Smutgate: Drudge nukes Webb with pedo passage from novel; Update: Michelle slams Allen camp
posted at 11:22 pm on October 26, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Technically it’s the Allen camp that nuked him by issuing the press release, but come on. Who has the launch codes? Who’s the one capable of putting this into media orbit?
A few thoughts.
1. In Webb’s defense, American ass is, in fact, an important product.
2. Yes, “ma-cock-a.” I get it. No need for further e-mails.
3. John Hawkins broke this story ten days ago with help from an unknown “someone” who called it to his attention. Read his post, as it places the passage in context. It’s an odd little vignette, to be sure, but the other characters seem as mystified by it as the reader is. The story’s about Vietnam; maybe he’s describing some obscure cultural practice that he encountered there. Or, just maybe, he made it up. Have we actually reached the point where Senate seats now turn on the sex scandals of fictional characters?
4. If George Allen had written this book, not only would the left be going berserk, they’d be circulating lists of characters in his other books whom they suspect of being gay.
5. E.M.’s too easy on Foley but her larger point is, as usual, right:
Its not a major scandal, by any stretch, since it doesn’t appear as though he acted on any of the impulses that he wrote about in his novel, but if a few vulgar IMs can send the media into a major fit for nearly two weeks, and a stint at the Playboy party can become a running gag on The Daily Show, this deserves at least a lookover in a campaign commerical and a few “rescue” interviews, or at least some sort of new adjective attached to Jim Webb’s name when he’s mentioned on nighttime political stew shows, something right in the middle of a Foley and Ford, Jr.
Yeah, there’s no getting away from “[he] turned him upside down, and put the boy’s penis in his mouth.” Once you’re famous for having written something like that, you’re famous for having written something like that. If he beats Allen, they might as well refer to him that way when calling the roll. “…Mr. Obama; Mr. Pryor; Mr. Put the Boy’s Penis in His Mouth…”
Henceforth, forevermore, it shall be seared, seared in our memories.

Update: Here’s another one for the “Malkin never criticizes conservatives” file.
Update: A pox on both their houses, says Moran:
Issuing a press release that quotes a character from one of Webb’s saucy war novels doing unspeakable things to his own son (sorry – find the damn link somewhere else. I don’t link to porn.), Allen may very well have sealed his victory by “outing” Webb’s fictional day dreams but he has lost his soul in the process…
But doesn’t this make anyone else’s skin crawl? Both because Webb wrote it and Allen brought it into a political campaign?…
There must be limits beyond which a candidate is penalized for exceeding. The absolutely disgusting nature of the passages quoted in the Allen press release fills that bill. The fact that they are quoting piece of fiction obviates only slightly Webb’s startling and disturbing imaginative wanderings into the sexual dark side of the human mind as it also reveals the depths to which Allen’s honor and integrity have sunk.
If this doesn’t doom any Presidential hopes for the Virginia Senator, it certainly should.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Regarding the banana trick: If it’s done longitudinally, wouldn’t it splint into three equal sections?
mikeyboss on October 26, 2006 at 11:34 PM
Please don’t subject us to weeks and weeks of “ma-cock-a”, people. I’ve already seen it like 4 times in the last hour. PLEASE!!!
DaveS on October 26, 2006 at 11:36 PM
Bonus points for working the 6-syllable word “longitudinally” into this particular discussion. And I think I agree with you.
DaveS on October 26, 2006 at 11:38 PM
I’ll vouch for that.
infidel4life on October 26, 2006 at 11:41 PM
Wait wait wait. Webb is a Democrat….this would only be a scandal if he were actually caught having sex with someone underage…wait, what? Gerry Studds you say?
Oh, right…bad example.
Ok Ok.
Webb is a Democrat…this would only be a scandal if he were to kill someone….wait, what? Ted Kennedy!!!
Awww crap. I quit.
Queasy on October 26, 2006 at 11:44 PM
Let he who disheth it out, taketh it
Ugly on October 26, 2006 at 11:46 PM
This is priceless- American politics has truly started to suck bottom. DU has a rundown on the cultural aspects of tribal customs that excuse such events. But it won’t work- the phrase is indeed seared into the popular culture- and most don’t even know it yet.
Scotsman on October 26, 2006 at 11:51 PM
If Webb had something like that on Allen he’d release it and al-NYT would put it on the front page. Fair’s fair.
Full disclosure: I’ve had it in for Webb ever since he backed out on going public with what he knows about Kerry’s discharge, which was upgraded from Section 8 to Honorable on his watch as SecNav under Carter. Promised Navy Chief he would, got bought off with promises of a position in the Kerry administration. (It’s only libel if it’s false. Sue me, Jimmy.)
bdfaith on October 26, 2006 at 11:59 PM
Of course you can’t condemn someone for creativity in writing, etc. But you have to consider what must be in someone’s head who would write:
Doesn’t obviously have anything to do with the campaign and again and you can’t restrict someone’s “art”, but come on. Do we knowlingly want to make someone 1 of only 100 U.S. Senators when their mind contained something like this? It’s one thing if it were based on a true event, and I’ll wait for that defense, but even if that is the case there certainly needs to be an explanation.
RightWinged on October 27, 2006 at 12:03 AM
So I guess we can move VA into the “Safe Republican” category.
paranoid on October 27, 2006 at 12:10 AM
I so don’t get where this is a scandal.
Is the writer of fictional crime novels, which often feature despicable characters as main and supporting characters, now responsible for the moral behaviour of the criminals he’s writing about?
I’ve never read this Webb novel — indeed, I just put two and two together that this is the Webb that writes novels, one or two I’ve read and they were pretty good — so maybe there’s something I’m missing.
But, in comparison, Tom Clancy wrote a novel about Islamic terrorists who detonated a nuclear weapon in Denver and about Tom Clarke a Cia agent and ex-SEAL who tortured men suspected of involvement to get info about them… and who previously had tortured men who killed his girlfriend (way to go Mr. Clarke!).
It was fiction.
Is Tom Clancy now responsible for the actions of Islamic terrorists, rogue CIA agents, and distraught boyfriends? Are writers now only allowed to have good people in their novels? Would you want to waste your time reading those books?
Am I off track here? Did Webb actually advocate putting children’s penises in one’s mouth? (Becaus I find it rather hard to believe he did.)
Christoph on October 27, 2006 at 12:11 AM
Umm.. Holy crap.
Hey Christoph.. You want someone who has control over laws in the US to also have visions of a little boy pee-pee being inserted into a grown man’s mouth? And you wonder why you lose.
AngryHank on October 27, 2006 at 12:23 AM
Dude, this is funny, but also the lamest scandal I have ever heard of.
Oh well. If we are going to pursue this, we might as well pursue it all the way.
I expect video footage of Webb being questioned on CNN. And no euphamisms! I need to see Wolf Blitzer asking Webb with a straight face, “Mr. Webb, why did you find it necessaary to write, and I quote, ‘[he] turned him upside down, and put the boy’s penis in his mouth’”?
Because if we are not willing to have that on CNN, well, then the terrorists will have won.
Not on my watch.
EFG on October 27, 2006 at 12:31 AM
No the point AP is making is had Allen written these words then it would be all over the front-page news. It is bad that a man running for Senate could not think of something more appropriate to write… Are we sure that it was Webb and not Mark Foley that authored the books?
Dittohead on October 27, 2006 at 12:31 AM
I’m with you, Christoph… to a point. I’d have to see it in context. If it’s out of context–rather, if the context makes it less unpalatable, since it is clearly out of context–you may be right.
And the more I think about it, the more annoyed I’m getting at Allen. He’s up in almost every poll, so why pull some crap like this, unless he knows something we don’t. Is this a pre-emptive strike, maybe?
DaveS on October 27, 2006 at 12:34 AM
I’m a conservative, Hank. I oppose most liberal positions and certainly oppose child molestation.
However, if a person is writing a crime book about a criminal, and they discuss the imagined criminal’s thoughts, I assume those would be disturbing.
Christoph on October 27, 2006 at 12:40 AM
Cristoph
A. This is how bad things are getting in VA
B. this is the logical response to Webb’s firebombing in the media of that BS story about Allen
C. Its good to see that Allen can play the same game and won’t just take it lying down
D. I’ve red lots of crime novels and whatnot which has the disturbing inner workings of a person’s mind and the like. Alot of that is good fiction. Somehow I can’t see oral sex with an underaged boy in a book being either appropriate or acceptable ESPECIALLY when its a US Senate hopeful. Doesn’t mean he’s a NAMBLA man but its insanely inappropraite
Defector01 on October 27, 2006 at 12:51 AM
Uh, I don’t really see the big deal in this. It’s like saying that if someone writes a fiction novel vividly describing the gassing and cremation of Jews during the Holocaust that they are secretly a Nazi.
This isn’t good stuff for Allen to be counter-attacking with. People will see it as juvenile because it’s just fiction, and he’ll no longer be able to call himself the ‘victim’, which he has been throughout the campaign. And it’s also a problem since Webb hasn’t directly accused Allen of being a racist or of any of the other insinuations thrown at him. If Allen now counter-attacks DIRECTLY, that’s an image problem. Webb didn’t directly call him a racist, and for Allen to counter-attack with sexism and fiction pedophilia charges?
It’s just a really bad idea. Allen was already ahead. He should just shut his mouth and let the tide carry him.
Grebrook on October 27, 2006 at 1:00 AM
Amen, Grenbrook.
Christoph on October 27, 2006 at 1:06 AM
Allah, I was wondering when you would get to this.
I was doing some snooping at DU as I wanted the link to one of their topics, and ran across their defence of the Allen smut. Apparently they believe one of these passages are accurate descriptions of [no pun intended] how a loving father receives his son [???!!!]. I’ll leave it to others to dig that crud out if they want to read the unbelievable, and I’ll be interested to see if the MSM, or Allen tries to sell this, IMHO, sick defence.
DannoJyd on October 27, 2006 at 1:07 AM
Re: Defector
I know it’s a common response when your opponent makes a big butt-ass of himself to respond in kind, I just don’t see how it’s all “logical”.
Christoph on October 27, 2006 at 1:07 AM
bdfaith,
Hmm, I remember being active duty while Webb was SecNav, so it couldn’t have been during Carter. Nope, just looked it up:
1977-1981 – Counsel to the House Committee on Veteran’s Affairs (all of Carter’s term)(Did he have any influence on matters like Kerry’s discharge during this time? That could be your reference.)
1984-1987 – Asst. Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs
1987-1988 – Secretary of the Navy. (Resigned after refusing to agree in the reduction of the Navy’s force structure during congressionally-mandated budget cuts.)
The SecNavs under Carter were Graham Claytor, Jr. and Edward Hidalgo.
His campaign is hoping to succeed in Virginia on the concept that “This is Ronald Reagan’s secretary of the Navy saying, ‘The Democratic Party is closer to my ideals,’ ”
It will be interesting to see how the people of Virginia take to this news. It’s definitely not a “real” scandal, but VA is very much home to values voters, and the mind that can write things like this might turn them off. How much remains to be seen. I have to guess that Webb never expected the seedier elements of his fiction writing to be fodder in a campaign, but he should have known better.
Freelancer on October 27, 2006 at 1:14 AM
As a Virginian, I think that Allen releasing the press report was a good thing. Look, it really comes down to family values and American values. The book Lost Soldiers is about how the US never really recovered from the war in Vietnam. Virginia does not want a Vietnam-era retread leading the state when the nation is at war. And the fact that Webb used the image of gay incest gratuitously in a book really does highlight Webb’s inner morals.
BelchSpeak on October 27, 2006 at 1:20 AM
Shameful…
x95b10 on October 27, 2006 at 1:24 AM
Senate
Connecticut: Ned Lamont
Maryland: Ben Cardin
Maryland: Ben Cardin
Missouri: Claire McCaskill
Missouri: Claire McCaskill
Michigan: Debbie Stabenow
Montana: Jon Tester
Ohio: Sherrod Brown
Pennsylvania: Bob Casey
Tennessee: Harold Ford
Tennessee: Harold Ford
New Jersey: Bob Menendez
Virginia: James Webb
House
(AZ-5): Harry Mitchell
(AZ-08): Gabrielle Giffords
(CO-07): Ed Perlmutter
(CT-04): Diane Farrell
(CT-05): Chris Murphy
(FL-16): Tim Mahoney
(GA-03): Jim Marshall
(GA-12): John Barrow
(IA-01): Bruce Braley
(IL-06): Tammy Duckworth
(IL-17): Phil Hare
(IN-08): Brad Ellsworth
(IN-09): Baron Hill
(NC-13): Brad Miller
(NH-02): Paul Hodes
(NM-01): Patricia Madrid
(NY-20): Kirsten Gillibrand
(NY-24): Michael Arcuri
(NY-29): Eric Massa
(OH-15): Mary Jo Kilroy
(OH-18): Zack Space
(PA-07): Joe Sestak
(PA-10): Chris Carney
(PA-08): Patrick Murphy
(PA-12): John Murtha
(VA-02): Phil Kellam
(WA-8): Darcy Burner
(WI-08): Steve Kagen
Psycotte on October 27, 2006 at 1:28 AM
Freelancer has it right.
If the people of Virginia do not want a novelist who writes explicit sex scenes with a boy and an adult man to represent them in the Senate, they will vote accordingly.
If they neither care, of if they approve of his novels, then they can also vote accordingly.
The voters are now informed of Mr. Webb’s novels, his writing style and the content of his books.
Truthfully, I can’t say if this revelation would change my vote. But then, I don’t live in VA, either.
georgej on October 27, 2006 at 1:42 AM
Whenever I try that trick, I start with banana and end up with squash. What am I doing wrong?
Donnah on October 27, 2006 at 1:45 AM
Kerry – he’s so magnificently artificial, both physically and mentally.
Beauty! /sarc
Entelechy on October 27, 2006 at 1:56 AM
Personally, I think Webb is done. Toast. Gone.
Fiction or no fiction, it’s pretty messed up and it came from his mind. Sen. Allen might as well go buy a new pair of boots with the Senate seal emblazoned on ‘em. There’s nothing Webb can say to excuse a graphic description of pedophilia like that that will make people forget it.
CP on October 27, 2006 at 2:00 AM
The fact that it is disturbing aside. . . hasn’t anyone noticed that the writing is also just plain bad?
- The Cat
MirCat on October 27, 2006 at 2:12 AM
MirCat, now you’re just being mean. Poor Webb. His “Clancy Dreams” come crashing down around him at the same time he sells out his Reagan rep in a failed bid for the Senate. Makes you wanna pick him up and turn him upside down out of pity.
The Apologist on October 27, 2006 at 2:31 AM
I think there are two questions here that need answering:
Should this matter? No.
Does this matter? The answer is an emphatic yes.
The so-called “culture of corruption,” the den of thieves that is Washington DC, is not limited to one party or the other. I am mad as hell at both political parties, but I am voting Republican for the sake of sheer survival.
That having been said, I think this is great. Gutter politics at its best! I have never laughed as hard as I did when I saw that Drudge headline, until I read this thread at Hotair. I’m sick of “new tone” Republicanism. I’m sick of “civility,” where the donkeys do the cheap guttersniping, and we don’t fight back. Let’s drop the pretense, fellers, and get UGLY!
gryphon202 on October 27, 2006 at 2:32 AM
I think the visceral revulsion that the average person will feel upon reading something like that quote up there is going to trump any more measured intellectual response. I’m not saying that’s how it should be, but I suspect that’s how it will be. Yes, it’s just fiction, but whether it’s fair or not, I can’t help but wonder what the hell is wrong with a person who can think like that.
ReubenJCogburn on October 27, 2006 at 2:45 AM
It’s already friday evening here which made me think of the timing and how this could just become a weekend story for the MSM (where they usually get buried and lost). Then I realized that you state-siders still have all day, your friday, to have this “develop” before the weekend.
geckomon on October 27, 2006 at 3:13 AM
…
Heheheh. I know. It’s great, isn’t it? What I’m feeling right now should not be described as Shadenfreude. It is pure, simple, 100% unmitigated, unqualified glee.
gryphon202 on October 27, 2006 at 3:49 AM
Dude. WTF is wrong with Democrats? How did the party that won WWII turn into the party of Perverts, Communists, and Suiciders?!
venmax on October 27, 2006 at 5:26 AM
Dude, this is funny, but also the lamest scandal I have ever heard of.
Yeah, it’s at least as lame as the n-word scandal that Webb launched against Allen.
Webb hasn’t directly accused Allen of being a racist or of any of the other insinuations thrown at him.
Oh sure, none of those insinuations came from the Webb campaign. How naive are you, really? The most you can say is, “How come Allen can’t find a sock puppet to launch his attacks just like Webb has done?”
Personally, I think Webb is done. Toast. Gone.
Nah. But it’s a close race, and even a little thing might tip the balance.
Lehuster on October 27, 2006 at 5:40 AM
Heh. How many were there?
Kid from Brooklyn on October 27, 2006 at 7:46 AM
(I’m going to sound like a liberal. Warning.)
Um … anyone read the book? Anyone have any idea of the context of the passage?
I don’t. Do you?
If the above is part of a repetition of pedophiliac fantasy, then fine. Attack the guy. But how do I know it’s not actually a scene describing molestation – as in, a description of a crime.
John Grisham’s first (and still best) novel begins with a brutally graphic description of the gang rape of a 10-year old. Is he a pedophile?
If you pulled that scene out of context – you’d sure think so.
In fact, the same could be done to every writer or filmmaker who ever portrayed a murder or a rape or a violent act. It’s called FICTION, people. It’s only relevent if the guy was clearly glorifying the behavior.
Anybody read the whole book?
—————————————————-
And now some valid criticism: if you want to slam the guy, slam the WRITING. That is beyond atrocious. Laugh out loud funny, it’s so bad. So bad it’s almost good. Allen should hire some decent conservative critics to point out that Webb is apparently functionally illiterate.
Professor Blather on October 27, 2006 at 8:09 AM
That is the best Campaign Slogan I have ever seen. Print that on a few posters, stand on a few street corners and let the people decide.
I am vacillating between “it’s fiction” and “it sick”. I guess it’s both.
labwrs on October 27, 2006 at 8:12 AM
Shorter version of me (thanks Christoph):
Yup. My point precisely.
Professor Blather on October 27, 2006 at 8:21 AM
Here in Richmond, no mention of this in any of the newscasts (WRVA or the local PBS station) this morning. Not a word anywhere I could find in the Times-Dispatch either.
I think Professor Blather is right from the angle that it is a work of fiction. No, I haven’t read the book, and most likely won’t, but authors write squeamish stuff all of the time and it doesn’t mean they endorse the actions of their characters. They’re just selling books.
That being said, I’m somewhat tickled that the nasty phrase from Webb’s book will most certainly be in the news here, and put him on the defensive. I mean, the MSM takes GOP’er comments totally out of context all of the time, so why not this?
Do I think Webb is a pedophile? No. Am I glad he is going to take some heat over this? Damn right.
Will this have an effect on some voters? I think it will.
That’s my two cents worth from the Capital City.
BacaDog on October 27, 2006 at 8:29 AM
Here’s the MSM scenario.
Webb camp accuses Allen of being a racist because he may have used the “N” word 30 years ago. Media goes on full blown attack against Allen.
Allen camp accuses Webb of being a sexist, child porn pervert with tons of proof in his own writings. Media goes on full blown attack. Against Allen for making such a vicious nasty accusation.
Maybe the book was ghost written by Barney Frank?
roninacreage on October 27, 2006 at 8:39 AM
The Imus show this morning said Webbs book also uses the “N” word at least 14 times. No problem. He’s a democrat. It’s expected.
roninacreage on October 27, 2006 at 8:44 AM
It has been pointed out on radio, Mark Levin, Nancy Pelosi accepts money from ACLU, and gives to them too, looks who ACLU supports, pervs. Where is she from? Exactly. We can add 1 and 1 to show where some of these people come from. Wonder if Harry Reid has connections with the whore houses in Nevada?
StuLongIsland on October 27, 2006 at 8:51 AM
Words are also relevent, fiction or not.
Question? Was Bill Clinton the ghost writer?
CharlestonCritic on October 27, 2006 at 8:54 AM
This is not a scandal, it is a reflection on what Webbs does in his spare time. Would you hire a baby sitter that looks at porn all day, but never looks at it while babysitting? Spare time works for charitable groups, or writes soft porn…who uses his/her time for the betterment of society. You choice…I know mine.
right2bright on October 27, 2006 at 9:05 AM
The important thing here, though, of course, is that George Allen STOLE A BIKE WHEN HE WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL and this development is just proof that hes a HUGE MEANIE.
I was too easy on Foley. I think the great liberal blogosphere Karma is going to even things out in that respect though.
E. M. on October 27, 2006 at 9:07 AM
The Democrats, and Webb in perticular, through down this gauntlet. Now it is time to wrestle in the mud (for all I know, that imagery is in another one of Webb’s books.)
Sadly, October Surprises will now be an ingrained part of every political season. There is no sense in objecting to it — we just have to embrace it and hope that our guys will have what it takes to be better carvillians that the Democrats.
Coyote D. on October 27, 2006 at 9:12 AM
This is stupid. Macaca was stupid. The whole damn campaign is stupid. The culture’s at an all-time low. It’s hard to be shocked by anything.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on October 27, 2006 at 9:31 AM
And that..is the heart of the matter. Disgusting,not ileagal mind you, but is that the highest quality of representation they can find?
Who cares what the context was, why should it matter. If it was indeed just harmless prose, why did he not disclose it himself? Afraid the “general populous” might object? Too far out of the mainstream for Mom and Pop? Unreal….
And yea, the style sucks too.
CBarker on October 27, 2006 at 9:36 AM
I was surfing the web, looking for My Country, America, has anyone seen it? It seems to be missing.
WTF?
Viper1 on October 27, 2006 at 9:44 AM
Heh.
Jaibones on October 27, 2006 at 9:54 AM
I just find it interesting that, when in the need to insert a bizzare cultural shock aspect into a book, the first thing he thought of was man-on-boy. Clearly there are a ton of other cultural differences between Vietnamese and other cultures. Why pick that one (which may or may not happen in Vietnamese culture)?
Further, if you look at the other passages Drudge has posted, it seems to be a trend with Webb’s writing.
AP is correct in that if Allen or any Republican had written books like these, it’d be plastered everywhere and they’d suspect the person of being in with Mark Foley’s romping around the page dorms.
Enoxo on October 27, 2006 at 9:56 AM
Having said that, I return to my drumbeat theme that the real problem is that politicians aren’t like the rest of us. They are a lower form of human life, and the further right conservative has more in common with the furthest left moonbat than they have with us.
Never forget this.
Jaibones on October 27, 2006 at 9:56 AM
Rightwinged said:
I totally agree. There have been many extremely disturbing novels that I have read lately that have given me pause. I have to wonder – these passages and thoughts come from somewhere deep within the writer. I’ve always thought many authors who write fiction are a bit off their rockers… So saying that, I think Webb is a little “off.”
pullingmyhairout on October 27, 2006 at 10:05 AM
I say to myself as I read some fiction, “How in the world does the author come up with something like this?” Is the author creative? or just plain nuts??
pullingmyhairout on October 27, 2006 at 10:06 AM
Highly inappropriate subject matter even though it is fiction. His constituents would be justified in demanding an explanation of his stance on incest and pedophilia as implied by the text.
Mel Gibson’s filming of Passion caused him to be under scrutiny for anti-semitism (pre DUI rantings). Response to Webb’s fictional creation should be no different.
MRegine on October 27, 2006 at 10:21 AM
Webb is fighting with the host on WTOP right now.
Great radio.
E5infantry on October 27, 2006 at 10:23 AM
I respectfully disagree with Michelle.
You don’t win a street fight by following the Marquis of Queensbury rules.
The consequenxces of losing are too great for our side to aloofly rise above the fray.
Some things are worth fighting for.
JayHaw Phrenzie on October 27, 2006 at 10:32 AM
I’m a staunch Republican — but I would never vote for a Republican candidate that I knew wrote that. And yes, I would want to know.
wytammic on October 27, 2006 at 10:39 AM
I’m conflicted on this one. I’m a writer plucking away at a book that will never be published. But still, the book is a mystery of sorts and I’ve written some scenes in the book that would make people wonder about my sanity. I can see the temptation to believe that writing such things reveals something horrible about a writer’s inner self, but I think it’s more an indication of imagination.
Is it a little weird that Webb’s imagination took him to a place where he depicted incestuous pederasty? Sure, but perhaps it is something he saw once, the scene stuck with him, and he wrote it down as a way to communicate the sheer foreign-ness of the culture he was describing.
The conflict with me, though, is realizing that this is a good political move. Sure, it’s dirty as all get-out, but Webb hasn’t exactly been playing fair this election, so this sucker-punch was earned.
Slublog on October 27, 2006 at 10:50 AM
When the inquisition comes and they pull all my words off this blog I’m going to be in big trouble.
It was tacky. No points for Allen. No points for Webb. Just tacky. Allen’s base might get a jolt out of it but the fence sitters are probably holding their nose.
Limerick on October 27, 2006 at 10:52 AM
Webb just said he wanted to be the Virginia “Daniel Patrick Moynihan.”
No on all the recent SC justices.
E5infantry on October 27, 2006 at 10:52 AM
I hate to say I don’t agree with Michelle on this one. Yes, Libby was trashed for his writing – as he should have been. Do we want a congressman who writes about children having sex with animals? I think not.
I don’t think it’s a matter of being wrong for outing Webb’s bizarre fantasies, but more of why any conservative would support a Republican guilty of the same thing.
It is extremely scary that these people are representing our country – on either side of the aisle. I would want to know immediately if a Republican candidate had written this type of garbage and I would promptly out him myself if need be.
Gregor on October 27, 2006 at 10:59 AM
anyone read the book? Anyone have any idea of the context of the passage?
I don’t. Do you?
Yes, I have read all of James Webb’s books, some of them like “A Sense of Honor” 3X’s, “Something to Die For” 3X’s and “Fields of Fire” 2X’s. I have also read the book “The Nightengale’s Song” once.
I strongly recommend reading “The Nightengale’s Song”. This book is a biography of 4 USNA grads; Jimmy Carter, John McCain, James Webb and Oliver North. Jimmy Carter is portrayed as basically a dufus. He did his 5 years after the Academy and then re-upped and accepted a slot in the Navy’s brand new nuke school. Shortly after starting nuke school his father died and Jimmy got out of the Navy to go back home to run the peanut farm. John McCain was a bad boy at the Academy, scored 2 “Black N’s” and ended up in a bamboo box for 5 years in Vietnam.James Webb was the most decorated Marine in the Vietnam conflict and went on to hold important gov’t jobs. Oliver North is described as pretty much of a weasel during his Academy years and, we all know what went on with him (Iran-Contra and FOX News).
Yes, Mr. Webb’s writing is being taken out of context. In each instance, other than the Morphine Mary passage, Mr. Webb is trying to drive home the degradation of Southeast Asian and African societies. Foley (I can run all day, I can run all night) is crucified in “A Sense of Honor” for his brutal tactics at the Academy in order to get a Plebe to understand just what awaits and the grit this young man will need to employ when he is shipped to Southeast Asia after graduation to put his life on the line. “Are you bigger than yourself Plebe? Are you willing to risk your very life to defend our nation?”
In this same book Rafferty, a Marine Lt., that was horribly wounded in Vietnam recounts his months in and out of a morphine haze while recovering at Bethesda Naval Hospital. His wife has divorced him and taken their child in order to marry a liberal lawyer of the P.C. variety. He is clearly tortured by his time in Vietnam, his wounds and his wife’s abandonment. The “Morphine Mary” character says more about Rafferty’s struggle than it does about women.
Foley reappears in “Something to Die For” as a mid ranking Marine officer on a boat off the coast of Western Africa. He senses early on that the politicians are playing a political game that will eventually be paid for with the blood of the men he leads. This is where the “banana scene” comes in. Webb uses Foley’s trip to an Asian strip joint to emphasize the moral filth he sees all around him. He ends up dying on the beach in Eritrea while directing his Marines in a fight they were bound to lose while the Navy ship immediately off the coast refuses to support with supressive fire due to political decisions in Washington (Somalia anyone?)
The main character in “Fields of Fire” is a disaffected college student that joins the Marines because he thinks he can play in their band, something the recruiter does not disabuse him of… He ends up a low level officer (I think) in Vietnam and really the book is about the horror this young man experiences having been torn from his upper middle class American shell that he thought was world reality. He also dies in battle.
Lost Soldiers deals with the same topic (in case I haven’t made myself clear) the degradation of societies that we, as sheltered Americans, know little about and, the scars made as someone is thrust into a brutal reality completely alien to our American way of life. Only Mr. Webb knows whether or not he actually saw anything like the upside down boy/penis scene that we all think is completely repugnant… Having read all of Mr. Webb’s books, I wouldn’t put it past him.
OK, having defended Mr. Webb’s writing, I will now say that I would never vote for him and, that I am quite surprised that he would run for a senate seat. Nor, would I ever vote for McCain. They both have at least one screw loose in part due to their time in Vietnam. Sen. McCain suffered for years at the hands of the enemy and, I am sure, Mr. Webb saw way more horror than 100 other civilian Americans combined. For their service to our country, I am extremely grateful. This does not mean however, that I would wish that either one of them direct the future of this nation.
You might wonder why I know so much about Mr. Webb’s writing… My oldest son Tim graduated from USNA last spring. On the first day of Plebe summer (way back when) all the Plebes in my son’s company were handed the book “A Sense of Honor” and instructed to read it. Being the book junkie that I am, I went on to read all his books. They are quite thought provoking and very moving.
Babs on October 27, 2006 at 11:05 AM
I’m thinking of voting for myself in this election. Better than voting for either of these two idiots. Vote High Desert Wanderer for the Senate!
High Desert Wanderer on October 27, 2006 at 11:12 AM
Well, it’s Friday. So…
Hakuna Macaca!
(sorry, Allahpundit)
Mazztek on October 27, 2006 at 11:16 AM
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200610/POL20061027c.html
E5infantry on October 27, 2006 at 11:18 AM
No.
EF on October 27, 2006 at 11:21 AM
Thought provoking to the point that I’d wonder what real values he holds near. Those we do not see?
