<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Came from Diebold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:29:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Diebold Derangement Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-862937</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Diebold Derangement Syndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-862937</guid>
		<description>[...] Derangement Syndrome 2006 It came from Diebold Diebold! Stolen election! Um, never mind&#8230; The Dems&#8217; preemption strategy Attack of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Derangement Syndrome 2006 It came from Diebold Diebold! Stolen election! Um, never mind&#8230; The Dems&#8217; preemption strategy Attack of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Diebold Derangement Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-571540</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Diebold Derangement Syndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-571540</guid>
		<description>[...] It came from Diebold Diebold! Stolen election! Um, never mind&#8230; The Dems&#8217; preemption strategy Attack of the mother machines Pandering to the crackpot left  Posted in: Voter fraud, Kos  comments (0)&#160;&#160;&#160;trackbacks (7) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It came from Diebold Diebold! Stolen election! Um, never mind&#8230; The Dems&#8217; preemption strategy Attack of the mother machines Pandering to the crackpot left  Posted in: Voter fraud, Kos  comments (0)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;trackbacks (7) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-109448</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-109448</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Diebold Derangement Syndrome...&lt;/strong&gt;

Oh, this is just side-splitting. The Daily Kos summons up the Black Box Brigades and launches a fund-raising drive to fight evil Diebold, which Kos thinks stole a congressional election from a Democrat in Florida&#039;s 13th district. &quot;These are the......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Diebold Derangement Syndrome&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Oh, this is just side-splitting. The Daily Kos summons up the Black Box Brigades and launches a fund-raising drive to fight evil Diebold, which Kos thinks stole a congressional election from a Democrat in Florida&#8217;s 13th district. &#8220;These are the&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stones Cry Out</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-97901</link>
		<dc:creator>Stones Cry Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-97901</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Election Roundup...&lt;/strong&gt;

As of now, Democrats have been given control of the House of Representatives, and there are two outstanding races in the Senate that will determine who controls that chamber. This is definitely going to make it harder for Republicans to......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Election Roundup&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As of now, Democrats have been given control of the House of Representatives, and there are two outstanding races in the Senate that will determine who controls that chamber. This is definitely going to make it harder for Republicans to&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Considerettes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-97893</link>
		<dc:creator>Considerettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-97893</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Election Roundup...&lt;/strong&gt;

As of now, Democrats have been given control of the House of Representatives, and there are two outstanding races in the Senate that will determine who controls that chamber.  This is definitely going to make it harder for Republicans to get their init...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Election Roundup&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As of now, Democrats have been given control of the House of Representatives, and there are two outstanding races in the Senate that will determine who controls that chamber.  This is definitely going to make it harder for Republicans to get their init&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilpatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96606</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilpatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96606</guid>
		<description>The winnah and still champion of all dirty elections?   Coke Stevenson vs Lyndon Johnson in 1948.  Best dirty trick?
It was called voting by the string.  &quot;Motor Voters&quot; from south of the Rio Grande were brought in by the truckload.  They were generally illiterate in Spanish let alone English. So they were each given a piece of string with a big knot at the top and little knots on down the line.  They were to place the big knot in a certain place, stretch the string and then make an &quot;X&quot; by each of the little knots.

One remote precinct had about 547 people living there. Had a good turnout as 868 of them voted.  Total was Lyndon Johnson 865, Coke Stevenson 3.  When George Parr, the &quot;Duke of Duvall County&quot; was asked to explain that kind of result. He replied, &quot;Three of those dumb Mexicans hung the string in the wrong place.&quot;

So what is new at the polling place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The winnah and still champion of all dirty elections?   Coke Stevenson vs Lyndon Johnson in 1948.  Best dirty trick?<br />
It was called voting by the string.  &#8220;Motor Voters&#8221; from south of the Rio Grande were brought in by the truckload.  They were generally illiterate in Spanish let alone English. So they were each given a piece of string with a big knot at the top and little knots on down the line.  They were to place the big knot in a certain place, stretch the string and then make an &#8220;X&#8221; by each of the little knots.</p>
<p>One remote precinct had about 547 people living there. Had a good turnout as 868 of them voted.  Total was Lyndon Johnson 865, Coke Stevenson 3.  When George Parr, the &#8220;Duke of Duvall County&#8221; was asked to explain that kind of result. He replied, &#8220;Three of those dumb Mexicans hung the string in the wrong place.&#8221;</p>
<p>So what is new at the polling place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96549</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96549</guid>
		<description>I love you Michelle!!!

