Video: Matthews begs Dean to cut and run more quickly from Iraq
posted at 3:02 pm on November 9, 2006 by Allahpundit
I missed this on Tuesday but Newsbusters rescued it from history’s scrap heap. Can it really be that Olbermann isn’t the most liberal newsbot on MSNBC? Judge for yourself.
Speaking of which, are you curious to know what happens when the voices in Olby’s head tell him it’s time for another Special Comment? All is revealed at dKos!
Update: MSNBC was the channel of choice at Democratic HQ, boasts a proud Chris Matthews.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
When do we get to put Matthews in Gitmo?
Robb H on November 9, 2006 at 3:05 PM
They have no friggin’ clue!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 9, 2006 at 3:10 PM
Matthews is a complete tool.
Its the first time I’ve ever watched Howard Dean where he wasnt the biggest jerk on the screen.
RobG on November 9, 2006 at 3:10 PM
It’s just the beginning folks. Mark my words…
TheBigOldDog on November 9, 2006 at 3:12 PM
Matthews is disgusting. He would like to see thousands of people die just to make Bush look bad.
Dean is just useless, he keeps saying “we”. “We”? Like he had anything to do with the election gains. Imagine how bad it would have been for the GOP if Dean was mildly competent?
reaganaut on November 9, 2006 at 3:13 PM
Bwahahahahahaha…
C’mon, folks, you think the media’s going to let the Democrats get away with drifting to the center following this sweeping victory? Now’s the time to push withdrawal from Iraq! Oh happy day! Failure is finally at hand!
I already e-mailed Feingold telling him to push for a timetable. You think I should call his office too, to really drive the point home?
Enrique on November 9, 2006 at 3:16 PM
(sarcasm) Of course we need to withdraw from Iraq. As soon as the evil, violent, barbaric Americans get out, the magical bunnies and unicorns can come in and cause a huge breakout of peace and harmony.
If it wasn’t for the American’s all of the Iraqi people would be living in peace and harmony under Saddam. (/sarcasm> /vomit
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:18 PM
I’m glad somebody saved this video online. I saw this when it aired around 8:00PM (Eastern) on election day.
This has got to be the earliest media attack on the Iraq policy of the Democratic majority. Dean says something almost reasonable, and he gets Chris Matthews screaming at him about immediate withdrawl. Classic.
Anton on November 9, 2006 at 3:19 PM
Matthews needs to get out more. The stale air in the studio has caused his brain to mold. How about a new program, “Meet the Bloggers” where toadies like Matthews have to face the likes of MM or HH? I guess the positive side is that the MSM is feigning partiality anymore.
windbag on November 9, 2006 at 3:19 PM
The far Left will not allow the Dems to pull back to the middle… like they need to for the NEXT election…
or… to simply govern.
Romeo13 on November 9, 2006 at 3:19 PM
On election night Snowcap want’s to hear Demo policy! Where the hell was that committment to making the Dems state their policy for the last year?
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 9, 2006 at 3:20 PM
Personally, I’d like to see Matthews up against Darth Misha over at the Rot. Misha would rip his head off.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:22 PM
And while I’m at it, what would Snowcap have done had his brother won the Lieutenant Governorship in PA.
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 9, 2006 at 3:24 PM
This is good. At the end, Matthews is beating up on Dean because we haven’t yet heard the Democrat’s position on Iraq. Was he bothered by this a week ago?
Carin on November 9, 2006 at 3:26 PM
Oh my God, this clip is sooooooo rich! Did Howard Dean just say we can’t pull out too quick because there would be chaos? THAT’S THE POINT HOWARD. He acts like chaos in which Muslims slaughter each other is a bad thing. Crap, why do Democrats persist in pretending that non-American human life is valuable?
The part where Chris Matthews says “Howard Dean believes we should stay in Iraq” is like beautiful music.
C’mon, Dems, don’t tell me you let me believe you’d pull out immediately only to give me this “we have to get out responsibly” crap. The time to be responsible has long past. Now’s the time for betrayal and fecklessness. WHY DO YOU THINK WE ELECTED YOU?!?!!?!?
Enrique on November 9, 2006 at 3:27 PM
Howard Dean, Howard Dean….wasn’t he the guy who warned about going into Iraq? Boy what an idiot.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 3:27 PM
Enrique, you might as well send a skywriter over his house for all the good complaining to Feingold is going to do you.