What do you see when you close your eyes?
Moving to the point of wanting to make me vomit. Morally repugnant and crude, no matter the context, it smacks of child porn.
Any person who would produce somthing of this nature for the means of making a profit should be dismissed from society. Period.
If it were a “diagnostic tool” or “piece of mental therapy” it would be different in that it would be for private personal reasons. As a profit making device it makes me wonder exactly where abusers fall in his moral spectrum. And that….determines my votes, where do they rank what is important to me…
CBarker on October 27, 2006 at 11:22 AM
There must be limits beyond which a candidate is penalized for exceeding.
Alerting the voters that your opponent wrote some really creepy stuff “exceeds the limits” and causes you to lose your soul? Somehow I don’t think so.
Lehuster on October 27, 2006 at 11:28 AM
I wonder what would be the consequence to a public school teacher creating a work of fiction with this subject matter?
I had a high school chemistry teacher that also dabbled in gay fetish film making. When this information was known by school officials the teacher was relieved of teaching responsibilities out of an abundance of caution.
One could argue for a similar standard for public representatives, particularly now that we understand their interaction with teenage pages.
MRegine on October 27, 2006 at 11:28 AM
Thought provoking to the point that I’d wonder what real values he holds near.
It is clear to me that the man holds values of American decency very near and, to that end, points out the filth of other societies. Your ire about his writing is misplaced. Don’t vote for the guy or anyone like him. Fine. But, do not put the man’s writing down unless you want to keep your head firmly under the covers. Hell, Thailand sells its female children into sexual slavery. If you don’t want to think about that, be my guest. Just keep your moral indignation to yourself unless you can speak on a topic from a position of information.
What do you see when you close your eyes?
What I see is my first born son having to possibly deal with societies like those described in Mr. Webb’s writings.
it smacks of child porn.
Are you aware of the epic center of child porn in the world? It is southeast Asia. If you don’t want to consider this topic that is fine. If you have a child in the American military, you might want to know about these things. Your choice but, please, save me your purity.
Babs on October 27, 2006 at 11:36 AM
What I find curious about Michelle’s taking of Allen to the woodshed is this passage, which sticks out like a cockroach on a wedding cake:
(my emphasis)
In other words, she’ really not objecting to this becoming a campaign issue to be used against Webb, she’s just against the Allen camp directly making it an issue. Does it really make any difference? The Webb campaign wasn’t directly responsible for the ridiculous brother-once-dated-a-girl-who’s-cousin’s-sister-knew-Ferris Bueller’s-sister-who-dated-a-who’s-older-brother-went-hunting-with-Allen-who-heard-him-use-the-N-word-once allegations, or the even more ridiculous deer-head-in-the-mailbox allegations, but we knew he did it through surrogates all the same. At least Allen is willing to step to the plate and take the heat for it instead of letting someone else do the dirty work at his behest while he pretends to have clean hands. Sorry, Michelle, but it seemed like you undermined your own case with that suggestion.
Sure, I’d rather Allen win the campaign on the issues, where I think he is clearly stronger, but with Webb’s repeated below-the-belt attacks and with the WaPo gleeful assistance to his campaign, it was clear that he had brought a knife to a gunfight. You cannot sit there and let your opponent continue to put you on the defensive with crap like that hurled by the Webb campaign. Sometimes you have to go on offense. What is the honor of losing by letting Webb control the campaign with all of his dirty pool?
All that aside, I had a huge bellylaugh when I first heard this last night. The schadenfreude is just too sweet. After all the crap hurled by the left at the entire Republican party and the conservative movement in general over the Foley affair, they have this blow up in their face, where one of their own candidates is writing sick, disgusting crap about kiddie diddling. Never has a party so richly deserved the blowback from something, and whatever wind was still left in their sails from Foleygate, it has definitely been taken away by this. Karma is a bitch, dems. Enjoy the poetic justice.
thirteen28 on October 27, 2006 at 11:44 AM
Hey you guys,
I’m here in northern VA listening to WTOP as they are interviewing Webb, and Webb said about that excerpt with they boy’s penis in his fathers mouth ” THAT IS NOT A SEXUAL ACT” I kid you not!! Its over for him !
JVelez on October 27, 2006 at 11:46 AM
How politically correct! When the sickening perverse public writings of a liberal candidate are outted then let’s throw rocks at the republican, but when the not so perverse IM’s of a republican candidate are outted then let’s throw rocks at all republicans, and consider having the republican speaker resign. Indeed, if there is even the hint of anything tawdry connected to republicans let us all get to the rock pile ASAP, and let the party of the perverse rule the country. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face…
IMHO, it is a good thing that at least 1 party shows moral character, but if we get carried with that then we risk losing the gains we have acheived to date. Politics is a filthy business, and if we refuse to get a little dirty then we will lose every time.
DannoJyd on October 27, 2006 at 11:49 AM
Just heard Webb speak on WTOP radio in VA regarding the excerpts. He has an answer that is incredible. He is done.
Allah, you need to get a transcript on this interview.
JVelez on October 27, 2006 at 11:51 AM
Drudge has the link regarding the interview up.
JVelez on October 27, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Donnah, send along a video and I’ll analyze your technique. And ease up on the Kegels.
mikeyboss on October 27, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Michelle,
He wrote them, you are also excusing his inexcusable conduct dueing tailhock and in his capacity as secretary of the Navy. Having a daughter who is applying one of the Military Academies – we need a Webb as much as we need a Foley.
The only difference is this sick freak has been caught with his own words. (you also have to question why he made it this far in the Virginia Democratic Party they deserved better than Webb)
Sadly, he was paid for them too and kept writing this war fantasy filth until no one wanted to read it anymore in 2002.
Allen didn’t lose his soul he saved us from a souless creep.
EricPWJohnson on October 27, 2006 at 11:57 AM
Hammer. Nail. Head.
thirteen28 on October 27, 2006 at 12:00 PM
I knew I could count on Michelle for a little clear thinking.
People – stop. Think.
Some of you actually said “the context doesn’t matter.”
Really? So how is any “bad guy” ever going to be portrayed in fiction ever again? I notice no one commented on whether Grisham is a pervert for opening his first book with a child rape scene …
Every piece of fiction in history shows its villian being … the bad guy. That’s how you know he’s the bad guy. Isn’t it?
Or should we condemn Stephen King for glorifying bio-warfare and vampirism? Perhaps Peter Benchley was a sick freak who supported shark attacks? Hell … by the logic of some here, we better condemn Matthew, Luke, John and Mark … after all, they got off on writing about ritual execution. Didn’t they? In non-fiction even.
(eye roll)
Come on. This whole thread belongs on DU. Not here. Unthinking hysterics.
I can’t believe Allen’s camp did this. It’s so very … liberal. I’m glad he won’t get the nom, because I’d have trouble voting for him now.
Professor Blather on October 27, 2006 at 12:08 PM
I think Mr. Webb is guilty of describing the world he saw, which is not ours.
Radley Balko at The Agitator has two posts talking about the context of the description, and lawsuits where it’s described. Actions “out of culture” are dangerous, especially when the law becomes involved.
From
Here’s an example that has recently come to my attention. My example comes from a legal case in the state of Maine. One of the problems of life in a multicultural law and order society, especially for immigrant and minority groups, is that the law of the land often presupposes and codifies the substantive beliefs, values, emotional reactions, aesthetic standards, and pictures of the world peculiar to the group with the most power. And this was the case when, in 1985, the state legislature of Maine wrote a law making criminal any sexual act with a minor, non-spouse, under the age of fourteen, and went on in its wisdom to define a sexual act as, among other things, “direct, physical contact between the genitals of one and the mouth of another.” Thus, in 1993, when Mr. MK, an Afghani refugee, who had been residing in the United States for three years, was seen kissing the penis of his eighteen-month-old son, he found the police descending on his house, and he was arrested and convicted of gross sexual assault in Superior Court. A few years later, his conviction was overturned by the State Supreme Court, relying heavily on cultural analysis. As it turns out, kissing the penis of a young child is commonplace in MK’s cultural community and is viewed as a sign of love and affection. It is precisely the father’s willingness to kiss what is viewed as an unclean or unholy part of the body, a place where urination takes place, that makes the act such a powerful display of love. Photographs of this type of act are displayed proudly in family photo albums in the community. After taking testimonies from members of the relevant local community and expert witnesses, it was possible for the Supreme Court to construct an alternative understanding of the meaning of MK’s act, although at great cost to the defendant and with no assurance that the law will be amended so as to make room for alternative cultural understandings of sexuality and touching—and with no assurance that other Afghani residents of Maine will not have the police knocking on their doors.
(I can’t find the case online, some lawyer probably can.)
htom on October 27, 2006 at 12:10 PM
I have to disagree with Ms. Malkin on this one.
In life, sometimes you get what you give. I think Webb is just finding that out.
.
GT on October 27, 2006 at 12:13 PM
Indeed.
I don’t know. Maybe it is just me, but as I see it we conservatives are pretty good at shooting ourselves in the foot. After decades of listening to the democrats, and the conspiring MSM tell us that we are racist biggoted homophobes perhaps their propaganda has caused us to work overtime towards taking the high road, but the problem with that is we risk taking a huge fall.
I don’t like how we are saddled with RINO’s in order to stay in power, but neither do I like the whining from conservatives when things don’t go picture perfect. If blame needs to be cast then cast that on the main stream media. They picked the game, and we must play in it if we want to keep the sickening perverse party out of power.
DannoJyd on October 27, 2006 at 12:16 PM
From 1999, part of a speech by Richard Schweder:
(I can’t find the case online, some lawyer help while I clean my cache?)
And Radley Balko has a couple of posts about the history of the activity, too.
htom on October 27, 2006 at 12:16 PM
Shorter and more relevant version of me:
I’m writing a novel at the moment in which the protagonist is a prosecutor who decides to start murdering guilty defendants who go free on technicalities.
So explain it to me: how EXACTLY should I describe the crimes? If I describe a brutal rape – am I smut peddling child porn freak? (Me and Grisham, both?). Or can’t I describe the crime at all?
Just curious. This one has me baffled. And perturbed.
So explain it to me.
Professor Blather on October 27, 2006 at 12:18 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »