Video: Rudy: Kerry comment ‘disgraceful’, notes Hillary said ‘inappropriate’
posted at 11:53 am on November 4, 2006 by Ian
Share on Facebook | regular view
(h/t Ace)
Rudy wonders how Bob Casey, Jr., could defend Kerry’s “disgraceful” remark while Hillary condemned it as “inappropriate”. Bam! Killing two birds with one stone; slamming Casey, while getting in a jab with your potential 2008 opponent.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Ya gotta love the Rudy.
Some say he’s too liberal to be a Republican 2008 candidate, but they’re forgetting that what America needs right now is someone who is steadfast and plain speaking to win this war against Islamist fascism.
The Bush administration seems exhausted from the 6 years of non-stop abuse and defeatism, and I think Rudy embodies that ‘don’t you want us to win this war‘ mentality that the Republicans have to start using.
MoxArgon on November 4, 2006 at 12:00 PM
Ah, the consumate politician. Gets the most bang for his buck.
Bob's Kid on November 4, 2006 at 12:00 PM
Mitt’s Da Man! There will be no backing down with him.
auspatriotman on November 4, 2006 at 12:03 PM
I wouldn’t care if Rudy was a democrat! I like the crusty old bastard!
james hooker on November 4, 2006 at 12:13 PM
As someone who lives in NYC and has had the opportunity to be around Rudy a number of times, I can tell you he does not take any prisoners and has a loooooong memory for his enemies.
DoctorDentons on November 4, 2006 at 12:25 PM
Too bad clear-thinking politicians with a solid opinion on the issues rarely rise to the top. Too often we end up with middle-of-the-road candidates looking for mass-appeal over demonstrating true leadership. I wish Rudy all the best. I believe he would make a very good leader. Unfortunately…
thedecider on November 4, 2006 at 12:25 PM
Rudy ‘08, no holds barred.
bdfaith on November 4, 2006 at 12:27 PM
You’re absolutely right DoctorDentons. And Rudy can still count many friends among NYC’s bravest and finest. He turned NYC around and gave the cops and firemen the respect they deserved.
He would be a terrific “law and order” candidate, and I doubt conservatives would have any problems with judges he would appoint. My only problem with Rudy is that socially he is very liberal (abortion, gay marriage). However, I think I could live with that for another 8 years or so as long as he kept up his strong stand against the barbarians who wish to destroy us. Because, frankly, if the lunatics are successful, it really won’t matter who Jim McGreevy marries next.
IrishEi on November 4, 2006 at 12:50 PM
RUDY, RUDY, fresh and fruity!!!
When we wake up from this two year hangover, he might be just the tonic.
seejanemom on November 4, 2006 at 1:23 PM
What is Rudy’s position on immigration? I like him but he certainly won’t win unless he changes his positions on abortion and gay marriage. He probably will before the primaries.
januarius on November 4, 2006 at 1:35 PM
Like the guy…..like his persona….reps will never back him…..I consider myself in the center…..he will never get the far right. Sad but true. The press field day with his personal life and that will squash the right vote in the primaries.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 1:40 PM
Nice to see Rudy G. out and about supporting Santorum here in PA. And guess who’s visiting the keystone state today in support of Bob Casey? None other than AlGore. Imagine that, an empty-head supporting an empty-suit.
Quite a contrast in supporters and candidates. Unfortunately it looks like Santorum is out, along with Curt Weldon, who has decided to not to run any more campaign ads on TV as of today.
The libs managed to turn up some dirt on Weldon too, which has mortally wounded a staunch supporter of the WOT. Apparently his daughter was involved in lobbying and ended up with some cash in hand thanks to Poppa Weldon. Liberal rags like the Phila Stinquirer have been all over Weldon for his inappropriate activities. We even have the FBI on his case.
Sorta like the FBI coming down hard on Harry Reid, huh? Yeh, and monkeys are going to fly out of my ass.
They get away with it, we get hammered. Nothing new to report here.
fogw on November 4, 2006 at 1:43 PM
I am a conservative R, period. Here is the way I am looking at things lately… I will take my president under any label as long as he/she is a moderate and a good administrator. administrator is key for me, the job is just to big to be getting involved in every little political issue. To me the president is to the country as a CEO is to a large corp. Rudy fits the bill on that score, a great administrator. Put him on the ballot and lets go. Let the 2 houses take care of the politics. I don’t know, am I making any sense?
CharlestonCritic on November 4, 2006 at 1:43 PM
I’m curious about something. Do you all really believe in the conservatives that have been in power. You’ve got guys like Cunningham and Nay taking bribes for votes. You’ve got Delay under indictment and Abramoff sneaking around the Capitol. You’ve got guys like Foley taking advantage of his post, and you’ve got the head of the NAE buying drugs from male prostitutes (at the very least). This congress has done NOTHING to help the average worker, instead wasting time on the “values” issues. Do you really support them, or is it a “least bad of the worst” kind of thing? I am not trying to be combative or sarcastic. I am a liberal and genuinely curious why such inteptitude is being rewarded with public support. Any insight would be helpful.
shackler on November 4, 2006 at 1:54 PM
Rudy is the man…
x95b10 on November 4, 2006 at 2:07 PM
shackler,
Because the alternative has given sufficient signals they are unwilling to protect us in a time of war.
Sad but true.
fogw on November 4, 2006 at 2:11 PM
I Love Straight talking Rudy but he’s anti gun and pro illegal migrant big time and these two issues are too important to rule out.
Speakup on November 4, 2006 at 2:20 PM
Well, now that we know where you stand…
Here’s what we cannot tolerate: the welfare state you would like to see, and the secularization of a once great nation which, thanks to years of liberal progressive “thought”, has left nearly half this country without a moral compass.
And you act as if the Democrats have never been sullied with any type of corruption! At least Republicans throw their bad apples out, unlike the Dems who would rather promote them.
IrishEi on November 4, 2006 at 2:21 PM
Anybody want to discuss the President’s incompetence? No? How… unsurprising. Oh well; back to your non-stop Kerrygate coverage.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 2:22 PM
Counterpoint……
Jefferson. Murtha. NAE has NOTHING to do with rep’s, besides the media touts his Gay-Prostitute-Drug Dealer as the moral authority here…make me puke. Clintons Whitewater deals are no better then Abramoff. You have a woman killer senator, a man convicted by the senate for bribery in the house, Reid making shady land deals.
Basically….neither side has the moral authority. We both have crooks and creeps. Problem is your side won’t admit it.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 2:22 PM
I hear you, Speakup. But again, if we’re all dead, what’s the difference. I would love to see a true conservative on the ticket, but if I have to choose the lesser of two evils (which is so often the case,) I will pick the guy who’s going to do everything he can to save our lives.
IrishEi on November 4, 2006 at 2:24 PM
Sure, Constantine! Wanna start with the economy? Remember those 10 million jobs Lurch was gonna make for us?
4.4%. the incompetence is stunning, isn’t it?
Pablo on November 4, 2006 at 2:31 PM
Edited for clarity.
fogw on November 4, 2006 at 2:33 PM
Shackler……
Lets see…..My income tax is lower, My property tax is lower, if I am out of work the unemployment rate is 4.4%, the DOW is at a record high, housing starts are up, I can afford that truck I’m driving…..your right….I have nothing to be thankful to those ‘value’ people……damn……guess I better just go to the lake and end it all.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 2:33 PM
Remind me: what’s the national debt? How much are we spending in Iraq every day?
I have to admit, though, there are around 2,800 troops who will never have to worry about finding a job ever again.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 2:49 PM
Constantine, that was, beyond doubt, the statement that shows your true colors…..You BELIEVE Republicans would have soldiers killed just because they can…….true LEFT LOON comment that paints your side of this argument in day-glow colors.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 2:59 PM
Constatine: and thanks to your ilk, there are millions of people who were never born who don’t have to find jobs. Its called abortion.
Hint- stop with this line of reasoning- its a dead end.
RiverCocytus on November 4, 2006 at 3:00 PM
Hey, we’ve got 12 million extra illegals, and still have 4.4% unemployment, record homeownership, a record stock market, and that’s after 9/11, 2 wars and the most devastating hurricane in American history and a few more that weren’t far behind.
Aside from Iraq, which we can argue forever, what else have you got, Constantine? Or is it just that one line of spew you’re going to keep treating us to?
Pablo on November 4, 2006 at 3:02 PM
RiverCoctyus, a very good point. At least the troops had something those 35 million babies didn’t have: a choice. Just like the loving mothers that killed them had a choice, except the troops chose to make their own sacrifices for a greater purpose, where the mothers chose to kill their babies as a matter of convenience.
What about all that bloodshed, Constantine?