Ees no his yob, mang.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 3:28 PM
Yeah, yeah… rainbows, magical unicorns and bears… peace and prosperity… blah blah blah… Saddam was better than the US… blah blah blah…. Iraqi deaths don’t matter, only American… blah blah blah… if we’d leave they’d live in peace… yadda yadda…
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:31 PM
I’m still waitin’ to hear about their “Plan” for Iraq. I bet it’ll sound something like this: (In the voice of a 12 year old girl) “Well, first, we like *totally* train their *army*? Then, like we um, like start withdrawling? Then we have Britney Spears give a concert for them? And THEN we make peace with Iran? Then, we like TOTALLY feed South Korea! What? Nuh UH! It is SOOOO *not* NORTH Korea! It IS??? SHUT! UP! For REAL?”
Tony737 on November 9, 2006 at 3:33 PM
What? You mean even Dean won’t give a time table?
Yeah, I guess it was much easier on them when all they had to do was criticize the Right.
Esthier on November 9, 2006 at 3:34 PM
Right. Cause this way is so much better.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 3:38 PM
Timetable for WHAT??? The Pubs gave ‘em a chance to vote on a pullout timetable. THREE Dhimmis voted for it!
Tony737 on November 9, 2006 at 3:38 PM
Hmmm. Because it is? (I gather you’re not from the evangelical side of the party, the side that claims that a bunch of undifferentiated cells in a petri dish is a life?) LOL
honora on November 9, 2006 at 3:40 PM
It beats doing nothing.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:40 PM
Ok. So, Dean believes that we shouldn’t “cut and run” but should try to stabalize the situation in Iraq before we attempt to leave. Hmm. Sound like what EVERY FRIGGIN REPUBLICAN SAID AND WAS BLASTED ON!
BTW, anyone notice that Matthews is more liberal than the Chairman of the Democratic National Committee? Is that sad or what?
americanpundit on November 9, 2006 at 3:42 PM
HAHA. The Dems know why they won. I’m suprised to see them not shooting themselves in the foot immediately. The left is going to be “left” out in the cold. Pun intended.
Hamsher has to be having a puppy over this, Iran too.
Theworldisnotenough on November 9, 2006 at 3:42 PM
Shall I add this to the list:
REASONS FOR INVADING IRAQ:
1)WMD
2)Saddam ties to 9/11
3)Plant a democracy in the mid-east
4)Fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here
5)If we leave all hell breaks loose
6)It beats doing nothing
Well frankly it’s a bit weak, but on the plus side, these rationales have an increasingly short shelf life so what the hell.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 3:43 PM
Tell that to the 2.5 dhimmis in Darfur.
And you forgot to add the number of UN Resolution against Saddam that he was in violation of.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:45 PM
Did the Deaner just refuse to give a timetable?
Opinionnation on November 9, 2006 at 3:48 PM
Why don’t I just put these in an omnibus category: “other stuff that pisses us off” Good.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 3:49 PM
Am I wrong but doesn’t the pic…well….are these guys stem-cell clones? Just asking?
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 3:51 PM
Honora, anytime you want a one way ticket to Darfur, Pakistan so you can tell us how great it is to live under Sharia as a woman… I’ll hook ya up.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 3:53 PM
Now that’s comedy.
Benaiah on November 9, 2006 at 3:53 PM
Reasons for invading Iraq:
1. They have oil and we want it.
2. If you have a problem with that walk to work.
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 9, 2006 at 3:56 PM
You know, honora, you could go read the Joint Authorization for the Use of Military force in Iraq, but that would screw your little game up, wouldn’t it?
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 3:59 PM
Particularly when you point out to her who all voted in favor.
thirteen28 on November 9, 2006 at 4:01 PM
Darfur is in the Sudan. So there’s at least 2 reasons you won’t be booking any flights for me anytime soon.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:04 PM
And particularly since regime change in Iraq was US policy established and endorsed by her precious hero the Slickster and all his dem buddies. Let’s see… that would be what… pre-Bush, wouldn’t it?
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 4:05 PM
how nice it to see Howard Dean “NOT” give a timetable & yet liberal democrats like Enrique & honora voted for the democats to “cut & run / surrender / raise the white flag” lol
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:11 PM
Passed the Senate 77-23 (21 Dems and 2 independents against)
Passed the House 296-133 (127 Dems and 6 Reps against)
So the Dems were half wrong. I’ll take that.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:12 PM
i guess the far-left website Moveon.org and other American hating groups like the ACLU & Code Pink are “NOT” going to get their wishes after all. gee, i wonder what Cindy”Baghdad”Sheehan is saying right now
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:15 PM
Jesus you people just won’t learn will you?
First, you clowns got us into this–as noted above, half of the Dems were against it. Now that we are there, there are a real dearth of good solutions–a situation you seem loathe to accept accountability for, typical. Dean is being responsible, though he had the good sense to predict this disaster, he is now going to try to figure out how to clean it up. Cut and run? How about stop and think?
You need to understand that the people have just told all you folks to sit down with a nice tall glass of shut the fuck up. At least have the sense to recognize when you have lost legitimacy, a la Rumsfeld.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:17 PM
…your country is at war. Or, it isn’t your country, because *THIS* country is at war.
Don’t like it? Emigrate.
Puritan1648 on November 9, 2006 at 4:20 PM
should be interesting to see jus thow long the Dems and their media people tread water without doing anything.
People like them usually don’t ever want to be in power or have responsibility and the realities there, they want to chase after it however.
What an unserious bunch of weirdoes.
benrand on November 9, 2006 at 4:21 PM
THE ONLY THING THATS “pulling out” is Matthews head (or worse)out of Dean’s tight ass…
As soon as those butt burps get into the data and realize what a bloodbath the Pentagon knows it will be…They’ll COME TO JESUS LIKE THE REST OF US.
seejanemom on November 9, 2006 at 4:24 PM
so honora, i guess that you liberals rather fight the terrorists ( i mean “freedom fighter” as your hero Cindy Sheehan has said many times before) here & have more American deaths.
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:28 PM
…
Didn’t you say you weren’t going to waste any more of your time on me? I beg you, hold that thought.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:28 PM
Honora wrote: “You need to understand that the people have just told all you folks to sit down with a nice tall glass of shut the fuck up. At least have the sense to recognize when you have lost legitimacy, a la Rumsfeld.”
Who the @#$%& are YOU to tell us the WE don’t have legitimacy, woman?
You side won an election. And that election was NOT for Godhood!
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 4:30 PM
It’s like trying to reason with a sack of rocks. Yeah, that’s exactly right, your insight is blinding.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:30 PM
It’s like trying to reason with a sack of rocks. Yeah, that’s exactly right, your insight is blinding.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:30 PM
you see Puritan, liberals don’t see this as a “war” persay, they see it as a “Law enforcement” problem”
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:30 PM
I was meaning to saying Darfur or Sudan, but as usual, my hands got ahead of me.
Yes I know my geography….
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:31 PM
gee, why are you so harsh in you terrorist pals, that’s not being liberal of you
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:31 PM
correction – gee honora, why are you so harsh on your terrorist pals, that’s not being liberal of you
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:33 PM
We keep saying the same thing about your side.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:33 PM
…actually, I was using you as an example…much as a parent would point out a skid-row drunkard or holding tank felon to his offspring…”See what happens if you don’t eat your greens, Junior?”
…but, to spare your blood pressure, I assign you to oblivion…until you again seem useful.
Puritan1648 on November 9, 2006 at 4:34 PM
I take back any of the nice things I’ve said about you.
And I notice you skipped my post about regime change in Iraq being set as US policy by the Clintoonian Empire.
And don’t you remember all those empassioned speeches by some of the biggest dems who went on and on about what a real and emminent threat saddam was? But now those very same people are bleating exactly the opposite.
The reality is that saddam really had to be taken down, and that it was just the first step to attempt to reshape the middle east.
Won’t matter much now, because for the past 6 years an MSM completely in the tank for the dems has done nothing but work to obfuscate what’s going on there. Well, you guys finally got what you wanted. You’ve dispirited the American People to the point where we’ll probably pull out of Iraq and let it fall. Just like your kind did back in Vietnam. We were winning that one too, but in the modern world the only thing that matters is who has the cameras and microphones.
