RedWinged Blackbird on October 30, 2006 at 10:57 AM

NO, ROSIE O’DONNELL…

dung.

Hillary as Aunt Jemimah?

RedWinged Blackbird on October 30, 2006 at 10:57 AM

“And I do believe ya’ll KNOW what ah’m talkin’ about….”

Hoot!

.

The Machine on October 30, 2006 at 11:41 AM

That reminds me… I was attacked by one of the bigger liberal blogs for blasting one of the left’s previous “blackface” incidents for having morphed Hillary on to the cover of the Roots DVD. The problem was, mine was in context and not mocking of someone’s race. It was when Hillary made her famous “running Congress like a plantation” comment. The skin tone of her face was darkened to match the hands as best I could with my crappy photoshop program, but that was it. It wasn’t the minstrel imagery or anything remotely related. It was simply mocking Hillary for painting the Democrats as slaves on a plantation. Not invoking the stereotypical racist imagery to blast those who don’t agree with me. It was shocking how many hundreds of comments these blogs got and who could not comprehend the difference no matter how many ways I broke it down to them.

She sure was lookin’ good.

CAVUTO: Did you talk to her prior to her going on?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: No.
CAVUTO: Did you talk to her afterwards?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: I did.
CAVUTO: What did you tell her?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: I told her I thought it was a sterling performance.

http://perezhilton.com/topics/australiastic/caption_me_interesting_costume_choice_20061029.php#comments

Wolf Blitzer gets the same blackface treatment that Michael Steele and Joe Lieberman have already been tarred with. As Allah writes, “Not for any particular reason. It was just his turn”:I guess they’re speaking racism to power now. It’ll happen……

How does this explain white trash? Just curious.

…hey, *HEY*, Hey…as a Redneck-American, I take issue with the unjust, racist…er…somethinist…characterization of my people….

…you’re probably not “genuinely country”….

They imagine racism where there is none, and then think nothing of employing blatant racist imagery to attack those who aren’t liberal enough for them: As I noted in my column last week, there are no grown-ups on the other……

Lynne Cheney: Right. But what is CNN doing running terrorist tape of terrorists shooting Americans? I mean, I thought Duncan Hunter asked you a very good question, and you didn’t answer it. Do you want us to win?

Wolf Blitzer: The answer, of course, is we want the United States to win. We are Americans. There’s no doubt about that. You think we want terrorists to win?

In the nutroots’ world, suggesting that you actually want America to triumph in its war with Islamic fascists is beyond the pale.

Maybe someone is still mad about this and didn’t know how to vent their anger. Poor Wolf “So poor, so black” Blitzer.

I’d never seen that! Holy crap — so poor and so black? That’s insane. I guess that means that people who are so white are not so poor? How does this explain white trash? Just curious.

Black isn’t something one can quantify

didn’t Spike Lee suggest that it could be…? (a la Jungle Fever, when he put the “light” blacks into a nicer hotel than the “darker” blacks)

You could do a Venn diagram of their logic here. But at this point, who’s left?

Just one example here - Camille Paglia or any courageous liberal who reminds them of their nuttiness.

The Blacks will awake, hopefully soon, and it will be all over for the dems. It’s just a matter of time.

Poor Wolf “So poor, so black” Blitzer.

…there is a definitive glimpse into the Democrat psyche: one can be “so black”…there are degrees of blackness.

If someone darkly complected is poor, lives in the 9th Ward, has several other social strikes against him, he’s “so black”. He’s more genuinely black, because someone black *should* be poor, maybe, should live in the 9th Ward, should be vulnerable, etc.

If, on the other hand, someone of African ancestry lives in the ‘burbs, drives a Volvo, has read the latest “summer novel”, has a college education, maybe is a lawyer, drinks Cabernet and not Boone’s Farm, whose wife calls him “my husband” not “my baby daddy”, he’s “not very black”.

It’s all about quantifying stereotypes.

Where is the black outrage at white pundits grading their “blackness” on a curve?

You can be so fat, so nice, so awful, so cheap, so stupid, or so late, based upon how fat, nice, awful, cheap, stupid or late other people you’ve met are or have been. How can someone be “so black”? It’s like being “so pregnant”. It’s a binary thing. You either are or you aren’t. If you’re not black, you’re something else, and I hope you like it because it isn’t going to change soon (unless you’re Michael Jackson).

Black isn’t something one can quantify…because, if it is, it can then be judged qualitatively, and be “so black=bad”, which I thought the Party of Self-Promotion was trying to wean us all away from.

1) I don’t love God. But they do.
2) I shouldn’t judge people … especially not the people judging me and telling me not to judge.
3) Suggesting that a white woman might find a black man attractive is racism.
4) To insult someone – you should paint them up in blackface. Because that’s not racist at all. Only Playboy bunnies and using the term “macaca” is racist. The N-word, calling people “Oreo,” and blackface is not racist.

I love learning new things.