Bush to make Rose Garden announcement at 11:35; Update: Newsmax says Bolton likely out; Update: Fizzle
posted at 10:16 am on November 9, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
According to Fox, which started hyping it 20 minutes ago. They’re speculating that because it follows a cabinet meeting, he’s going to announce new personnel changes. Bolton’s not a member of the cabinet but he’d logically be next, especially given Biden’s comments this morning:
Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, who is expected to chair the Senate Foreign Relations Committee if Democratic control of the U.S. Senate is formally confirmed, told reporters:
“I never saw a real enthusiasm (for Bolton’s nomination) on the Republican side to begin with. There’s none on our side. And I think John Bolton’s going nowhere.”
Feel free to theorize in the comments. In the meantime, chew on this:
Senior White House officials said the Rumsfeld resignation had been discussed for weeks, coming as the violence intensified in Iraq and a growing number of critics — including Republicans — called for the secretary’s firing.
Several weeks ago, with the White House’s own internal polls showing Democrats making gains on antiwar sentiment, Mr. Bush and a few top aides began a series of secret meetings to discuss what he knew would be an explosive announcement.
Was Rumsfeld’s firing supposed to be the October surprise that Rove promised, but which never materialized?
John Warner says they’re going to try to push Gates through before the new Senate is seated.
Update: More food for thought. The Wall Street Journal wants to know: what role did Bob Gates, then-deputy NSA under Brent Scowcroft, play in convincing Bush I not to support the Shiite uprising against Saddam in 1991?
One reason the Iraqi government of Nouri al-Maliki has had such a hard time dismantling Shiite militias is because Shiites fear that it’s only a matter of time before the U.S. abandons them again and they will have to confront the Sunni Baathist insurgency on their own. If President Bush wants to reassure Shiites on this score and about Mr. Gates, he should announce that the recent efforts to appease the Sunni terrorist political fronts in Iraq have failed.
We presume Mr. Gates will be grilled about these and other issues during his confirmation hearings. He should be.
Bob Owens agrees.
Update: Maybe he’s going to formally repudiate the Bush doctrine.
Update: I like this theory at Free Republic:
Cheney is resigning; Rumsfeld nominated to replace him…
Update: Not sure if this is what Bush is planning to announce, but Newsmax says Bolton is done:
NewsMax has learned that U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton will likely leave his post next month.
After a rocky series of Senate confirmation hearings, Bolton was sent to the U.N. by President Bush in August 2005 under a recess appointment. That allowed the president to bypass Senate confirmation while it was in recess, but the appointee could only serve for the length of the current Congress which is set to expire at year’s end…
“This nomination is dead and we have known it for several days,” a source close to the U.S. mission to the U.N. tells NewsMax.
Update: Nothing happened in the Rose Garden. Standard yadda about working with the opposition and the upcoming legislative agenda. Oh well.
Update: The fact that nothing happened is what makes this so noteworthy, says Tammy Bruce:
I now have to face the possibility that Bolton may be tossed overboard because the president did not mention him in his press conference just a moment ago. President Bush issued a list of things he wants the current congress to pass before the changeover at the end of the year. Confirming Bolton was not among them.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I think the loss of Bush in any democratic form (resignation/impeachment) would be catastrophic.
With him, you would lose the Bush Doctrine and the ideal that it’s better to attack your enemies now, then wait for them to attack you later.
Kai on November 9, 2006 at 12:07 PM
If this is the kind of demoralized crap that I am going to have to read on a constant basis on Hot Air from now on, I’ll just quit coming. Ya’ll need to buck up.
Yes, we lost. Yes, we got our butts kicked.
Yes Bush is doing something we don’t approve of. However, I am not sure he’s changed all the much.
He was for amnesty before, and he’s still for Amnesty. The only way Bush is going to stop Illegal Immigration is buy purchasing Mexico. He just doesn’t have the balls to do anything else.
We don’t know what kinds of deals he is attempting to wheel and deal in the back rooms of the White House and Capitol building.