I accept my portion of the responsibility for actually wanting us to win this war on terror. I’m not running from it. I support our troops AND their mission.
This weak bullshit that’s about to happen is going to wind up killing millions that otherwise wouldn’t have to die so soon.
Our enemies LOVE that the dems won. Because they know you will keep us from fighting back. But I’m sure that’s ok with you.
Dems say that Republicans are the reason that America is hated around the world. That might be partly true. But another very real reason is that they know that we can’t be counted on to tough out the rough patches like we used to in WWII. They know that when things start getting bad, the dems will reign the country back in and give up and leave. It’s happened over and over.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 4:35 PM
Matthews is picking up where Russert left off. Remember the Mehlman/Dean appearance on Meet the Press? Russert asked Dean point blank, what’s your agenda? He asked for something specific from his so-called plan…and he gave him nothing. Flash forward to 11/7, and still, Dean and the Democrats have nothing.
This is going to be one hell of a ride!
budorob on November 9, 2006 at 4:36 PM
I’m the person who was against this war in the first place, who predicted that the likely outcome would be civil war and that the notion of planting a democracy in a country that is in every sense, tribal, is pure nonsense. I’m the person who saw terrorism as a much broader issue and one that makes national borders irrelevant.
Here is how legitimacy works: let’s say you take your car to a mechanic with some sort of problem. He misdiagnoses it over and over and over. At some point a lightbulb goes off and you say to yourself: “Self, perhaps this guy doesn’t know shit from beans about cars”. Lacks legitimacy in other words–so you go to another mechanic. You don’t get endless tries.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:37 PM
…actually, I was using you as an example…much as a parent
You zealots all have the same problem, no impulse control. Suck it up bro, you can do it.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:38 PM
Number 4) isn’t weak. Also add to that list: 7) restoring American credibility in the Middle East after 12 years of defiance by Saddam; 8) the knock-on effects like Col. Gaddafi surrening his nuclear program and the Cedar revolution; 9)the killing of Zarqawi; 10) peace and stability in 12 out of 17 of Iraq’s provinces (including tourist destination Kurdistan); 11) justice for Saddam’s victims
aengus on November 9, 2006 at 4:39 PM
I figured as much. Too much bitchy in my Cheerios this morning.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:40 PM
I’m just the warmonger who have been over there and chewed more dirt with the troops than John Kerry did in Vietnam. But of course, because I’m a Republican, I’m discounted.
Sorry Honora, you didn’t get a absolute moral authority card, so put the elite-est paint-brush down.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:40 PM
Bwhahahahaahahaaha!!! That’s rich. A lib preaching about impulse control! Damn that was funny.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 4:41 PM
Ok but how ’bout next time we get the reasons for going to war, before we go to war. This retroactive business is a little off, don’t you think? Sorta makes us look like we don’t know what we’re doing.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:43 PM
Isn’t that like having a plan for Iraq before we get elected… pot/kettle anyone?
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:44 PM
Somebody needs to point out to Honora and the rest of the leftists posting here that the election DOES NOT mean that we have to “shut the fuck up” as she wrote.
First, we are NOT going to shut up just because she (or that assclown Matthews says so).
Second, we have the absolute right to continue to express our opinions and that I, for one, fully intend to continue to do so. And if Honora or her ilk don’t like it, too damn bad.
Third, WHEN (not if) the terrorists strike America again, America will absolutely reverse course, because the so-called “moderates” that voted against the war will almost certainly see it our way again.
But, and this is a prediction, if that strike involves massive numbers of dead Americans in a destroyed American city, the backlash agsinst the Democrats and the left will be massive and bloody.
As of January, 2007, the Democratic Party assumes all blame for what happens afterwards in the Global War on Terrorism.
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 4:45 PM
Are you saying that when a president pursues a failed policy he doesn’t relinquish some of his legitimacy as president? (Not actual legitimacy you understand, you know what I mean). I do. Stuff costs you know?
You know as well as I do that this blog is full of shrieking banchees who are now wildly demanding that Howard Dean (who I should point out, is not even an office holder) and Nancy P immediately pull a solution to this mess out of their collective butt. What I am saying is, those who made this mess need to tend to their knitting for a while, and let cooler and hopefully wiser heads have a chance to work this out.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:48 PM
well said techno
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:48 PM
Yep. Because the American People elected them to do that very thing. Solve the problem in Iraq. America took the bait and now the dems have to perform.
