A heckler meets his better…….

Republican Alan Schlesinger shows ‘em all how it’s done. “Show some respect to Senator Lieberman! Leave this audience NOW!” “Enough.”Alan you don’t have a chance, but you have class and that is rare in politics. …

I thought it was the high point of the meeting.

What about the audience? Nobody wants to say anything to the heckler??

Gotta love Schlessinger’s heartfelt response.

This is really, really classy. I bet this time, the liberal bloggers aren’t quite as over the moon about under-under-underdog Republican Alan Schlesinger as they were after the last Connecticut Senate debate.
Because this time, Schlesinger shouted……

I’ve had a busy two days but promise to have some stuff up soon. For now though, the list: * Dawn, Ari, PN and I are friends with Mr. and Mrs. Jake, an amazing couple from Minnesota that treat us……

Thanks for posting this and others just like it…I would never see it. It’s imperative that we civilize debate, and I don’t see any other way other then exposing the “tolerant” left’s open mouths and closed ears!

As the battle of interpretation continues, The New York Times sorted 362 of Mr. Lieberman’s war-related comments since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks into content-related categories, and found that he has alternated his arguments about the parties and the war’s prosecution, shifting tone at critical points as political circumstances have evolved.

In plain english – Since Lamont doesn’t seem able to do any research on his own, we here at the NYTimes have decided to smear Leiberman for him.

As for fellow Democrats, Mr. Lieberman had negative things to say about them more than three dozen times in the past five years, with his harshest words coming after he lost the Democratic primary.

Well, no sh#%. Do the moonbats at the Times really expect Joe to play nice after the way the Dem party has treated him?

Yes, it’s panic time for the Dems there. They ran their best candidate out of office, and now he’s kicking their a$$ on his own terms.

Update: With the Freshmaker behind by double digits and facing a war chest shortfall of $4 million, the Times presses the panic button.

Doesn’t this constitute some kind of McCain-Feingold violation where in-kind contributions are concerned?

Too bad the New York Times couldn’t have devoted a few man hours and one column of print to informing the public about Ned Lamont’s past. Do we know anything about this guy, other than he’s made a boatload of money in telecommunications and he’s willing to spend most of it to become a Senator?

Not that it’s important anymore.

Bravo to Mr. Schlessinger.

With the Freshmaker behind by double digits and facing a war chest shortfall of $4 million, the Times presses the panic button.

Maybe I don’t “grok” the mindset of the NYTs or Lamont supporters, but that article seemed pretty fair to me. In fact, it seemed to be a good case for why Lieberman is the one to support in this Lieberman/Lamont campaign.