Bush to make Rose Garden announcement at 11:35; Update: Newsmax says Bolton likely out; Update: Fizzle
posted at 10:16 am on November 9, 2006 by Allahpundit
According to Fox, which started hyping it 20 minutes ago. They’re speculating that because it follows a cabinet meeting, he’s going to announce new personnel changes. Bolton’s not a member of the cabinet but he’d logically be next, especially given Biden’s comments this morning:
Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, who is expected to chair the Senate Foreign Relations Committee if Democratic control of the U.S. Senate is formally confirmed, told reporters:
“I never saw a real enthusiasm (for Bolton’s nomination) on the Republican side to begin with. There’s none on our side. And I think John Bolton’s going nowhere.”
Feel free to theorize in the comments. In the meantime, chew on this:
Senior White House officials said the Rumsfeld resignation had been discussed for weeks, coming as the violence intensified in Iraq and a growing number of critics — including Republicans — called for the secretary’s firing.
Several weeks ago, with the White House’s own internal polls showing Democrats making gains on antiwar sentiment, Mr. Bush and a few top aides began a series of secret meetings to discuss what he knew would be an explosive announcement.
Was Rumsfeld’s firing supposed to be the October surprise that Rove promised, but which never materialized?
John Warner says they’re going to try to push Gates through before the new Senate is seated.
Update: More food for thought. The Wall Street Journal wants to know: what role did Bob Gates, then-deputy NSA under Brent Scowcroft, play in convincing Bush I not to support the Shiite uprising against Saddam in 1991?
One reason the Iraqi government of Nouri al-Maliki has had such a hard time dismantling Shiite militias is because Shiites fear that it’s only a matter of time before the U.S. abandons them again and they will have to confront the Sunni Baathist insurgency on their own. If President Bush wants to reassure Shiites on this score and about Mr. Gates, he should announce that the recent efforts to appease the Sunni terrorist political fronts in Iraq have failed.
We presume Mr. Gates will be grilled about these and other issues during his confirmation hearings. He should be.
Bob Owens agrees.
Update: Maybe he’s going to formally repudiate the Bush doctrine.
Update: I like this theory at Free Republic:
Cheney is resigning; Rumsfeld nominated to replace him…
Update: Not sure if this is what Bush is planning to announce, but Newsmax says Bolton is done:
NewsMax has learned that U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton will likely leave his post next month.
After a rocky series of Senate confirmation hearings, Bolton was sent to the U.N. by President Bush in August 2005 under a recess appointment. That allowed the president to bypass Senate confirmation while it was in recess, but the appointee could only serve for the length of the current Congress which is set to expire at year’s end…
“This nomination is dead and we have known it for several days,” a source close to the U.S. mission to the U.N. tells NewsMax.
Update: Nothing happened in the Rose Garden. Standard yadda about working with the opposition and the upcoming legislative agenda. Oh well.
Update: The fact that nothing happened is what makes this so noteworthy, says Tammy Bruce:
I now have to face the possibility that Bolton may be tossed overboard because the president did not mention him in his press conference just a moment ago. President Bush issued a list of things he wants the current congress to pass before the changeover at the end of the year. Confirming Bolton was not among them.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Maybe Bush is going to switch parties.
bloggless on November 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
It is hard not to conclude that Dubya didn’t want to keep Congress.
Lehuster on November 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Well, this is a new reason to be disappointed with the election results. The wrong Ohio Senator was on the ballot yesterday.
I hope Voinovich’s grandchildren are happy.
Slublog on November 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Pink slips anyone?
vcferlita on November 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Bolton as Secretary of State! Please please please…
Yossarian on November 9, 2006 at 10:19 AM
resignation of Cheney; Bush suggests Condi as VP, Bolton moves to SecState
dalewalt on November 9, 2006 at 10:21 AM
If Bush lets them take out Bolton….he is a traitor to the Republican party.
Bolton is the best thing that has happened to the UN in 50 years.
msipes on November 9, 2006 at 10:22 AM
If Bush fires Bolton, he’s dead to me.
EF on November 9, 2006 at 10:24 AM
If Bush lets anyone go, he is officialy the biggest joke of a president we ever had. As a evanservative I would be extremley PO’d.
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 10:24 AM
An election perspective
Just to educate some as to why they dont understand why the democrats won in 2006.