Republicans will do the unthinkable and hold the house and senate and even pick up a couple seats.

YHIHF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you Michelle!!!</p>
<p>Republicans will do the unthinkable and hold the house and senate and even pick up a couple seats.</p>
<p>YHIHF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Years Later</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96529</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Years Later</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96529</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Couverture &quot;Live&quot; Des Mid-Term Elections aux Etats-Unis sur 5 Years Later...&lt;/strong&gt;

7.30 pm: Missouri&#039;s last polls HERE as well as Montana&#039;s polls HERE. Robert Byrd is reelected God Damn It!


7.23 pm: With a 42% turnover, it looks as if the GOP has managed to attract its voters to the ballots. Here are the last outcomes availabl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Couverture &quot;Live&quot; Des Mid-Term Elections aux Etats-Unis sur 5 Years Later&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>7.30 pm: Missouri&#8217;s last polls HERE as well as Montana&#8217;s polls HERE. Robert Byrd is reelected God Damn It!</p>
<p>7.23 pm: With a 42% turnover, it looks as if the GOP has managed to attract its voters to the ballots. Here are the last outcomes availabl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkeyhue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96469</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkeyhue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96469</guid>
		<description>I failed your test seejanemom, but not for a lack of Patriotism...Im just not that smart and currently blindly drunk.  Ill retake it tommorow when I sober up.  

This is my first comment and I look forward to bringing absolutely nothing to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I failed your test seejanemom, but not for a lack of Patriotism&#8230;Im just not that smart and currently blindly drunk.  Ill retake it tommorow when I sober up.  </p>
<p>This is my first comment and I look forward to bringing absolutely nothing to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96458</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96458</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; just voted using those machines. Everything went fine. But I couldn&#039;t find Kerry or Bill Clinton’s name anywhere. I thought they were running for something, seeing as I saw them in every single commercial. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Did not see George Bush either although everyone was running against him.  Strange!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> just voted using those machines. Everything went fine. But I couldn&#8217;t find Kerry or Bill Clinton’s name anywhere. I thought they were running for something, seeing as I saw them in every single commercial. </p></blockquote>
<p>Did not see George Bush either although everyone was running against him.  Strange!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96405</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96405</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I voted a straight republican ticket, and where there was no republican running, I wrote in Ronald Reagan. 

JackM on November 7, 2006 at 11:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hah... Too funny.  I gotta remember that for next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I voted a straight republican ticket, and where there was no republican running, I wrote in Ronald Reagan. </p>
<p>JackM on November 7, 2006 at 11:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hah&#8230; Too funny.  I gotta remember that for next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;We Won or You Cheated&#8221; &#171; Something should go here, maybe later.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96393</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;We Won or You Cheated&#8221; &#171; Something should go here, maybe later.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96393</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air gives roundup of the issues with voter machines. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air gives roundup of the issues with voter machines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Shay</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96224</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96224</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in favor of a voting system where:

- I am required to show government-issued photo ID.
- I am allowed to anonymously fill in my paper ballot or use the electronic voting machine without a moonbat &quot;observer&quot; filming me.
- I am issued some kind of receipt with a unique serial number on it and a confirmation of my choices.  After the election is certified, I can visit a website and enter the serial number on my receipt to confirm that my choices were correctly recorded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in favor of a voting system where:</p>
<p>- I am required to show government-issued photo ID.<br />
- I am allowed to anonymously fill in my paper ballot or use the electronic voting machine without a moonbat &#8220;observer&#8221; filming me.<br />
- I am issued some kind of receipt with a unique serial number on it and a confirmation of my choices.  After the election is certified, I can visit a website and enter the serial number on my receipt to confirm that my choices were correctly recorded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96180</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96180</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course there wasn’t becuase there were no machines in those counties and 2000.

How could you forget THE HANGING CHAD… 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup.

And how could you forget Democrats SCREAMING afterwards for electronic voting ...?

Oh, the irony. It burns, it burns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course there wasn’t becuase there were no machines in those counties and 2000.</p>
<p>How could you forget THE HANGING CHAD…
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup.</p>
<p>And how could you forget Democrats SCREAMING afterwards for electronic voting &#8230;?</p>
<p>Oh, the irony. It burns, it burns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaHerer22</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96147</link>
		<dc:creator>JaHerer22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There wasn’t anything wrong with the machines in those 4 Florida counties in 2000 and there’s nothing wrong with them now…
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course there wasn&#039;t becuase there were no machines in those counties and 2000.

How could you forget THE HANGING CHAD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There wasn’t anything wrong with the machines in those 4 Florida counties in 2000 and there’s nothing wrong with them now…
</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course there wasn&#8217;t becuase there were no machines in those counties and 2000.</p>
<p>How could you forget THE HANGING CHAD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96140</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dirty, Dirty Tricky Time...&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle focuses on the Dems&#039; pre-delegitimization of the elections. 
Be afraid! Be very afraid of Diebold!
Just kidding. I think the dead voters, mail-in voters, non-ID voters, and ACORN voters are much more problematic than the technical......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dirty, Dirty Tricky Time&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michelle focuses on the Dems&#8217; pre-delegitimization of the elections.<br />
Be afraid! Be very afraid of Diebold!<br />
Just kidding. I think the dead voters, mail-in voters, non-ID voters, and ACORN voters are much more problematic than the technical&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theworldisnotenough</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96126</link>
		<dc:creator>Theworldisnotenough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m turning in my absentee ballot. I do not trust the machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m turning in my absentee ballot. I do not trust the machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96116</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96116</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The only way to completely rid ourselves of “flaws” in the electoral process would be to dispense with the secret ballot so that audits can be performed after the fact. A record would be made of every vote ever cast - and would be on the record. And if your vote suddenly showed up a few days after election day on a website that didn’t jibe with the one you cast, then an investigation could ensue. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So what do people think of Urbancenturion&#039;s idea? (Great name, by the way!). What&#039;s wrong with it? Wouldn&#039;t it just about solve every problem - if you could later check your OWN vote?

You could even keep it semi-secret by publishing votes by Social Security #.

Seems workable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only way to completely rid ourselves of “flaws” in the electoral process would be to dispense with the secret ballot so that audits can be performed after the fact. A record would be made of every vote ever cast &#8211; and would be on the record. And if your vote suddenly showed up a few days after election day on a website that didn’t jibe with the one you cast, then an investigation could ensue. </p></blockquote>
<p>So what do people think of Urbancenturion&#8217;s idea? (Great name, by the way!). What&#8217;s wrong with it? Wouldn&#8217;t it just about solve every problem &#8211; if you could later check your OWN vote?</p>
<p>You could even keep it semi-secret by publishing votes by Social Security #.</p>
<p>Seems workable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96115</guid>
		<description>Pablo,

Same here in Indy.  We used to have ancient pull-lever machines, but a few election cycles ago they got the electronic ballot readers.  I&#039;ve never heard of any problems or controversies.  Every time I&#039;ve voted it was smooth sailing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo,</p>
<p>Same here in Indy.  We used to have ancient pull-lever machines, but a few election cycles ago they got the electronic ballot readers.  I&#8217;ve never heard of any problems or controversies.  Every time I&#8217;ve voted it was smooth sailing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96108</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96108</guid>
		<description>The ballot I used today had no marks on it identifying who voted. Which means that if a boxful of new ballots suddenly &quot;appeared&quot;, there wuold be no way to substantiate if they were legitimate or not. A similar problem occurs if a boxful of votes from a predominantly &quot;red&quot; district were to fall out of a car window and into a river on the way to the counting station.

The only way to completely rid ourselves of &quot;flaws&quot; in the electoral process would be to dispense with the secret ballot so that audits can be performed after the fact. A record would be made of every vote ever cast - and would be &lt;em&gt;on the record&lt;/em&gt;. And if your vote suddenly showed up a few days after election day on a website that didn&#039;t jibe with the one you cast, then an investigation could ensue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ballot I used today had no marks on it identifying who voted. Which means that if a boxful of new ballots suddenly &#8220;appeared&#8221;, there wuold be no way to substantiate if they were legitimate or not. A similar problem occurs if a boxful of votes from a predominantly &#8220;red&#8221; district were to fall out of a car window and into a river on the way to the counting station.</p>
<p>The only way to completely rid ourselves of &#8220;flaws&#8221; in the electoral process would be to dispense with the secret ballot so that audits can be performed after the fact. A record would be made of every vote ever cast &#8211; and would be <em>on the record</em>. And if your vote suddenly showed up a few days after election day on a website that didn&#8217;t jibe with the one you cast, then an investigation could ensue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96084</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96084</guid>
		<description>CrazyFool, then your best option is to start cranking out babies.

JackM, good idea. If the dead can vote, then the dead should be able to hold office. Ronaldus Magnus from the grave is better than Kennedy/Kerry/Clinton, &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt; stealing oxygen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CrazyFool, then your best option is to start cranking out babies.</p>
<p>JackM, good idea. If the dead can vote, then the dead should be able to hold office. Ronaldus Magnus from the grave is better than Kennedy/Kerry/Clinton, <em>et al</em> stealing oxygen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96041</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96041</guid>
		<description>Mark Jaquith, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;The public has no idea how these machines work. With paper ballots, there are publicly available procedures for counting votes. Not so with electronic voting machines.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We&#039;ve been using a paper ballot which you then feed into an optical scanner for years. It seems like the best of both worlds. If you can read, you can&#039;t screw the ballot up, and there will always be an original paper record of each vote if something happens to the electronic data, intended or unintended. There&#039;s also no human involved in the counting unless the ballot is messed up...in which case the scanner won&#039;t accept it until a poll worker gets you straightened out.

I don&#039;t recall anyone ever requesting a recount other than a write in candidate for a city post a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Jaquith, </p>
<blockquote><p>The public has no idea how these machines work. With paper ballots, there are publicly available procedures for counting votes. Not so with electronic voting machines.</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;ve been using a paper ballot which you then feed into an optical scanner for years. It seems like the best of both worlds. If you can read, you can&#8217;t screw the ballot up, and there will always be an original paper record of each vote if something happens to the electronic data, intended or unintended. There&#8217;s also no human involved in the counting unless the ballot is messed up&#8230;in which case the scanner won&#8217;t accept it until a poll worker gets you straightened out.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall anyone ever requesting a recount other than a write in candidate for a city post a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njrob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96030</link>
		<dc:creator>njrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96030</guid>
		<description>As you can see by my name, I live in NJ. I&#039;m one of the rare principled conservatives in a sea of liberals. I also know several of the elderly ladies that run the polls by me. Still, they asked me for ID which I gladly gave. I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s a requirement here, but it&#039;s by far the most logical thing we can do to minimize voter fraud. A name and address on your ID can definitely limit the number of places you can go to vote for those people that hop to different polls to vote. The only possible reason I can see to be against it is to encourage fraud. 

And maybe I&#039;m mistaken, but I thought you needed to have ID on you if you were over 18 in case you had a run in with the police. Am I mistaken here? Maybe it&#039;s just my NYC upbringing where I saw the cops trying to take back the city under Giuliani after Dinkins nearly destroyed the place. 

Yes, I held my nose and voted for Tom Kean Jr. for Senate. He&#039;s a buffoon, but he doesn&#039;t appear to be corrupt like Menendez is, at least not yet. Have a good day all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you can see by my name, I live in NJ. I&#8217;m one of the rare principled conservatives in a sea of liberals. I also know several of the elderly ladies that run the polls by me. Still, they asked me for ID which I gladly gave. I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a requirement here, but it&#8217;s by far the most logical thing we can do to minimize voter fraud. A name and address on your ID can definitely limit the number of places you can go to vote for those people that hop to different polls to vote. The only possible reason I can see to be against it is to encourage fraud. </p>
<p>And maybe I&#8217;m mistaken, but I thought you needed to have ID on you if you were over 18 in case you had a run in with the police. Am I mistaken here? Maybe it&#8217;s just my NYC upbringing where I saw the cops trying to take back the city under Giuliani after Dinkins nearly destroyed the place. </p>
<p>Yes, I held my nose and voted for Tom Kean Jr. for Senate. He&#8217;s a buffoon, but he doesn&#8217;t appear to be corrupt like Menendez is, at least not yet. Have a good day all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: VENT with Michelle Malkin - It Came from Diebold &#171; Red State American</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96025</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: VENT with Michelle Malkin - It Came from Diebold &#171; Red State American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96025</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/comment-page-1/#comment-96005</link>
		<dc:creator>StephC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/07/it-came-from-diebold/#comment-96005</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We here in the Peoples Republic of Washington (King and Snohomish counties) don’t have to worry about mamma machine. Polling places are outlawed by [imperial] decree. 

Instead we are forced to vote by mail. Makes it easier for the dead, illegals, felons, and imaginary friends to vote - they don’t have to show id or even exist in the same reality.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Same here on the other side of WA State (Franklin Co.)  I hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We here in the Peoples Republic of Washington (King and Snohomish counties) don’t have to worry about mamma machine. Polling places are outlawed by [imperial] decree. </p>
<p>Instead we are forced to vote by mail. Makes it easier for the dead, illegals, felons, and imaginary friends to vote &#8211; they don’t have to show id or even exist in the same reality.</p></blockquote>
<p>Same here on the other side of WA State (Franklin Co.)  I hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