Pablo on November 4, 2006 at 3:05 PM
How about you don’t make jokes about the deaths of my fellow service members, Constantine? Because doing that makes you an asshole.
ReubenJCogburn on November 4, 2006 at 4:05 PM
Increase in home ownership continues the trend that existed under Clinton. The record stock market is what? Primarily wealthy people’s trading activity, not surprising after a tax cut that overwhelmingly favors them. How does this help the rest of us? Apparently Bush never learned the lesson that Reagan taught us: trickle-down economics doesn’t work, unless your goal is to enrich wealthy special interests. Why do you think Bush Sr. inherited an economy (and a deficit) that became an issue that greatly helped Clinton win the Presidency?
Low unemployment is positive, but how good can the jobs be when poverty is increasing? This was another result of Reaganomics: polarization of income. Improvement in the economy may continue, but history tells us it won’t.
Do you really want to introduce Hurricane Katrina when arguing in favor of the President’s competence? I’ll give you a mulligan on that one.
I don’t like abortion either, but you’ll have to be specific: how about in the case of rape? Endangering the life of the mother? And, if you want to outlaw abortion, are you also in favor of the war? If so, you’re not pro-life, you’re just pro-birth.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 4:09 PM
It’s no joke to me, Reuben. I just don’t understand why you’re not outraged at the man whose incompetence, as evidenced by lack of planning and support (if you still think the war is a good idea), helped get them killed.
In my opinion many of the casualties are a result of sending the troops into a situation they never should have been.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 4:17 PM
I’m curious about something. Do you all really believe in the conservatives that have been in power. You’ve got guys like Cunningham and Nay taking bribes for votes. You’ve got Delay under indictment and Abramoff sneaking around the Capitol. You’ve got guys like Foley taking advantage of his post, and you’ve got the head of the NAE buying drugs from male prostitutes (at the very least). This congress has done NOTHING to help the average worker, instead wasting time on the “values” issues. Do you really support them, or is it a “least bad of the worst” kind of thing? I am not trying to be combative or sarcastic. I am a liberal and genuinely curious why such inteptitude is being rewarded with public support. Any insight would be helpful.
As far as the bribes for votes/corruption issue goes I don’t see this as belonging to any one party. The Democrats have their dirty politicians as well. The fact that the Republicans tend to be slightly less tolerant of this sort of thing than the Democrats is in my opinion a plus in their favor. Foley is a disgrace to be sure, but I thought Democrats were all about the gays, I think that if Foley had been a Democrat his fellow Democrats would be defending his behavior as they did Bill Clintons. As far as the junkie, gay preacher guy goes, I had never heard of him until yesterday, and I am not sure what he has to do with upcoming congressional elections. As far as the nothing to help the average worker thing goes I am not so sure. I work as a waiter/bartender at a slightly upscale restaurant. I make pretty good money from serving whiskey to men who saved money from the bush tax cut. That money definitely trickles down into my pocket.
That isn’t to say that the Republicans don’t do anything to piss me off. I don’t gamble online but I resent a government that is so arrogant as to think it has the authority to tell me I can’t. I hate nanny government be it from Republicans or Democrats. Illegal immigration doesn’t bother me so much as an unsecured border. I work with about a dozen or so guys whom I’m fairly sure don’t have proper documentation. That doesn’t bother me so much except that I know if a Mexican dishwasher can get across the border, so can one of Bin Ladens men. There are numerous other issues as well where I have problems with Republican performance. Problem is, the Democrats are just as bad or worse when it comes to these issues.
There are also areas where I think the Republicans did some things right. Letting the assault weapons ban expire was a great victory for gun owners like myself. There are areas of the War on Terror Where I think the Republicans should have done better. (If they had to go into Iraq it should have been done with more force) But overall I think that it has been at least a c+ kind of job and since the Democrats and others would rate an F in the war I guess I will have to go with the Republicans on that issue as well.
As far as my politics go just to let you know whom this is coming from. I am a married man in my mid 30’s I have a 3 year old daughter. My wife is in the National Guard and I am ex army. I never saw a combat deployment; my wife did a tour in Afghanistan. I self identified as a Libertarian until 911. I love the Libertarians locally but they are wrong on the war, and they don’t win anyway. Currently I am a bartender my last job was at a local Sporting goods store until it was bought out by a national chain. The first thing I look at when deciding on a candidate, is their position on the 2nd amendment. I would consider voting for a Democrat if they had a good track record on that issue. Then I look at support for the military, then their record on other issues.
jones on November 4, 2006 at 4:20 PM
Constantine;
Primarily wealthy people’s trading activity,……ever heard of 401k’s, Mutual Funds, ??????????
Do you really want to introduce Hurricane Katrina …..sure you can put that in here…it wouldn’t have mattered if FDR, JFK and Clinton were in the White House the government would have screwed it up just the same.
if you want to outlaw abortion, are you also in favor of the war? …..easy…..the human child has no choice, something your side forgets, NATIONS have a choice, if they choose to fight then they deserve the consequences.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 4:23 PM
I admit, the economy seems to be going well, but at what cost? I have a great job with benefits. But 30 million have lost their coverage. I make more now than I did two years ago, but the average wage is down. If you have genuinely noticed the drop in your taxes, then hats off to you. I am still looking. I hate to burst your (real estate) bubble but the housing market is down. That 4.4% unemployment only includes those still LOOKING for a job. It doesn’t include those who have given up. And, yes, we did survive 9/11, and Katrina, and can sustain two wars…BECAUSE WE BORROW TRILLIONS FROM CHINA! Why do you think we have no leverage in dealing with N. Korea or Iran in the security council? Because they could call in their debt any time. Who’s going to pay that bill? Our kids. How? Higher taxes. I don’t believe the Democrats are impervious to scandal and taint and bribery. We’ve seen it before. But this unflinching apologizing for GOP misdeeds is sick (and so is democratic apologizing). And, btw, the head of the NAE is important, because he tries to legislate morality by peddling influence in Washington. It’s all about the power. But, I have senn those of you who genuinely support the current conservatives, and not much we liberals can say to change that. And since you are currnetly in power, I sure as hell hope you know what you are doing.
shackler on November 4, 2006 at 4:24 PM
Shackler…….how many Democrats are in the NAE?
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 4:26 PM
So you believe any Democrat (or any other Republican, for that matter) would have hired someone in charge of FEMA who was a political crony whose only pervious experience was the horse show circuit? Not only that, but in some recent legislation it was clearly outline that the position should only be filled by qualified individuals, and Bush added another one of his infamous “signing statements” showing he intended to disregard that particular item. Incredible.
I’ve heard a lot of similar talk from conservatives (neo and otherwise) regarding other issues… “sure it’s bad, but the Democrats would be worse.” You have no information to back that up, and it seems symptomatic of a Republican revolution that has failed miserably and whose supporters refuse to admit they “bet on the wrong horse” (pun intended).
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 4:36 PM
I agree with you on the first point, but nations do not have a choice… soldiers do. For example, I don’t think any of the civilians in Fallujah whose bodies were melted by American use of blue phosphorus had a choice.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 4:40 PM
bodies were melted by American ,
this is where the thinking of your side and mine differ…..
your side believes Jack Bauer will save the world. All neat, surgical, intelligent……..HOLLYWOOD
If you ALLOW the enemy in your midst and you get hurt do not blame me for shooting back.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 4:49 PM
And, btw, the head of the NAE is important, because he tries to legislate morality by peddling influence in Washington…Shackler
OK I follow the line of reasoning that NAE influence peddeling might be an issue. But are you honestly saying I should dump my congressman because one particular religeous leader is a crackhead homosexual. I just dont see how one thing has to do with the other. Now if Mike Pence were actually the gay prostitute he was getting “massages” from that might be a different story.
jones on November 4, 2006 at 4:51 PM
You’re speaking as someone who has never and hopefully will never know what it’s like to live in poverty in a third world country.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 4:57 PM
No Constantine, I’m speaking as someone who understands that the people have the power to remove tyrany from within their midst…ALL PEOPLE….if they chose not to then that is their decision. Am I saying kill innocents willingly? Of course not. But if the enemy is THERE then THERE is a legimate target.
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 5:01 PM
Now THAT’s a Hollywood scenario: fighting off a militia with no weapons, no resources and kids to feed. You’ll never win the hearts and minds of a people when you have an attitude that gets innocents killed.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 6:38 PM
Constantine, exactly what did the federal government fail to do in Katrina that it should have done?
What, exactly, should have been done differently?
Pablo on November 4, 2006 at 8:07 PM
The fed’s didn’t take Nagin and Blanco by the collar and force an evacuation order out of them.
The White House called the Louisiana Statehouse three days before Katrina made landfall clearly stating that an evacuation order should be made, and they were ignored.
FEMA practically begged Mayor Nagin to start moving essential materials and equipment out of range so that they would be available for cleanup and recovery operations. Ignored.
For those conscientiously asking why people continue to call for voting Republican when many on the right are upset with how our own party has governed, here is a synopsis of the answer:
Our displeasure stems from supposedly conservative Republicans allowing the party to slip to the left in their manner of governance. Responding to that by voting for the further left is illogical on its face.
Cunningham did wrong. He’s gone.
Foley did wrong. He’s gone.
Abramoff did wrong. He’s gone, but don’t you lefties get too smug, he’s going to end up taking down some Democrats before all is said and done, he was an equal opportunity crook.
In the meantime, Ted Kennedy continues to serve in spite of manslaughter and treason. John Kerry continues to serve in spite of treason. Barney Frank continues to serve in spite of suborning criminal behavior. Just to name a few.
One party does a slightly better job of cleaning house for honor’s sake than the other. Oh, and all that is without mentioning:
Taxes
Abortion
Military support
Immigration enforcement
And a host of other issues where there really is a black and white difference in values.
Freelancer on November 4, 2006 at 8:58 PM
Constantine read Krugman. Conservatives understand Krugman.
cms on November 4, 2006 at 9:50 PM
this is why Democrats would be worse, Constantine
1)Democrats want to get rid of the NSA program so that their terrorist buddies can call other terrorists to plan more attacks on the U.S. but as long as we don’t listen to their call, democrats don’t care what happens, they will just blame Bush.
2)Democrat want to give constitutiuonal rights to those who want to kill us, in other words – they want to appease those who want to kill every single american, including you & your family, but you liberals don’t care because liberals like yourself don’t want to infringe on their rights to kill us.
3)democrats WANT to raise taxes
4)democrats WANT amnesty to those who BROKE the law
5)democrats WANT gay marriage even the a majority of americans, like myself are against it.
6)democrats want to get rid of all hoildays so that it doesn’t offend non-religion people.
liberals democrats are A)Anti-Millitary B)Anti-American & C)Terrorist appeasers
Starblazer on November 4, 2006 at 10:01 PM
Freelancer, you have a very selective memory of what happened, and how many GOP representatives and supporters have left their positions in disgrace. Failure and incompetence are not characteristics of “the left” as you so smugly assert (or “the right” for that matter). However, it is a characteristic of the current Republican majority. Your statement beautifully illustrates everything that’s wrong with it: distortion, revisionist history, hypocrisy and lack of accountability. These are the reasons they’ll likely lose their majority, and have already lost the confidence of the people.
Constantine on November 4, 2006 at 10:39 PM
Constantine….constipated, what-ever…..
Limerick on November 4, 2006 at 11:00 PM
Sounds more like the Clinton administration. And, the resulting fallout that put Republicans in power.
thedecider on November 4, 2006 at 11:13 PM
The states that had Republicans in office didn’t have the Katrina problem. The state that had Democrats in office did have problems. I see a different lesson there. The problems in our country can be traced to liberalism. Poorly performing schools, promiscuity resulting in unwed mothers raising children without fathers, criminals being released early or receiving light sentences. Liberalism cannot cure what it has caused. I will never vote for a Democrat.
Rose on November 4, 2006 at 11:13 PM
^ unwed mothers? This whole assertion that spreading “imorality”is a result of liberalism is such bs, the state with the lowest divorce rate in the country is Massachusetts, and most of the worst ones are red states, same goes with teen pregnancy. The reason “moral values” is so high on the list of priorities for conservatives is because they have to work on them…
crr6 on November 5, 2006 at 3:50 AM
“The fed’s didn’t take Nagin and Blanco by the collar and force an evacuation order out of them.”
So…the Republicans have to babysit the liberals?
EEprom on November 5, 2006 at 1:24 PM
The point I’m making about the unwed mothers is that the majority of them are living off of the government because the liberals have provided taxpayers’ money to them. It is liberalism that enables this type of lifestyle and it has had negative ramifications for our society. Children in these types of homes tend to be more inclined to have behavior problems and get into trouble with the law. If someone wants to have a child who is not married and can provide for that child without govenment assistance it really is not my business. But if they choose this lifestyle knowing that the government (taxpayers) will take care of them then it is my business.
Rose on November 5, 2006 at 4:28 PM
Comment pages: