Judicial Watch issues dossier on MEChA (Junior) High
posted at 4:09 pm on October 30, 2006 by Allahpundit
Remember Academia Semillas del Pueblo? They’ve been lying low for the past five months, possibly because their charter’s up in December.
Judicial Watch hasn’t forgotten. Check out this nifty, full-color, 12-page compilation of data points they released this week. Quote:
[W]hen Aguilar applied for public financing through the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) in 2001, he did not attempt to conceal much about his true intentions. This is the true scandal with respect to Aguilar’s school: The Los Angeles Unified School District approved financing for what is very clearly a radical Mexican reconquista training ground for school children.
How much financing? According to financial statements for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2005, taxpayers spend more than $1.6 million per year to advance the school’s radical agenda. This includes funds from both federal ($210,000) and state ($1.4 million) sources.
They’ve got snippets from the lesson plans and a quote from the boss prominently featured — under a photo of Hillary.
That’ll earn you a link every time.
Here’s a handy dandy graph of how their API progress stacks up with other California schools.
And here’s their California Standards Test performance from 2001 to 2006; for ease of reference, yellow, orange, or red is bad. Like I said before: “knowing the Aztec word for ‘honky’ doesn’t really help much with algebra.” Right, Principal Huitzilixtlitiu?
In other news, the feds have ruled out amnesty for illegal workers! There’s just one catch…
Related Posts:
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Why does everyone get in an uproar if men act like men and give women compliments, just not in a rosy sensitive way.
tommer74 on April 5, 2013 at 11:05 PM
Kamala Harris probably is the best looking Attorney General California has had since Jerry Brown. Obama was merely struggling to find more substantive qualifications for her, so it’s an understandable comment.
We should go easy on Democrats. They seem to have attracted visually shocking figures such as Barney “the Blob” Frank, Henry “Nostrils” Waxman, John “Mr Ed” Kerry, Snake-eyes Carville, Her Thighness Hillary, “Stretch” Pelosi, Debbie Was-a-man Schultz and, who can forget, the harrowing visage of Rachel Maddow (I know I can’t).
We can take the stupidity, the incompetence, the deceit, the low-rent attitudes but Democrats, please address the aesthetics (it’s OK to leave the feminists for phase two, we don’t expect miracles) -
Is personal ugliness is a primary qualification for liberal party favor?
virgo on April 6, 2013 at 2:33 AM
B.O. is a lecher. What’s he going to say next “Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the hottest chick on the Supreme Court, and I like her boobies”?
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 8:48 AM
Michelle wanted to give B.O. a bunch of crap for that comment, but she knows he’ll just smack her, and tell her to STFU.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM
Go to the Daily Kook, they’re really smart over there.
JackM on April 8, 2013 at 8:54 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2