UK imam: Execute gays to prevent spread of “disease”

posted at 12:23 pm on October 26, 2006 by Allahpundit

It’s in the Koran:

Arshad Misbahi of the Manchester Central Mosque confirmed his views in a conversation to John Casson, a local psychotherapist.

Casson said: “I asked him if the execution of gay Muslims in Iran and Iraq was an acceptable punishment in Sharia law, or the result of culture, not religion.

“He told me that in a true Islamic state, such punishments were part of Islam: If the person had had a trial, at which four witnesses testified that they had seen the actual homosexual acts.”

“I asked him what would be the British Muslim view? He repeated that in an Islamic state these punishments were justified. They might result in the deaths of thousands but if this deterred millions from having sex, and spreading disease, then it was worthwhile to protect the wider community.”

The worst part? I’ve helped cause terrorism just by posting this.

LGF has the full transcript of what Aussie mufti Sheikh Hilali said yesterday about rape. A taste:

When it comes to adultery, it’s 90 percent the woman’s responsibility. Why? Because a woman owns the weapon of seduction. It’s she who takes off her clothes, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protect us, dallying. It’s she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then, it’s a look, a smile, a conversation, a greeting, a talk, a date, a meeting, a crime, then Long Bay jail. Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years.

The Anchoress adds some Steynian gloss. Read it all, but here’s the pullquote: “The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in.”

Exit question: how soon before Misbahi gets invited to Harvard?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I have to wonder how Rosie will defend this point of view?

dread pirate roberts on October 26, 2006 at 12:29 PM

Would someone please get Rosie O’Donnell’s comment on this? I’d like to hear her reaction to the treatment of homosexuals vis a vis fanatical islamic jihadists and fundamental Christians. Does she still think they are morally equivalent?

Mallard T. Drake on October 26, 2006 at 12:29 PM

ARE YOU SATISFIED YET LIBERALS??????

Defector01 on October 26, 2006 at 12:35 PM

We debate marriage, they debate death.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 12:38 PM

It’s she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then, it’s a look, a smile, a conversation, a greeting, a talk, a date, a meeting, ….

Is it just me, or does he seem to know a little too much about hookers?

BacaDog on October 26, 2006 at 12:42 PM

Defector – liberals will never be satisfied.

Starblazer on October 26, 2006 at 12:46 PM

Where the hell is this sex-machine that he keeps refering to? (just curious——)

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 12:47 PM

Islamisympatico suggestion #1. Enact Sharia law in Hollywood, just long enough to sand-blast the gay themes out of Disney movies. After the self fulfilling profit motive of real “Family Entertainment” is re-established, revoke the towelhead visas and dredge up some FDA nonsesense about pork (the OTHER white meat) being one of the essential food groups and the California NEA will require it be served in every California school, EVERY SINGLE DAY.

If you’re following the math:

abs(-1 Kookball idea) + (-1 kookball idea) = 2 conservative victories = 2 birds w/ 1 stone

Left_Behind on October 26, 2006 at 12:47 PM

Allah, in the Australian article you mentioned he said you are not basing your ‘stories in fact’. Could you please refrain from publishing their own words in the future and only give us the truth. Thank you.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 12:53 PM

Oops, did I say, “towelheads“?……I meant to say “North African YOUTHS.”

Sorry for the mixup.

Left_Behind on October 26, 2006 at 12:58 PM

ARE YOU SATISFIED YET LIBERALS??????

Defector01 on October 26, 2006 at 12:35 PM

????

This ranting is reminiscent of far right wing nuts who quote the Old Testament on homosexuality–abomination etc ad nauseum. Liberals support gay rights.

honora on October 26, 2006 at 1:02 PM

I thought they had these bizarre laws in the UK that any speech slightly unflattering to homosexuals is considered hate speech and an arrestable offense? Or, doe muslims get a pass, because, well, they are muslims?

EF on October 26, 2006 at 1:04 PM

You need four witnesses for a homosexual act? And the four guys standing around watching the homosexual are what… straight?

frankj on October 26, 2006 at 1:04 PM

Honora, in case you missed my drunken apology yesterday I just want to say I am sorry for my gender-confusion madam.

(Hey some of us conservatives support it too-just not marriage)

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 1:04 PM

They’re killing everyone but the Immams. Wonder what that’ll look like in 10 -12 years? Bunch of semi-dead old bearded men hangin’ together bitchin’ about the state of the world.

shooter on October 26, 2006 at 1:06 PM

Oh please God protect us from those dallying women!

Mr. Bingley on October 26, 2006 at 1:07 PM

US MAN: Execute Radical Imams to prevent spread of “dementia”

Can we get these imams out of Civilization and back to rotating around the meteorite in Mekkah where they belong?

profitsbeard on October 26, 2006 at 1:08 PM

Nice… I really want the liberals in America and, to a lesser degree, Europeans to see exactly what Muslims are going to do to their gay friends when, through their actions and hatred of America, they let the Jihadies win this fight.

They fight so hard against the very people that are trying to save America but actively support terrorist seeking to destroy America and freedom. Make no mistake folks I really don’t get it.

x95b10 on October 26, 2006 at 1:09 PM

honora: “This ranting is reminiscent of far right wing nuts who quote the Old Testament on homosexuality–abomination etc ad nauseum. Liberals support gay rights.”

A large majority of people, democrats and republican oppose gay marriage yet support civil unions. Saying liberals “support” gay rights means nothing. Everyone supports basic rights for everyone. What rights are gays lacking? And as it seems you’ve forgotten, people are free in this country to hold an opinion of anyone or anything, regardless of what you or liberals think.

I don’t see “ranting” here, but feel free to check out some of the more popular liberal sites where I’m sure you’ll find plenty of it and probably feel quite at home.

darwin on October 26, 2006 at 1:13 PM

honora is cool, even if she does have a blue-voting card in her wallet. Never seen her rant.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 1:17 PM

Yes, Honora. (ironic screename)

Abomination. Which letter don’t you understand?

And just remember: When keeping one’s head screwed on tight:
Righty tighty, lefty loosey!….lol

Left_Behind on October 26, 2006 at 1:19 PM

Satan’s cult of death with its daily condemnations. Good luck Europeans dealing with these lunatic death-worshippers.

liberty on October 26, 2006 at 1:25 PM

Nice… I really want the liberals in America and, to a lesser degree, Europeans to see exactly what Muslims are going to do to their gay friends when, through their actions and hatred of America, they let the Jihadies win this fight.

Liberals would be the first ones to convert to Islam when Sharia law comes. Islam is already the quasi-official religion on most college campuses today and engenders the most respect. Liberals, whether in Europe, America, Canada, and Australia generally hate Christianity, capitalism, and Western Civilization more than they fear Islamic law or sharia. These people would rather have multiculturalism even if it means Islamic Sharia than defend Western Civilization. It is always going to be our fault.

This does have a precedent in history: The Arian heresy of the 300′s through the 600′s was extremely strong in the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa (a heresy that denied the Divinity of Christ, very similar to today’s liberals); these people were unwilling to put up a strong fight when Islam swept through in the 600′s and easily converted to Islam that also denies the Divinity of any human being.

It is shocking hearing that mindless Australian blaming the media for “Islamo-phobia” instead of the comments calling white women “meat” who deserve to be raped.

Can we trust liberals to save our civilization? Absolutely not.

januarius on October 26, 2006 at 1:26 PM

Liberals support gay rights.

honora on October 26, 2006 at 1:02 PM

By outing supposed closeted homosexuals, and attacking homosexuals just for being republican? With support like that, who needs gay rights laws?

The only thing that democrats support is themselves. Period.

DannoJyd on October 26, 2006 at 1:28 PM

You need four witnesses for a homosexual act? And the four guys standing around watching the homosexual are what… straight?

frankj on October 26, 2006 at 1:04 PM

That’s a good one frank. I got a little chuckle in spite of the depressing topic.

forest on October 26, 2006 at 1:29 PM

Liberals support gay rights.

honora on October 26, 2006 at 1:02 PM

Well… I support Gay rights, just not Gay marriage. However a lesbian (who thinks I’m the anti-Christ) who I knew when I was much younger has informed me that you can’t be for gay rights, but not gay marriage.

She, like Rosie O, has her head in the sand. She can’t fathom that there is still a large population of people outside the US who would gladly behead her and her girlfriend just for breathing.

E L Frederick on October 26, 2006 at 1:35 PM

You need four witnesses for a homosexual act? And the four guys standing around watching the homosexual are what… straight?

frankj on October 26, 2006 at 1:04 P

Well… if it’s two chicks…

E L Frederick on October 26, 2006 at 1:37 PM

Also it remains to be seen what the Arabs define as “homosexual”. From what I have seen from being over there…

“Women are for procreation, men are for fun”.

Ask anyone who’s been to Afghanistan about man-love-Thursday. truly frightening.

E L Frederick on October 26, 2006 at 1:41 PM

The problem is the mullahs, ayatollas, and the upper management of the religion of islam.
KILL THEM ALL.

tormod on October 26, 2006 at 1:43 PM

honora
sschmucks like you keep claiming bush is the real threat to all your preciously held beliefs. Here and that Australian guy are proof that islamofascism is instead your biggest threat. Squawking that at the top of my lungs is simply to penetrate that locked box you carry around on your shoulders
That you still proceed to think Conservatives are the biggest threat shows you obviously don’t realize that the same people who want to kill us will kill you right afterwards because you support what are abominations to their faith.

btw I’m jewish not christian. don’t paint all of us wiht one brush

Defector01 on October 26, 2006 at 1:45 PM

Rehabilitation, counseling, guidence, understanding, tolerance, forebearance, negotiation, inclusion, job-creation, and ‘jihad is ok’ national holiday…..that is the solution.(oh yeah, and open borders)

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 1:47 PM

you can’t be for gay rights, but not gay marriage.