It’s beside the point now, but they really should’ve stood shoulder to shoulder with us and helped us win as quickly as possible. But it was so much more important to take down chimpy. Smart move dems. Thanks so friggin’ much.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 4:49 PM
well said georgej, i totally agree with you 100%
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:50 PM
Pull one out of their butt? Excuse me? How long has the left been saying “Wrong War, Wrong Time”, or “Cut and Run”… You campaigned on having “new ideas” and better plans.
Are you now saying that they were lying!? That they had no plans?! After all…. if they had plans, they would be able to tell us… right?
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:50 PM
btw honora, last time i checked this “IS” a free country & don’t forget the 1st admendment, you should know that one honora, since you liberals always hide behind it.
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 4:52 PM
Did I miss a Constitutional amendment? I really need to catch up on my reading.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:52 PM
Honora wrote: “Here is how legitimacy works…”
Absolute BULLSHIT!
1. We went to war in both Iraq and Afghanistan LEGITIMATELY. In both cases, a Joint Resolution was passed and signed into law by the President. In both cases the MAJORITY of your party agreed. Do I need to cite the statements of ALL THOSE DEMOCRATS who, since 1998, agreed that Iraq was a threat to America’s national security?
2. The credibility of you asshole liberals has NOT been established. All your party did is win an election. At the rate you assclowns are going, in 2008 WE will win it back!
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 4:54 PM
Seriously, honora, have you actually listened to those ‘cooler and hopefully wiser heads’? Let’s be honest. I haven’t heard anything approaching wisdom coming out of the Democratic party in a long time. Accusations and screeching condemnations? You bet. Calm rational wisdom? Not so much.
But believe me. I really am pulling for you guys. I really want this solved, because the jihadi problem is one that’s not going to go away. Not even if we throw up our hands and say we quit. The jihadis are at war with us, whether or not we want it. They have been, actively, since 1979 when jimmah screwed the pooch with his dealings with iran.
They. Will. Not. Stop.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 4:54 PM
Yeah, well while your reading maybe you find yourself and Howard Dean a clue.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:54 PM
Well I can’t speak for them. What do I think? There is no good option. We stay: it’s pouring oil on the fire and taking casualties and draining our coffers and our military; we leave: implosion. Heads we lose, tails we lose.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:55 PM
Honora wrote: “Did I miss a Constitutional amendment?”
You missed the entire Constitution, dearie.
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 4:55 PM
Sucks to the party in power, doesn’t it?
Ya’ll are going to end up doing the same thing Bush has been doing all along, because you have no new ideas.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 4:56 PM
You People??? YOU PEOPLE???
(Ok, so the caps was becuse this is the internet)
What You People?
Seriously, I am an American. I am not a republican, Democrat, Independant, Green party what ever. I am an American. And I voted for what I, as an American, felt was best for this country.
perhaps this is something ALl of us should get over. This crap is looking more and more like a “Us Vs Them” scenerio between the Reps and the Dems. Guesse What Honora, The islamic extremist want you as dead as they want EFG.
WE, as Americans, got into this war. And we were right. WMD’s? The Post announced that the letters seized from Iraqw show Saddam being one year from a nuke. The flaunting of the resolutions, his bounties for evey glorious suicidal bomber etc were all good reasons to go after him. Was that the best thing to do though? maybe, maybe not. But the simple fact is, teh war was sent to a vote. the people WE americans voted for okd it. Now that we are in the war we either win it, or we loose it. Pissing and moaning about who did what to get us in this mess won’t clean it up.
Now that the dems have the power they will get to see first hand why they can not pull out. if they do, then the price of failure will be carried by us all.
Wyrd on November 9, 2006 at 4:57 PM
I have heard Biden and Levin both talk very rationally. I have heard the other crap as well, but you guys have the likes of Cheney so that’s a wash.
I don’t see the Dems (or the Reps) doing this by themselves. Perhaps having the split of power will at least force some degree of mutual respect and a real effort to get our hands around this whole jihad problem. Here’s hoping.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 4:59 PM
Actually, it’s more than worth it to stay and fight. And to take the gloves off and fight like we actually intend to win. That is the best, most sane action to take. That will require the American People to not be squeamish when the horrible footage, gathered by jihadis and displayed to the world to make them look like martyrs is shown all over the world (just like the palis have honed to an artform in gaza).
