<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Mary Katharine Ham talks attack ads on CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdpaz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85640</link>
		<dc:creator>jdpaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85640</guid>
		<description>Very nice job...a little too much Southern hospitality, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice job&#8230;a little too much Southern hospitality, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjjen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85540</link>
		<dc:creator>jjjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85540</guid>
		<description>MK was excellent, very articulate, she came across as &quot;real&quot; and comfortable. I loved the way she wouldn&#039;t let them distract her away from the point she needed to make.  The zinger on who really has the racial hangups....priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK was excellent, very articulate, she came across as &#8220;real&#8221; and comfortable. I loved the way she wouldn&#8217;t let them distract her away from the point she needed to make.  The zinger on who really has the racial hangups&#8230;.priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itzWicks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85520</link>
		<dc:creator>itzWicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85520</guid>
		<description>Not her strongest appearance, but it was still an honorable one. She was the one with class, and did get a killer point across. Let&#039;s give her some slack as it was her first major appearance on a cable news outlet.

I see big things in her future. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not her strongest appearance, but it was still an honorable one. She was the one with class, and did get a killer point across. Let&#8217;s give her some slack as it was her first major appearance on a cable news outlet.</p>
<p>I see big things in her future. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85433</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85433</guid>
		<description>Mary Katharine that was a fantastic Debut, MUCH CONGRATULATIONS !! I personally think you&#039;ve got way too much class for those snotballs over at CNN. But, I guess they will do for a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Katharine that was a fantastic Debut, MUCH CONGRATULATIONS !! I personally think you&#8217;ve got way too much class for those snotballs over at CNN. But, I guess they will do for a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85380</link>
		<dc:creator>EFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, it was her best line.  It was also her only line.  Aravosis dominated that segment.

I&#039;m not trying to beat up on her.  I completely support her position.  Just like each sports fan has a team they root for, I rooted for her.

But the unfortunate fact is, Aravoisis dominated the clip.  &lt;strong&gt;Our&lt;/strong&gt; team didn&#039;t win this one.

There will be a next time, and we&#039;ll all be in her corner at the rematch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, it was her best line.  It was also her only line.  Aravosis dominated that segment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to beat up on her.  I completely support her position.  Just like each sports fan has a team they root for, I rooted for her.</p>
<p>But the unfortunate fact is, Aravoisis dominated the clip.  <strong>Our</strong> team didn&#8217;t win this one.</p>
<p>There will be a next time, and we&#8217;ll all be in her corner at the rematch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Deth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Deth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85189</guid>
		<description>Very well done, Mary Katherine!

Though the annoyingly aedenoidal CNN chick and Aravosis geek did try to gang up on you, you toughed it out and held your ground.

Brava!

I&#039;m with Viper1 on a weekly Fox &quot;Ham Nation&quot; segment.

Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well done, Mary Katherine!</p>
<p>Though the annoyingly aedenoidal CNN chick and Aravosis geek did try to gang up on you, you toughed it out and held your ground.</p>
<p>Brava!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Viper1 on a weekly Fox &#8220;Ham Nation&#8221; segment.</p>
<p>Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geekrunner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85166</link>
		<dc:creator>geekrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85166</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t see the video (still on dialup :( ) but have read her recent piece, and she should be a future outstanding conservative writer and pundit.

geek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t see the video (still on dialup :( ) but have read her recent piece, and she should be a future outstanding conservative writer and pundit.</p>
<p>geek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85164</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85164</guid>
		<description>Congratulations MKH, Now we need a weekly &quot;Ham Nation&quot; segment on Fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations MKH, Now we need a weekly &#8220;Ham Nation&#8221; segment on Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85162</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85162</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;ve viewed the video and I&#039;m really steamed.  That was one of the most blatant hit jobs I&#039;ve ever seen on TV.

Mary Katherine Ham, competent, intelligent, and charming woman that she is, was ganged up upon. She was set up to be the punching bag of John Aravosis. Aravosis, proves (once again) that he is a lying  partisan pig, and CNN continues to be the lying partisan assclowns we know them to be.

If they want to deal with unfair political advertising, they could have dealt with the Tammy Duckworth (IL-6) hit job against Peter Roskam.  

Her ad opens with some woman claiming to be a school principle, complaining about guns in schools.  Says that THE LAW prohibited principals from expelling children who bring guns to school; claiming that they could only suspend them.  

FLAT OUT LIE 1.  

Principals and school districts have always had the ability to expel students for violating rules or for disciplinary problems.

The ad then goes on an says that when legislation was passed (to give the principals the right to expel), Roskam &lt;em&gt;STOOD WITH THE NRA &lt;/em&gt;instead of the children.

FLAT OUT LIE 2.  

The NRA has not supported guns in schools beyond supervised events and programs (i.e., competition rifle teams).  The NRA created the Eddie Eagle program that has taught tens of thousands of children to leave a gun alone, leave the area, and tell an adult.  The NRA has never taken the position that kids &lt;strong&gt;should not be expelled &lt;/strong&gt;for endangering other children by bringing guns to school.

Besides, standing with the NRA, in this humble gun owner&#039;s opinion, &lt;strong&gt;IS A RATHER GOOD THING&lt;/strong&gt; and nothing to be ashamed about!  

Duckworth (and the Democrats) got a &quot;three-for&quot; with this attack ad.  1. They smeared Roskam.  2. They lied about the NRA&#039;s position in order to tie the smear to Roskam.  3. They smeared every law abiding gun owner by implication for daring to oppose gun control and/or supporting the NRA.

And as this ad was SPONSORED by Rep. Rahm Emanuals little slander operation, it proves that the Democrats are STILL anti-gun, and anti-gun owner.

I commend Mary Katherine for her professional and calm responses. I, would have reacted much more angrily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve viewed the video and I&#8217;m really steamed.  That was one of the most blatant hit jobs I&#8217;ve ever seen on TV.</p>
<p>Mary Katherine Ham, competent, intelligent, and charming woman that she is, was ganged up upon. She was set up to be the punching bag of John Aravosis. Aravosis, proves (once again) that he is a lying  partisan pig, and CNN continues to be the lying partisan assclowns we know them to be.</p>
<p>If they want to deal with unfair political advertising, they could have dealt with the Tammy Duckworth (IL-6) hit job against Peter Roskam.  </p>
<p>Her ad opens with some woman claiming to be a school principle, complaining about guns in schools.  Says that THE LAW prohibited principals from expelling children who bring guns to school; claiming that they could only suspend them.  </p>
<p>FLAT OUT LIE 1.  </p>
<p>Principals and school districts have always had the ability to expel students for violating rules or for disciplinary problems.</p>
<p>The ad then goes on an says that when legislation was passed (to give the principals the right to expel), Roskam <em>STOOD WITH THE NRA </em>instead of the children.</p>
<p>FLAT OUT LIE 2.  </p>
<p>The NRA has not supported guns in schools beyond supervised events and programs (i.e., competition rifle teams).  The NRA created the Eddie Eagle program that has taught tens of thousands of children to leave a gun alone, leave the area, and tell an adult.  The NRA has never taken the position that kids <strong>should not be expelled </strong>for endangering other children by bringing guns to school.</p>
<p>Besides, standing with the NRA, in this humble gun owner&#8217;s opinion, <strong>IS A RATHER GOOD THING</strong> and nothing to be ashamed about!  </p>
<p>Duckworth (and the Democrats) got a &#8220;three-for&#8221; with this attack ad.  1. They smeared Roskam.  2. They lied about the NRA&#8217;s position in order to tie the smear to Roskam.  3. They smeared every law abiding gun owner by implication for daring to oppose gun control and/or supporting the NRA.</p>
<p>And as this ad was SPONSORED by Rep. Rahm Emanuals little slander operation, it proves that the Democrats are STILL anti-gun, and anti-gun owner.</p>
<p>I commend Mary Katherine for her professional and calm responses. I, would have reacted much more angrily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halley</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85136</link>
		<dc:creator>Halley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85136</guid>
		<description>I think this underscores just how pervasive and powerful the insidious MSM still is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this underscores just how pervasive and powerful the insidious MSM still is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85134</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85134</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; a good line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists</p></blockquote>
<p>That <em>was</em> a good line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85101</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85101</guid>
		<description>Freelancer: I was thinking about quoting that part, too.  It really captures the flighty nature of the segment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freelancer: I was thinking about quoting that part, too.  It really captures the flighty nature of the segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali-Bubba</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85094</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali-Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85094</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Next time you see Aravosis, tell him those were gay drums, not jungle drums. And ask him how he feels about some hot Tennessee Democrat Redneck action. :-) &lt;/blockquote&gt;
So it wasn&#039;t just me. What a screamer, huh? I&#039;d never seen Avarosis before this video, and even my feeble gaydar was sounding a Level 4 Alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Next time you see Aravosis, tell him those were gay drums, not jungle drums. And ask him how he feels about some hot Tennessee Democrat Redneck action. :-) </p></blockquote>
<p>So it wasn&#8217;t just me. What a screamer, huh? I&#8217;d never seen Avarosis before this video, and even my feeble gaydar was sounding a Level 4 Alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85093</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85093</guid>
		<description>It was too chaotic to be a &quot;debate&quot;.  Such segments seem designed to be a free-for-all of talking points without real interaction between the participants.  MK tried to interact.  Was that a mistake?  If it was, maybe I just lament the absence of real debate.

The premise of the segment was &quot;nasty&quot; Republican ads, and it was often 2 vs. 1, innately placing MK on the defensive as she attempted to dispell their assumptions.  In spite of this, MK was calm and polite.  Too polite?  Should she have interrupted or interjected more, like John?

John&#039;s talking points seemed more simplistic than MK&#039;s, which might have also been a disadvantage for MK due to the nature of the segment.

All in all, I think MK did very well, and I suspect she&#039;ll adapt to the various modes of discussion as she gains more experience which is sure to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was too chaotic to be a &#8220;debate&#8221;.  Such segments seem designed to be a free-for-all of talking points without real interaction between the participants.  MK tried to interact.  Was that a mistake?  If it was, maybe I just lament the absence of real debate.</p>
<p>The premise of the segment was &#8220;nasty&#8221; Republican ads, and it was often 2 vs. 1, innately placing MK on the defensive as she attempted to dispell their assumptions.  In spite of this, MK was calm and polite.  Too polite?  Should she have interrupted or interjected more, like John?</p>
<p>John&#8217;s talking points seemed more simplistic than MK&#8217;s, which might have also been a disadvantage for MK due to the nature of the segment.</p>
<p>All in all, I think MK did very well, and I suspect she&#8217;ll adapt to the various modes of discussion as she gains more experience which is sure to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85089</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85089</guid>
		<description>Q: How can you tell when a liberal has realized your substance beats his emotion? 

&quot;...the liberal pundits, and bloggers...who hear drums in the back of an ad that are meant to be, y&#039;know sinister, negative music behind the opponent they&#039;re running against, and immediately think &#039;jungle drums&#039;, maybe the ones with the racial hangups...&quot;

A: When they talk over you to change topics before you&#039;ve finished making your point.

&quot;Ok, let&#039;s talk homophobia...&quot;

Outstanding, Mary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: How can you tell when a liberal has realized your substance beats his emotion? </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the liberal pundits, and bloggers&#8230;who hear drums in the back of an ad that are meant to be, y&#8217;know sinister, negative music behind the opponent they&#8217;re running against, and immediately think &#8216;jungle drums&#8217;, maybe the ones with the racial hangups&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>A: When they talk over you to change topics before you&#8217;ve finished making your point.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ok, let&#8217;s talk homophobia&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Outstanding, Mary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jummy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85088</link>
		<dc:creator>jummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85088</guid>
		<description>a douche and an enema in the same bag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a douche and an enema in the same bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85087</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85087</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HamNation, deconstructed...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m watching that CNN video and thinking to myself, &quot;No, the ads aren&#039;t racist, but John Avarosis sure is gay.&quot; How gay is he? He&#039;s gayer than a Streisand medley. Gayer than a Judy Garland Fan Club meeting. Gayer than ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HamNation, deconstructed&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m watching that CNN video and thinking to myself, &#8220;No, the ads aren&#8217;t racist, but John Avarosis sure is gay.&#8221; How gay is he? He&#8217;s gayer than a Streisand medley. Gayer than a Judy Garland Fan Club meeting. Gayer than &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Kurdistan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85069</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Kurdistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85069</guid>
		<description>Good job, MKH. The Americablog guy is a douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, MKH. The Americablog guy is a douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starflyer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85059</link>
		<dc:creator>starflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85059</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to watch goofs like Aravosis. Completely buoyed by the anchor, he distorted the facts and stole a lot of MKH&#039;s time and didn&#039;t speak to her reality-based points. What a douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to watch goofs like Aravosis. Completely buoyed by the anchor, he distorted the facts and stole a lot of MKH&#8217;s time and didn&#8217;t speak to her reality-based points. What a douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85033</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 05:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85033</guid>
		<description>Is anyone else having trouble getting the video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else having trouble getting the video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrvass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85020</link>
		<dc:creator>jrvass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85020</guid>
		<description>MKH,

Congratulations on your national news debut! Even though they outnumbered you 2 to 1, you had more brains than the both of them.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKH,</p>
<p>Congratulations on your national news debut! Even though they outnumbered you 2 to 1, you had more brains than the both of them.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-85012</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-85012</guid>
		<description>No side-kick status for Mary, she gets the full length super hero cape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No side-kick status for Mary, she gets the full length super hero cape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hack Ptui</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-84993</link>
		<dc:creator>Hack Ptui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-84993</guid>
		<description>Congrats, Mary K! You did great!  Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, Mary K! You did great!  Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texyank</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-84990</link>
		<dc:creator>Texyank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-84990</guid>
		<description>MK ,  You did GREAT.  Since when did these all caring  
   libs get so sensitive about personal issues ? ?
   Kill Bush Good, &lt;strong&gt; Bongo Drums &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bad&lt;/strong&gt;.  &lt;strong&gt;WTF&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK ,  You did GREAT.  Since when did these all caring<br />
   libs get so sensitive about personal issues ? ?<br />
   Kill Bush Good, <strong> Bongo Drums </strong><strong>Bad</strong>.  <strong>WTF</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyboss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-84974</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/28/video-mary-katharine-ham-talks-attack-ads-on-cnn/#comment-84974</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, that was a great line.  I keep wondering, would it have been better if it were a black woman playing the airhead?  I suspect that would be labelled racist, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>she delivered the knockout punch when she blind sided him with her statement that those pointing out the racist content where in fact the real racists</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, that was a great line.  I keep wondering, would it have been better if it were a black woman playing the airhead?  I suspect that would be labelled racist, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
