way to get a Black man to hit you, is to talk about his mother. The tightrope Dems would have to walk to reject her as a supreme court justice would be so thin as to make it impossible. The black communtiy will have zero vilifying of Janice.
Do you know what is popular speak right now? “Affirmative action helps white women not us.” Do you want to make that statement seem all the more true? Put a nice liberal judge on SCOTUS and watch Black churches squirm at the prospect of “gay rights.”
HAHA that is just what you should think. “Good dog you know who loves you.” Black people are very frustrated with the Democratic party. Think aboout you got 90% from anti-Bush sentiment, what would you have gotten withouot it Grebook?
I can tell you from first hand experience your 90% came from anti-Bush sentiment. Without Bush Michael Steele is a new Senator. Heh. He got 45% of the vote in a state 2/3rd’s Democrat in an election this polarized? Keep playing us for fools, when the tipping point hits it will be a landslide. What are you going to use next time around? The Democrats are keeping you down?
Wouldn’t be a shame to get amnesty, but lose the Black vote, be forced into replacing Stevens (who I hope is doing very well Allah) with Janice R. Brown. Watch Roe go on the chopping block, and have Hilary as your Presidential candidate, while running against a Gingrich/Steele ticket. Everything has a price.
This is chess not checkers.
Theworldisnotenough on November 13, 2006 at 8:33 PM
“THEY BETRAYED OUR COUNTRY, THEY PREYED ON OUR FEARS”!!!!!
Can’t believe how absolutely stupid the RNC is. Mistake, after mistake, after mistake, all while ignoring their base. They betrayed us as well.
ultracon on November 13, 2006 at 8:42 PM
I’ve said this once or twice before in my blog. I honestly think it is time for the Conservative base of the GOP for a “Conservative Party”. I detest what the GOP has done and I want to see a viable place for the Conservative viewpoint can go. I am tired of wasting my vote for people who will disappoint me.
Mooseman
Mooseman on November 13, 2006 at 9:00 PM
Jen, I’ll stop now that you have requested that of me, not because it is a bad idea. As nasty and rude as you were to me I can still find the manners to meet you half way.
I’ll stop pushing the idea, but I will continue to support those who call for it here on this site.
DannoJyd on November 13, 2006 at 9:07 PM
I get it now! The RNC doesn’t think conservatives are the GOP base…
Jaibones on November 13, 2006 at 9:19 PM
I found our putrid little troll over at the inmates of DUmmieland just now. Have a looksee what Grebrook says.
Enoxo on November 13, 2006 at 9:25 PM
1.) http://www.pollingreport.com/2008.htm#misc Newsweek poll: 58% say there is “no chance” they will vote for Gingrich. Keep dreaming.
2.) Democrats will reject Janice Rogers Brown. No one will care.
3.) No one in the black community is stupid enough to base their entire vote on gay marriage. Hence why your side was crushed in 2004, and again, more so, in 2006.
4.) Black Americans aren’t going to vote for anti-affirmative action Republicans because Democrats legalized 20 million illegal immigrants. I know you saw that episode of Hannity & Colmes where the black dude in the rastafari clothing claimed illegal immigration was more dangerous than slavery, and I know you thought it would be the salvation of black Republicans. It wasn’t. Not even Michael Steele could pull in 30% of the black vote in Maryland. It was a miserable train wreck.
No, you failed to explain “trends”. There have been no “trends” in the black vote. In 2004 Bush got 12% of the black vote. In 2006 the GOP got 10%. If that’s a trend, I’m on board, because it’s heading in our direction.
Now, Mr.I-Know-What-Black-People-Think-Because-I’m-Black Republican, let me explain some trends to you.
1.) 18-24 year olds support gay marriage in the majority
2.) 18-24 year olds voted for Democrats by a margin of 60-38%, the most lopsided win in the youth vote ever recorded
3.) Black Republicans have been using the same rhetoric about how “Blacks will start voting Republican on social issues” for literally 20 years. And for twenty years, nothing has changed. Because most Americans are not stupid, and don’t really base their vote on social issues. They base them on fiscal matters, and African-Americans are not fiscally conservative.
That Michael Steele won 45% of the vote in a state where about 50% of the population is registered Democratic does not impress me. Ben Nelson won 60% of the vote in a state that is 50% Republican. Steele also held an advantage as lieutenant governor whom all of the voters were familiar with, whereas Ben Cardin was just a congressmen no one outside of hiw own district would have been aware of. The voters chose the unfamiliar Democrat over the familiar Republican.
Keep deluding yourself with your hysterical “BLACKS WILL START VOTING FOR US BECAUSE OF ABORTION!!! YOU’LL SEE!!! YOU’LL SEE!!!”. Same tired old lines has been playing for twenty years. And for twenty years, you have been flatlined at 10% of the black vote.
Grebrook on November 13, 2006 at 9:35 PM
This means that the GOP has not learned anything as to why they lost this past election. They seem to have no intentions of winning in 08 either. Idiots.
zerodamage on November 13, 2006 at 9:37 PM
Kos:
Greg Tinti on November 13, 2006 at 9:42 PM
Grebrook, that’s not what theworldisnotenough said.
He said that black values voters were going over to the GOP–anti-abortion, anti-affirmative action, anti-marriage, anti-amnesty, pro-school voucher black people who’ve been voting for Dem Liberals all their lives.
Last Tuesday was anything but a “mandate” for the Dem Left.
Tuesday’s majority was won by Dem moderates and centrists.
You can howl about traditional American values all you want, but they’re not going away because you and San Fran Nan want them to.
Tuesday’s Dem voters want us to fight the war harder, not to cut and run.
They want to keep the Bush tax cuts, not add on more pork welfare programs like health care.
They want border controls and illegal immigration enforcement, not the perceived amnesty offered by the GOP.
You can spin and interpret the numbers all you want, but you’re still talking about the American people, not numbers.
Jen the Neocon on November 13, 2006 at 9:45 PM
This just shows the GOP is suffering badly from ‘Beltwayitis’. Moves like this guarantees that they’s stay a minority party.
Mike O on November 13, 2006 at 9:47 PM
It doesn’t matter what they want. The next generation has already decided. And what they want is an end to social conservatism. Hence why your party would be smart to start playing up your fiscal conservatism. Because to continue to rage and rant about social issues in a country that is becoming more socially liberal is about as politically suicidal as a national party openly being racist against red-skinned people for years and years, and, as the years go on, magically another 100,000 red-skinned people drop out of the sky as their constituents continue to die off. Inevitably it’s going to come back to haunt you pretty badly if you don’t wise up.
You lost the two most key voting blocs in this election, and you lost them in a landslide:
1.) The Youth vote
2.) The Hispanic vote
Both are the only ones that matters. If you can’t connect with youth voters they will grow up as Democrats and crush you in every election from this point forward, and obviously Hispanics, who are the fastest growing segment of the population.
Face reality.
Grebrook on November 13, 2006 at 10:13 PM
If the voters of the USA were capable of that, the election would have turned out absolutely the opposite of what it did. For liberals and the mostly ignorant swing voters, perception and emotion trump reality every time.
The reason Conservativism lost this time is because most of our putative leaders have abandoned the core values to try to out-liberal the Dems.
LegendHasIt on November 13, 2006 at 10:29 PM
Re The Constitution Party
About-I dunno-5 years ago my husbandd(then boyfriend) and I attended a meeting of the Illinois CP.
Things wer just dippy until it was mentioned that CP-IL
Non Christians could be members but- not officers.
Being that I’m the Nazarene daughter of Jewish parents that just didn’t wash. If Judaism was good enough for the Savior-it should be good enough for the Constitution Party of Illinois.
We later heard that CP-IL was a bit of a mutant group-and they might heard cleaned up since then.
Still…
That said I’m checking out CP-MO’s page.
just browsing-at this point.
annoyinglittletwerp on November 13, 2006 at 10:32 PM
Don’t feed the trolls, boys and girls. Here’s our troll Grebrook over at DU….
Fun stirring up the crap, isn’t it Grebrook? I enjoy doing the same on your side of the fence.
Ignore him, he’s a troll.
BacaDog on November 13, 2006 at 10:49 PM
Hey guys:
I was just on the Constitution Party’s site.
On terrorism they sound a lot like the left-bots.
annoyinglittletwerp on November 13, 2006 at 10:55 PM
Here’s the linky:
annoyinglittletwerp on November 13, 2006 at 10:57 PM
Ahhh!
I HATE computers.
Just go to http://www.constitutionparty.com and click on party platform.
You’ll stay GOP after you read some of it.
annoyinglittletwerp on November 13, 2006 at 10:59 PM
Anyone but Martinez! I voted for him *hangs head in shame*. I was looking forward to someone, anyone, to run against him in the primary just to get rid of him. What an utter disappointment. And now the GOP wants to let him head up the RNC?! Did I step throught the looking glass? Someone please change the channel from this comedy of errors I’m witnessing.
raz0r on November 13, 2006 at 10:59 PM
…doesn’t make any difference whether he’s replied to or not…he can drop by, cut and paste, and go back to his little girlfriends at DU with encouraging words….
…and, being without character themselves, the DU-ies will take heart, feeling themselves so clever, completley unaware that folks here — who *have* character — get frustrated sometimes, vent and grumble…and step away from the computer and do their magic out in the *real* world.
They think they won a mandate. They’re re-arranging all the furniture. They take anger for defeatism. They’re all crowding the table at the Mad Hatter’s tea party.
Grebrook and his little sisters would be useless cut up for bait. You can’t stop his stealing. Probably should stop bothering to reply to him, though. It makes him feel less inconsequential.
Puritan1648 on November 13, 2006 at 11:27 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »