Republicans lost. We should accept that decision rendered by America, and follow the lead of our POTUS by also compromising with the liberals. If you don’t like that then blame it on those who voted for Impeachment at the polls, not on a GOP volunteer. Your ire is misplaced. :oP

Honora, bless her heart, is “half clueless,” in that she is in denial about how our enemies are relying upon the Democratic Party to give them what they cannot obtain on the battlefield — victory. The same victory that the Democrats gave to the Communist Vietnamese in December 1974 when they cut off all military assistance, including spare parts and ammunition, to South Vietnam.

If the leadership of the Democratic Party follows through on their threats of massive investigations and subpoenas (ref. Henry Waxman’s comments this week and Conyers’ promise of an impeachment investigation), and also appeases their cut-and-run base, they will help deliver a massive terrorist strike against the United States and the rest of us will hold them directly and personally accountable.

Well I already told you that Communist and terrorists would be happy. Gateway Pundit found that Al Qaeda in Iraq is celebrating and claiming victory. Hot Air found that Iran is also claiming victory and Syria is relieved. And did you know the firs…

You need to cite the offenses. Make your case, I will listen.

AZ_Redneck on November 11, 2006 at 9:21 PM

Thank you as that is very kind of you to offer, but instead of trying to swim upstream I’ll just allow the issues which makes Bush impeachable to me to play out. As they occur you can be certain that I’ll point them out, and I believe that by doing it in this manner we will find less to disagree on.

I’ll leave you with this tidbit from Rush …

These folks [democrats] have no interest in oversight. Oversight is the technique. Oversight is the umbrella. Oversight is the mask and the camouflage that will mislabel. These are going to be full-fledged investigations, and it doesn’t matter how bipartisan the president promises to be, because we had a caller that said they hate me — and they do, but they hate Bush. They hate Bush. They hate Bush, and they are going to do whatever they can to pay him back and dispatch him back to Crawford as disrespected as they can. They got payback on their mind for Clinton, and they have this in mind for everybody they think stands in their way.

I agree with Rush, but I prefer to take it a step further by pointing out that the American Voters voted for this. You see, I want them to remember what they got for their effort. ;o)

I chose to persue impeachment on grounds of betrayal AND dereliction of duty because that is relevant, and can be argued as fact.

Then you need to cite the offense, chapter and verse. Not -because I think so. Are we not a country of laws? Oddly, betrayal is not listed in the USC.

Should Bush stop shirking his sworn duty to America during this time of War I will happily change my mind and tone, but not before he does the job he was elected to do.

Then you forgive the puppet because he performed what you wanted? If he executed the violations that you speak of, should he not be prosecuted? Again, are we not a countyr of laws, or, are all violations absolved because DannoJyd approves?

You need to cite the offenses. Make your case, I will listen.

“Ummm, I really don’t know how to answer thqt question, I have no clue, the Democrats have no clue, so therefore I will not answer.”

BIZZZZT! Sorry, wrong answer, but thanks for playin’.

From the doorway Bush and Rove stick their heads in the door and screams: NOVEMBER SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Then laughing they head on down the hallway, laughing harder as Hillary SCREAMS….. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!…

Can they blow The White House some time when Bushie is in Crawford and Nancy Pelosi is haunting it—measuring for Hillary’s drapes?

seejanemom on November 11, 2006 at 10:02 AM

I love the way you think, but let’s face facts. Who do the terrorists want to kill? Certainly not Pelousy. Her party assists the terrorists every chance that they can.

IMHO, Cheney should never be close to the White House when Bush is there, but I don’t know that we are being that diligent. [my current curse] Great shades of Speaker Pelousy!

If you are so freaked out with the potential of President Pelosi, why c?
AZ_Redneck on November 11, 2006 at 12:07 AM

I have decided to persue Impeachment because Americans just voted for that. They might not have realized that, but such are the facts. Personally, I hope that everyone who stayed home, or voted for the BDS crowd chokes on their actions.

I chose to persue impeachment on grounds of betrayal AND dereliction of duty because that is relevant, and can be argued as fact. The BDS crowd make their issues out of thin air. Should Bush stop shirking his sworn duty to America during this time of War I will happily change my mind and tone, but not before he does the job he was elected to do.

I’m still waitin’ to hear your side’s ‘plan’. How do we get out of Iraq?

They’re gonna cut and run, you know, I know it, and the terrorists are giddy about it.

I first noticed this syndrome when my late brother went off on his first of six “trips” to Viet Nam. A small vocal minority of smelly hippies thought it was cool to be antiestablishment and side with the communist and to protest our troops.

Back then the under current of the Cold War was more like a rip tide. The agents of darkness were very active here in the States. They found allies in groups like the Students for a Democratic Society and the like. Many members of those groups decided to test the waters and were swept away in the current. They were well funded, well spoken and the forces of darkness were successful, they had found the surrogates they needed, that fifth column to help fight America. Communism vs. America; in Viet Nam, darkness prevailed.

Now we face another determined enemy. The smelly hippies of the past who were touched by the dark side are now law professors and politicians and political advisors. Are they still doing what they did before? Is being perceived as “cool” and “antiestablishment” more desirable than being viewed as loyal???

I’m still waitin’ to hear your side’s ‘plan’. How do we get out of Iraq? Maybe YOU can tell us how we should handle this war. And when I say ‘this war’ I mean the whole thing, not just the Battle of Iraq.

Tony737 on November 10, 2006 at 5:12 PM

I am leaving in a half hour to catch a plane, remember to ask me this Wed when I get back; only if you can promise not to use whatever I say as relief to you own POV. Deal?

Sorry, not our problem anymore… ask Howard Dean & Nancy Pelosi.

(sarcasm) We should just leave and let the country tear itself apart on CNN, because Iraqi deaths don’t matter. Why should I care if Habibi or Akmed die, they aren’t American, and they don’t vote. Why should I care if Iran and Syria just carve up Iraq and the oil reserves, it’s not my side of the planet. They aren’t posing a threat to us. (/sarcasm)

E L Frederick on November 10, 2006 at 5:01 PM

First, I was talking to Tony. Second, I don’t recall being told we were invading Iraq to save Habibi and Akmed. This movable feast of rationale is getting old.

Maybe you could trump up the charges with smirking or cowboying and gain some mileage.

Americans understand that all points of view have merit even when not popular.

You can freely exercise your First Amendment right, however, all points do not have merit.

suggest Para-Ord… Light Double Action is the way to go in my opinion.

Very nice choice.

Thought there was more mileage with name recognition in the other two.

I happen to agree with ALL that you just posted, yet that does not adress the issues facing America today. We have the terrorists proposing hitting the White House, and we must take that threat seriously. We must face the real possibility that we could end up with President Pelousy [freaks me out!] should they succeed while Bush, and Cheney were inside. Due to our POTUS playing games with border security we must increase the odds of another successful attack. What can we do?

America got the House Heroes [they fell on their swords] to try to close the borders even though they went against Bush by doing so. Now Bush, the man I worked to get elected in 04, and have stood by throughout the 06 elections, has decided to ignore his loyal base. What can we do?

IMHO, the White House is currently deaf on the border issue. Do you think they would hear Impeach Bush when it comes from Republicans? Until he decides to act as our commander-in-cheif I’ll be pushing that message. Heck, when the libs do decide to try to impeach him that just might get us back in power in 08. Nothing else that I can see would do so, and I refuse to sit back while Hitlary worms her self back in to America’s House. The only way that I can see him gaining in the polls is if he works to close the borders. The issue is that popular across the political spectrum.

Question my timing as that is relevant. ;o)

The President has done a lousy job at the border. However, so has the Congress. It’s not all Bush’s fault. Your ranting and raving about impeachment ruins any credibility you may of had at one point.

If your going to go and use that wide paintbrush to slap around “Dereliction of Duty” for anyone who doesn’t do exactly what you want, you’ll be left standing alone.

I am all for a more aggressive approach in Iraq. I am all for real, serious, militarized, boarder security. However, impeaching Bush will not get you what you want.

How is your ranting and raving helping the cause? How is what you are doing going to be productive? You are doing far more harm than good. Your not being part of the solution, your being part of the problem.

If you have actual helpful suggestions, lets hear them. However ranting about how Bush has betrayed us and we should impeach doesn’t help anyone.

Like it or not, impeachment will happen since the majority of Americans voted to allow that, and I will continue to support their attempt as long as Bush ignores the huge defence gap at our borders which allows the terrorists to come and go as they please. The POTUS needs to learn that he cannot shirk his duty as our commander-in-chief. Maybe facing Impeachment with very low polling numbers will wake him up to that fact. Maybe not.

Americans understand that all points of view have merit even when not popular. Didn’t you just fight for that right guaranteed under the Constitution? :oP