Comments on: Lamont Compares Sen. Lieberman to Nixon

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:24:18 +0000

Few top Democrats have been as active on Lamont’s behalf as Kerry

Kerry (not Kerrey) and McGovern – spiraling toward abyss? Maybe a bit harsh – just walking toward neverland, where no one cares who you are and what you say, except the two of you (Kerry and McGovern). Oh, and Lamont…in a few months “Lamont who?”

Two glasses of champagne on the night of Nov. 7th – the defeat of Lamont and Angelides, just because they’re as annoying as can be (I don’t like champagne).

By: areseaoh

areseaoh — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:03:49 +0000

Democrats these despots are still available and unused.
Amin
Stalin
Goebel
Kadafi
Col. Mustard
The Grinch
Hitler and Nixon have been used and are no longer available.

right2bright on October 25, 2006 at 1:10 PM

Well said…

By: right2bright

right2bright — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:10:57 +0000

Democrats these despots are still available and unused.
Amin
Stalin
Goebel
Kadafi
Col. Mustard
The Grinch
Hitler and Nixon have been used and are no longer available.

By: BobK

BobK — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:50:36 +0000

Sorry, I forgot to add – Wasn’t it Johnson (a democrat) who cut and ran? Or should I say, refused to run for a second term and left Nixon to face the Peaceniks and the MSM.

By: BobK

BobK — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:19:12 +0000

Joe Lieberman’s “war of choice” and compared his rival to former Republican President Nixon.

Um, wasn’t JFK (a democrat) the one who first put troops into Viet Nam? Wasn’t Johnson (a democrat) the one who put more troops into Viet Nam?

Also, wasn’t it Johnson who wanted to avoid “targets of opportunity” in hopes of negotiating with the north? They didn’t come to the table until we started to bomb Hanoi.

Negotiations don’t work when your enemy is a nutcase who is being supported by the MSM

Yep, those dems really know how to twist a story.

By: dalewalt

dalewalt — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:52:42 +0000

I’m getting confused trying to keep up with which days it is fashionable to either smear or praise our military.

BacaDog on October 24, 2006 at 11:29 PM

That’s cause there’s an (R) after your name… if you had a (D), then you could smear one day and praise the next (or is it smear one sentence and praise the next?)

By: BigOrangeAxe

BigOrangeAxe — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:52:40 +0000

As one contibutor here points out quite often:
“I question the timing”

By: Coyote D.

Coyote D. — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:09:30 +0000

If he’s McGovern, this isn’t going to end well for him.

Lam·on·ta·tion (n): the act of expressing sorrow or mourning at the fact that the American people are still not enlightened enough to hand over national security to a bunch of hippies.

By: Coronagold

Coronagold — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:57:56 +0000

Let’s see how many Americans show up at Lamonts’ funeral.

By: Sean M.

Sean M. — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:43:07 +0000

If he’s McGovern, this isn’t going to end well for him.

By: Coyote D.

Coyote D. — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:51:42 +0000

So Lamont is saying he is McGovern and Iraq is Vietnam. How many years will it be before anyone with 60′s nostalgia is no longer able to contribute to the public debate? I’m waiting.

By: RedBlueChristian » Blog Archive » STILL TRICKY, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

RedBlueChristian » Blog Archive » STILL TRICKY, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:20:26 +0000

[...] Ned Lamont compares Lieberman to Nixon. (HT: HotAir) Trailing in the polls, Democrat Ned Lamont called the Iraq conflict Sen. Joe Lieberman’s “war of choice” and compared his rival to former Republican President Nixon. [...]

By: BacaDog

BacaDog — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:31:29 +0000

Oooops – forgot /sarcasm off

Hope you folks here already know better.

I am BacaDog and I support this message

By: BacaDog

BacaDog — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:29:49 +0000

I thought the Liberals loved anyone who had any connection to Vietnam. I mean, their hero “When I was in Vietnam…..” John Kerry nearly went to the White House on nothing more than his service.

Which is it with them? Should we support our efforts to supress dictators, murderers, despots or communists – or not? I’m getting confused trying to keep up with which days it is fashionable to either smear or praise our military.

Damn hard to be a Dem.

By: Defector01

Defector01 — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:30:02 +0000

They’ve already used hitler for everyone
so now they’re going down into the other circles of hell, because you know, to a hippie liberal, nixon really is worse then hitler

By: EFG

EFG — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:26:14 +0000

What, no Hitler?!

ReubenJCogburn on October 24, 2006 at 9:53 PM

Yeah, it seems sad that it is a sign of progress that he is compared to Nixon and not Hitler.

Oh well.

Baby steps. It’s all about baby steps.

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:22:17 +0000

"Over here! Over here!!! Look at meeeeeeee!"

By: thedecider

thedecider — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:02:44 +0000

This quote from the link really says it all: “Some Democrats have voiced concern that his wider message could undercut his core anti-war appeal in a state where the vast majority of voters oppose the war.” Pay particular attention to their concern this candidate basically has no appeal other than his anti-war stance. Yeah, there’s a winner for ya!

By: Ouabam

Ouabam — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:58:57 +0000

It might be his october surprise.
Big fool,I say, to be modest.

By: ReubenJCogburn

ReubenJCogburn — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:53:23 +0000

What, no Hitler?!