So Rummy is gone, in exchange for what? Was there a deal that Congress wouldn’t waste our time with idiotic impeachment hearings if Rummy left?
Amnesty in trade for… what? A more positive outlook on Iraq from Dems?
It’s all politics… and I suspect that Bush wheels and deals with the best of them.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 12:08 PM
Would it be too much to wait and see what he does before we go castigating him for making a bad choice? SHEESH!
smellthecoffee on November 9, 2006 at 12:10 PM
well last night on Bill O’Reilly show, Dick Morris said basically that if the Republicans pass some kinda of immigration law that huurts the illegals that already in this country then the Republicans lose the Hispanic vote for about 100 years & the democrats will be inpower for a very long time & if the Republicans side with the open border groups then – game over.
Starblazer on November 9, 2006 at 12:11 PM
Bush’s “resigning” of Rumsfeld is pretty clear evidence that Bush has no interest in fighting or winning anything anymore, just bugging out. The Cut & Run Democrats are calling the shots now.
Spiny Norman on November 9, 2006 at 12:15 PM
Rumsfeld resignation bodes end of Bush Doctrine
Spiny Norman on November 9, 2006 at 12:18 PM
So impeachment is good for America…..it is what you are saying…….that will fix this problem…..
FIRE THE COACH WE LOST A GAME!!!!!!! Screw you.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 12:20 PM
Conservatives need to be open minded and realize that some of the left’s complaints are valid, no matter how horrid it is to admit it.
It is not really debated that Bush and Rumsfeld have been repeatedly told by our Generals to send more troops, but both Bush and Rumsfeld have been extremely stubborn for whatever reason. I do not blame that on the media.
If we fought this war with the attitude that Bush pretended to have – it would be over by now. Instead, Rumsfeld decided to invite the entire world of film crews in to film the battles and basically sabotaged the entire thing himself. The fact that Iraq is a mess IS Rumsfeld’s fault. The media has done it’s part in making it tough, but the fact that Bush and Rumsfeld have ALLOWED them to dictate our actions is only their fault.
Bush is not the gung-ho Texas cowboy he promised us. So far, all we’ve really seen is more of a wimpy whine and now we’re seeing him wave the white flag.
Meanwhile he has completely flipped us the finger on illegal immigration.
If we’re going to win back the majorities next time, we better make our choices more carefully next time around and pick true conservatives like Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Tom Tancredo.
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 12:21 PM
Exactly!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 12:22 PM
That’s a bunch of crap!
First off, we don’t HAVE the Hispanic vote NOW, so how can we LOSE it?
Second, most law-abiding Hispanics are AGAINST illegal immigration.
Bush is not doing this out of fear for the “Hispanic vote.” He’s doing it for financial purposes.
He’s selling us out!
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 12:25 PM
As Bush is currently telling Republicans the same by totally caving in to the liberals again, I will support Impeachment!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 12:31 PM
This is exactly why the position on the battlefied with the highest casualty rate is the platoon leader. While everyone is jumping for a shell hole he is trying to move them forward. Leadership. Something many on this page think means doing things THEIR way. Well hunker down boys. Find your shell hole. The war will be over soon.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 12:31 PM
Um, I guess you missed the election results? The war IS over, and Republicans totally lost. Liberalism won, and Bush has already surrendered.
Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 12:37 PM
The real enemy, Osama and his minons, have to be laughing their heads off at us right now. The number of times we’ve all talked about the left eating their own, and here we are doing the same thing.
I am ashamed of ya’ll.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 12:39 PM
Bush will not be impeached because Rumsfeld was sacrificed. I read it here first.
Of course, the dims may go back on their hypothetical promise to Bush.
AtomicAmish on November 9, 2006 at 12:42 PM
Trolls…………..when you bury me, when you drink at the wake…..drop High Noon in the DVD. There are two parts in the movie you are not, Gary Cooper or Frank Miller. Welcome to our happy town citizens. On my gravestone please put the following ‘At least he had entertainment value’.
