Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Ballot initiative bonanza

posted at 9:37 am on November 7, 2006 by Michelle
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

I grew up in New Jersey, which does not have provisions for initiatives and referendum–even though it’s the state where the I&R movement began. When I moved out to the West Coast, I got to experience the process up close and personal, tracking Prop. 187 (the anti-illegal immigration ballot measure) and Prop. 200 209 (Ward Connerly’s first successful anti-racial preference measure) in California and anti-tax and anti-preference measures in Washington state. Elite civic worrywarts don’t like “rabble-rousers” having so much say in the electoral process. Guess that’s why I’m such a big ballot initiative booster.

If the national campaigns don’t bring out voters, local and state ballot initiatives will. The Economist reports, “Daniel Smith of the University of Florida and Caroline Tolbert of Kent State University have looked at voting patterns from 1980-2002, and estimate that mid-term turnout goes up by an average of 1.7% for each initiative on the ballot.”

There are measures on the ballot in 37 states covering everything from eminent domain to gay marriage to cloning.

Here are a few we’re keeping an eye on. We’ll update as results come in. Let us know what you’re watching.

*Amendment 2, the “stem cell initiative” in Missouri. It’s Rush vs. Michael J. Fox. Missourians Against Human Cloning lays out the implications. Polls show tightening. Motivated voters on the issue could tilt the dead-heat Talent-McCaskill race.

*MCRI in Michigan – Proposal 2. The usual race-card players, coupled with spineless GOP elites, tried to keep Ward Connerly’s anti-racial preference measure off the ballot. Now, voters will get to speak. Connerly and company have won resoundingly in California and Washington state. It’s a tight race in Michigan.

*Gay marriage. It’s on the ballot in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin.

*Abortion in South Dakota – Referred Law 6. Here’s the editorial take of the Aberdeen News. Weather forecast: High temps and high turnout.

Elsewhere, via the Associated Press:

On Withdrawing from Iraq — Three states — Illinois, Massachusetts and Wisconsin — will ask voters if they want to call for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.

On Hosting a New Lottery — Voters in Arizona could be rewarded next election for exercising their right to vote. Proposition 200, the Arizona Voter Reward Act, would establish a $1 million prize drawing every two years for a voter selected at random from those casting ballots in state primary or general elections.

On Raising the Minimum Wage — A boost for state minimum wage levels goes before voters in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Montana, Missouri and Ohio. All the states currently have minimum wages that match the federal level of $5.15 per hour. Arizona would raise its rate to $6.75 per hour; Colorado would go up to $6.85; Missouri would rise to $6.50; Montana and Nevada would increase theirs to $6.15 per hour; and Ohio would raise its wage to $6.85 per hour.

On Designating an Official Language — Arizona will ask voters whether they want to designate English as the official language.

On Smoking and Tobacco Taxes — Arizona and Ohio will decide if they want to ban smoking in public places but allow it in bars. California, Missouri and South Dakota will vote to increase state taxes on tobacco products.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

The one being hammered on here in CA is #87, taxing the hell out of oil .
There are those that actually believe that this will not add to the cost of fuel.

bbz123 on November 7, 2006 at 9:44 AM

The ones that Michelle listed I like.

However, the questions in referendums are often misleading. For example, here in Fairfax County, VA they always have questions like 1) Do you support a $XX million funding for libraries. . .or parks. . .or schools?

These usually pass with an 80% approval rate. What person wouldn’t want more libraries?

What the questions don’t state is that the millions of tax dollars going to libraries are for foreign language books (Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese, etc.) for those who don’t speak English and for expanding buildings to hold these collections. That was last year’s referendum for libraries in Fairfax County, but nobody knew what the funding was really for. That is just one example of many misleading questions they have in referendums in this suburban county.

This is why I prefer a Republic, where we elect members who we can contact, and who will vote for us.

Also, referendums favor Dems because whenever conservatives pass ones we like, the libs in the courts always overturn them.

januarius on November 7, 2006 at 10:06 AM

North Dakota has a hot initiative on the burner as well, the North Dakota Shared Parenting Initiative.

NOW and the Bar Association are not impressed. It’s short, sweet and perhaps overreaches a bit, but it makes sense to me:

Full Text of the Measure

BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF NORTH DAKOTA:
A new subsection of Chapter 14 the North Dakota Century Code is created at 14-09-06.7, and enacted as follows:Not withstanding any other state statute or common law, the following fundamental rights are hereby recognized for all adults and children of North Dakota, and this subsection shall be self activating upon voter approval.

14-09-06.7 Shared Parenting – equal access to children.

1. Parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody and control of their children. Acknowledging the long established legal tenet that fit parents act in the best interest of their children, no parent shall be denied custody of a child without first having been declared unfit, utilizing the clear and convincing evidentiary standard. Absent a finding of parental unfitness parents retain joint legal and joint physical custody of their children. Joint physical custody of the children is defined as a rebuttable presumption of equal time sharing by the parents. In the event of a finding of unfitness of one parent, the best interests and welfare of the child is determined at the court’s discretion utilizing current best interest standards as defined in existing state code.

2. Parents shall develop a joint parenting plan, or if they can not agree to such a plan, the court shall facilitate production of a parenting plan with them. These plans must take into account the fundamental liberty interest of the parents, encouraging parents to craft a plan based on their unique family circumstances. Parents may modify the parenting plan anytime without restriction by mutual agreement. Parenting plan changes as a result of court petition require the petitioner to demonstrate how the modification serves the child’s best interest. Parents who have not previously had a fitness hearing may petition the court for a fitness hearing at any time. All decisions or actions under state law shall be gender and race neutral. Gender cannot be a determining factor in parenting plan formulation or modification decisions.

3. Child support payments and allocation of child support obligations will be determined according to the parenting plan, and will not be greater than the actual cost of providing for the basic needs of the child(ren).

Pablo on November 7, 2006 at 10:06 AM

Yes, I liked our cut and run ballot question in Mass. I also like how they had to point out it is non-binding, which is a bit ironic. Any ballot question that ends up being against what the Dems want seems to suddenly become non-binding.

This could be a huge day for the unions and the libs here in MA. What a sad state of affairs. The unions have spent millions on their candidates and ballot questions.

The only bright side is, the impending state-wide disaster might serve as a warning to voters in other states.

reaganaut on November 7, 2006 at 10:07 AM

Massachusetts needs to just secede from the Union and get it the hell over with. John Kerry can be their President king village idiot.

seejanemom on November 7, 2006 at 10:38 AM

Michelle is a Jersey-girl?? I didn’t know that conservatives still inhabited that planet.

budorob on November 7, 2006 at 10:41 AM

In Florida, we have a full plate. Amendment 3 looks to limit ballot initiatives, by requirng that they pass with a 60% margin. Amendment 8 addresses Eminent Domain abuse.

As a bonus, we vote on 3 Supreme Court justices, two of which were involved in the 2000 election.

Kid from Brooklyn on November 7, 2006 at 10:43 AM

Michelle is a Jersey-girl?? I didn’t know that conservatives still inhabited that planet.

budorob on November 7, 2006 at 10:41 AM

The grow up there, and flee in disgust. :P

Kid from Brooklyn on November 7, 2006 at 10:44 AM

In Illinois we had,

Pull out the troops.
Raise the minimum wage.
Ban the sale of assault weapons.

BobK on November 7, 2006 at 10:47 AM

Georgians are voting today on a constitutional amendment to preserve the right to hunt and fish. We gun-totin’ rednecks believe this is necessary to protect outdoor sports from animal rights extremists like PETA. Most opponents say that it’s just a ploy to get more gun-totin’ rednecks to vote. Pretty clever for a bunch of rednecks, eh?

RedWinged Blackbird on November 7, 2006 at 10:58 AM

One way to get Libs to Vote against embryotic stem cell research…..
make the research only on small, furry, endangerd animal embryos.. PETA will go insane….

DarianCounts on November 7, 2006 at 11:08 AM

Boy – Arizona seems to rather busy. So proud to live here :P

There are two initiatives to screw up the vote – the ‘Voter Lottery’ and the ‘Mail-In Ballot Only’ initiatives.
The libs are SO mad that you have to show ID in order to vote in Arizona (a previous Prop 200). They tried to stop it, but it was re-instated just before the election. Too bad, now all the illegals that live here won’t get to vote :(

And the ‘Mail-In Ballot’ – wouldn’t that be ripe for voter fraud. I heard that Oregon voted this in and are having all sorts of problems. Anyone know if this is true or not?

Finally, just what we need – there are enough ‘uninformed’ voters that make their way to the polls (driven by libs, no doubt) to cast a ballot. If the ‘Voter Lottery’ is passed, it will only make it worse.

Timothy S. Carlson on November 7, 2006 at 11:11 AM

Two other important initiatives in Michigan –

One strongly limits eminent domain for private development, and the other provides a (large) guaranteed funding for teacher salaries (with anual rises linked to the CPI).

Clark1 on November 7, 2006 at 11:16 AM

In addition to gay marriage, SC also has an initiative to limit eminent domain powers for public use only.

SCGOPgirl on November 7, 2006 at 11:43 AM

In Chicago, I had to vote down 1) a proposed raise in the minimum wage, 2) a move to pull troops out of Iraq, 3) a move to force large chains to pay outrageous wages for unskilled labor that would chase them out of Chicago, and 4) a move to ban certain kinds of guns in violation of the 2nd amendment. I might be one of three Repubs in the city, but I voted.

ahem on November 7, 2006 at 11:58 AM

One problem with the initiatives is that he politicos are learning to manipulate the process.

In California they are doing an end run around tax restraint laws (prop 13) and putting measures on the ballot that will result in higher taxes, subverting previous tax restraint laws.

IMHO-The process needs to be reformed so that the crooks cannot put bond measures on the ballot to raise taxes. It is out of control in California.

Some examples:
Remember this is where they allowed stem cell research on the ballot and 6 billion Liability to the taxpayers that will only benefit the crooks “researchers” that put it on he ballot to make money because of a Politically Correct issue.

Rob Reiner also was successful in raising taxes on tobacco, Proposition 10 and fleeced tobacco users to support left winged liberal causes. 700 million has been collected. It was supposed to be “for the children”.

The reality, however, is that the massive bureaucracy set in place to spend the tax has not managed to implement any programs during the year in which the tax has been collected

Next March we will be voting to get rid of Prop 10 with Prop 28 and return 700 million to taxpayers. Go figure.

ScottyDog on November 7, 2006 at 12:07 PM

I grew up in New Jersey

Really!! What Exit?

Kini on November 7, 2006 at 12:07 PM

Just tried to convince my co-worker that a $1 million voter lottery isn’t a good thing. So many bad propositions in AZ…oy!

jdpaz on November 7, 2006 at 12:35 PM

Ugh, Prop 87 in Cali is terrible. What’s worse is seeing Bill Clinton on TV every night showing pictures of babies with asthma and saying that “California needs to lead the world to cleaner fuel!” It’s enough to make me puke. We already pay about 25 cents more a gallon than any of our neighbors and have stupid required formulations that increase the price more.

NTWR on November 7, 2006 at 1:40 PM

I just voted and Brought my dvr camera but didn’t need it.turnout was pretty good and we in Cali have a paper trail to go with our E-vote so i feel good about NOT being Dissed.I was asked about my NUKE THE MOON T shirt,I just pointed out the website.One thing I Did notice is it took a LOONG time for people to vote,can’t read?….No I live in a Dem district, do the math,
Bob

Bobnormal on November 7, 2006 at 1:55 PM

Prop 85 in California is parental notification for abortion. It’s a no-brainer unless you’re Kate Michelman. Please vote for it!

see-dubya on November 7, 2006 at 2:10 PM

One of the great props here in San Diego, don’t remember the number as I can’t vote for anything here as I’m a Kansas resident in the military out here, is the non-binding vote to make MCAS Miramar the designated site of the new San Diego airport on the off-chance that the DOD will sometime in the future decide to up and leave. BTW everyone in the DOD, Navy, and Marine Corps have flat out said that that there is no way they’re leaving any time soon. The people in charge of finding a new site also floated the idea to share the base with commercial aircraft which was flatly given a no way.

ic1redeye on November 7, 2006 at 3:13 PM

I’m a 13A myself.

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 7, 2006 at 3:19 PM

I should say 13A NJTP or 140 GSP!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on November 7, 2006 at 3:21 PM

The California Proposition on Tobacco would raise the tax by $2.60/pack.

Me? I’m headed to Nevada to rent a truck.

mojo on November 7, 2006 at 4:10 PM

What person wouldn’t want more libraries?

Tyrannical, little-ole me, in fact. I am probably more informed than the vast majority of people who bother to spend time in a library. The internet is a remarkable source of information. I voted against 10 out of eleven spending measures in Irving, TX. If all added together, it would probably have been close to $100M (in muni’s) which means taxes, of course. The only one I supported was the spending for police/fire. Unfortunately, they will probably all pass.

urbancenturion on November 7, 2006 at 4:23 PM

I voted YES on FL amendment 3 (require 60% to pass amendments) and YES on amendment 8 (protect property rights). NO on everything else.

Charlie Crist (Republican Gubernatorial candidate) voted AGAINST amendment 3. I didn’t really need another reason not to vote for him (he’s the Attorney General, and he’s a Socialist who prosecutes people for providing supplies to hurricane-ravaged Florida Counties because he thinks they’re charging too much), but his position on amendment 3 certainly makes me feel good about shunning him.

I really hope 3 goes through… this “simple majority” thing is making it too easy for stuff like smoking bans and minimum wage rises to get passed.

Mark Jaquith on November 7, 2006 at 4:54 PM

Here in Washington State there is one to repeal the estate (death) tax. The opponents have been running an ad claiming that 99.5 percent of Washingtonians don’t pay a estate tax…

Of course 99.5% aren’t dead or inheriting an estate from someone who died…. but who’s counting.

CrazyFool on November 7, 2006 at 5:50 PM

I used to be Exit 2, Swedesboro exit. Off of RT55 in Franklinville.

I don’t miss it…..

Kini on November 7, 2006 at 10:15 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.