<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats embrace anti-war hoaxer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mortarman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lying is ok for librials and democrats to win.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-843561</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortarman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lying is ok for librials and democrats to win.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-843561</guid>
		<description>[...] http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/   Leave a Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/</a>   Leave a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generic ambien.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-397726</link>
		<dc:creator>Generic ambien.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 08:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-397726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ambien without a prescription....&lt;/strong&gt;

Ambien during pregnancy. Ambien. Drugs detected on drug test ambien. Ambien cr. Buy ambien 10. Buy ambien....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ambien without a prescription&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Ambien during pregnancy. Ambien. Drugs detected on drug test ambien. Ambien cr. Buy ambien 10. Buy ambien&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-388506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-388506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Edwards Fans for Edwards Hair Truth...&lt;/strong&gt;

This, on the trail, in South Carolina, from an Edwards-supporter: &quot;Please address the haircut better. I&#039;m serious.&quot;Unlike my liberal commenters, this guy knows it&#039;s an issue. C-SPAN caught the exchange on tape:

In the interest of equal time,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edwards Fans for Edwards Hair Truth&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This, on the trail, in South Carolina, from an Edwards-supporter: &#8220;Please address the haircut better. I&#8217;m serious.&#8221;Unlike my liberal commenters, this guy knows it&#8217;s an issue. C-SPAN caught the exchange on tape:</p>
<p>In the interest of equal time,&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95578</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95578</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thekidalog.com/seejanemom/2006/11/the_new_america.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Who has the &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; to vote, anyway?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thekidalog.com/seejanemom/2006/11/the_new_america.html" rel="nofollow">Who has the <em>right</em> to vote, anyway?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; Marine Faults American Public: &#8216;We&#8217;re Not In It For The Fight&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95557</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; Marine Faults American Public: &#8216;We&#8217;re Not In It For The Fight&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95557</guid>
		<description>[...] More at Michelle Malkin about the sorts of people who will control the country should we lose, Captain Quarters with more on the Pew Polls and a mention from Tony Snow and Rush, PJ Media, Hot Air here and here.  &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More at Michelle Malkin about the sorts of people who will control the country should we lose, Captain Quarters with more on the Pew Polls and a mention from Tony Snow and Rush, PJ Media, Hot Air here and here.  &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinois Thought Police &#171; Hidden Dragon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95546</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinois Thought Police &#171; Hidden Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95546</guid>
		<description>[...] Welcome Hot Air readers.   Published in: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Welcome Hot Air readers.   Published in: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95531</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95531</guid>
		<description>JaHerer22 wrote: &quot;True, but four years after we declared war we had won a resounding victory, emerged as the world’s richest and most powerful country, and the only country with nuclear weapons. 

Four years after declaring war on Iraq, well, we haven’t accomplished quite as much to say the least…&quot;

Unlike WWII, the USA has not engaged in Total War with Iraq. We have not been, nor are we interested in, destruction of Iraq as a state or the Iraqi people.  We invaded Iraq to effect a regime change.

Had we been interested in fighting a Total War with Iraq, much of Iraq, includine all its major cities, would be flattened, and radioactive, from the firepower of just one Trident Sub.

Point 2:  We have accomplished MUCH. Don&#039;t believe what the media says.  First and foremost, Iraq has had 3 elections, with 12 million participants in the last one. That is a significant accomplishment and that only happened because the Ba&#039;athist regime was forcibly removed from power by the invasion. Saddam, the Butcher of Baghdad, is going to the gallows, as he deserves.  The &quot;rape rooms&quot; run by him and his two monster sons no longer exist.  Our efforts have given the Iraqi people a chance.  It is up to them to capitalize on it.

Point 3: Iraq does not now have, or will have in the foreseable future, any weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons.  Saddam&#039;s program was ended by the United States and the UK because of the invasion, and his stockpile of yellowcake was confiscated. As a result, Iraq is not longer a threat to its neighbors as it was under Saddam.

To summarize: a major war criminal and mass murderer has been removed from power and is on his way to the gallows. His &quot;dynasty&quot; was ended when his sons were killed. Iraq no longer has any WMDs or a program to develop nukes, and Iraq is no longer a threat to their neighbors.  And a country of 26 million souls has been liberated from a monsterous dictator.  

