<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kerryism Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-90080</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-90080</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did me mean...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Er, Did &lt;b&gt;he&lt;/b&gt; mean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did me mean&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Er, Did <b>he</b> mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-90079</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-90079</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;C’mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Or, more to the point, that troops are losers with no better choices in life, so you&#039;d better study hard so youu don&#039;t end up one of them?  Yes!  What did *you* think he said?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Even if that’s what he believes...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I rest my case

&lt;blockquote&gt;... does anyone think that’s what he meant to say?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Define &quot;meant to say&quot;.  The soundtrack is so ingrained in the man/human karaoke machine that to him, saying it is like breathing.  Did he mean to wreck his own career?  Of course not!  Did me mean to go out of his way to insult any troops?  No.  But that is clearly how the man thinks.  Who can credibly assert otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>C’mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots?</p></blockquote>
<p>Or, more to the point, that troops are losers with no better choices in life, so you&#8217;d better study hard so youu don&#8217;t end up one of them?  Yes!  What did *you* think he said?</p>
<blockquote><p>Even if that’s what he believes&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I rest my case</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; does anyone think that’s what he meant to say?</p></blockquote>
<p>Define &#8220;meant to say&#8221;.  The soundtrack is so ingrained in the man/human karaoke machine that to him, saying it is like breathing.  Did he mean to wreck his own career?  Of course not!  Did me mean to go out of his way to insult any troops?  No.  But that is clearly how the man thinks.  Who can credibly assert otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave R.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-89113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-89113</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want Kerry to resign.  I want him out there every day reminding people what the dims are really all about, just like Murtha, Pelosi, and all the rest of the Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist crowd and their dog washers in the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want Kerry to resign.  I want him out there every day reminding people what the dims are really all about, just like Murtha, Pelosi, and all the rest of the Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist crowd and their dog washers in the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88913</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88913</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;C’mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots? Even if that’s what he believes, does anyone think that’s what he meant to say? I mean, really?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good luck, Enrique. I think you&#039;re arguing with the same folks who pretended not to know what &quot;fiction&quot; meant the other day.

And like I said, it&#039;s all missing the main point: that whether Kerry meant it or not, a great many Democrats DO feel that way about our troops.

That&#039;s the story here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>C’mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots? Even if that’s what he believes, does anyone think that’s what he meant to say? I mean, really?</p></blockquote>
<p>Good luck, Enrique. I think you&#8217;re arguing with the same folks who pretended not to know what &#8220;fiction&#8221; meant the other day.</p>
<p>And like I said, it&#8217;s all missing the main point: that whether Kerry meant it or not, a great many Democrats DO feel that way about our troops.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the story here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88908</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88908</guid>
		<description>Enrique, you&#039;ve been running through several threads today defending Kerry.  I&#039;ve put his history out in front of you--he built his career on smearing the military starting in 1971 and continuing through this past summer and this week.  You&#039;re giving him far more of a benefit of a doubt than he deserves, because he deserves none.  He said what he thinks and has been trying to spin his way out of it.  That&#039;s understandable.  What&#039;s less understandable is why you would wreck your own credibility defending the indefensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enrique, you&#8217;ve been running through several threads today defending Kerry.  I&#8217;ve put his history out in front of you&#8211;he built his career on smearing the military starting in 1971 and continuing through this past summer and this week.  You&#8217;re giving him far more of a benefit of a doubt than he deserves, because he deserves none.  He said what he thinks and has been trying to spin his way out of it.  That&#8217;s understandable.  What&#8217;s less understandable is why you would wreck your own credibility defending the indefensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88904</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Look, Derbyshire’s right. Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f’ed it up. We all assume that he’s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that. But it’s not honest to pretend like we don’t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.

Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.

Doesn’t mean we can’t nail him for it, but let’s be honest with ourselves. 

Enrique on November 1, 2006 at 1:53 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey Enrique:

Of course it was a joke. That&#039;s pretty obvious. A lame joke, sure, but this is John Kerry we&#039;re talking about. But I knew what he meant as soon as he said it.

Of course, I ALSO knew he&#039;d screwed it up, and I knew how it sounded.

So the question is: why didn&#039;t he? 

Why didn&#039;t he IMMEDIATELY correct the wording - and apologize?

Because the simple truth is that if you take it out of context, and read just the words he said - he definitely implied that the troops are all optionless losers. That IS what he said, no matter what he meant.

And unlike your basic Bush verbal gaffe that makes no sense at all - this made just enough sense to hurt a lot of people. So it&#039;s not what he meant to say, or even what he said that bothers me ... but his response to it!

Plus, there&#039;s the fact that he&#039;s sincerely and intentionally attacked the troops plenty of times in the last 35 years. I think if another liberal had done this, people might give him the benefit of the doubt; after his JennJiss Kahn bull!#$% ... well, it&#039;s hard to assume Kerry means well when it comes to the troops.

But you know what bothers me most of all? It&#039;s the reaction from OTHER liberals. There are millions of Democrats out there right now applauding Kerry.

And they&#039;re not applauding the joke he MEANT to say - they&#039;re applauding the &quot;our troops are uneducated morons&quot; crap that actually came out of his mouth. 

Personally, I agree with you. It was a stupid slip from a stupid man.

(Although I&#039;d suggest it may hint at how he REALLY feels. Did you ever see footage of Shepard Smith on Fox News a year or so back, when he was talking about J. Lo? Go check You Tube - it&#039;s there somewhere. If you missed it, he was trying to read off the teleprompter somethink like ... J. Lo was kicked to the curb, given a curb job ... something like that. Whatever that was supposed to mean. What he said, as clear as day, is, well ... since there may be children present, I&#039;ll just say it rhymes with &quot;snow job.&quot; Now that WAS a mistake obviously - and Smith immediately apologized to viewers and got very red in the face, while laughter rang in the background - but here&#039;s my point: I&#039;d suggest that Shepard Smith might find J. Lo just a wee bit attractive ... and that um &quot;snow job&quot; comment originated from a real emotion. Same thing with Kerry. If this was just a slip ... I think it was a meaningful slip, if you follow me.)

But the stuff from other liberals is even worse. They are openly crowing that soldiers ARE dumb, and that Kerry&#039;s remark - slip or not - was right.

That&#039;s why, no matter what Kerry meant, this is actually an important story. People deserve to know how Democrats actually feel about the troops.

Even if Kerry doesn&#039;t mean what he said - millions of Democrats DO mean it, and they mean it gleefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Look, Derbyshire’s right. Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f’ed it up. We all assume that he’s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that. But it’s not honest to pretend like we don’t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.</p>
<p>Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.</p>
<p>Doesn’t mean we can’t nail him for it, but let’s be honest with ourselves. </p>
<p>Enrique on November 1, 2006 at 1:53 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey Enrique:</p>
<p>Of course it was a joke. That&#8217;s pretty obvious. A lame joke, sure, but this is John Kerry we&#8217;re talking about. But I knew what he meant as soon as he said it.</p>
<p>Of course, I ALSO knew he&#8217;d screwed it up, and I knew how it sounded.</p>
<p>So the question is: why didn&#8217;t he? </p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t he IMMEDIATELY correct the wording &#8211; and apologize?</p>
<p>Because the simple truth is that if you take it out of context, and read just the words he said &#8211; he definitely implied that the troops are all optionless losers. That IS what he said, no matter what he meant.</p>
<p>And unlike your basic Bush verbal gaffe that makes no sense at all &#8211; this made just enough sense to hurt a lot of people. So it&#8217;s not what he meant to say, or even what he said that bothers me &#8230; but his response to it!</p>
<p>Plus, there&#8217;s the fact that he&#8217;s sincerely and intentionally attacked the troops plenty of times in the last 35 years. I think if another liberal had done this, people might give him the benefit of the doubt; after his JennJiss Kahn bull!#$% &#8230; well, it&#8217;s hard to assume Kerry means well when it comes to the troops.</p>
<p>But you know what bothers me most of all? It&#8217;s the reaction from OTHER liberals. There are millions of Democrats out there right now applauding Kerry.</p>
<p>And they&#8217;re not applauding the joke he MEANT to say &#8211; they&#8217;re applauding the &#8220;our troops are uneducated morons&#8221; crap that actually came out of his mouth. </p>
<p>Personally, I agree with you. It was a stupid slip from a stupid man.</p>
<p>(Although I&#8217;d suggest it may hint at how he REALLY feels. Did you ever see footage of Shepard Smith on Fox News a year or so back, when he was talking about J. Lo? Go check You Tube &#8211; it&#8217;s there somewhere. If you missed it, he was trying to read off the teleprompter somethink like &#8230; J. Lo was kicked to the curb, given a curb job &#8230; something like that. Whatever that was supposed to mean. What he said, as clear as day, is, well &#8230; since there may be children present, I&#8217;ll just say it rhymes with &#8220;snow job.&#8221; Now that WAS a mistake obviously &#8211; and Smith immediately apologized to viewers and got very red in the face, while laughter rang in the background &#8211; but here&#8217;s my point: I&#8217;d suggest that Shepard Smith might find J. Lo just a wee bit attractive &#8230; and that um &#8220;snow job&#8221; comment originated from a real emotion. Same thing with Kerry. If this was just a slip &#8230; I think it was a meaningful slip, if you follow me.)</p>
<p>But the stuff from other liberals is even worse. They are openly crowing that soldiers ARE dumb, and that Kerry&#8217;s remark &#8211; slip or not &#8211; was right.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why, no matter what Kerry meant, this is actually an important story. People deserve to know how Democrats actually feel about the troops.</p>
<p>Even if Kerry doesn&#8217;t mean what he said &#8211; millions of Democrats DO mean it, and they mean it gleefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88878</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88878</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As we all know, Kerry has a history of doing this sort of thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, he sure does.  So let&#039;s talk about that history (which would be substantive) instead of pretending that we don&#039;t know he obviously meant to say &quot;you end up &lt;em&gt;getting us&lt;/em&gt; stuck in Iraq (which is manufactured outrage).