1980 Saw the Democrats in control of Congress and the White House. AS typical the Ameican people got distrustful of one party having too much power.
This lead to a shift in giving the Republicans the White House with Ronald Reagan and control of the US Senate and many gains in the congress.
Overall results
Party Total Seats (change) Seat
Democratic Party 242 -35
Independents 1 +1
Republican Party 192 +34
This quickly changed around two year latter.
1982 elections The Republicans lost the senate and many house seats
Party Total Seats (change)
Democratic Party 269 +27
Independents 0 -1
Republican Party 166 -26
Now the government stayed divided until the 1992 elections when Clinton beat Bush Sr to take the Presidency and swept many democrats to power
By 1994 there was a get turn around in Congress.
Party Seats Seat percentage Popular Vote
1992 Elected Net Change
Democratic Party 258 -54
Independent 1 1
Republican Party 176 +54
Which now leads us to 2006 and the completion of the cycle. The dems gained seats while the reopublicans had held the Congress and White House
TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
GOP 196 -28
DEM 229 29
So as can be seen this shift was the smallest of the three elections of 1980 and 1994 when there were far more radical shifts and the every next elections the party that won big ended up losing seats in the next elections.
The point is that the American people dont like one party having too much power and they move back to a balance. But what happened on tuesday was the smallest shift in a re alignment election and isnt a repudiation of anything.
William Amos on November 9, 2006 at 10:25 AM
Everybody calm the hell down. Do I think Bolton should go? Hell no, but the President has to get this government moving if we are going to get anything done. Calling Bush a traitor is BS. If Bush is anything he is a realist. If the American government cannot start working together soon then the war WILL be lost. He is not going to put Bill Richardson in the post.
All you ‘REAL’ Republicans need to leave room on this bus for some RINOs or you are going to make 08 look like 06squared.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 10:26 AM
What if they try to run Bolton through before the new Senate sits? Voinovich has flipped his position on the matter, and it’s conceivable that he could be confirmed.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 10:26 AM
If Bush fires Bolton, he’s dead to me.
What does he care? He’s in lame duck city. There is nothing the voters can do to him or for him anymore.
Lehuster on November 9, 2006 at 10:26 AM
Bolton was a recess appointment and was never confirmed by Congress (thanks rhinos that is why you guys lost)
Bolton wont be able to stay.
William Amos on November 9, 2006 at 10:28 AM
Hey, this is the intertubes! If people weren’t freaking out, what fun would it be? ;-)
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 10:28 AM
Hmmmm…let’s see.
Cheney resigns, Bolton takes his place.
or
Bush rolls over and plays dead.
I’m not sure…
SouthernGent on November 9, 2006 at 10:28 AM
“Doom, despair, and agony on me.”
dalewalt on November 9, 2006 at 10:30 AM
Dear Mr President, trying to appease the Dems is like trying to appease the Islamic terrorists. It won’t work. The Dems won’t stop until they get their impeachment hearings and all of the troops out of Iraq and there ain’t a thing you can do to stop it. They figure they may only hold power for 2 years so they need to go for the gusto.
LakeRuins on November 9, 2006 at 10:33 AM
I would but pessimism is contageous. Thanks Allah
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Immigration?Taxes?Abortion?Education?War?Bad Pizza delivery?
It doesn’t matter right now why we lost this election what matters is the the Republicans lost the conservative Dems, the Independents, and the RINOs.
You want to be pure. You are going to be locked in the closet. The Democrats won because they convinced the MIDDLE that they had a plan and the MIDDLE bought it. Now they have to perform or 08 will slap em down hard. If the Dems roll this platform over into the river they are the ones who will drown in 08.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 10:37 AM
If he abandons Bolton, I’m going to be pissed. I’m already bothered by the Rumsfeld “resignation”.
FWIW – and it may not be likely, that if the Bolton nomination wasn’t going to work, they could technically leave the UN ambassador job open, make Bolton the “deputy” and name him “acting” ambassador. Pretty creative, but I doubt they have the boldness to actually do it.
CP on November 9, 2006 at 10:37 AM
Bush resigns.
Skywise on November 9, 2006 at 10:40 AM
Bush announces that Lieberman’s going to take over as Secretary of State or VP or something, so the Republican CT governor gets to choose CT’s senator, giving the Republicans the Senate.
/a girl can dream, can’t she?
