MSNBC Poll: Should Bush be impeached?
posted at 7:00 pm on November 10, 2006 by Ian
I’m not surprised by the results, nor by the way the answers were worded:
Get ready for the liberal blogs to call this a mandate.
Join Ed and Allahpundit on Facebook!
GreenRoom
- Chris Matthews tired of being asked if he still feels ‘thrill up his leg’
- Feds forced to release list of words used to monitor online speech
- The enduring legacy of Elizabeth Warren’s tribal roots
- Is the Obama campaign really incompetent?
- Calling a spade a spade: most forms of entitlement reform are theft
- Thou Shalt Not Steal…Unless You Have To
- Barack Obama: Scatologist in chief
- Senator Jon Kyl, sequestration, and the economy
- TV chef Lidia Bastianich sued for stealing tips from staff at swanky restaurant
- Movie Review: “For Greater Glory”
Hot Links
|
|
Feeds
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Ok, I’ll admit I missed that one, and that I must have mistaken… (Unless he changed his mind and had a later program that was anti-minuteman)….. Anyway, That has been my impression for several months, and perhaps I have been incorrrect.
Nonetheless, I don’t believe that O’Reilly is anything but a Populist.
As far as calling me a LIAR…. If YOU have ever been incorrect about anything, then I guess YOU must be a liar too, huh?
Now; Am I wrong that he thought that the Swift Boaters were not telling the truth?
LegendHasIt on November 10, 2006 at 10:55 PM
DannoJyd, I suggest sobering up before commenting again.. you’ve clearly gone off the deep end over the election. Hey, I was virtually silent for a couple days, but you’re cross in to a land of ridiculous reserved for Kos Kids.
Basically what you’re saying is you refuse to give any grounds for impeachment other than “I don’t like him”. Do you have any idea how much you sound like a Kos Kid? Seriously.
And voiceofreason, it would take a book to go in to detailed explanations of how ridiculous your comments were… But don’t you think you’re just a bit extreme saying “Bush obliterated everything we built in the last 26 years.”? Come on. And saying that the Dems can do with him what they wish? Yeah, because that’s constructive. Not only is your clowniness legitimate grounds for impeachment, allowing them to “do what they want” would only benefit the Dems bud, I hate to break it to you. Do you think the American people are going to come out in droves to vote in Republicans after a Bush impeachment. Again, it’s just such a large issue that I can’t even begin to get in to if you don’t already get it.. it involves how powerful the left has been at manipulating the media even out of power, and how much worse it will be now, etc…
RightWinged on November 10, 2006 at 11:00 PM
correction
should read:
Not only is your clowniness NOT legitimate grounds for impeachment,
RightWinged on November 10, 2006 at 11:02 PM
RightWinged, I’ve offered my personal reasons for wanting to see the impeachment hearings to be carried out. Mine are not the ridiculous reasons that the liberals offer, but they will do as Bush has decided that we republicans need to be more bipartisan.
Bush will cave into the democrats when he wants so I will follow his lead.
DannoJyd on November 10, 2006 at 11:14 PM
RightWinged…..DannoJyd he has immigration fears…that is his total problem….he is mad that more MexCans will be in his neighborhood. To hell with the damage to the country, if Bush is going to let the MexCans into DannoJyd neighborhood he gets real scared and real noisy.
Limerick on November 10, 2006 at 11:46 PM
That’s my point… your personal reasons don’t mean shit. Impeachment has nothing to do with your “personal feelings”, it has to do if there were grounds for impeachment. “Personal feelings” are how the emotional left deals with things. Not us.
RightWinged on November 10, 2006 at 11:53 PM
Going to bed RightWinged…good luck with that fool Danno…..if you nuke him let me know.
God Bless the Veterans!!!!
Limerick on November 10, 2006 at 11:56 PM
“Populists” are defined as being economically liberal and socially conservative.
O’Reilly is socially conservative, which you don’t seem to be denying if you’re calling him a populist.
But as for his “economic liberalism”, where’s your proof? O’Reilly openly supports a flat tax, welfare reform and “tax cuts for the rich”. Hence, he is not a populist, he’s simply an all-around conservative, as populists would oppose such measures.
Grebrook on November 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
God bless the vets indeed… as for Danno, I believe he’s been thoroughly nuked, and I just put the nail in his coffin.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 12:02 AM
Gee, I guess I (and my dictionary) are wrong about the definition of populist. I (and my dictionary) always thought that being a populist was: “CLAIMING to be ‘for the common man’ for political or personal gain”.
Here’s a deal for you:
How about if I concede the argument to you and agree that O’Reilly is a total Conservative, and that I was mistaken about him.
In return you apologize to me for for calling me a liar?
LegendHasIt on November 11, 2006 at 12:10 AM
How about everyone agrees that O’Reilly’s politics don’t mean shit to anyone here? And the liberals can continue to hate him for donating tons of money to charity and for pressing for and getting action on Jessica’s law around the country, and go on regurgitating lefty site talking points.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 12:22 AM
I don’t think Bush should be impeached.
frankj on November 11, 2006 at 12:29 AM
What… Are you the only one permitted to carry on long tirades and personal attacks here? When did Michelle hire you to be the arbiter of all discussions on HotAir?
LegendHasIt on November 11, 2006 at 12:30 AM
Are you talking to me LegendHaslt? I’m not telling anyone they are or aren’t permitted to do anything, I just think if you guys step back and consider how silly it is to argue about something like O’Reilly’s politics, you might save yourself some time. By all means, carry on if you wish… I just don’t see the point of arguing with someone like Grebrook. Don’t get me wrong, I can’t fault you for falling in to the trap because I’ve been there myself (with his type), but it’s a fruitless battle.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 12:38 AM
Yes, I was RightWinged… I should have made that clear.
Also thought that you were accusing ME of “regurgitating lefty site talking points.”
Although I would think that accurately defining O’Reilly’s position IS kind of important since it is obvious that no matter who is correct about his leanings, as the cable news time-slot leader he is a significant national figure; and his quotes ARE often used by the left to try to make a point. (And since Michelle is a frequent guest on his program, O’Reilly’s stance on issues can be used against her as well.)
LegendHasIt on November 11, 2006 at 12:51 AM
I’m in the 4.4% .. come on, you have to admit Bush has made some mistakes, the man isn’t perfect.
What I’d be interested in knowing is if MSNBC had this type of poll when Clinton was being impeached.
Anywho, the number of voters is problem correct, MSNBC.com is one of the most visited sites on the web .. they have Newsweek on their website too.
Ian on November 11, 2006 at 12:51 AM
To be clear LegendHaslt, I found the whole O’Reilly discussion boring because it’s been done to death and liberals have their talking points and it always goes no where.. but from glancing over the comments, I gathered that you were on the right side of the thing and I was accusing Grebrook of spouting lefty talking points… And I was really just trying to save you some time.
And Ian, did you check out my links in earlier comments back to your old site and a post of mine from February, revealing what these lefties do everytime these MSNBC.com polls come out? The polls may have been intended for regular visitors of the site, but whenever the poll is of this variety, the lefties “freep” or “smurf” the poll, because… I guess they get their kicks out of it… I’m not really sure why they think it’s the cool thing to do.. but the fact is, that is what leads to the numbers. Yes, MSNBC’s viewership is a liberal one, but even still these numbers wouldn’t be anywhere close to this if it was any batch of rational human beings.. it’s simply the pointless, lame, and childish tactics of the left, and that’s all. It’s really just stupid and means nothing, other than the fact it may make an average reader who doesn’t spend more than a few minutes digesting news every day thing “wow, Bush must really be a lot worse than I ever knew”, and again… sure that’s their problem if they’re that stupid… but it turns in to our problem when we realize that being idiots doesn’t prevent them from voting, and cancelling out informed votes.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 2:09 AM
I do not know about the number of voters being correct…when I was a member of ProtestWarrior.com we always caught DU rallying people to vote several times on these polls.
EnochCain on November 11, 2006 at 2:21 AM
Constantine blathered: “Not getting court approval to do the wiretapping is a violation of the law. Period.
You WISH he was only wiretapping AQ:”
First of all, fool, the list of US Supreme Court cases that allow the President to wiretape and conduct searches without a warrant for foreign intelligence purposes is longer than your arm. But you and talkingpoints have never bothered to look them up, have you? Ask nicely and I’ll provide an extended list.
Point 2. Feel free to prove that Bush ordered the wiretapping of anybody OTHER than Al Qaeda without a warrant.
georgej on November 11, 2006 at 2:46 AM
Constantine filled his diaper with: “You’d think law and order Republicans would be interested in prosecuting violations of the law.”
We would — but there weren’t any with respect to the NSA intercepts.
georgej on November 11, 2006 at 2:50 AM
Grebrook,
Alan Colmes, ya dork. Oh, and O’Reilly ain’t much of a conservative.
Now check the ratings, and f*ck off, troll.
Pablo on November 11, 2006 at 5:00 AM
What makes you think you’d like President Cheney any better, Danno?
Pablo on November 11, 2006 at 5:04 AM
My mother has an expression she uses to describe certain kinds of people: “injustice collectors”. Sorta just jumped into my mind…
honora on November 11, 2006 at 8:41 AM
I don’t believe those poll results even a little. The only thing you can call it a mandate for is removing MSNBC News from your news links!
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 10:36 AM
rocked on November 11, 2006 at 10:45 AM
The only reason they want to impeach bush is for revenge from cliton.
Pathetic.
Mazztek on November 11, 2006 at 11:32 AM
Don’t worry Josh, there’s no reason to believe them (see all of my previous comments, starting towards the top). It was “freeped” or “smurfed” by the far left from their favorite blog(s).
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 12:54 PM
Personal reasons DO mean shit! We just saw that in the last election where the majority of Americans voted for Impeachment, cut-and-run, and ignoring the border security problem for their own personal reasons! Like it or not, the BDS, terrorist supporting crowd won, and now have their mandate.
Please explain to me why I should not go along with the majority when Bush is.
Limerick, you continue to ignore the reality of last Tuesdays vote. You can run but you cannot hide. Impeachment was voted for by the majority, and thus will happen. I didn’t vote for it, but I will be realistic. Maybe you are amongst those who feel guilty because of the way you voted? I am certain that many Americans will feel guilty very soon as impeachment will happen.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 12:54 PM
Methinks what we need here is a troll poll. How about this one?
Do you believe that trolls should be
a) impeached AND suppressed,
b) sent to GITMO and water-boarded,
c) simply ignored,
d) forgiven and issued honorary RINO certificates,
e) all killed and sorted out later (see quotes of Pope Innocence III),
f) subjected to evolutionary, mutant, retard butt-sex with Borat or other bizarre medical experiments,
g) issued a “Press pass” and given a time slot on MS-NBC adjacent to Keith Olbermann,
h) outed for who they really are (ever suspect that Allah is “making these people up” just for fun?)
g) permitted to date Britney Spears and/or other celebrities
CyberCipher on November 11, 2006 at 12:57 PM
1) Cheney is a much better communicator, and it appears that he wouldn’t cave into liberal demands as fast as Bush has.
2) Democrats are scared to death of the idea of President Cheney.
3) With Cheney in the White House we could place Steele, or another worthy Conservative in as VP.
4) I believe that Cheney understands that a majority of Americans are demanding that our borders be secured.
5) After being successful at removing Bush the democrats would have a very difficult time in trying to get rid of Cheney while maintaining that they are willing to be bipartisan. Their blatant hatred would be apparent to even a blind man.
6) Cheney could pardon Bush!
IMHO, Cheney moving into the top spot wuld be a win-win-win situation.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 1:02 PM
Who ARE you? Are you SURE that you’re not from Wyoming?
You’re not Lynne Cheney, are you?
(Don’t take offense. Not meant as a criticism. You’re supposed to laugh.)
CyberCipher on November 11, 2006 at 1:12 PM
Oh yes! Let us all get rid of the trolls so that we can pretend that America is safer, and Americans would never vote in a manner that would hurt us. We deserve to live in our fantasy happy lands, and will vote out any who disturb it with facts. Indeed, the liberals working to Impeach our President for ridiculous reasons isn’t even happening! Americans would never support that. Vote for irrelevance today!
Face the reality of the day. Americans just elected the BDS crowd to Congress, and that will help Hitlary in her bid to be President. We can try to ignore all of that, or brace ourself for the worst that is yet to come. My message is simple. Bush can either act as our POTUS, or he can coddle up to the BDS crowd and expect to face impeachment with few in his corner. There is no middle ground as the liberals have already refuted that.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 1:19 PM
Thanks for the laugh CyberCipher, but what is so wrong with people from Wyoming? I must have missed the punchline as I live in lower Michigan amongst the hillbillys today. BTW, the majority down here voted Republican. ;o)
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 1:21 PM
Your right of course. Freeping happens constantly on web polls. I remember during the arrest of that teacher who had sexual relations with one of her students, seeing a poll online somewhere asking if the legal age limit of what was considered to be a minor should be lowered to allow the occasional relationship between adults in their 30s and young teens. The poll results were overwhelmingly in favor of lowering the age limit. So you know a teenporn blog somewhere had to be linking to the news site.
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 1:26 PM
I agree that the poll must have been freeped, but can we ignore the fact that Americans voted for the party that promises to Impeach Bush? I think not.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 1:32 PM
Americans didn’t vote for the party that promised to Impeach Bush. The Republicans voters just didn’t go out and vote. Unfortunately, we know this to be the case. As for the democrats who did go out and vote, they’re not interested in “a new course” as the Dems so love to put it. If they were, Lieberman wouldn’t have been elected. The Democrats better be careful. If they spend the next two years trying to arrest, imprison or impeach Republicans while terrorists get stronger, the American voters will bury the Democratic party for good in 2008!
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 1:42 PM
So now you’re arguing with yourself? If the Democrats are scared to death of President Cheney, why would they impeach Bush? (quick, come up with a new piece of spin… your best bet will be “I mean… uh… they’ll impeach both… yeah”, which based on the discussion you were having when you made the Cheney comment was clearly not what you meant)
Anyway, I see you’ve reached a level of lunacy not even achieved by most of the nutroots and I won’t bother explaining how stupid your claim that “voters voted for impeachment” is. I can almost guarantee you that if someone was to do an actual poll on whether Bush should be impeached, the number wouldn’t even reach 40%.
It’s one thing to spin, but your spin is beyond idiotic. You insist that because you don’t like Bush he should be impeached. I repeat – your “personal opinion” doesn’t mean shit. There have to be grounds for impeachment, like it your not you psychotic and/or drunk retard.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 2:04 PM
Between me, my father, my brothers and now my son we have a total of 84 years of Military service to this great country. Several of us with top secret clearances. To this country and our men and women in the military safe certain things need to be done and be kept AS A NEED TO KNOW BASIS. Far too much is being leaked which puts us in danger. Let the President, CIA, FBI, etc do thier jobs. I for one have nothing to hide so if my phone is tapped then they are getting to know my grandsons. I want a President with the balls to kick some ass than some draft dodger, chicken shit, lier, adulter, I can keep going but you get my drift. My son will probably be going back to Iraq and damn it, I want him to be able to shoot first, ask questions second.
ChrisIansNana on November 11, 2006 at 2:07 PM
Thank you for you and your family’s service ChrislansNana.
So you mean, you don’t hate the President? Why aren’t you a media darling globe trotting on the left’s dime, calling for criminal charges being brought against everyone in the Bush administration, calling him a murderer, hanging out with Chavez, etc. etc.? Wait, I think I already know the answer. Hey CNN, Fox, NY Times, Networks, etc… Why aren’t you profiling ChrislansNana and making a star out of him/her?
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 2:56 PM
Here are some links that prove the impeachment issue is relevant…
Impeach Bush, Impeach Bush, Impeach Bush, Impeach Bush. Here you can find about 1000 more articles on Impeaching Bush, and those who allowed the BDS crowd to regain Congress are to be thanked for making this possible [/sarc.].
I do not believe that there is precedent to impeach both the President and the VP at the same time, but impeaching a President is most possible as Republicans showed how it is done back in the late 90′s.
Buddy, you can duck and complain about the issue, but it will happen. Americans voted for it, and ignorance is not a viable excuse which allows them to deny that, thus I will shove this issue down all of their throats. Enjoy!
Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 3:16 PM
So we’re clear, again DannoJyd, you’ve provided no grounds for impeachment. Seriously sober up and read your own comments, you sound like such an effing retard “Americans voted for it”… Anyone else care to waste their time with this idiot?
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 3:27 PM
Sir, the party that wants to Imeach Bush won the last election. They were voted in, and no matter how we try to excuse that the fact remains that America voted for the Impeach Bush party.
Democrats do not need to be careful. The election is over, and now their insideous work will begin unchecked.
You will soon see that America also made it easier for a Hitlary win in 08. Republicans have no clear candidate at this time, and with the recent elections it will be an almost insurmountable task to regain control of the Federal Government. Unless the same cut-and-run conservatives who allowed the BDS crowd to gain power will actually work to correct this error all will remain lost. As a 2 time GOP volunteer I can assure you that many of those fine people will not return to help in 08.
Ya know, that would make a pretty good poll. Will you assist the GOP in ’08′ by signing up as a volunteer?
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 3:28 PM
RightWinged, you didn’t read the articles I supplied the links to or you would know that they already have their grounds for Impeachment. All that remains is for the liberals to be sworn in.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 3:35 PM
My son said when he returned from Iraq “The U.S. needs to be in Iraq!!!” “We are liked by the people of Iraq and we are making a difference there” The media is full of shit. Cindy Sheehan spits on the memory of her son!!!!!!!! She brings nothing but disgrace to everything he stood for!! If she was in front of me I would slap her face. Americans didn’t vote to impeach Bush, they didn’t vote for the so called conservatives that didn’t have the balls to stand up and be true conservative.
ChrisIansNana on November 11, 2006 at 3:39 PM
ChrisIansNana, America voted into power those who have slandered our fine Heroes, are pushing to remove Bush via Impeachment, and are poised to push through their cut-and-run plan. Bush is all too ready to look for compromise, and if he does cave then he will again have allowed our troops to leave before their job is finished. Despicable!
I have the utmost respect for your son and all of his comrades, and I absolutely despise those who allowed the party of terrorist enablers to regain power in America.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 3:52 PM
Where can I get a bumper sticker that says Don’t look at me I voted Republician?
DannoJyd
I could have done without Stabinow and Grandholm for another term!! (sorry spelling of names) Maybe they can lead us to be number 50 in the nations econony eh? Won’t that be something.
ChrisIansNana on November 11, 2006 at 4:12 PM
Why, DannoJyd, are you so afraid to make your own case? Those were just the bogus liberal impeachment talking points we’ve heard for a long time. But you are claiming to be a right-winger in support of impeaching Bush, apparantly because we lost the election. I’ve BEGGED YOU to give me grounds for impeachment, and you’ve repeatedly told me it’s your “personal” opinion. Now you throw out so ridiculous links? Okay then DannoJyd, I’ll take your bait… Are you saying Bush lied us in to Iraq? Are you saying Bush has advocated torture and broken Geneva conventions? Do you believe Bush’s wiretapping programs violate the constitution? Despite the bullshit that lies benieth all of those “cases for impeachment”, at least they are something to be debated… the same can’t be said for anything you’ve said.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 4:28 PM
You missed my point completely. There is a difference between Democrat party leaders and Democrat voters. The voters are the receivers of deception and their leaders are the source of that deception. My point is that the Democrat voters did not vote for impeachment and they most certainly did not vote for withdrawal from Iraq. If they had, Lieberman would not have won! As for the Democrat leaders, they are the ones who need to be careful. Read all the words, my friend.
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 4:34 PM
Why do you think that the Lefties (Rangel for instance, but many others) are demanding that Bush fire Cheney? They aren’t going to actually impeach President Bush until Cheney is gone.
If they can get Bush to dump Cheney like they did with Rumsfeld. I believe that congress DOES get the right of refusal on a Vice Presidential replacement pick –
Then, depending on their timing, if they DON’T approve a replacement pick before they Impeach him, then Nancy Pelosi (or whoever else they decide on as Speaker in January) gets to be President. (Constitutional Scholars please correct me if I’m wrong; but I don’t believe I am.).
Although they would probably settle for some wishy-washy version of a pseudo-conservative RINO to replace Cheney.
But anyway, I doubt that they will allow any situation where Cheney gets to move into the White House.
THAT IS WHY THEY ARE TRYING SO HARD TO GET BUSH TO DUMP CHENEY.
If Bush caves on that, like he did Rumsfeld (Yeah, Yeah, I know, I keep repeating myself on that, but it really ‘sticks in my craw’.) then I’ll guarantee that within 24 hours of Cheney ‘resigning to spend more time with his family’ or due to ‘medical problems’, a Bill for Impeachment will be filed.
LegendHasIt on November 11, 2006 at 4:35 PM
If Bush dumps Cheney to get along with the Dems, then he deserves to get what’s coming to him. Maybe an impeachment would finally communicate to him how absurd trying to bring “a new tone” to Washington was. If America ever survives the war on terror, the history books in the years to come will not paint a pretty picture for the Democrats between 1993 and the present. They have constantly shown to all of us that no matter what’s going on in the world, POWER is all they want! They’ll spread hatred onto anyone of any race or religion while doing it in the name of compassion. They’ll speak any lie! They’ll accuse anyone! No one is safe! Even now while terrorists in Iraq plan and hope for our total destruction, Democrats plan and hope to impeach the President. Anything to win! Any means necessary! Shameless doesn’t even begin to describe them.
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 4:48 PM
You mean Stabacow, and I concur. We who worked for the MIGOP did everything we could to elect new people to those positions, but it appears that the Michigan voters who don’t live in Lower Michigan are happy with our current economic situation. As we’ve already lost 20,000+ residents over the past 4 years I guess we will continue to lose more. With liberals now in control of Congress we might see Michigan go up a few notches on the list while the economy tanks for the rest of the country. Sheesh!
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 5:45 PM
Joshua P. Allem, the majority of those who voted the democrats into power wouldn’t care if Bush was Impeached. Indeed, it would be easy to argue they would be dancing in the streets when that occurs. In reguards to those few who didn’t realize the liberals would Impeach, all I can say is what I posted earler, and that is that ignorance is no excuse. Whether they like it or not, they will get what they voted for just as will you, and I.
You are absolutely correct in your post of 4:48 PM.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 5:54 PM
RightWinged, I made my case. You are being redundant so as to to duck the issue.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 6:11 PM
Redundant? REDUNDANT!? Who’s being redundant? Worse, you just keep repeating your idiotic lines fit for Kos, and refusing to answer simple questions. You’re a weak minded… well, I’ll stop before I get banned, but you’re pathetic. You insist Bush should be impeached dozens of times, and keep putting it in bold for some unknown reason..
Now, as I said earlier, aside from the fact that you’re a total idiot if you think the net result of impeaching Bush would do anything but have a negative impact on the GOP and conservative ideas in our government…. You haven’t made a case for Bush’s impeachment. I beg you for a reason, you say it’s your “personal” opinion. I explain that this doesn’t matter, you need to have grounds for impeachment, not because you suddenly don’t like him and because enough of America were stupid enough to vote for Democrats (still no logic there anyway). You insist that your “personal opinion” that he should be impeached is good enough reason. Then, realizing how much of a retard you appear to be, go out and dig up some articles spouting the same old bogus liberal impeachment talking points. I ask you if you agree with the claims (i.e. Bush lied on WMD, illegally spying on Americans, approved torture, etc.) and you are such a fricken’ pussy that you can continue your long rants with everyone else.. but all you can come up with is to call me rendundant? Answer the effing question. Are those the reasons you agree with that are grounds for Bush impeachment? If not, give grounds please… How many times do I have to beg you.
(By the way, I know you don’t have an answer and you’re about as dishonest as any liberal I’ve ever encountered… but I thought I’d let you take another stab at it)
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 6:29 PM
I don’t know RightWinged, he said he agreed with my comment of 4:48.
Joshua P. Allem on November 11, 2006 at 6:38 PM
I predict the House will impeach Bush in 2007 but the Senate will narrowly vote against removal.
I also think there will be a surprising lack of conservative outcry against the proceedings as Bush continues the amnesty and border security undermining efforts.
MRegine on November 11, 2006 at 6:45 PM
Danno shat:
Pardon me for stating the obvious, but Danno, YOU are part of the BDS crowd!
Let me guess, your choice would be Pat Buchanan, wouldn’t it?
*snort*
(FYI, I like Gingrich too, but if you think he’s electable, you are even more clueless than your “impeach” comments here alone indicate. I’m thinking you’re just a Moby now.)
bamapachyderm on November 11, 2006 at 9:35 PM
That’s one reason why the GOP is frequently referred to as “The Party of Stupid.”
Bunch of spoiled ignoramuses. Y’all who think impeachment is called for because Bush is too liberal are nucking futs, and an embarrassment to conservatives everywhere. Ronald Reagan must be turning in his grave. Way to take a dump on his legacy, crazies.
bamapachyderm on November 11, 2006 at 9:40 PM
He’s just reaching out for someone to be on his side Joshua, after all the ridiculous things he’s said here (not sure if you read all of his comments before you arrived at the thread… they’re ridiculous.)
And bamapachyderm, I agree about Gingrich. I already made a prediction (to myself) earlier today that Gingrich will seek the nomination, as will Hillary for her party. We’ll be smart enough to realize he’s unelectable, and if the Dems stay true to form, they won’t be that smart and WILL make the unelectable Hillary as their nominee. That’s about the only ray of sunshine I can see right now. Sadly the media, who is more powerful than any branch of the government, can make a lot of things happen in the next couple years so it’s all up in the air. We saw what years of their bogus “scandals” lead to this round… can you imagine the field day they’re going to have with the constant investigations to come?
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 9:46 PM
I don’t know if that was a deliberate misspelling of Clinton, but still …
mikeyboss on November 11, 2006 at 10:47 PM
bamapachyderm, you post like a liberal when you are forced to resort to sophmoric insults because you have nothing else to offer.
RightWinged, the same goes for you. You continue to try to ignore the posts where I’ve answered all of the questions you have asked more than once. BTW, people here are begining to see my point, so why don’t you learn to embrace the horror as well?
America voted for the Impeach Bush Party, thus they have spoken. Why should I buck the majority? :oP
From Rush …
Endgame.
DannoJyd on November 11, 2006 at 11:03 PM
So for the record, you’re once again not going to provide grounds for Bush’s impeachment? You’re just going to slowly coast off in to “it’s just inevitable” territory, and do your gay little smiley’s like it’s some funny joke… after you’ve spent this entire thread supporting Bush’s impeachment, and repeatedly putting “impeach Bush” in bold?
Come on weakling, I’m going to give you yet another chance to give YOUR grounds for Bush’s impeachment. Not your “because I don’t like him anymore” opinion, and not the bogus reasons the left gives for impeachment… because if you supported and agreed with those, then it wouldn’t have taken the election to make you take the impeachment position, you’d have already been for it.
Let’s go DannoyJyd, I’m dying to hear it.
RightWinged on November 11, 2006 at 11:31 PM
I don’t have to provide a thing as the liberals continue to do the work that Americans don’t want to. :oP
Champaign-Urbana Votes to Withdraw from Iraq and Impeach Bush-Cheney; Other Illinois Cities Vote to Withdraw from Iraq
The people have spoken!
DannoJyd on November 12, 2006 at 3:14 PM
I repeat:
Let’s go DannoyJyd, I’m dying to hear it. And wtf does some county voting to withdraw from Iraq have to do with impeachment you retard? Oh that’s right, you’ve fully gone over to the left now, so instead of addressing direct question you throw out diversions. That is a classic liberal move we’re all familiar with. But to that end (withdrawal), I suggest you check out Malkin’s latest post.
Again, that’s a diversion, I’m still waiting for you to lay the grounds for impeachment. You won’t because you’re too busy acting like a middle school girl by laying down the gay little tongue sticking out smiley faces. Clever bud.
RightWinged on November 12, 2006 at 4:57 PM
You continue to ignore the very real fact that America voted for the Impeachment of Bush. I am willing follow the President’s example, and work with the side that now holds America’s confidence. What other reason is needed? I am certain that you too will support Bush’s decision to totally capitulate, and now follow the leadership offered by the Impeach Bush Party.
America has spoken. Embrace the horror! Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 13, 2006 at 4:42 PM
I’m honestly asking you… are you retarded? There is no other explanation, because I’ve never even met a liberal this dishonest.
I repeat:
RightWinged on November 13, 2006 at 5:56 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2