I support the President. I support the war. You obviously are either trolls, cowards, or the child in the grocery store screaming on the floor.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 12:44 PM
You still don’t get it. We totally lost, and thus we need to wake up to that fact. Republicans are no longer relevant, and that needs to be fixed ASAP as the liberals are totally geared up to lose the WOT, push their social agenda, and make sure that they regain the White House in 08.
We lost our best chance to keep the country on track last Tuesday. Now is the time to get started on renewing the conservative agenda, and get rid of the RINO’s that brought the GOP to its knees. IMHO, we should start with Impeaching Bush.
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 12:48 PM
Agreed, Limerick. It doesn’t follow that just because someone doesn’t like how he runs his cabinet that he should be impeached.
To be against impeachment last week and for it this week is just emotionalism. Unless, or course, they know something the rest of us don’t.
AtomicAmish on November 9, 2006 at 12:49 PM
I’m actually ashamed at the number of conservatives who are not outraged at what Bush has done to our Party.
That is what the liberals do. They blindly support their leaders no matter what they do. Clinton under the desk? No problem. Reid taking bribes? No problem. Michael Moore lies? Who cares? Murtha negotiating bribes? Great!
Bush has spent us into the ground. Rumsfeld has failed in Iraq and on top of all of this … Bush has pissed off the base with his open borders desires.
He is destroying us!
Sure the media is biased! Sure the Times is doing it’s best to bring us down. But who has given them the ammo? Bob Ney was dirty. Foley was a homo-perv. This stuff wasn’t made up and it has crushed us.
I thought we were the Party who wouldn’t tolerate it. I thought we were better than them? I thought we were the Party who stood for values.
It was fine to be gung-ho about supporting and voting for these guys in the mid-terms in the hopes of holding our power, but many of us admitted that we then needed to clean house in the primaries.
We lost! We are in trouble. And this has happened because our leaders have lied to us, cheated us, and failed us.
For you people that say we should not be blasting him …
Other than fighting terrorists, what else has he done that could be considered a win for conservatives?
And I remind you that currently the Iraq war is a disaster.
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 12:55 PM
I’m not in favor of Impeachment, far from it. In fact, if the Dems want to go ahead with their dog-&-pony show, they’ll be the ones to suffer. Good.
I just think Bush became the walking definition of a “lame duck” with his news conference yesterday.
Spiny Norman on November 9, 2006 at 12:58 PM
“If it weren’t for bad luck, we’d have no luck at all.”
CyberCipher on November 9, 2006 at 1:02 PM
Except for your comment on the Iraq War, I totally agree with you.
Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 1:06 PM
It hasn’t even been a week since the election, and ya’ll are already talking lynching the President.
I’m not happy with the way things turned out. I’m not happy that the Dems are in control of the Congress, but I am willing to see how things go when 110th is seated in Jan.
Those screaming for Impeachment are way jumping the gun, and have yet to prove any legal ground to do so.
So just take a tranq and settle down.
This isn’t DU, this is Hot Air. Michelle, Allah, Ian, and Bryan have worked hard to make this a respectable site and we owe it to them to keep it from becoming the DKOS for the Right.
E L Frederick on November 9, 2006 at 1:09 PM
I’m not calling for “lynching the President” and I don’t want him impeached. That would – once again – embarrass the GOP.
What I’m saying is that conservatives should be DEMANDING that our reps fullfil the promises they made to us. We should not be blindly supporting them like the DUers and KosKids do. We should be letting them know that we want conservative ACTIONS.
As for Iraq … if we don’t want liberals to call it “another Vietnam” … then we shouldn’t be fighting it that way. We should be sending in as many troops as possible and we should be brutal. We should “clean house” and put a stop to it.
And Limerick, as for your comment:
We all support the war. We just want it WON! None of us want to pull out. I would venture to say that MOST of us would like to go in harder and more brutal. If you think the war is going brilliantly … that’s just confusing.
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 1:21 PM
thank you EL…..I needed the tranq…….all this pointing fingers has gotten me unhinged.
Limerick on November 9, 2006 at 1:22 PM
“Doom, despair, and agony on me.”
dalewalt on November 9, 2006 at 10:30 AM
“Deep dark depression, excessive misery.”
If it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all….
Dave R. on November 9, 2006 at 1:28 PM
I know W says he pays no attention to polls, but when it has an affect on the political survival of others, perhaps he ought to cast an ear now and then.
Willing one’s self to support Bush is becoming more and more onerous- now he’s abandoning Bolton?
Good grief.
drjohn on November 9, 2006 at 1:33 PM
Looks like his presser was followed by a “lunch with Democratic leaders.” I wonder what they served…crow?
RD on November 9, 2006 at 1:35 PM
Did you know that Dick Morris works for Vicente Fox?
Bill O’Reilly had 2 open border advocates on last night that agree with him about Amnesty;Racist Jerry Rivers aka Heraldo Rivera and Dick Morris.
He owed it to the viewers to let them know that Dick Morris works for Vicente Fox and has advocated for the North American Union or Security and Prosperity Agreement(SPP) since he ran Fox’s election campaign.
Do you actually think that Mexicans will vote for Republicans when they come from a country that almost elected a communist?
ScottyDog on November 9, 2006 at 1:52 PM
Via Fox News:
Bolton will be presented to the Senate for a try at confirmation before the Congress changes.
Let’s hope!
DJ Dubya on November 9, 2006 at 2:02 PM
So you want it to be a moderate site, something like Hitlary is working towards?
We know what the moderates voted for. Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 2:06 PM
This reads too close to the scene in Episode IV in which Grand Moff Tarkin is in a meeting with other department heads. Tarkin just announced that the Emporer has dissolved the senate or something.
allie on November 9, 2006 at 2:09 PM
Woo Hoo! W00t!
Linc Chaffee, don’t you even think about it. Remember, you’ve got to come home sometime.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 2:14 PM
God, this is disheartening. During his first term, Bush had the chance to be the next Reagan. Now? He’s shooting for Carter.
Wolfman on November 9, 2006 at 2:17 PM
Bush makes push for approval of UN envoy Bolton
Yeah, baby!
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 2:18 PM
This is partially scary. Bolton was pretty much a dead issue BEFORE the mid-terms, so what makes him think it will be any different now?
My guess is he’s making some kind of trade off. That could be bad.
Gregor on November 9, 2006 at 2:23 PM
Voinovich was tearfully opposed to Bolton before. Now he’s not. It’s possible they could do this.
It’s also a nice chance to see how much the Dems really want to work together.
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 2:27 PM
Fat chance!
DannoJyd on November 9, 2006 at 2:29 PM
Bush announced that we captured Osama bin Laden on Monday, but he didn’t want the news to affect the outcome of the mid-term elections. Tool!!!!!!!!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 9, 2006 at 2:29 PM
Which is why you do it before the Dems take over…
Pablo on November 9, 2006 at 3:23 PM
Savage is totally right.
Waldo is here.
Bush is a dumb fk.
LZVandy on November 9, 2006 at 3:24 PM
I support the President too, but I didn’t vote for Bush twice to have him give amnesty to people who broke laws getting here. Hearing “press 1″ for English when I call the drugstore is not the America I want. I shouldn’t be pressing anything to hear English, the language of my country.
I support the war as well. I’m not disappointed in our troops, I’m disappointed in the Iraqi people. I don’t advocate pulling our troops out of Iraq, but I want our troops out of Baghdad. If the Sunni’s and Shiite’s want a civil war, let them have at it, but get our troops out of the way. No war is won by politicians.
Actually, I’m very afraid of the direction the Republican party has taken. I want the Reagan Republicans back. I’m neither troll, coward, or a child, or a kool-aid drinker. I’m just an American protesting.
moonsbreath on November 9, 2006 at 3:30 PM
Fat chance!
Pablo, please explain to me how that works again. I don’t get it, and neither does the Senate. Indeed, it was the Senate candidate Senator Chafee whom Bush supported who again proved that the liberals already control the Senate.
Impeach Bush!
DannoJyd on November 10, 2006 at 5:54 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2