Yossarian on November 9, 2006 at 10:42 AM
Right, and I’m going to be named King… NOT!
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 10:42 AM
Either way, Bolton was going to be out in January. His recess appointment is up then.
If he wanted to keep him, wouldn’t it make sense to try to nominee him now, while he has a better chance in congress?
Maybe Rumsfeld was the sacrifice that he had to make to save/keep Bolton?
Kai on November 9, 2006 at 10:44 AM
If the writing is on the wall and Bolton couldn’t be confirmed, then Bolton leaving should not cause Bush to be “dead” to people. Biggest joke ever? Were you around for the Carter presidency?
Really, people have to stop taking this so personal. So they lost an election. It’s not the end of the world.
I was leaning toward Bush announcing the concentration camp imprisonment of Rall and the Peace Mom, but I guess that’s too much to ask for.
Here’s a random thought. Cheney retires so he can go hunting full time and Romney is installed as VP so he can be the heir apparent.
JammieWearingFool on November 9, 2006 at 10:44 AM
I’m hoping for a waterboard ride at six flags…
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 10:45 AM
Could they do that? And if so, why haven’t they confirmed him already?
Esthier on November 9, 2006 at 10:45 AM
Honestly I do not know why everyone is fawning over Liebs. The man is still a freakin liberal so why did the reps vote him in? In all honesty I wanted Lamont to win to expose his sorry @ss as a clueless lib.
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 10:46 AM
Nah that doesn’t work… then they impeach Romney and Bush and Pelosi takes command… Except Hillary wouldn’t let her do that… :)
Skywise on November 9, 2006 at 10:46 AM
I think he’s going to announce that Nancy Pelosi is Liberace’s love child.
natesnake on November 9, 2006 at 10:47 AM
Great Googly Moogly!!
I remember that song!
From Hee Haw?
allie on November 9, 2006 at 10:47 AM
Could it have something to do with Steele? The reps need to have him doing something for them. He is just stuck in a crappy blue state.
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 10:48 AM
I disagree with Limerick on the reason the Dems won. They didn’t convince the MIDDLE that the Dems had a plan, they ran as conservative Democrats. Many pro-life and pro-gun. They, in essence, hoodwinked the undecided. I’ll grant that the party with a majority of power is in a tough spot to keep it, but the Dems were stretching the truth about their real intentions during the campaign.
A great man once said, “Conservatism wins every time it’s tried.” This is a true statement. Just ask the conservative Dems who won.
Troy Rasmussen on November 9, 2006 at 10:49 AM
I don’t see why not. Bush would simply have to renominate him.
God only knows what they’re thinking up there these days.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 10:50 AM
The way GWB has been acting as of late I could not agree with you more. I think he was so upset that Congress did not pass his traitorous Amnesty plan that he decide to allow the DNC to take over so he could get Comprehensive Immigration passed.
When he was asked about Immigration during his press conference yesterday, he said he looked forward in working with Pelosi on Immigration and he looked excited as hell.
Translation-He will pass Amnesty for 30 million Illegals with Pelosi.
Throwing rummy under the Bus after the election shows he had no intention of re-electing Republicans.
ScottyDog on November 9, 2006 at 10:50 AM
Since our liberal trolls aren’t around…
The Red States are going to officially leaving the union again! George Bush to be crowned king of the New Confederate States in Birmingham, Alabama later this month.
/snark
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 10:51 AM
This is so weird; my computer must be f***ed up. I swear I linked to HotAir.com, but this looks like DU in negative…
Jaibones on November 9, 2006 at 10:51 AM
Yossarian,
That would be SO AWSOME!!! Oh, MAN! That would be one of the greatest political moves of all time!!
Troy Rasmussen on November 9, 2006 at 10:51 AM
Bush announces Lieberman talking over as Rep to the UN!!!
Bolton stays on as Deputy, but is there as the hammer…
Romeo13 on November 9, 2006 at 10:52 AM
“Deep dark depression, excessive misery.”
moonsbreath on November 9, 2006 at 10:52 AM
so much for reform in the UN. Can’t wait to see what pantywaist is going to replace bolton. Maybe they’ll send over Stewart Smalley. He’d fit right in. The only people he’s tough on are conservatives.
We’re in serious need of some real direction here. Our party seems to be floundering in the midst of a predicted loss. I don’t understand how they DIDN’T see this coming, and weren’t prepared for the blow.
I mean between the drum beat of the so-called delay scandal, the mark foley bombshell, the media hanging like vultures over our troops waiting for them to drop so they can get some “news footage”, and the New York Times pasting our national secrets on their pages under the nose of a frozen republican controlled house, senate, and white house
how could this NOT happen?
Where is our leadership?
One Angry Christian on November 9, 2006 at 10:52 AM
Bush will announce that he will be seeking another term as president………….
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 10:53 AM
I agree with “bloggless” . . . Bush is switching parties.
rplat on November 9, 2006 at 10:54 AM
Or… Bush is appointing Bolton as SecDef and Rummy… GOES TO THE UN!
Kai on November 9, 2006 at 11:00 AM
Cheney plans to take Nancy Pelosi on one of his hunting trips.Heh.
vcferlita on November 9, 2006 at 11:02 AM
Could they do that?
I don’t see why not. Bush would simply have to renominate him.
And if so, why haven’t they confirmed him already?
God only knows what they’re thinking up there these days.
They tried to set up confirmation hearings in early September after Voinovich changed his mind on Bolton. However, then our ole buddy Linc Chafee said he planned on reversing his earlier vote and they were back to square one.
there it is on November 9, 2006 at 11:02 AM
Im going to a hardware store and buy a heavy duty rope……
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 11:02 AM
Question – again, not likely, but is it possible for Bush to give Bolton a second recess appointment?
CP on November 9, 2006 at 11:04 AM
Not me. I’m… putting.. on my… armadillo shell hat… Ahhh that’s better. It keeps the bad thoughts out.
Trooper on November 9, 2006 at 11:04 AM
Hmm.. Bolton is out due to the Senate, and Rummy is nominated to his spot… it would never fly… but it’s fun to think about.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 11:05 AM
Fox says not to expect anything “earthshattering”
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 11:05 AM
Bush resigns.
He shoulda done that before the election – then the Republicans woulda made a clean sweep in Congress!
Lehuster on November 9, 2006 at 11:05 AM
A large percentage of the cabinet resigns.
Cheney resigns.
Bush selects Condi as VP.
Bush pardons Cheney (to stop any dhimmicrat witchhunt).
Bush resigns.
Condi becomes president.
Condi pardons Bush (same reason as above).
Condi selects Bolton as VP.
dhimmicrats heads explode….
Any other suggestions for players in this game?
Tancredo and Hayworth maybe? :D
Condi and Lieberman (to make the KosKids go crazy)
Who would REALLY tweak the dhimmicrats if selected for P/VP?
Timothy S. Carlson on November 9, 2006 at 11:06 AM
Why are the best people in this administration leaving? Bolton was great. He was actually doing something at the UN other than warming a seat.
I think a logical thing to do, would be to make Cheney leave, install someone in there for the next 2 years and make them the defacto republican candidate in 2008. 2 years of their ideas against ours, intsead of their ideas against a lame duck.
lorien1973 on November 9, 2006 at 11:06 AM
Condi had a meeting with the new Mexican President this morning… it could be immigration related.
Mexico annexed at the 51-55th states.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 11:07 AM
LOL I love that. That is too funny. I don’t think it can quite happen like that though. If Cheney resigns, does the president get to select a VP? Or does the house majority leader step up into the spot. Gotta read the constitution on that one :P
lorien1973 on November 9, 2006 at 11:08 AM
Edit. Ford selected Rockefeller after Nixon resigned, but the new VP had to be confirmed by the house and senate. That’s gonna happen ;)
lorien1973 on November 9, 2006 at 11:09 AM
I think there would need be a special election… but I am not sure
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 11:09 AM
Well He certainly isn’t telling me anything.
Esthier on November 9, 2006 at 11:12 AM
When Agnew resigned, Nixon selected Ford as VP. I don’t remember if Nixon pardoned Agnew or not. Then when Nixon resigned, Ford became Pres (and pardoned Nixon) and selected Goldwater as VP.
Ooooo – it is just _so_ Rovian…. :D
Timothy S. Carlson on November 9, 2006 at 11:12 AM
this is going to suck
Defector01 on November 9, 2006 at 11:13 AM
Yeah……real progress here…..that is my good ol Republican party…..let’s throw President Bush under the bus. That will show em’. Who is the Bush guy think he is anyway?! That will show em’.
Friggin cannibals. Friggin Animal Farm. Friggin Lord of the Flies. That will show em’!
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 11:14 AM
Ah – correct. Rockefeller, not Goldwater. Thanks for refreshing the old memory banks.
Timothy S. Carlson on November 9, 2006 at 11:14 AM
Well, as the players still stand…
Bush AND Cheney resign. Dennis Hastert becomes President and appoints Michael Steele to VP.
I have no idea what happens with Hasterts seat tho.
Kai on November 9, 2006 at 11:17 AM
Does anyone know what the predictions are on the other side of the aisle? I imagine they’re thinking something like this:
GWB: “I have dissolved the Senate. Each state’s governor will report directly to me.”
Condi: “That’s impossible. How will you maintain control?”
GWB: “Fear will keep the governors in line…fear of Dick Cheney’s hunting trips.”
James on November 9, 2006 at 11:17 AM
James,
Ha! That would be very Putinesque, now wouldn’t it?
CP on November 9, 2006 at 11:22 AM
It’s a cookbook! A cookbook!
vcferlita on November 9, 2006 at 11:22 AM
What did Pelosi slip him in his chocalate milk this morning?
SouthernGent on November 9, 2006 at 11:24 AM
I think its Bolton…..and Im getting queazy.
JVelez on November 9, 2006 at 11:25 AM
DUs and Kossacks are loving this. We have just reaffirmed everything they stand for…..’Every man for himself-the hell with the women and children’!!!!!!! YeeeeeeeHawwwwwwwww
Michael Moore is having an orgasm watching you ‘Reps’ jerk each other off.
If you believe President Bush is the problem then you are as deluded as the Kossacks. You all are playing right into the Dean/Pelosi handbook.
Grow a friggin pair people. President Bush is not the problem. The United States Congress is the problem.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 11:26 AM
Makes sense to me–the Dems can afford to ignore the South if they keep the NE, consolidate the Midwest and build in the West. So it’s a pretty good idea–heck you already have your flag, the rest should be easy!!
honora on November 9, 2006 at 11:29 AM
I heard on Brit Hume’s show last night that if Bush were to recess apt. Bolton again, he couldn’t be paid. Now, that man should be paid. twice or more what he is being paid to be at that swamp.
rslancer14 on November 9, 2006 at 11:29 AM
Uh-oh. Yellow tie. Not a good sign.
IrishEi on November 9, 2006 at 11:31 AM
Phew.
IrishEi on November 9, 2006 at 11:32 AM
You can say what you want.
However, even if Bush is trying to play fair with the Dems… when it comes to our foreign policy and how we project our influence throughout the world…Bolton is the best thing Bush has.
He lets him go…and I’m on the 60% side of “Bush sucks”.
msipes on November 9, 2006 at 11:32 AM
Thank God it wasn’t about Bolton, I don’t think my blood pressure can take this anymore.
moonsbreath on November 9, 2006 at 11:32 AM
Hey Trooper,
Where did you get an armadillo shell hat? All I have is a tinfoil one I found at DU.
Troy Rasmussen on November 9, 2006 at 11:32 AM
And the big news: nothing… just basically said that we all need to work together, and again mentioned that Gates is being nominated for SecDef.
dalewalt on November 9, 2006 at 11:33 AM
Bush was part of the problem this election because:
- He was running a ‘polite’ war, trying to appease all
sides. No shooting until shot at. Letting Al-Sadr run
wild. He needed to let the troops _do their jobs_.
- He was so soft on border control and illegal immigration.
He signed the border fence bill only after the pressure
got to be too much.
Those two issues alone managed to tweak a great deal of the republican base.
Timothy S. Carlson on November 9, 2006 at 11:33 AM
Actually, I was going for ‘very Palpatine.’
James on November 9, 2006 at 11:34 AM
The south will rise again! Yeeha!
LOL
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 11:35 AM
Well, that was a whole lot o’ nuttin’…
Timothy S. Carlson on November 9, 2006 at 11:35 AM
Is he playing with their heads, now?
Editor on November 9, 2006 at 11:36 AM
Check the 25th Amendment. If there’s a vacancy for VP, the Pres gets to nominate a new VP, but the nominee must be confirmed by BOTH houses of Congress. Gerald Ford was House Minority Leader, which made his confirmation to succeed Agnew easier.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on November 9, 2006 at 11:37 AM
Seriously.
Condi “You all obviously can not run a government, give us a shot”
Theworldisnotenough on November 9, 2006 at 11:38 AM
Wow — all that suspense … just deflated
wytammic on November 9, 2006 at 11:41 AM
How about Cheney resigns and Steele is VP!?!
Well…I can dream can’t I?
Benaiah on November 9, 2006 at 11:42 AM
If Bush get’s impeached, then Chenney is president? No amnesty?
As far as Iraq, I’ve been wanting our troops pulled out of Baghdad for months. Let the Sunni and Shiite militias kill each other.
moonsbreath on November 9, 2006 at 11:43 AM
U
I saw this as: Update: Nothing happened in the Rose Garden. Standard yadda about working for the opposition and the upcoming socialist agenda. Oh hell!
EF on November 9, 2006 at 11:45 AM
Honestly, I’ve had enough of THIS.
I don’t think I could possibly care any less if Bush gets impeached at this point. He’s a fraud who’s selling out our country to Mexico.
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 11:48 AM
I must say Bolton is WAY to hawkish on Darfur. I have no desire to participate in any UN missions ever again. Let everyone else pay for those little fiascoes. We make too nice a target for jihadis. They just don’t get as much satisfaction bombing the Swedes.
Theworldisnotenough on November 9, 2006 at 11:49 AM
It takes 2 sides to work together. Democrats haven’t wanted to work with Bush for 6 years. What makes anyone thinks that’ll change now that they have more power?
Just like, they always said Bush was a divider. It takes 2 to divide. Democrats were moving left as Bush as moving center. And HE was the divider. Please.
lorien1973 on November 9, 2006 at 11:50 AM
Truly Gregor I am sick of it as well.
We need their oil to cripple the Middle East, but we need to put or economy down there so they can keep their citizens.
Theworldisnotenough on November 9, 2006 at 11:51 AM
What planet have you been living on. Bush basically told the base to F…off on conservative issues. He betrayed us yet you are still drinking the kool-aid.
Do you remember he appointed Julie Meyers to ICE?
Do you remember the Kennedy Education Bill?
Do you remember RX Drugs?
Do you remember Amnesty for Illegals?
Do you remember the Transportation Bill?
Do you remember Harriet Meyers?
Did you forget the GWB has not vetoed one spending measure?
I could go on and on but you definitely have not been paying attention.
ScottyDog on November 9, 2006 at 11:52 AM
I found this quote on instapundit and I think it encapsultes ’06 best, “The Republicans lost and the Democrats won for the same reason — they distanced themselves from their base. ”
The electorate consistenetly self identifies as conservative vs. liberal 3-2. For Republicans to win they need to go back to core principles. Small, non-intrusive gov’t and fiscal discipline. How many of the newly won Democratic House seats did they win by less than 5% are in districts that Bush won by more than 5% IN 2004? All those seats will be in play in 2008.
Bush is part of the problem. He is to be admired for his conviction but he fails to communicate. How many years did it take him to spit out ‘Islamo-fascism’? I am embarrassed to hear him trying to make a point because he always comes across as whinging. It is terrible that he has the bully pulpit and has not used it to inspire.
The good news is we get a fresh chance in 2008.
Go MIKE PENCE!
Bill C on November 9, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Would it ever be in our interest to see Bush impeached?
I am not ready to give up on Bush. If he caves too far though maybe I would consider it. There are lines that cannot be crossed.
Sometimes it is better to have a martyr. Besides, then we get Cheney and I like him more anyway.
Bill C on November 9, 2006 at 11:57 AM
ScottyDog…….so Judges/Taxes/Immigration THAT is your priority? That trumps winning this war on jihad? That gives you reason to kick out of office the one man who has pick up a gun to fight back?…..
If you want to run this American government with one party then you WILL always loose. Bush can’t just rule by issuing edicts of Republicanism……America is not all RED. There has to be compromise on issues. I want to fight for the RED and I always have….but this is a real government with real divisions and you cannot rule from ONE SIDE.
Here is my voting record: Nixon,Ford,Reagan,Reagan,Bush,Bush,Dole,Bush,Bush. There is my RINOhood. If you want to know about RINOhood I suggest you look at Reagan closely. He understood you have to bend in some areas. The current ‘PURE REPUBLICAN’ does not. You want to stay in power? Then you better learn that.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 12:05 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »