<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT wonders: Does Islamic law authorize nuclear jihad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:15:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally: Michael Moore embraces 9/11 Truth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-483898</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally: Michael Moore embraces 9/11 Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-483898</guid>
		<description>[...] He&#8217;s been looking for an alternate explanation since, literally, the day after. It reminds me of a piece published last year in the Times explaning how Iran has made anti-Americanism a de facto tenet of Islamic doctrine. Same with the with far left: the idea of the United States being victimized so horrendously, particularly by third-worlders, contradicts their faith too starkly. Even the usual compensation, that we &#8220;deserved&#8221; it, doesn&#8217;t quite suffice. So they make the only cognitive move they can. (Chomsky, interestingly, is an apostate on this subject.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He&#8217;s been looking for an alternate explanation since, literally, the day after. It reminds me of a piece published last year in the Times explaning how Iran has made anti-Americanism a de facto tenet of Islamic doctrine. Same with the with far left: the idea of the United States being victimized so horrendously, particularly by third-worlders, contradicts their faith too starkly. Even the usual compensation, that we &#8220;deserved&#8221; it, doesn&#8217;t quite suffice. So they make the only cognitive move they can. (Chomsky, interestingly, is an apostate on this subject.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran set to add atomic symbol to currency</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-283686</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran set to add atomic symbol to currency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-283686</guid>
		<description>[...] That means it&#8217;s time to ratchet up the nationalist brainwashing, so the atomic symbol is getting a plum spot on the face of the new 50,000 rial note (Khomeini himself appears on the reverse). The mullahs have a habit of transforming political issues into elements of religious doctrine, as Noah Feldman memorably described last year in writing about Islamist anti-Americanism. Khamenei has issued a fatwa declaring Islamic nuclear weapons forbidden, but the more dissent there is in Iran over the nuclear program, the more we&#8217;ll see Shiite religious authorities start to argue that Islam demands nukes. This is a short step in that direction. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That means it&#8217;s time to ratchet up the nationalist brainwashing, so the atomic symbol is getting a plum spot on the face of the new 50,000 rial note (Khomeini himself appears on the reverse). The mullahs have a habit of transforming political issues into elements of religious doctrine, as Noah Feldman memorably described last year in writing about Islamist anti-Americanism. Khamenei has issued a fatwa declaring Islamic nuclear weapons forbidden, but the more dissent there is in Iran over the nuclear program, the more we&#8217;ll see Shiite religious authorities start to argue that Islam demands nukes. This is a short step in that direction. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; French filmmaker shoots documentary about suicide bombers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-120587</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; French filmmaker shoots documentary about suicide bombers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-120587</guid>
		<description>[...] Islamic doctrine might supply the religious imprimatur for the violence but the brainwashing the Palestinians use goes far beyond memorizing the appropriate verses from the Koran. In fact, interpretations of the Koran have evolved in order to accommodate their revanchist viciousness. Here&#8217;s a clip dug up by Pajamas Media of the Arafat Youth in full flower. See for yourself how suicide bombers are made. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Islamic doctrine might supply the religious imprimatur for the violence but the brainwashing the Palestinians use goes far beyond memorizing the appropriate verses from the Koran. In fact, interpretations of the Koran have evolved in order to accommodate their revanchist viciousness. Here&#8217;s a clip dug up by Pajamas Media of the Arafat Youth in full flower. See for yourself how suicide bombers are made. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A kinder, gentler Islamic fundamentalism?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-103960</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A kinder, gentler Islamic fundamentalism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-103960</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with the &#8220;classical understanding&#8221; of Islamic law is that understandings have a habit of changing, particularly when there&#8217;s a lot of popular pressure on them to do so. Fortunately, as Kofi assures us, the Koran doesn&#8217;t encourage violence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with the &#8220;classical understanding&#8221; of Islamic law is that understandings have a habit of changing, particularly when there&#8217;s a lot of popular pressure on them to do so. Fortunately, as Kofi assures us, the Koran doesn&#8217;t encourage violence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political Pit Bull</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-92882</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political Pit Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-92882</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Awesome...&lt;/strong&gt;

Six Arab states announced yesterday that they plan to go nuclear. THE SPECTRE of a nuclear race in the Middle East was raised yesterday when six Arab states announced that they were embarking on programmes to master atomic technology. The......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Awesome&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Six Arab states announced yesterday that they plan to go nuclear. THE SPECTRE of a nuclear race in the Middle East was raised yesterday when six Arab states announced that they were embarking on programmes to master atomic technology. The&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-86511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-86511</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, that&#039;s odd, I just can&#039;t seem to find anything in the koran about nuclear weapons. Oh that&#039;s right, nukes didn&#039;t exist when this &quot;holy book&quot; was written. Is anybody out there dumb enough to think the terrorists won&#039;t use nukes if they ever get their grimey little hands on &#039;em? We have a bigger problem with nukes in Pakistan ... &#039;cause they already HAVE nukes! If Mushy were overthrown by the Taliqaedaban, suddenly the rules of the game would change drastically. We&#039;d hafta go in and take out those nukes before they can be distributed to all the branches of the global jihad. Get THAT thru your lefty hippie pot smokin&#039; right-brain dominate freakin&#039; heads ... this is all the same war. Chechnya, &quot;Palistine&quot;, Southern Thailand, Kashmir, etc etc etc and they&#039;ll be coming HERE (again) next if we don&#039;t kill the bastards over there. If we take out Iran&#039;s nuclear facilities, the libs will go bonkers, but if the terrorists ever set one off (most likely in some blue city in some blue state) in the U.S. those very same libs (if they survive) will blame it all on Bush and why didn&#039;t he stop it and blah blah blah! Ya can&#039;t have it both ways, either we fight, or we die. Playing PREvent Defense can only work for so long before they score one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, that&#8217;s odd, I just can&#8217;t seem to find anything in the koran about nuclear weapons. Oh that&#8217;s right, nukes didn&#8217;t exist when this &#8220;holy book&#8221; was written. Is anybody out there dumb enough to think the terrorists won&#8217;t use nukes if they ever get their grimey little hands on &#8216;em? We have a bigger problem with nukes in Pakistan &#8230; &#8217;cause they already HAVE nukes! If Mushy were overthrown by the Taliqaedaban, suddenly the rules of the game would change drastically. We&#8217;d hafta go in and take out those nukes before they can be distributed to all the branches of the global jihad. Get THAT thru your lefty hippie pot smokin&#8217; right-brain dominate freakin&#8217; heads &#8230; this is all the same war. Chechnya, &#8220;Palistine&#8221;, Southern Thailand, Kashmir, etc etc etc and they&#8217;ll be coming HERE (again) next if we don&#8217;t kill the bastards over there. If we take out Iran&#8217;s nuclear facilities, the libs will go bonkers, but if the terrorists ever set one off (most likely in some blue city in some blue state) in the U.S. those very same libs (if they survive) will blame it all on Bush and why didn&#8217;t he stop it and blah blah blah! Ya can&#8217;t have it both ways, either we fight, or we die. Playing PREvent Defense can only work for so long before they score one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iam7545</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-86259</link>
		<dc:creator>iam7545</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-86259</guid>
		<description>WOOOOO - Is the NYT for real? The idea that we can make rational sense out of the jihadists is freakin insane. Is the intention to make us feel that we can be spared if we let Pelosi run congress? There are many instances when homicide bombings kill Muslims bystanders. The terrorists reply?  - The Muslims that were killed have become martyrs!! Instant martyrdom! Or - they consider muslims that live among non muslims infidels - they deserve to be killed. Happened this summer in Israel.  The Islamofacists will spin the Koran any way they want and then  drop the big one right on the offices of the NYT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOOOO &#8211; Is the NYT for real? The idea that we can make rational sense out of the jihadists is freakin insane. Is the intention to make us feel that we can be spared if we let Pelosi run congress? There are many instances when homicide bombings kill Muslims bystanders. The terrorists reply?  &#8211; The Muslims that were killed have become martyrs!! Instant martyrdom! Or &#8211; they consider muslims that live among non muslims infidels &#8211; they deserve to be killed. Happened this summer in Israel.  The Islamofacists will spin the Koran any way they want and then  drop the big one right on the offices of the NYT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-86247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-86247</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1701/documentid/2762/history/3,2360,655,1701,2762&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sheik Nasir bin Hamid al Fahd, one of the “Three Takfir Sheikhs” in Saudi Arabia&#039;s Wahhabi death cult, published a fatwa on May 21, 2003 called “A Treatise on the Legal Status of Using Weapons of Mass Destruction against Infidels” (Risalah fi hukm istikhdam aslihat al-damar al-shamel didh al-kuffar), that gives Al Qaeda or any other Islamic terrorists permission to use nuclear, biological or chemical weapons against the United States and its allies&lt;/a&gt;.  

It specifically allows “the permissibility of attacking the polytheists by night, even if their children are injured” and allows “that these weapons will kill some Muslims”.   As the Islamists say, Allah will know his own.  If you&#039;re wondering who the polytheists are, look in the mirror.

Sheikh al Fahd says there is no need to worry about international law banning the use of such WMDs because Allah&#039;s law trumps any man-made infidel laws.  Fahd claims that American weapons have killed ten million Muslims so therefore its OK to use WMDs to kill ten million Americans, though any more than that would require additional fatwas.

Sheikh al Fahd, like all Saudi clerics, is an employee of the Saudi government, the same Saudi Arabia which claims in its TV ads in the Washington, DC area to be our &quot;ally in the war against terror.&quot;

It&#039;s also worth noting that Islam values expediency above all.  Mohammed makes it clear in the Koran that anything that advances Islam is good, anything that doesn&#039;t is bad.  Should an atom bomb detonate in DC or ricin poison thousands in New York or anthrax break out in LA, the entire Muslim world will cheer this victory for Islam, just like they did on Sep 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1701/documentid/2762/history/3,2360,655,1701,2762" rel="nofollow">Sheik Nasir bin Hamid al Fahd, one of the “Three Takfir Sheikhs” in Saudi Arabia&#8217;s Wahhabi death cult, published a fatwa on May 21, 2003 called “A Treatise on the Legal Status of Using Weapons of Mass Destruction against Infidels” (Risalah fi hukm istikhdam aslihat al-damar al-shamel didh al-kuffar), that gives Al Qaeda or any other Islamic terrorists permission to use nuclear, biological or chemical weapons against the United States and its allies</a>.  </p>
<p>It specifically allows “the permissibility of attacking the polytheists by night, even if their children are injured” and allows “that these weapons will kill some Muslims”.   As the Islamists say, Allah will know his own.  If you&#8217;re wondering who the polytheists are, look in the mirror.</p>
<p>Sheikh al Fahd says there is no need to worry about international law banning the use of such WMDs because Allah&#8217;s law trumps any man-made infidel laws.  Fahd claims that American weapons have killed ten million Muslims so therefore its OK to use WMDs to kill ten million Americans, though any more than that would require additional fatwas.</p>
<p>Sheikh al Fahd, like all Saudi clerics, is an employee of the Saudi government, the same Saudi Arabia which claims in its TV ads in the Washington, DC area to be our &#8220;ally in the war against terror.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that Islam values expediency above all.  Mohammed makes it clear in the Koran that anything that advances Islam is good, anything that doesn&#8217;t is bad.  Should an atom bomb detonate in DC or ricin poison thousands in New York or anthrax break out in LA, the entire Muslim world will cheer this victory for Islam, just like they did on Sep 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-86194</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-86194</guid>
		<description>I believe Shari&#039;a law allows whatever the madmullah&#039;s want it to allow.  What would become of &#039;perpetual outrage&#039; if they couldn&#039;t lash out in any way they see fit over any slight whatsoever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Shari&#8217;a law allows whatever the madmullah&#8217;s want it to allow.  What would become of &#8216;perpetual outrage&#8217; if they couldn&#8217;t lash out in any way they see fit over any slight whatsoever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-86106</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-86106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Speaking of which, the nutroots has been buzzing for weeks about the American naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf and how Bush is allegedly planning to attack Iran as an October surprise.

Debka thinks they’re right.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I won&#039;t be entirely satisfied unless the attack helps address the demographic problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Speaking of which, the nutroots has been buzzing for weeks about the American naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf and how Bush is allegedly planning to attack Iran as an October surprise.</p>
<p>Debka thinks they’re right.</p></blockquote>
<p>I won&#8217;t be entirely satisfied unless the attack helps address the demographic problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: see-dubya</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85985</link>
		<dc:creator>see-dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85985</guid>
		<description>Hmm...Mullah Omar&#039;s really &lt;em&gt;grown in office&lt;/em&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;Mullah Omar&#8217;s really <em>grown in office</em>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Broken Chair</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85915</link>
		<dc:creator>The Broken Chair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85915</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran Strike Brewing?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Debka has a military report citing naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf are a prelude to an attack on Iran before the election. Our Tehran......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran Strike Brewing?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Debka has a military report citing naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf are a prelude to an attack on Iran before the election. Our Tehran&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakko77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85835</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakko77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85835</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So Islamic law is a kind of “living constitution”? Another point of alliance with the Left… &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, you really gotta love those &quot;living documents&quot;.  That way you can change established standards and rules to justify anything you want... like nuclear war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So Islamic law is a kind of “living constitution”? Another point of alliance with the Left… </p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, you really gotta love those &#8220;living documents&#8221;.  That way you can change established standards and rules to justify anything you want&#8230; like nuclear war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valiant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85786</link>
		<dc:creator>Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85786</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Speaking of which, the nutroots has been buzzing for weeks about the American naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf and how Bush is allegedly planning to attack Iran as an October surprise.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So late in the game, it would rightly come across as a desperate &lt;em&gt;wag the dog&lt;/em&gt; campaign ploy.  We should wait until Nov. 8 so the new Dhimmicrat Congress-elect has something to cry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Speaking of which, the nutroots has been buzzing for weeks about the American naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf and how Bush is allegedly planning to attack Iran as an October surprise.</p></blockquote>
<p>So late in the game, it would rightly come across as a desperate <em>wag the dog</em> campaign ploy.  We should wait until Nov. 8 so the new Dhimmicrat Congress-elect has something to cry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puritan1648</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85785</link>
		<dc:creator>Puritan1648</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85785</guid>
		<description>...here&#039;s a little slice of Islam that the moral relativists (one religion is as good as another...and none of &#039;em are worth much) at the NYT should check out:

&lt;blockquote&gt;[9.28] O you who believe! the idolaters are nothing but unclean, so they shall not approach the Sacred Mosque after this year; and if you fear poverty then Allah will enrich you out of His grace if He please; surely Allah is Knowing Wise.
[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From Sura 9 (&quot;The Immunity&quot;), verses 28 and 29...I apologize for the circuitous prose...nature of the beast....

The premise is simple:  

* This Allah guy made us, but made us all muslim.  

* Those of us who don&#039;t toe the line are unclean.

* This Allah guy promises to despoil us and allow muslims to tax and subjugate us.

The Koran is full of subjugation...slaying, stabbing, and the rest.  The Sharia is more of the same, with loads of nitty-gritty to make the stabbing and slaying and taxing and subjugating possible.

If Islamism was just another socio-economic system, it&#039;d be one thing.  As someone&#039;s pointed out earlier, they&#039;ve been at this jihad thing for 1300 years...they&#039;re like the Borg in bedsheets...they&#039;re not going away.

Don&#039;t believe me?  Try out another slice...same Sura:

&lt;blockquote&gt;[9.5] So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...&quot;slay&quot;...&quot;take&quot;...&quot;besiege&quot;...&quot;ambush&quot;...but &quot;Allah is Forgiving&quot;.

Which way will they go *IF* they can strike back with nukes?  What will Islamic lawyers say is moral?  