That seems inarguable. How can anyone say they’re for gay rights but not gay marriage with a straight face? It’s like saying you’re in favor of affirmative action for racial minorities, but not Asians.

Hey, wait a minute…

Enrique on October 26, 2006 at 1:50 PM

I believe that gay should have a right to employment and a right to live their lifestyle.

However, I do not feel they need to have a “special right” to get married. They have the same rights to get married to a opposite gender person as the rest of us. To give them the special right to marry a same sex person, goes way beyond affirmative action. IMO

E L Frederick on October 26, 2006 at 1:55 PM

I think when the liberals call the terrorists/islamofascists/muslim extremists “freedom fighters,” they are giving them moral equivalence to our soldiers, etc. It’s interesting that they give moral equivalence to terrorists and even give them a platform (see CNN, YouTube, Google) on which to spread their hate and yet these liberals are the first ones who would be beheaded should sharia law become the norm. It is interesting…

pullingmyhairout on October 26, 2006 at 2:02 PM

I have to wonder how Rosie will defend this point of view?

dread pirate roberts on October 26, 2006 at 12:29 PM

My first thought too.

CrimsonFisted on October 26, 2006 at 2:05 PM

This ranting is reminiscent of far right wing nuts who quote the Old Testament on homosexuality–abomination etc ad nauseum. Liberals support gay rights.

honora on October 26, 2006 at 1:02 PM

That’s not the point. Liberals may support gay rights, but fail to stand up to these crackpots that make these ridiculous comments. Instead, you jump on American conservatives constantly as if they are at fault for everything that’s wrong in the world. What is it going to take for liberals to finally stand up and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!?? I hope that it’s not too late by then.

Rick on October 26, 2006 at 2:16 PM

Radical Islam, meet the Westboro Baptist Church. Praise God!

It appears many on this thread have confused homosexuality with pedophilia.

Constantine on October 26, 2006 at 2:19 PM

We debate marriage, they debate death.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 12:38 PM

Says most of it, doesn’t it?

Axe on October 26, 2006 at 2:19 PM

I wonder what the Queers for Palestine or Queers Undermining Israeli Terrorism(QUIT) will have to say about this.

BohicaTwentyTwo on October 26, 2006 at 2:20 PM

(click)…DKOS….(click)MSNBC…..(click)CNN……(click)BBC…..(click)….MoveOn…..ok I know what happened now.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 2:21 PM

(click)…DKOS….(click)MSNBC…..(click)CNN……(click)BBC…..(click)….MoveOn…..ok I know what happened now.

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 2:21 PM

None of that matters to them. They are waiting for the next GOP scandal. The Bush administration is the only real evil in this world.

Rick on October 26, 2006 at 2:35 PM

Radical Islam, meet the Westboro Baptist Church. Praise the Lord!

Seems many on this thread have confused homosexuality with pedophilia.

Constantine on October 26, 2006 at 2:43 PM

I think we just found the Weapons of Mass Destruction.

When it comes to adultery, it’s 90 percent the woman’s responsibility. Why? Because a woman owns the weapon of seduction.

right2bright on October 26, 2006 at 3:39 PM

honora: “This ranting is reminiscent of far right wing nuts who quote the Old Testament on homosexuality–abomination etc ad nauseum. Liberals support gay rights.”

Check back with me after Falwell, Robertson, or one of the other Christian leaders makes a video tape of a beheading of an infidel.
As far as liberals supporting gay rights it the same as supporting any other minority group, they only support those minorities that continue to vote Democrat. Put an (R) behind their name and watch how they treat ya.

LakeRuins on October 26, 2006 at 3:40 PM

It sounds like Western gay men had better do their part to boost Western fertility rates. That’s a real headscratcher, isn’t it?

Hmm. Maybe gay men should consider helping support their nieces and nephews. They could produce an economic incentive for larger families among their relatives by putting their financial support strictly on a per-capita basis. A tax deduction or credit would really help this idea along. (Did I just think up a new gay right? Heh.)

Maybe while their lovely “breeder” relatives have lots of cute babies, gay men could devise diabolical schemes to destroy Islam. The right combination of masculine anger and feminine cunning would make some of them just right for that job. In fact, maybe Americans could get past the whole issue of “gays in the military” by steering gay men into CIA black ops. After all, they’re already accustomed to maintaining “plausible deniability.”

Kralizec on October 26, 2006 at 3:51 PM

Honora, is supporting NAMBLA gay rights? That is what the San Fransisco gay liberals support, and most gay groups. They (NAMBLA) are the featured float right in front of the Grand Marshall (have for years)…who was the Grand Marshall you ask? Nancy Pelosi…makes you kinda think maybe that total support of the gay agenda may not be what you want for your family. Or you may want to give your son the web address to NAMBLA, you may not want to judge a group, Nancy and her friends don’t.

right2bright on October 26, 2006 at 3:56 PM

Radical Islam, meet the Westboro Baptist Church. Praise the Lord!

Seems many on this thread have confused homosexuality with pedophilia.

Constantine on October 26, 2006 at 2:43 PM

What the hell are you talking about??

Rick on October 26, 2006 at 4:11 PM

Rick…if I read his/her message correct, I believe him or her are trying to compare Westboro Baptist Church with Radical Islam. If that’s true he/she is comparing apples to oranges. One is a family of nuts out of Kansas; the other is a religious group of approximately 1.4 billion. Of that 1.4 billion some don’t care too much for western beliefs/culture. One pickets military funerals with signs such as “GOD hates fags” the other stones gays to death. If you was gay which would you want to show up at your front door?

SPIFF1669 on October 26, 2006 at 4:34 PM

Liberals support gay rights…

…for liberal gays. Republican gays? Not so much.

Fixed that for you.

B Moe on October 26, 2006 at 4:46 PM

Hey right2bright, unless you are a San Fransisco gay liberal, I suggest you not speak for them. I don’t believe that most “most gay groups’ support NAMBLA.

BohicaTwentyTwo on October 26, 2006 at 4:59 PM

“Muslim and gay people know the pain of prejudice and discrimination. We should be working together to challenge homophobia and Islamophobia. I hope liberal Muslims will speak out in defense of the human rights of lesbians and gay men,” said Tatchell.

Yeah, that’s going to happen.

What an idiot.

Benaiah on October 26, 2006 at 6:00 PM

Liberals support gay rights.
honora on October 26, 2006 at 1:02 PM

Islam doesn’t.

Radish on October 26, 2006 at 6:36 PM

Rick asked Constatine “What the hell are you talking about?”

Hey Rick … he doesn’t know.

Imam “Gay should be killed to prevent spread of disease.”

Maybe muslims oughta be killed to prevent the spread of islam, which is also a disease.

They say “Europe is a cancer, islam is the answer”

Cancer spreads like islam, we use radiation to fight cancer. Maybe we need some radiation to stop the spread of islam.

Gays think Bush is taking away their rights. What rights have they lost? None. What rights will they lose if the religeon of peace takes over? The right to life. Put THAT in your penis shaped bong and smoke it.

Tony737 on October 26, 2006 at 7:14 PM

Cancer spreads like islam, we use radiation to fight cancer. Maybe we need some radiation to stop the spread of islam.

I hope that sounded less genocidal in your head than it reads on the screen…

jic on October 26, 2006 at 8:35 PM

So wait, what’s the big deal about this? Homosexuals have been proven to have higher rates of drug use, criminal activity, pedophilia, sexually predatory behavior. AIDS, yeah, I get that, and some STD’s. Yeah, I get that execution sounds pretty extreme, but governments do have the right to protect their societies from walking disasters from within. The harshness of such action seems to be a more appropriate debate, and obviously this would be over the line.

Also, they’re obviously supporting it for the wrong reasons, being the Islamonazi neanderthals that they are. But I agree with the premise that society should protect itself.

Grebrook on October 26, 2006 at 10:07 PM

Homosexuals have been proven to have higher rates of drug use, criminal activity, pedophilia, sexually predatory behavior.

Proven where? You can’t just put something like that out there without hard facts to back it up.

jic on October 26, 2006 at 10:39 PM

Oh come, give me a break, I don’t have to sign every post with a fact sheet or a link to a national geographic documentary. These things are well established by now.

Grebrook on October 26, 2006 at 10:48 PM

These things are well established by now.

Then you’ll have no problem linking to a reputable source, will you?

jic on October 26, 2006 at 10:52 PM

“The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in.”

Do we get them here? The sensible ones who are leaving, I mean?

kate q on October 27, 2006 at 12:17 AM

We get most of the Germans, and some of the Dutch.

jic on October 27, 2006 at 12:37 AM

Grebrook = Moby?

BohicaTwentyTwo on October 27, 2006 at 1:46 PM

Grebrook, why do we need to protect ourselves from homosexuals and their STDs? It’s no secret that we can protect ourselves from STDs by not having unsafe sex. It’s a solved problem. It’s called personal responsibility.

Truth is, you’re just looking for an excuse to be a bully.

sandberg on October 27, 2006 at 7:01 PM

Maybe we should execute clerics spreading jihad throughout the world. Hmm.

Mojave Mark on October 27, 2006 at 9:10 PM