That&#039;s quite a lot to have accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JaHerer22 wrote: &#8220;True, but four years after we declared war we had won a resounding victory, emerged as the world’s richest and most powerful country, and the only country with nuclear weapons. </p>
<p>Four years after declaring war on Iraq, well, we haven’t accomplished quite as much to say the least…&#8221;</p>
<p>Unlike WWII, the USA has not engaged in Total War with Iraq. We have not been, nor are we interested in, destruction of Iraq as a state or the Iraqi people.  We invaded Iraq to effect a regime change.</p>
<p>Had we been interested in fighting a Total War with Iraq, much of Iraq, includine all its major cities, would be flattened, and radioactive, from the firepower of just one Trident Sub.</p>
<p>Point 2:  We have accomplished MUCH. Don&#8217;t believe what the media says.  First and foremost, Iraq has had 3 elections, with 12 million participants in the last one. That is a significant accomplishment and that only happened because the Ba&#8217;athist regime was forcibly removed from power by the invasion. Saddam, the Butcher of Baghdad, is going to the gallows, as he deserves.  The &#8220;rape rooms&#8221; run by him and his two monster sons no longer exist.  Our efforts have given the Iraqi people a chance.  It is up to them to capitalize on it.</p>
<p>Point 3: Iraq does not now have, or will have in the foreseable future, any weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons.  Saddam&#8217;s program was ended by the United States and the UK because of the invasion, and his stockpile of yellowcake was confiscated. As a result, Iraq is not longer a threat to its neighbors as it was under Saddam.</p>
<p>To summarize: a major war criminal and mass murderer has been removed from power and is on his way to the gallows. His &#8220;dynasty&#8221; was ended when his sons were killed. Iraq no longer has any WMDs or a program to develop nukes, and Iraq is no longer a threat to their neighbors.  And a country of 26 million souls has been liberated from a monsterous dictator.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s quite a lot to have accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95418</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95418</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;you are a two-legged dry hole and not owrth the price of a worn-out cable tool.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You&#039;re a bright, shining star of conservative thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>you are a two-legged dry hole and not owrth the price of a worn-out cable tool.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re a bright, shining star of conservative thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilpatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95324</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilpatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95324</guid>
		<description>Oh Constantine Dahling:   Be informed that Haliburton and other contractors are doing a MUCH better job of logistical support than did the 1st Log Command (&quot;Leaning Outhouse&quot;) of Vietnam.  Ditto for Spanish-American War, Philippine War  World War I, World War II and Korea.  
I have little doubt that the total monetary cost to the taxpayer will be less than what the government has ripped us off for in the past.  
You want to complain about a better job done for less money?
Not without my informing you that you are a two-legged dry hole and not owrth the price of a worn-out cable tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Constantine Dahling:   Be informed that Haliburton and other contractors are doing a MUCH better job of logistical support than did the 1st Log Command (&#8220;Leaning Outhouse&#8221;) of Vietnam.  Ditto for Spanish-American War, Philippine War  World War I, World War II and Korea.<br />
I have little doubt that the total monetary cost to the taxpayer will be less than what the government has ripped us off for in the past.<br />
You want to complain about a better job done for less money?<br />
Not without my informing you that you are a two-legged dry hole and not owrth the price of a worn-out cable tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omegaram</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95275</link>
		<dc:creator>omegaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Great Vent Michelle!  Please keep exposing the Left for what they really are&lt;/strong&gt;

Big surprise, the Left using deceptive practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great Vent Michelle!  Please keep exposing the Left for what they really are</strong></p>
<p>Big surprise, the Left using deceptive practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95212</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95212</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The reasoning is, if they despise America, and our armed forces so much, then they should have never gone into the military. And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I can&#039;t understand why so many keep confusing support for the troops with disdain for the military. I&#039;ve repeatedly seen John Kerry&#039;s congressional testimony distorted beyond recognition into &quot;treason&quot;. Wes Clark believes our military should not have been delivered to a hostile region that was no threat to us, underequipped and undersupported with a poorly planned campaign. This means he hates America and the military? He wants to keep our servicemen and women out of such quagmires by illustrating what has happened.

Likewise, you&#039;re confusing disgust with &lt;strong&gt;military contractors&lt;/strong&gt; who have wasted hundreds of millions with their fraud and malfeasance with disdain for the military itself. Two different things. Part of the problem with this administration is it doesn&#039;t take enough interest in prosecuting corporations who are bilking the military and the American taxpayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The reasoning is, if they despise America, and our armed forces so much, then they should have never gone into the military. And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand why so many keep confusing support for the troops with disdain for the military. I&#8217;ve repeatedly seen John Kerry&#8217;s congressional testimony distorted beyond recognition into &#8220;treason&#8221;. Wes Clark believes our military should not have been delivered to a hostile region that was no threat to us, underequipped and undersupported with a poorly planned campaign. This means he hates America and the military? He wants to keep our servicemen and women out of such quagmires by illustrating what has happened.</p>
<p>Likewise, you&#8217;re confusing disgust with <strong>military contractors</strong> who have wasted hundreds of millions with their fraud and malfeasance with disdain for the military itself. Two different things. Part of the problem with this administration is it doesn&#8217;t take enough interest in prosecuting corporations who are bilking the military and the American taxpayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95136</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95136</guid>
		<description>sorry, ...what did you call it???  MONEY?????

Fourteen years active duty....I&#039;m still waiting for the windfall. Wake me up when it gets here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, &#8230;what did you call it???  MONEY?????</p>
<p>Fourteen years active duty&#8230;.I&#8217;m still waiting for the windfall. Wake me up when it gets here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95133</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95133</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byteshredder</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95118</link>
		<dc:creator>byteshredder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95118</guid>
		<description>I believe that any career military person that hung around just for their retirement, then came back to bash our government and the military, should be tried for treason.   Clearly, retired General Wesley Clark is a classic shameful example of a disgrace to the United States, and to the uniform he once wore.   The reasoning is, if they despise America, and our armed forces so much, then they should have never gone into the military.  And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?

&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that any career military person that hung around just for their retirement, then came back to bash our government and the military, should be tried for treason.   Clearly, retired General Wesley Clark is a classic shameful example of a disgrace to the United States, and to the uniform he once wore.   The reasoning is, if they despise America, and our armed forces so much, then they should have never gone into the military.  And if our military was so bad, other than for their greed for money, why did they stay so long?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95071</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95071</guid>
		<description>NANCY, &lt;strong&gt;NANCY,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;NANCY&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;...too much BOTOX while you were in the spiderhole, babe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NANCY, <strong>NANCY,</strong> <strong><em>NANCY</em></strong>&#8230;too much BOTOX while you were in the spiderhole, babe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95067</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95067</guid>
		<description>Final clay, how Freudian was that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final clay, how Freudian was that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95065</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95065</guid>
		<description>Or did invoke it. Why do liberals like Constantine act like they&#039;re cut from finer cloth and molded from final clay? Why are we still allies with Britain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or did invoke it. Why do liberals like Constantine act like they&#8217;re cut from finer cloth and molded from final clay? Why are we still allies with Britain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95053</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95053</guid>
		<description>Really, have you ever known anyone who didn&#039;t invoke the I word who wasn&#039;t a total irredeemable pussyfilth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, have you ever known anyone who didn&#8217;t invoke the I word who wasn&#8217;t a total irredeemable pussyfilth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95043</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95043</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, that old English major drive-by irony. The culture studies creep creeps in like liberal feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, that old English major drive-by irony. The culture studies creep creeps in like liberal feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95026</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95026</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Careful, Constantine, smugness is the third leading cause of death among liberals. 
mymanpotsandpans on November 6, 2006 at 4:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Touche!
Second leading cause of death among conservatives: irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Careful, Constantine, smugness is the third leading cause of death among liberals.<br />
mymanpotsandpans on November 6, 2006 at 4:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Touche!<br />
Second leading cause of death among conservatives: irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95023</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95023</guid>
		<description>William, when I visit my mom and dad (ages 86 and 88), they have Katie Couric on. I won&#039;t enter the room until they turn off the set. That&#039;s how repulsive the newscasts have become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, when I visit my mom and dad (ages 86 and 88), they have Katie Couric on. I won&#8217;t enter the room until they turn off the set. That&#8217;s how repulsive the newscasts have become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William2006</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95011</link>
		<dc:creator>William2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95011</guid>
		<description>One thing I have observed during this election cycle, and the previous election cycle, and the cycle before that, and the one before that, is that there definitely IS a left wing, liberal, pro-democrat bias in the majority, paleo-media, the one that people refer to as the main stream media, such as the New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, Washington Post, etc., along with Newsweek, Time, and similar magazines, and ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, and even the likes of the BBC (not necessarily a US based operation), and others.

This bias comes on strong, loud, and clear as the media actually acts like the promoters for the Democrat candidates and their issues and agenda (Issues?  What issues, other than Bush Derangement Syndrome and demonizing our own country and our own troops, making excuses for Muslim militants, and such).

It is so blatant, in your face, and obvious!  While watching the news on television on these main stations, their news itself is editorialized and slanted a la Democrat, and anti-Republican, anti-conservative.  The print news is the same.  For example, instead of making the headline about Kerry&#039;s condescension toward our soldiers, the headline reads something like &quot;Bush attacks Kerry for his comments.&quot;  Then the news won&#039;t even tell readers what Kerry said, not until numerous paragraphs later.

The story becomes how evil the Republicans are, those nasty waskals (spelling intentional)!

Bush cannot get good news.  The news outlets repeat the false talking points and propaganda which claims such things as &quot;The economy is a mess,&quot; and &quot;Bush lost his war,&quot;  (Bill Maher had the audacity to make this false claim while closing his program this week.)  Other phony claims &quot;The war has actually made us less safe, and created more terrorists.&quot;

What do these people want?  Do they want us to sit on our hands and do nothing as the Muslim radical theocratic forces continue to engage in world wide domination and establishment of a caliphate, a task they surely will succeed, possibly during the next fifty years or so, because we in the west, save for a few, are weak, soft, and cowards, and we won&#039;t stand up and fight for our way of life, but instead we engage in opposing those brave few who actually DO sacrifice to fight for our way of life.

Bush is the convenient scapegoat.  The news media has kept a great deal of information from the people, filtering out that which is favorable to conservatives and Republicans, while magnifying that which is favorable to liberals, leftists, democrats, even if they have to exaggerate it and fabricate it in order to come up with a story to help the Dems.

It is pathetic, and it is working.

How can a conservative or republican get a single vote this way, let alone win an election?

Nevertheless, conservatives and Republicans have won several elections regardless of the heavy weight of news media and Hollywood propaganda against them, but it isn&#039;t easy, and it is a surprise when lies, exaggerations, and omissions can affect an election, and people&#039;s awareness, so strongly.

William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I have observed during this election cycle, and the previous election cycle, and the cycle before that, and the one before that, is that there definitely IS a left wing, liberal, pro-democrat bias in the majority, paleo-media, the one that people refer to as the main stream media, such as the New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, Washington Post, etc., along with Newsweek, Time, and similar magazines, and ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, and even the likes of the BBC (not necessarily a US based operation), and others.</p>
<p>This bias comes on strong, loud, and clear as the media actually acts like the promoters for the Democrat candidates and their issues and agenda (Issues?  What issues, other than Bush Derangement Syndrome and demonizing our own country and our own troops, making excuses for Muslim militants, and such).</p>
<p>It is so blatant, in your face, and obvious!  While watching the news on television on these main stations, their news itself is editorialized and slanted a la Democrat, and anti-Republican, anti-conservative.  The print news is the same.  For example, instead of making the headline about Kerry&#8217;s condescension toward our soldiers, the headline reads something like &#8220;Bush attacks Kerry for his comments.&#8221;  Then the news won&#8217;t even tell readers what Kerry said, not until numerous paragraphs later.</p>
<p>The story becomes how evil the Republicans are, those nasty waskals (spelling intentional)!</p>
<p>Bush cannot get good news.  The news outlets repeat the false talking points and propaganda which claims such things as &#8220;The economy is a mess,&#8221; and &#8220;Bush lost his war,&#8221;  (Bill Maher had the audacity to make this false claim while closing his program this week.)  Other phony claims &#8220;The war has actually made us less safe, and created more terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do these people want?  Do they want us to sit on our hands and do nothing as the Muslim radical theocratic forces continue to engage in world wide domination and establishment of a caliphate, a task they surely will succeed, possibly during the next fifty years or so, because we in the west, save for a few, are weak, soft, and cowards, and we won&#8217;t stand up and fight for our way of life, but instead we engage in opposing those brave few who actually DO sacrifice to fight for our way of life.</p>
<p>Bush is the convenient scapegoat.  The news media has kept a great deal of information from the people, filtering out that which is favorable to conservatives and Republicans, while magnifying that which is favorable to liberals, leftists, democrats, even if they have to exaggerate it and fabricate it in order to come up with a story to help the Dems.</p>
<p>It is pathetic, and it is working.</p>
<p>How can a conservative or republican get a single vote this way, let alone win an election?</p>
<p>Nevertheless, conservatives and Republicans have won several elections regardless of the heavy weight of news media and Hollywood propaganda against them, but it isn&#8217;t easy, and it is a surprise when lies, exaggerations, and omissions can affect an election, and people&#8217;s awareness, so strongly.</p>
<p>William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-95003</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-95003</guid>
		<description>Behind Malkin and W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behind Malkin and W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanpotsandpans</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-94996</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanpotsandpans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-94996</guid>
		<description>Careful, Constantine, smugness is the third leading cause of death among liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Constantine, smugness is the third leading cause of death among liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/comment-page-1/#comment-94950</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/06/democrats-embrace-anti-war-hoaxer/#comment-94950</guid>
		<description>Oh, Jaibones. Look up, quickly! See that? It&#039;s the point, going way over your head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Jaibones. Look up, quickly! See that? It&#8217;s the point, going way over your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