&quot;WOW!  Look at the pretty colors, man!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;here&#8217;s a little slice of Islam that the moral relativists (one religion is as good as another&#8230;and none of &#8216;em are worth much) at the NYT should check out:</p>
<blockquote><p>[9.28] O you who believe! the idolaters are nothing but unclean, so they shall not approach the Sacred Mosque after this year; and if you fear poverty then Allah will enrich you out of His grace if He please; surely Allah is Knowing Wise.<br />
[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.</p></blockquote>
<p>From Sura 9 (&#8220;The Immunity&#8221;), verses 28 and 29&#8230;I apologize for the circuitous prose&#8230;nature of the beast&#8230;.</p>
<p>The premise is simple:  </p>
<p>* This Allah guy made us, but made us all muslim.  </p>
<p>* Those of us who don&#8217;t toe the line are unclean.</p>
<p>* This Allah guy promises to despoil us and allow muslims to tax and subjugate us.</p>
<p>The Koran is full of subjugation&#8230;slaying, stabbing, and the rest.  The Sharia is more of the same, with loads of nitty-gritty to make the stabbing and slaying and taxing and subjugating possible.</p>
<p>If Islamism was just another socio-economic system, it&#8217;d be one thing.  As someone&#8217;s pointed out earlier, they&#8217;ve been at this jihad thing for 1300 years&#8230;they&#8217;re like the Borg in bedsheets&#8230;they&#8217;re not going away.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me?  Try out another slice&#8230;same Sura:</p>
<blockquote><p>[9.5] So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;slay&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;take&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;besiege&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;ambush&#8221;&#8230;but &#8220;Allah is Forgiving&#8221;.</p>
<p>Which way will they go *IF* they can strike back with nukes?  What will Islamic lawyers say is moral?  </p>
<p>&#8220;WOW!  Look at the pretty colors, man!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85777</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85777</guid>
		<description>If you people don&#039;t like this, you should all become Muslims so you can be a part of the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you people don&#8217;t like this, you should all become Muslims so you can be a part of the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dittohead</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85775</link>
		<dc:creator>Dittohead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85775</guid>
		<description>It is not just America that is in danger of being struck. America will be the first target because we have the strongest military in the world. Islamofascists will quickly use their weapons to try and gain control of the world. 

It is an ideaology that must be defeated. NYT is giddy that America is the main enemy without truly understanding the Islamic beliefs. When will MSM people awake to this ideaology? I know us on Hot Air understand this but others certainly do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not just America that is in danger of being struck. America will be the first target because we have the strongest military in the world. Islamofascists will quickly use their weapons to try and gain control of the world. </p>
<p>It is an ideaology that must be defeated. NYT is giddy that America is the main enemy without truly understanding the Islamic beliefs. When will MSM people awake to this ideaology? I know us on Hot Air understand this but others certainly do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puritan1648</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85773</link>
		<dc:creator>Puritan1648</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85773</guid>
		<description>...does it have instructions in the Koran on how to duck?

They want to be a nuclear nation, I&#039;m all for it.  The moment that their reactors go live, I say that we allow them to borrow a cup of nuclear fuel.

If they give us an 8-digit grid, we can deliver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;does it have instructions in the Koran on how to duck?</p>
<p>They want to be a nuclear nation, I&#8217;m all for it.  The moment that their reactors go live, I say that we allow them to borrow a cup of nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>If they give us an 8-digit grid, we can deliver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85772</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85772</guid>
		<description>So Islamic law is a kind of &quot;living constitution&quot;?  Another point of alliance with the Left...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Islamic law is a kind of &#8220;living constitution&#8221;?  Another point of alliance with the Left&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahdi Al-Dajjal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahdi Al-Dajjal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85768</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Iran&#039;s President seek a religious ruling awhile back on the use of nuclear weapons?  And didn&#039;t that ruling give him religious standing to use nukes?  

I&#039;ve searched the web for this ruling but I wasn&#039;t able to locate it.  In short, this issue has already been resolved and the bottom line is that islamic jurisprudence permits the use of nuclear weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Iran&#8217;s President seek a religious ruling awhile back on the use of nuclear weapons?  And didn&#8217;t that ruling give him religious standing to use nukes?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve searched the web for this ruling but I wasn&#8217;t able to locate it.  In short, this issue has already been resolved and the bottom line is that islamic jurisprudence permits the use of nuclear weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/comment-page-1/#comment-85767</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/30/nyt-wonders-does-islamic-law-authorize-nuclear-jihad/#comment-85767</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s absurd.  They&#039;re even talking about delaying the Hussein verdict until after the elections.  There is no way Bush is going to launch military strikes against Iran right before the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s absurd.  They&#8217;re even talking about delaying the Hussein verdict until after the elections.  There is no way Bush is going to launch military strikes against Iran right before the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