C&#039;mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots?  Even if that&#039;s what he believes, does anyone think that&#039;s what he meant to say?  I mean, really?

Which isn&#039;t to say that he doesn&#039;t actually think the troops are idiots - maybe he does.  And it doesn&#039;t mean that we shouldn&#039;t cynically nail him for misspeaking - we should.

Let&#039;s just be up front about our cynicism.  I think that would be a refreshing change in the realm of political discourse.  Don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As we all know, Kerry has a history of doing this sort of thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, he sure does.  So let&#8217;s talk about that history (which would be substantive) instead of pretending that we don&#8217;t know he obviously meant to say &#8220;you end up <em>getting us</em> stuck in Iraq (which is manufactured outrage).</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, does anyone hear really think that he meant to say that the troops are idiots?  Even if that&#8217;s what he believes, does anyone think that&#8217;s what he meant to say?  I mean, really?</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t to say that he doesn&#8217;t actually think the troops are idiots &#8211; maybe he does.  And it doesn&#8217;t mean that we shouldn&#8217;t cynically nail him for misspeaking &#8211; we should.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just be up front about our cynicism.  I think that would be a refreshing change in the realm of political discourse.  Don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88868</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88868</guid>
		<description>Spurius Ligustinums said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;LOL, Professor - my wife, who is in the Army National Guard, just got back from a year on active duty training - spent the first half at Sheppard AFB, and the second half at Ft. Gordon. She was amazed at how much more physically rigorous the Army was compared to the Air Force, as well as the difference between the barracks conditions and the strictness of the discipline.

“Civilians in uniform,” I’d simply explain to her about our brothers and sisters in blue …&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Spurius:

True story: when I was stationed in Scotland, the Marines all thought we&#039;d died and gone to Heaven. The barracks had CARPET! Air conditioning! A freakin&#039; in room refrigerator. Just 2 guys to a room; some junior NCOs even had their own room!

Sure, it was kinda run down and, you know, military - gray and ugly ... but all the single guys really thought they were livin&#039; large. A big step up from most Marine barracks.

But the Air Force guys? You ready for this? The small Air Force detachment (maybe a dozen zoomies) was getting a SUBSTANDARD HOUSING allowance ... for living in the very same barracks. Cuz it just wasn&#039;t good enough for them.

Seriously.

I repeat: frickin&#039; Air Force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spurius Ligustinums said:</p>
<blockquote><p>LOL, Professor &#8211; my wife, who is in the Army National Guard, just got back from a year on active duty training &#8211; spent the first half at Sheppard AFB, and the second half at Ft. Gordon. She was amazed at how much more physically rigorous the Army was compared to the Air Force, as well as the difference between the barracks conditions and the strictness of the discipline.</p>
<p>“Civilians in uniform,” I’d simply explain to her about our brothers and sisters in blue …</p></blockquote>
<p>Spurius:</p>
<p>True story: when I was stationed in Scotland, the Marines all thought we&#8217;d died and gone to Heaven. The barracks had CARPET! Air conditioning! A freakin&#8217; in room refrigerator. Just 2 guys to a room; some junior NCOs even had their own room!</p>
<p>Sure, it was kinda run down and, you know, military &#8211; gray and ugly &#8230; but all the single guys really thought they were livin&#8217; large. A big step up from most Marine barracks.</p>
<p>But the Air Force guys? You ready for this? The small Air Force detachment (maybe a dozen zoomies) was getting a SUBSTANDARD HOUSING allowance &#8230; for living in the very same barracks. Cuz it just wasn&#8217;t good enough for them.</p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>I repeat: frickin&#8217; Air Force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88711</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88711</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Enrique, can you explain what the joke was supposed to be and how it would be the least bit funny? &quot;Don&#039;t screw up in school or you&#039;ll wind up POTUS?&quot;

The whole &quot;They didn&#039;t do their homework..&quot; is crap. Kerry voted for it to. Did he not do his homework when he voted to go to Iraq? Was he trying to say &quot;Don&#039;t be like me&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.</p></blockquote>
<p>Enrique, can you explain what the joke was supposed to be and how it would be the least bit funny? &#8220;Don&#8217;t screw up in school or you&#8217;ll wind up POTUS?&#8221;</p>
<p>The whole &#8220;They didn&#8217;t do their homework..&#8221; is crap. Kerry voted for it to. Did he not do his homework when he voted to go to Iraq? Was he trying to say &#8220;Don&#8217;t be like me&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88662</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88662</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Look, Derbyshire’s right. Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f’ed it up. We all assume that he’s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that. &lt;strong&gt;But it’s not honest to pretend like we don’t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.&lt;/strong&gt;

Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.

Doesn’t mean we can’t nail him for it, but let’s be honest with ourselves. 

Enrique on November 1, 2006 at 1:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like hell it&#039;s not honest.  

As we all know, Kerry has a history of doing this sort of thing.  We also know that nowhere in his remarks did he mention Bush.  When he had a chance to atone for it by showing at least a little contrition, he instead goes on the attack like someone who knows he&#039;s been nailed.  Now he is hiding the full transcript of his speech that would allow us to put his remarks in their full context, whatever it may be.  

Actions speak louder than words, and Kerry&#039;s actions, both past and present, are those of one who is guilty as charged.  He&#039;s certainly not getting the benefit of the doubt from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Look, Derbyshire’s right. Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f’ed it up. We all assume that he’s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that. <strong>But it’s not honest to pretend like we don’t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.</strong></p>
<p>Kerry’s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush’s expense.</p>
<p>Doesn’t mean we can’t nail him for it, but let’s be honest with ourselves. </p>
<p>Enrique on November 1, 2006 at 1:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Like hell it&#8217;s not honest.  </p>
<p>As we all know, Kerry has a history of doing this sort of thing.  We also know that nowhere in his remarks did he mention Bush.  When he had a chance to atone for it by showing at least a little contrition, he instead goes on the attack like someone who knows he&#8217;s been nailed.  Now he is hiding the full transcript of his speech that would allow us to put his remarks in their full context, whatever it may be.  </p>
<p>Actions speak louder than words, and Kerry&#8217;s actions, both past and present, are those of one who is guilty as charged.  He&#8217;s certainly not getting the benefit of the doubt from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88657</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88657</guid>
		<description>er, tone &lt;em&gt;deaf&lt;/em&gt; that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, tone <em>deaf</em> that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88656</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88656</guid>
		<description>God I love this story!  It&#039;s so quintessentially Kerry: tone death, elitist, wrong on the facts, needlessly offensive and, of course, finally needing unconvincing and ludicrous spin.  Anyone who actually, you know, watches the video can see that Kerry did not mean this as a joke, his usual lack of affect notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God I love this story!  It&#8217;s so quintessentially Kerry: tone death, elitist, wrong on the facts, needlessly offensive and, of course, finally needing unconvincing and ludicrous spin.  Anyone who actually, you know, watches the video can see that Kerry did not mean this as a joke, his usual lack of affect notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88651</guid>
		<description>Kerry&#039;s entire career is built on smearing the troops, beginning in 1971.  Enrique, you should read &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDhmZTBmN2U5MWY3NDg0NjBhMGVlODhiMjZmOTNjZmI=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Warren Bell&#039;s take on Kerry&#039;s &quot;joke.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  Bell is a professional comedy writer--he knows what he&#039;s talking about.  And he doesn&#039;t see Kerry&#039;s line as a joke at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry&#8217;s entire career is built on smearing the troops, beginning in 1971.  Enrique, you should read <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDhmZTBmN2U5MWY3NDg0NjBhMGVlODhiMjZmOTNjZmI=" rel="nofollow">Warren Bell&#8217;s take on Kerry&#8217;s &#8220;joke.&#8221;</a>  Bell is a professional comedy writer&#8211;he knows what he&#8217;s talking about.  And he doesn&#8217;t see Kerry&#8217;s line as a joke at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88650</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88650</guid>
		<description>Look, Derbyshire&#039;s right.  Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f&#039;ed it up.  We all assume that he&#039;s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that.  But it&#039;s not honest to pretend like we don&#039;t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.

Kerry&#039;s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush&#039;s expense.

Doesn&#039;t mean we can&#039;t nail him for it, but let&#039;s be honest with ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Derbyshire&#8217;s right.  Kerry clearly meant to goof on Bush, and f&#8217;ed it up.  We all assume that he&#8217;s betraying his sinceere beliefs that the troops are dupes, which is reasonable since a lot of liberals do think that.  But it&#8217;s not honest to pretend like we don&#8217;t know he meant to make a joke on Bush, not the troops.</p>
<p>Kerry&#8217;s a scumbag, and he may hate the troops, but he was clearly making a bad joke at Bush&#8217;s expense.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean we can&#8217;t nail him for it, but let&#8217;s be honest with ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88642</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88642</guid>
		<description>SEE the corrupt press in action.  I&#039;ve got a partial transcript up, am working on getting the rest (halfway done), but these JERKS are below THE LOWEST SOLDIER IN THE MILITARY.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snappedshot.com/archives/416-Bloviating-sacks-of-bovine-byproducts....html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BLOVIATING sacks of bovine byproducts!&lt;/a&gt; @Snapped Shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE the corrupt press in action.  I&#8217;ve got a partial transcript up, am working on getting the rest (halfway done), but these JERKS are below THE LOWEST SOLDIER IN THE MILITARY.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snappedshot.com/archives/416-Bloviating-sacks-of-bovine-byproducts....html" rel="nofollow">BLOVIATING sacks of bovine byproducts!</a> @Snapped Shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jummy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88617</link>
		<dc:creator>jummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88617</guid>
		<description>allah, bryan and all, 

sorry for spamming. its enraging to see the kerry camp spin this so completely perpendicular to the truth. 

to say it is &quot;unlikely&quot; that kerry meant what came out of his mouth is another one of these things where progressives believe they live on the other side of a two-way mirror and that nobody who is not progressive is capable of understanding their level of discourse, so its appropriate only to lie to the proles when they must be addressed and otherwise ignored as progressives speak unguardedly amongst themselves. 

in fact us proles can hear and understand and we know how commonly held the sentiiment kerry expressed was, and that it is more likely that that is what he meant than the bush thing. 

i think my formulation best demonstrates that. and i hope people use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>allah, bryan and all, </p>
<p>sorry for spamming. its enraging to see the kerry camp spin this so completely perpendicular to the truth. </p>
<p>to say it is &#8220;unlikely&#8221; that kerry meant what came out of his mouth is another one of these things where progressives believe they live on the other side of a two-way mirror and that nobody who is not progressive is capable of understanding their level of discourse, so its appropriate only to lie to the proles when they must be addressed and otherwise ignored as progressives speak unguardedly amongst themselves. </p>
<p>in fact us proles can hear and understand and we know how commonly held the sentiiment kerry expressed was, and that it is more likely that that is what he meant than the bush thing. </p>
<p>i think my formulation best demonstrates that. and i hope people use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurius Ligustinus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88597</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurius Ligustinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88597</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;and then enlisted in the Air Force 

Now imagine how you’d feel if you’d actually been in the military …!

Sorry. Couldn’t help it. Frickin’ Air Force. :)&lt;/em&gt;

LOL, Professor - my wife, who is in the Army National Guard, just got back from a year on active duty training - spent the first half at Sheppard AFB, and the second half at Ft. Gordon.  She was amazed at how much more physically rigorous the Army was compared to the Air Force, as well as the difference between the barracks conditions and the strictness of the discipline.

&quot;Civilians in uniform,&quot; I&#039;d simply explain to her about our brothers and sisters in blue ... but then again, a common USAF retort is, &quot;Who joins the Army? Everyone who couldn&#039;t get into the Air Force, Navy or Marines!&quot;

Back OT, Victor Davis Hanson pegs it when it comes to diagnosing &quot;Kerryism,&quot; and how it&#039;s closely related to Bush Derangement Syndrome.  The former has been around a lot longer than the latter, but BDS has a way of exacerbating the symptoms of Kerryism to the point where those suffering from it have great difficulty in suppressing outbreaks of the symptoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>and then enlisted in the Air Force </p>
<p>Now imagine how you’d feel if you’d actually been in the military …!</p>
<p>Sorry. Couldn’t help it. Frickin’ Air Force. :)</em></p>
<p>LOL, Professor &#8211; my wife, who is in the Army National Guard, just got back from a year on active duty training &#8211; spent the first half at Sheppard AFB, and the second half at Ft. Gordon.  She was amazed at how much more physically rigorous the Army was compared to the Air Force, as well as the difference between the barracks conditions and the strictness of the discipline.</p>
<p>&#8220;Civilians in uniform,&#8221; I&#8217;d simply explain to her about our brothers and sisters in blue &#8230; but then again, a common USAF retort is, &#8220;Who joins the Army? Everyone who couldn&#8217;t get into the Air Force, Navy or Marines!&#8221;</p>
<p>Back OT, Victor Davis Hanson pegs it when it comes to diagnosing &#8220;Kerryism,&#8221; and how it&#8217;s closely related to Bush Derangement Syndrome.  The former has been around a lot longer than the latter, but BDS has a way of exacerbating the symptoms of Kerryism to the point where those suffering from it have great difficulty in suppressing outbreaks of the symptoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiakjones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88489</link>
		<dc:creator>kiakjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88489</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is regrettable that Senator Kennedy has chosen Veteran&#039;s Day to continue leveling baseless and false attacks that send the wrong signal to our troops and our enemy during a time of war. It is also regrettable that Senator Kennedy has found more time to say negative things about President Bush then he ever did about Saddam Hussein. If America were to follow Senator Kennedy&#039;s foreign policy, Saddam Hussein would not only still be in power, he would be oppressing and occupying Kuwait.&quot; 

- Scott McClellan, White House Press Secretary (November 11, 2005)

Where&#039;s &lt;strike&gt;Waldo&lt;/strike&gt; Ted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is regrettable that Senator Kennedy has chosen Veteran&#8217;s Day to continue leveling baseless and false attacks that send the wrong signal to our troops and our enemy during a time of war. It is also regrettable that Senator Kennedy has found more time to say negative things about President Bush then he ever did about Saddam Hussein. If America were to follow Senator Kennedy&#8217;s foreign policy, Saddam Hussein would not only still be in power, he would be oppressing and occupying Kuwait.&#8221; </p>
<p>- Scott McClellan, White House Press Secretary (November 11, 2005)</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s <strike>Waldo</strike> Ted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudley Smith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88470</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudley Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88470</guid>
		<description>I generally like Derb, but he can be very pigheaded and obstinate when he wants to be.  A plausible argument can be made that, looking at the prepared text of the speech in hindsight, Kerry &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; screwed up a joke about Bush.  However, to say that &quot;no reasonable person&quot; could look at the &lt;em&gt;actual words spoken by Kerry&lt;/em&gt; and construe them as referring to the troops, is just nonsensical.  There is simply no reference to Bush at all in those words.  Trying to say that the use of the word &quot;stuck&quot; necessarily implies &quot;caught in perpetuity&quot; (rather than for one or two tours of duty), and therefore could only refer to Bush, ignores the common usage of the word.  How many times have people used &quot;stuck&quot; to say &quot;I was stuck at the office until late last night,&quot; or &quot;I got stuck on the phone with that guy for a half an hour?.&quot;  

&lt;em&gt;Of course&lt;/em&gt; Republicans are going to squeeze every bit of political advantage they can out of it, but that doesn&#039;t mean Kerry doesn&#039;t deserve every bit of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally like Derb, but he can be very pigheaded and obstinate when he wants to be.  A plausible argument can be made that, looking at the prepared text of the speech in hindsight, Kerry <em>really</em> screwed up a joke about Bush.  However, to say that &#8220;no reasonable person&#8221; could look at the <em>actual words spoken by Kerry</em> and construe them as referring to the troops, is just nonsensical.  There is simply no reference to Bush at all in those words.  Trying to say that the use of the word &#8220;stuck&#8221; necessarily implies &#8220;caught in perpetuity&#8221; (rather than for one or two tours of duty), and therefore could only refer to Bush, ignores the common usage of the word.  How many times have people used &#8220;stuck&#8221; to say &#8220;I was stuck at the office until late last night,&#8221; or &#8220;I got stuck on the phone with that guy for a half an hour?.&#8221;  </p>
<p><em>Of course</em> Republicans are going to squeeze every bit of political advantage they can out of it, but that doesn&#8217;t mean Kerry doesn&#8217;t deserve every bit of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88461</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88461</guid>
		<description>I hope that our honored vets will now feel the need to get involved, and &lt;strong&gt;get over to your local GOP center &lt;/strong&gt;as I know they would very much appreciate your help once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that our honored vets will now feel the need to get involved, and <strong>get over to your local GOP center </strong>as I know they would very much appreciate your help once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdfaith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88422</link>
		<dc:creator>bdfaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88422</guid>
		<description>I received my BSEE &quot;with Highest Honors,&quot; which is plain Texas English for &lt;em&gt;summa cum laude&lt;/em&gt;. My graduate GPA, while working full time, was 3.833/4.0. I wouldn&#039;t have the BSEE or the Masters if not for the GI Bill. Guess it was dumb to enlist and volunteer for Nam when the money ran out half-way through college the first time around.

Yo, Johnny! F****ck you very much.

Get your gear for the next Kerry Lied rally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smalltownveteran.net/bills_bites/2006/10/some_gear_for_t.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Proud Veteran-American. Silent No More!&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; We haven&#039;t gone away, Johnny, and we haven&#039;t forgotten. We&#039;re still here, locked and loaded, waiting for you to crawl back out from under that rock again. Bring it on, Johnny.

Bill Faith
USAF 1970-1974
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
Webmaster, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oldwardogs.us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.oldwardogs.us &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my BSEE &#8220;with Highest Honors,&#8221; which is plain Texas English for <em>summa cum laude</em>. My graduate GPA, while working full time, was 3.833/4.0. I wouldn&#8217;t have the BSEE or the Masters if not for the GI Bill. Guess it was dumb to enlist and volunteer for Nam when the money ran out half-way through college the first time around.</p>
<p>Yo, Johnny! F****ck you very much.</p>
<p>Get your gear for the next Kerry Lied rally <a href="http://www.smalltownveteran.net/bills_bites/2006/10/some_gear_for_t.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. &#8220;<strong>Proud Veteran-American. Silent No More!</strong>&#8221; We haven&#8217;t gone away, Johnny, and we haven&#8217;t forgotten. We&#8217;re still here, locked and loaded, waiting for you to crawl back out from under that rock again. Bring it on, Johnny.</p>
<p>Bill Faith<br />
USAF 1970-1974<br />
Proud Viet Nam Veteran<br />
Webmaster, <a href="http://www.oldwardogs.us/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.oldwardogs.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.oldwardogs.us</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88416</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88416</guid>
		<description>Kerry truly is the gift that keeps on giving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry truly is the gift that keeps on giving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88408</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d sketch in Murtha, the EX Marine behind sKerry.  He was the first that I know of to call the Marines Babykillers in the media.

I expected it from the left.  I expected it from the protesters.  I never expected it from an EX Marine and senator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d sketch in Murtha, the EX Marine behind sKerry.  He was the first that I know of to call the Marines Babykillers in the media.</p>
<p>I expected it from the left.  I expected it from the protesters.  I never expected it from an EX Marine and senator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88405</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88405</guid>
		<description>Please Please Please Please &lt;strong&gt;RESIGN&lt;/strong&gt;

Do us a favor,Please Please Please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Please Please Please <strong>RESIGN</strong></p>
<p>Do us a favor,Please Please Please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halley</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/comment-page-1/#comment-88402</link>
		<dc:creator>Halley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/kerryism/#comment-88402</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no way Kerry was talking about Bush. If you read it that way from the beginning, it makes even less sense. Bush is &quot;stuck in Iraq&quot;? I thought he was in Washington. But whatever - Kerry&#039;s record of disdain for US defense is unimpeachable and speaks for itself, even without this latest admission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way Kerry was talking about Bush. If you read it that way from the beginning, it makes even less sense. Bush is &#8220;stuck in Iraq&#8221;? I thought he was in Washington. But whatever &#8211; Kerry&#8217;s record of disdain for US defense is unimpeachable and speaks for itself, even without this latest admission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
