The verdict: Not Libel…No proof that Cartoons intended to spark the mayhem…To me, the most Confusing images were of Muslim rioters, burning the properties of other Muslims, in protest. Now they need to pay for their Euphoria……

Reuben:

THAT was great!……six pack headed your way!

Limerick on October 26, 2006 at 2:29 PM

Thanks, Limerick! I’m just making it up as I go along. But I will enjoy the virtual beer.

Western Sharia courts “should listen to what Muslim any type of scholars think,” ul-Azeem said. “If they think these cartoons insult their religion and the prophet, the Sharia courts should respect these views. It is not up to the court to decide if Muslims other humans will have hard feelings or not.”

Fixed that for ya. No need to thank.

He said he did not expect a repeat of February’s riots, however, saying people knew they were counterproductive.

Then why the blue blazes…!!!! Oh, never mind!

“Mohammad cartoons? What Mohammad cartoons?”

Thankfully, the Judeo-Christian inventors of typography provided a simple, built-in remedy:

*~@):~{>

(And, what’s wrong with “belittling Muslims”… if they are generally acting like homicidal pinheads? Or playing the 3 Monkeys from the Buddhist iconography. Hear-No, See-No and Speak-No about their murderous co-religionists?)

THAT was great!……six pack headed your way!

“This was expected because the values and culture of the West are different from Muslim countries,” said Ameer ul-Azeem, spokesman for Jamaat-e-Islami, which belongs to an Islamic alliance that organized mass protests across Pakistan last year.

Western courts “should listen to what Muslim scholars think,” ul-Azeem said. “If they think these cartoons insult their religion and the prophet, the courts should respect these views. It is not up to the court to decide if Muslims will have hard feelings or not.”

What a crock! ARGH! GRRRR!!!

IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW YOU FEEL!!! AND UNLESS YOU’RE A CITICZEN, IT’S NOT YOUR COUNTRY!

Word for the day – assimilation. I had to do it when I lived in Romania. Middle Eastern peeps can do it in the west.

If you want to change the culture, become a citizen and participate. If society likes it, they’ll adapt. If they don’t, it will go the way of the dodo.

Sorry for the rant. Long day at work and I’m getting tired of the “Religion of perpetual violence” whining about the lack of theocracies in the west.

(I also am sending that judge some of the barrels of Iraqi oil Dubya hid in my garage)

Agreed – I think I’ll give him some of my Halliburton stock (the secret stock that only us insiders know about), and I might just let him play with my mini-hurricane making machine (just got it last week – came straight from the White House as a gift).

“This was expected because the values and culture of the West are different from Muslim countries,” said Ameer ul-Azeem, spokesman for Jamaat-e-Islami, which belongs to an Islamic alliance that organized mass protests across Pakistan last year.
Western courts “should listen to what Muslim scholars think,” ul-Azeem said. “If they think these cartoons insult their religion and the prophet, the courts should respect these views. It is not up to the court to decide if Muslims will have hard feelings or not.”

If I were a liberal Democrat, I would be urging, “More immigration! More immigration! No border fence. We love multiculturalism! Please, Ameer ul-Azeem! Bring your brothers and sisters and all their cousins and immigrate to the West. After all, multiculturalism has “made us strong.” Your opinions and diversity have made the West truly great.

By the way, the court really didn’t stand up for freedom of speech; they simply stated that the opinions did not “belittle” Muslims. That is hardly freedom of speech.

(I also am sending that judge some of the barrels of Iraqi oil Dubya hid in my garage)

Anyone think that it is strange that the judges’ name isn’t published? I don’t.