<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative punditocracy converges!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-92850</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-92850</guid>
		<description>A/P:  Check out Vanity Fair interview excerpts with Adelman and Perle.  As Maureen Dowd said in her column this morning--&quot;reaching new heights in the sad annals of Now You Tell Us&quot;. Ouch.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1939471,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A/P:  Check out Vanity Fair interview excerpts with Adelman and Perle.  As Maureen Dowd said in her column this morning&#8211;&#8221;reaching new heights in the sad annals of Now You Tell Us&#8221;. Ouch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0</a>,,1939471,00.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-92107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-92107</guid>
		<description>Anyone seen any review&#039;s of Steyn&#039;s book from the Left?  I&#039;m curious to see what they say.  All I&#039;ve seen is when he was on Hannity &amp; Colmes, and Colmes just tossed him some boilerplate about the issue of the day, North Korea.  I&#039;d like to see what liberals say about his main themes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone seen any review&#8217;s of Steyn&#8217;s book from the Left?  I&#8217;m curious to see what they say.  All I&#8217;ve seen is when he was on Hannity &amp; Colmes, and Colmes just tossed him some boilerplate about the issue of the day, North Korea.  I&#8217;d like to see what liberals say about his main themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cms</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91965</link>
		<dc:creator>cms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91965</guid>
		<description>Regarding WFB&#039;s announcement, vaya con dios, Padre.  We owe you much more than we can ever repay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding WFB&#8217;s announcement, vaya con dios, Padre.  We owe you much more than we can ever repay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91880</guid>
		<description>Is &#039;Fraudian slip&#039; new slang?  If so, what does it mean?  I assumed it was just a typo, but I&#039;ve seen it 10+ times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8216;Fraudian slip&#8217; new slang?  If so, what does it mean?  I assumed it was just a typo, but I&#8217;ve seen it 10+ times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phile</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91863</link>
		<dc:creator>phile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91863</guid>
		<description>Regarding Canada&#039;s Indigo bookstore: I have no doubt that the absence of Steyn&#039;s book is by design, and has nothing to do with lack of supply. Regardless, walking into any of their stores you are immediately surrounded by a sea of anti-American and anti-Bush titles. This is precisely why every book I have purchased in the last 5 years (except for Steyn&#039;s latest, which I ordered from his site, in order to get myself a personally autographed copy) has been though www.amazon.ca. Indigo is dead to me.

-phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Canada&#8217;s Indigo bookstore: I have no doubt that the absence of Steyn&#8217;s book is by design, and has nothing to do with lack of supply. Regardless, walking into any of their stores you are immediately surrounded by a sea of anti-American and anti-Bush titles. This is precisely why every book I have purchased in the last 5 years (except for Steyn&#8217;s latest, which I ordered from his site, in order to get myself a personally autographed copy) has been though <a href="http://www.amazon.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.ca</a>. Indigo is dead to me.</p>
<p>-phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91808</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91808</guid>
		<description>What would that side be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would that side be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91796</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91796</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We live in an era when many of the neoconservatives—some who called for the removal of Saddam Hussein well before September 11—have by now either recanted their support for the President, or concluded that the effort in Iraq was not very good because it has proven less than perfect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mmm.  Go read Zeyad at Healing Iraq.  He was on our side from the very beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We live in an era when many of the neoconservatives—some who called for the removal of Saddam Hussein well before September 11—have by now either recanted their support for the President, or concluded that the effort in Iraq was not very good because it has proven less than perfect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mmm.  Go read Zeyad at Healing Iraq.  He was on our side from the very beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91793</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91793</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A SOLID B+&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...but I can&#039;t dance to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A SOLID B+</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;but I can&#8217;t dance to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a4g</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91788</link>
		<dc:creator>a4g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91788</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A SOLID B+&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excellent, Slublog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A SOLID B+</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent, Slublog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91781</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91781</guid>
		<description>This Hanson excerpt might be especially noteworthy to, uhm, &lt;em&gt;no specific pundits&lt;/em&gt;,

&lt;blockquote&gt;We live in an era when many of the neoconservatives—some who called for the removal of Saddam Hussein well before September 11—have by now either recanted their support for the President, or concluded that the effort in Iraq was not very good because it has proven less than perfect.

Rarely mentioned, much less appreciated, is the low probability that another American president would have removed Saddam, or stayed around to secure Iraq, in the face of such criticism. In addition, many traditional conservatives supported the war, but, like liberal hawks, now have gravitated to the “It was my perfect three-year war, and your lousy three-year occupation” school of opportunistic hindsight.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Hanson excerpt might be especially noteworthy to, uhm, <em>no specific pundits</em>,</p>
<blockquote><p>We live in an era when many of the neoconservatives—some who called for the removal of Saddam Hussein well before September 11—have by now either recanted their support for the President, or concluded that the effort in Iraq was not very good because it has proven less than perfect.</p>
<p>Rarely mentioned, much less appreciated, is the low probability that another American president would have removed Saddam, or stayed around to secure Iraq, in the face of such criticism. In addition, many traditional conservatives supported the war, but, like liberal hawks, now have gravitated to the “It was my perfect three-year war, and your lousy three-year occupation” school of opportunistic hindsight.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slublog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91748</link>
		<dc:creator>Slublog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91748</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t resist.  Those were the days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t resist.  Those were the days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91743</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91743</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A SOLID B+&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mwahahaha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A SOLID B+</p></blockquote>
<p>Mwahahaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huckleberry</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91741</link>
		<dc:creator>huckleberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91741</guid>
		<description>Regarding the first Wrong Track/Right Track poll, isn&#039;t it true that &quot;things&quot; go better with Coke?

Really, that poll is meaningless because the questions could mean anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the first Wrong Track/Right Track poll, isn&#8217;t it true that &#8220;things&#8221; go better with Coke?</p>
<p>Really, that poll is meaningless because the questions could mean anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slublog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/comment-page-1/#comment-91739</link>
		<dc:creator>Slublog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/conservative-punditocracy-converges/#comment-91739</guid>
		<description>Excellent interview.

&lt;em&gt;A SOLID B+&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent interview.</p>
<p><em>A SOLID B+</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