What’s needed right now is real strength. Real power. That’s what the ME understands. Brutal? You bet. Do I wish it were not so? Absolutely.
But some things in Life are very very difficult. And running away from them only makes them much worse.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:09 PM
And regardless of the constant drumbeat of “we can’t win” that we’ve been fed for the past 6 years, I DO think we can win. We just have to be as committed as our enemy.
One of the things I really hope the MSM gets around to doing is actually showing the enemy for what it is and how it thinks and what it’s capable of doing. Updates on our troop deaths isn’t really educating our populace about what we’re facing. If people were to see that, I think backbones would stiffen.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:12 PM
The problem with this is you’re approaching this like a conventional war. It’s not. The two sides are shooting at each other–what side do we take? Or do we stay and force them to play nice? What do we do if Malaki/Sadr ask us to leave?
honora on November 9, 2006 at 5:13 PM
For 6 years now, the Democrats have been throwing shit on the Republicans. “Bush was selected, not elected,” was the start.
“Bush is Hitler;” “Bush is a chimp;” “Bush is too stupid to run the country;” “Bush was a deserter;” blah, blah, blah!
“The Republicans are the Corrupt Party.”
“DeLAY! DeLAY!”
“GANNON!”
“PLAMEGATE!”
At ever turn, the party on the outside has been attacking the parth running Congress and the White House. Nonstop, without stopping even for a breath.
For exactly 3 weeks after 9/11/01, the Democrats eased up. But America’s left never did. on 9/18, Noam Chomsky said we had it coming.
And let’s everybody remember that in October 2003, Sen. Jay Rockerfeller authored a memo that laid out the plan on HOW TO SABOTAGE THE WAR IN IRAQ FOR POLITICAL GAIN.
And now today, Honora starts blathering about “legitimacy” (as if she knows what the word means) and how the rest of us shrieking banchees no longer have the right to speak out about the war.
Message to Honora and the rest of the asshole left: YOU NOW OWN THE WAR ON TERROR!
Yep. You complained. You screeched about unacceptable casualties (I don’t know why, they’re lower than Vietnam by a factor of 20). You screeched about all those 650,000 dead Iraqis (as if you gave a damn). And you convinced about 30% of the American population that YOU PEOPLE had the answers.
Well, Democrats.
YOU won the 2006 election. YOU control both Houses of Congress. YOU pass the appropriation bills. YOU will run the investigations looking for reasons to impeach Bush (whom you STILL HATE). And YOU control the purse strings of the United States government.
And YOU will be responsible. FOR EVERYTHING.
NOW you have your chance.
And WE will be spending our time undermining YOU at every opportunity.
Welcome to Target. Not the store — but the bullseye painted on your fat asses!
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 5:16 PM
That, to me is the tragedy of all this. The democrats refused to realize that we DID want their help. We honestly did. But we didn’t get that help. We didn’t get any ideas to help out. None of that dem brainpower was used to help the situation. Quite the contrary. All the dem energy was spent trying to take down a sitting President. Unwise and unhelpful.
And Cheney actually makes a hell of a lot of sense if you actually listen to him, rather than shoot rubber tipped darts at the TV everytime he speaks because you’ve villified him to a point where he’s not human anymore.
I’ve heard Biden say some pretty heinous things. Haven’t heard all that much from Levin. Except I think he and Biden spent an awful lot of time fillibustering in front of the cameras and not saying a whole lot of substance.
I’m not trying to fight with you. I’m trying to reason with you. You know… that ‘reaching out’ thing?
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:20 PM
Golly, sounds like someone is hoping the terrorists win…tsk, tsk, tsk. Funny how all those crocodile tears for the troops just suddenly dried up huh?
I’m sorry, that was mean. But this is like shooting fish in a barrel. Hilarious.
(Best laugh line was Imus this morning: “if Limbaugh was impotent before….” LOL)
honora on November 9, 2006 at 5:20 PM
Ok, now you sound like my husband. We are crossing messages. Would be interested in your response to my latest to you, especially the ask us to leave part. Gotta run.
honora on November 9, 2006 at 5:23 PM
No I’m not, actually. I realize that this is a new kind of warfare. I also realize that Iraq was the perfect training ground for it. And contrary to what you might be hearing from our green zone hotel newscorp, our troops have adapted and are VERY adept at fighting this war. The real challenge to me is getting the American People to take our military off their leash and let them fight like they need to. A lot of them are dying because we’ve established very foolish and counterproductive rules of engagement. That needs to change.
It’s hard. It’s going to be hard for a very long time. The sooner we realize what it takes to win, and do it, the sooner we can get all this unpleasantness over with.
The answer is strength. Our troops have proven they can be both strong AND compassionate. They’re not wanton killers. They’re the very finest people this Nation has. And with this election, their jobs are now an order of magnitude harder.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:26 PM
dear liberals, we spent most of WWII losing. But then in the end we won. Then we spent the next 20 years holding the hands of those fledgling democracies. If your liberal ancestors had gotten their way late in 1943 for instance, we would have lost. But they didn’t, so we won. Those who stand up in the middle of a war and scream “we’re losing, we must pull out now” have no clue how to fight a war. Those who have no clue how to fight a war should shut-up for fear of looking like fools. Have you no fear of just how ignorant you will look to future generations? Of course not. As a liberal your only interest is to make yourself feel better. Obviously you could care less about future generations. The time to claim victory will come. It will be after the war. Not in the middle. Not in the beginning. Afterwards. It’s always worked that way. Trust me.
Griz on November 9, 2006 at 5:26 PM
Respectfully. That’s emotionally satisfying. But tit for tat is what got us where we are right now. Personally I’m for pitching in and working with the dems.
Fighting among ourselves is what our enemies pray for. You guys and gals need to realize that the mullahs are hanging on by their fingernails right now. It’s a very bad situation, but we CAN win it. If we WANT to win it.
I gotta go. I’ll check back in later.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:29 PM
honora,
Maliki won’t ask us to leave. He’d be one of the very first ones butchered if we were to leave. And sadr has needed a bullet between his eyes for a very long time. THAT, I will readily admit, was a huge mistake in this war.
Mistakes happen. But the war must be won.
techno_barbarian on November 9, 2006 at 5:32 PM
Tecnho writes: “Actually, it’s more than worth it to stay and fight. And to take the gloves off and fight like we actually intend to win. That is the best, most sane action to take.”
You have it.
We have overwhelming military power. We have enough power to destroy the world — and certainly turn the middle east into radioactive green glass. Yes, we could make the Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq play nice.
This is not the only time Iraq has been the center of such turmoil. It happened to the British right after WWI. The British put down that revolt by wiping out Shiite villages and using overwhelming force. BTW, they even asked for authorization to use leftover WWI mustard gas, but never did use them.
But the Brits succeeded, mostly, by 1925.
Honora, in one of her rants, refered to the tribal nature of Iraq. Yes, Iraq still is a tribal society. And tribal societies have, at their base, what we would call a “medieval mindset.” This mindset knows when to knuckle under to overwhelming force.
Our invasion and subsiquent occupation was designed and operated to run with “kid gloves.” We COULD have destroyed their dams, poisoned their rivers, blown EVERY bridge in Iraq, flattened Baghdad and every other city, and killed MILLIONS of Iraqis — even without the use of nuclear weapons.
But we did not.
We did not want our victory to become the basis for a nationwide rebellion. And we have been successful. There are less than 20K “insurgents” in Iraq, including the Sunni and Shiite militias and the remnants of Al Qaeda, out of a population of 26 million.
Yes, in esoteric terms, the Iraqi people want us to go home. Who wouldn’t? But the average Iraqi does not hate America. They admire us. Most of them DID ACTUALLY cheer our troops. Most of them work with us on a daily basis to hunt down the terrorists.
That is the REASON that so many Iraqis join the police and new Iraq Army, knowning damn well how many of them will get blown up in the process.
The Iraqis are brave. They are not stupid.
WE did not destroy their country. WE rescued them from a barbarous dictator — and they know it.
What is happening now is factions jockeying for control of the country. The Sunnis want it back. The Shiites and the Kurds have no intention of letting them have it.
Techno, we WON the war. Hands down. What we are trying to do is stabalize the country and it may take knocking in the skulls of the “tribals” to achieve that point.
Rumsfeld and Bush did not want to take that approach. That might have been a mistake, though I think that had not the traitors on the left (including the Democratic Party) not given them hope that they could wait us out, Iraq would have been quiet by now.
Yes. The current strife in Iraq is caused by the DEMOCRATS proving the bin Laden was right — America will cut and run if you hold on long enough.
But as you correctly noted, the sane action now is to put enough power into Iraq to put down the rebellion and suppress the militias.
With Pelosi at the helm, it won’t happen as she actually said that if we go home, the terrorists will go home in Iraq. That’s how disconnected from reality the left’s mindset is.
So, once again, the DEMOCRATS will have lost a war — the Global War on Terrorism — for America.
Gatewaypundit puts it in perspective in his posting titled “This time the Democratic Chicago Platform wins”.
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 5:48 PM
honora,
You could still go read the Joint Authorization for the Use of Military force in Iraq, but that would still screw your little game up, wouldn’t it?
You’ve got a bunch left to get out, don’t you?
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 5:55 PM
That’s their way of saying they’re dirt people, too fucking stupid to deal with that totally foreign Democracy concept.
Which isn’t at all racist. Because it’s a Democrat notion.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 5:57 PM
So, how long has Matthews been an hysterical girlie-man?
JackM on November 9, 2006 at 6:03 PM
Honora wrote: “Golly, sounds like someone is hoping the terrorists win”
Nope. You Democratics wanted to regain the power you had lost in 1994 and you were willing to (and did) commit treason to get it. Now you have the power. Enjoy it while you can.
But as I said, YOU NOW OWN the Global War on Terrorism.
Lock. Stock. And Barrel.
The mistakes YOU make YOU will own. And as your side is STUPID and INCOMPETENT beyond belief (Pelosi proved that yesterday when she was “holding court” with the media), the terrorists WILL come home — OUR home — and then your party will fall. I certainly do not want Americans to die, but your party’s victory makes that inevitable.
Why do I say this?
Yesterday the Iranians and Syrians celebrated with you. Our enemies are dancing in joy with you because YOU won. No doubt, a message from bin Laden will be broadcast via Al Jazeera congratulating you — and gloating that they were right all along.
Your victory made us all less safe, but you’re all too damn stupid to “get it.” And when they strike us again, it will be YOUR shame, not ours, because my side wants to win the war on terror — on their soil, not ours. Your side doesn’t want to win it at all.
Well, you Copperheads wanted the power. Some of your leaders actually committed treason to get it.
You now got it.
And because you got it, many more Americans — civilians here at home — are going to die because of it. Because you’re incompetent.
All I’m doing is stating the facts and bracing for the future.
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 6:04 PM
Techno writes: “But tit for tat is what got us where we are right now.”
Believe me, this is not “tit for tat.”
The Democrats openly went to war with the rest of America starting in 2000 when Gore started the recount nonsense resulting in the US Supreme court intervening. From that day on, the Democratic Party has been calling Bush illegitimate and that everything he did after that the same. They refused to “get over it” and work with the Republicans.
Have you forgotten this?
The Democrats’ plan of treason was busted open in 2003, when Rockerfeller’s letter was leaked to the media.
They worked to sabotage the war on terrorism. They did it for partisan gain. It’s not ‘tit for tat’ to hold them accountable for it. It’s not ‘tit for tat’ to work to correct the situation and punish the saboteurs.
And let’s not forget the manufactured scandals “Plamegate,” “Foleygate,” and “Jeff Gannon” and all the rest. Let’s not forget Joe Wilson’s lies which resulted in years of leftist smears of Bush, Rove and Cheney.
Let not forget the complicity of the leftwing media who decided that the real enemy was the President of the United States of America and not the terrorists we were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The “civil” war started in 1995 when the Republicans took over Congress — something that the Democrats believe they own by ‘divine right.’
In 2003, the war became NO SO CIVIL as the Rockerfeller memo proves.
Well, now they won. And innocent Americans will pay the price of their treason because Cicero was right.
georgej on November 9, 2006 at 6:27 PM
honora
Would you please post a link to where W tied Suddam to 9/11 when he was telling us why we need to go to war. Please oh please show me the light.
1776 Remember Why!!!
rocked on November 9, 2006 at 7:27 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »