<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Michelle blasts CNN for sniper video on O&#8217;Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Communist News Network Part #2 at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-722075</link>
		<dc:creator>Communist News Network Part #2 at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-722075</guid>
		<description>[...] posting: Yankeemom, The Astute Blogger, Hot Air, Church and State, EU Referendum, The Nose on your Face, The Random Yak, NewsBusters, Power Pundit, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posting: Yankeemom, The Astute Blogger, Hot Air, Church and State, EU Referendum, The Nose on your Face, The Random Yak, NewsBusters, Power Pundit, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byteshredder</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-81126</link>
		<dc:creator>byteshredder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 06:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-81126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to don my flame proof suit for this post!
IMO, CNN is a classic example of why the ALL of the media should be booted out of Iraq.  So far they have reported only the negatives and not any good our military has accomplished.  Other then the enemy, who really needs a running body count of American dead.   Every war is ugly and has it&#039;s share of casualties.   To put the war into proper perspective, tens of thousands of Americans die on American highways, then have compared to Afghanistan or Iraq combined.  So then should we pull all of cars off of our highways?

Back to CNN.   Clearly, if the U.S. should ever get serious about winning wars, they must first boot out the media out.   Don&#039;t let these bozo journalists be used as enemy propaganda tools, such as CNN so poorly misjudged and recently displayed.  If the Bush administration wants to win in Iraq, the tide will turn over night with a forced AWOL media .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to don my flame proof suit for this post!<br />
IMO, CNN is a classic example of why the ALL of the media should be booted out of Iraq.  So far they have reported only the negatives and not any good our military has accomplished.  Other then the enemy, who really needs a running body count of American dead.   Every war is ugly and has it&#8217;s share of casualties.   To put the war into proper perspective, tens of thousands of Americans die on American highways, then have compared to Afghanistan or Iraq combined.  So then should we pull all of cars off of our highways?</p>
<p>Back to CNN.   Clearly, if the U.S. should ever get serious about winning wars, they must first boot out the media out.   Don&#8217;t let these bozo journalists be used as enemy propaganda tools, such as CNN so poorly misjudged and recently displayed.  If the Bush administration wants to win in Iraq, the tide will turn over night with a forced AWOL media .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80996</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Communist News Network...&lt;/strong&gt;

I do not think anybody that gives a damn about our soldiers lives should watch any show that network airs. Air America suffering bankruptcy, NYT with a 39% drop in revenue, NBC having to drop 700 employees, this is what happens when a network doesn&#039;t....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Communist News Network&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I do not think anybody that gives a damn about our soldiers lives should watch any show that network airs. Air America suffering bankruptcy, NYT with a 39% drop in revenue, NBC having to drop 700 employees, this is what happens when a network doesn&#8217;t&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asc85</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80732</link>
		<dc:creator>asc85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80732</guid>
		<description>Yes, we all love Michelle, and Hot Air is an amazing website, but I think she went too far with &quot;CNN wants us to lose this war.&quot;  Visions of Ann Coulter are dancing in my head.  

I&#039;ll agree more with Philmon&#039;s post that CNN wants the Bush administration to lose the war.

Is CNN wrong on this?  Absolutely.  But lose the war?  I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we all love Michelle, and Hot Air is an amazing website, but I think she went too far with &#8220;CNN wants us to lose this war.&#8221;  Visions of Ann Coulter are dancing in my head.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree more with Philmon&#8217;s post that CNN wants the Bush administration to lose the war.</p>
<p>Is CNN wrong on this?  Absolutely.  But lose the war?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readymade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80581</link>
		<dc:creator>Readymade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80581</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got a point there about the mental fatigue, but I couldn&#039;t blame her if she was a little loaded, what with Bill O sitting there leering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a point there about the mental fatigue, but I couldn&#8217;t blame her if she was a little loaded, what with Bill O sitting there leering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indy Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80428</link>
		<dc:creator>Indy Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80428</guid>
		<description>Readymade - Yes, I considered that myself, but have been afraid to bring it up. Perhaps some &quot;liquid courage,&quot; or &quot;mother&#039;s little helper&quot; (for those 40 and up) -? At the same time, it&#039;s total speculation, as she just as easily may have merely been sleep deprived, or under the weather. But, yes, she did seem strangely sedate.
  Maybe just trying defend the jackass party is taking a psychological toll? It must be hard to always be defending the indefensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readymade &#8211; Yes, I considered that myself, but have been afraid to bring it up. Perhaps some &#8220;liquid courage,&#8221; or &#8220;mother&#8217;s little helper&#8221; (for those 40 and up) -? At the same time, it&#8217;s total speculation, as she just as easily may have merely been sleep deprived, or under the weather. But, yes, she did seem strangely sedate.<br />
  Maybe just trying defend the jackass party is taking a psychological toll? It must be hard to always be defending the indefensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readymade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80354</link>
		<dc:creator>Readymade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80354</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that thought KP looked stoned to the bone last night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that thought KP looked stoned to the bone last night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenpiece</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80220</link>
		<dc:creator>greenpiece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80220</guid>
		<description>Michelle,
Just wanted to give a big THANK YOU for standing up for our troops the way you did on The Factor last night - and the way you do every day right here.

THANK YOU!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle,<br />
Just wanted to give a big THANK YOU for standing up for our troops the way you did on The Factor last night &#8211; and the way you do every day right here.</p>
<p>THANK YOU!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priest</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80174</link>
		<dc:creator>Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80174</guid>
		<description>Proper Context for News.

I think KP started the ball rolling in this conversation and Michelle nicely pushed it along.  

If one follows the logic that Americans have a right to know and a responsible reporter is attempting to provide the material that he or she is given and did not take part in then...  There is a way to do it.  You can do as CNN does and jam it in peoples faces or you could go another route.  For instance &quot;after a great deal of work under cover we were able to bring out this horendous video.  beware what you are about to see is disturbing etc.&quot;  This stated by a responsible reporter sitting at a news desk and behind him is flying the American Flag.  Guess what that is alot less objectionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper Context for News.</p>
<p>I think KP started the ball rolling in this conversation and Michelle nicely pushed it along.  </p>
<p>If one follows the logic that Americans have a right to know and a responsible reporter is attempting to provide the material that he or she is given and did not take part in then&#8230;  There is a way to do it.  You can do as CNN does and jam it in peoples faces or you could go another route.  For instance &#8220;after a great deal of work under cover we were able to bring out this horendous video.  beware what you are about to see is disturbing etc.&#8221;  This stated by a responsible reporter sitting at a news desk and behind him is flying the American Flag.  Guess what that is alot less objectionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EWTHeckman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80111</link>
		<dc:creator>EWTHeckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80111</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I was a bit disappointed in Michelle&#039;s performance.

My first impression came before she even opened her mouth. Her face reminded me of one of those old Looney Tunes cartoons where there&#039;s a thundercloud hanging over the character&#039;s head. In other words, Michelle looked sour to me, not serious. I felt that weakened her message.

Second, even though I know what the context is, I felt like Michelle didn&#039;t clearly articulate what that context is. IMHO, that context is this: This video shows terrorists prevailing over Americans. But CNN rarely, if ever, shows Americans prevailing over terrorists, and certainly not in proportion to the actual events in Iraq. Where are the videos of Americans taking out those terrorists snipers? Where are the videos of Americans training Iraqi troops and of those troops&#039; successes?

In short, CNN chooses to show only (or mostly) those videos which make it appear as if we are losing, when that is far from the truth. That is what reduces moral and support for our troops at home. That is also how CNN is showing that it has sided with the terrorists. The Eason Jordan thing only shows that this is a conscious decision on their part, not merely the happenstance availability of video footage.

Michelle, please practice the 15 second elevator pitch version of CNN&#039;s context and work on avoiding the Bob Dole (as candidate) look.

This video also left me with two other impressions. First, I was somewhat surprise, but pleased, that KP also agreed that CNN should not have shown it, and that her reason was that it was terrorist propaganda. Second, it felt like Bill O. was playing devil&#039;s advocate just to stir up conflict -- and thus ratings -- because he knew that KP and MM basically agree with each other, and agreement can be boring to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I was a bit disappointed in Michelle&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p>My first impression came before she even opened her mouth. Her face reminded me of one of those old Looney Tunes cartoons where there&#8217;s a thundercloud hanging over the character&#8217;s head. In other words, Michelle looked sour to me, not serious. I felt that weakened her message.</p>
<p>Second, even though I know what the context is, I felt like Michelle didn&#8217;t clearly articulate what that context is. IMHO, that context is this: This video shows terrorists prevailing over Americans. But CNN rarely, if ever, shows Americans prevailing over terrorists, and certainly not in proportion to the actual events in Iraq. Where are the videos of Americans taking out those terrorists snipers? Where are the videos of Americans training Iraqi troops and of those troops&#8217; successes?</p>
<p>In short, CNN chooses to show only (or mostly) those videos which make it appear as if we are losing, when that is far from the truth. That is what reduces moral and support for our troops at home. That is also how CNN is showing that it has sided with the terrorists. The Eason Jordan thing only shows that this is a conscious decision on their part, not merely the happenstance availability of video footage.</p>
<p>Michelle, please practice the 15 second elevator pitch version of CNN&#8217;s context and work on avoiding the Bob Dole (as candidate) look.</p>
<p>This video also left me with two other impressions. First, I was somewhat surprise, but pleased, that KP also agreed that CNN should not have shown it, and that her reason was that it was terrorist propaganda. Second, it felt like Bill O. was playing devil&#8217;s advocate just to stir up conflict &#8212; and thus ratings &#8212; because he knew that KP and MM basically agree with each other, and agreement can be boring to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob's Kid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80087</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob's Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80087</guid>
		<description>I thought O&#039;Reilly&#039;s use of the term &quot;great footage&quot; was sarcasm...is it just me?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s use of the term &#8220;great footage&#8221; was sarcasm&#8230;is it just me?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalewalt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80056</link>
		<dc:creator>dalewalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80056</guid>
		<description>Michelle, when she gets &lt;strong&gt;really&lt;/strong&gt; fired up about something, does an excellent job of getting her point across without looking like a loon.  I was hoping, however, that she would mention the Danish cartoons.

As Citizen Duck and others have mentioned, CNN has no problems at all showing beheadings, snipers, all manner of pure evil.  They won&#039;t, however, show Mohammed cartoons, or any of the &lt;strong&gt;good&lt;/strong&gt; things going on in Iraq.  Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, when she gets <strong>really</strong> fired up about something, does an excellent job of getting her point across without looking like a loon.  I was hoping, however, that she would mention the Danish cartoons.</p>
<p>As Citizen Duck and others have mentioned, CNN has no problems at all showing beheadings, snipers, all manner of pure evil.  They won&#8217;t, however, show Mohammed cartoons, or any of the <strong>good</strong> things going on in Iraq.  Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80052</guid>
		<description>Why do they keep showing the video if they think it&#039;s terrible, terrorist propaganda, and detrimental to troop morale?

Doesn&#039;t CNN have a brain in its head?  What happened to them?  In GW1, they were the shiznit!  Now, they are an almost anti-american shadow of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they keep showing the video if they think it&#8217;s terrible, terrorist propaganda, and detrimental to troop morale?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t CNN have a brain in its head?  What happened to them?  In GW1, they were the shiznit!  Now, they are an almost anti-american shadow of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80034</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80034</guid>
		<description>Just another reason I have stopped watching O&#039;Reilly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another reason I have stopped watching O&#8217;Reilly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philmon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-80018</link>
		<dc:creator>philmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-80018</guid>
		<description>Bill lofted Michelle a juicy pitch and she MISSED it!

When he asked if she really thought CNN wants us to lose this war, she should have begun her response with an unapologetic and very clear

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Yes I Do!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

Actually, the truth is they want the BUSH Administration to lose this war.  Because, as we all should be painfully aware by now, it&#039;s not about the war.  It&#039;s about Bush.

These people are wearing blinders.

Bill did have a point about the potential anger rallying these things could have, but as Michelle pointed out -- only if presented in the right context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill lofted Michelle a juicy pitch and she MISSED it!</p>
<p>When he asked if she really thought CNN wants us to lose this war, she should have begun her response with an unapologetic and very clear</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Yes I Do!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Actually, the truth is they want the BUSH Administration to lose this war.  Because, as we all should be painfully aware by now, it&#8217;s not about the war.  It&#8217;s about Bush.</p>
<p>These people are wearing blinders.</p>
<p>Bill did have a point about the potential anger rallying these things could have, but as Michelle pointed out &#8212; only if presented in the right context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79987</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79987</guid>
		<description>I guess the left has forgotten that she’s (technically) &lt;strike&gt;her&lt;/strike&gt; on their side.

/sigh need more coffee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the left has forgotten that she’s (technically) <strike>her</strike> on their side.</p>
<p>/sigh need more coffee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79985</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79985</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The always lovely but oddly subdued KP put up little resistance tonight, exhausted perhaps from the week she’s spent wrestling with Rick Ellensburg and his half dozen alter egos.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey AP - Yeah, she does seem to of stepped into a patch of pit vipers... repeatedly lately. She&#039;s been having to use the cluebat to knock around the rabid lefty trolls on her blog.

I guess the left has forgotten that she&#039;s (technically) her their side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The always lovely but oddly subdued KP put up little resistance tonight, exhausted perhaps from the week she’s spent wrestling with Rick Ellensburg and his half dozen alter egos.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey AP &#8211; Yeah, she does seem to of stepped into a patch of pit vipers&#8230; repeatedly lately. She&#8217;s been having to use the cluebat to knock around the rabid lefty trolls on her blog.</p>
<p>I guess the left has forgotten that she&#8217;s (technically) her their side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Master</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79974</link>
		<dc:creator>The Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79974</guid>
		<description>I think Michelle got it half right when she said CNN wants the USA to lose the war:  CNN wants us to lose so long as a GOP president is C-in-C.  God help us all if a Dumocrat wins in 2008, but if that happens I&#039;ll bet you dollars-to-donuts that CNN&#039;s coverage of the war will change dramatically and become much more favorable to the USA.  We&#039;ve already seen it happen, no?  If I recall correctly, CNN and the other Mastodon Media were far more supportive of everything Clinton did back when he was firing cruise missles into Iraq.  The NYT even fawned over Clinton&#039;s suicidal &quot;deal&quot; with Crazy Kim in North Korea.  You can get more commitment from a cracked-up Paris Hilton in the bathroom of the Ghost Bar than Clinton got from Kim in exchange for $5 billion and two nuclear reactors.  But there was the NYT, telling the world what a good deal it was for the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Michelle got it half right when she said CNN wants the USA to lose the war:  CNN wants us to lose so long as a GOP president is C-in-C.  God help us all if a Dumocrat wins in 2008, but if that happens I&#8217;ll bet you dollars-to-donuts that CNN&#8217;s coverage of the war will change dramatically and become much more favorable to the USA.  We&#8217;ve already seen it happen, no?  If I recall correctly, CNN and the other Mastodon Media were far more supportive of everything Clinton did back when he was firing cruise missles into Iraq.  The NYT even fawned over Clinton&#8217;s suicidal &#8220;deal&#8221; with Crazy Kim in North Korea.  You can get more commitment from a cracked-up Paris Hilton in the bathroom of the Ghost Bar than Clinton got from Kim in exchange for $5 billion and two nuclear reactors.  But there was the NYT, telling the world what a good deal it was for the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Valletta Papers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79972</link>
		<dc:creator>The Valletta Papers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Objective News or Useful Idiots: Whose Side Is CNN On? ...&lt;/strong&gt;

Congressman Duncan Hunter is mad. As a result of CNN’s willful submission of its network as a propaganda arm for enemies of the United States, Representative Hunter, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, “asked the Pentagon on Friday to.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Objective News or Useful Idiots: Whose Side Is CNN On? &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Congressman Duncan Hunter is mad. As a result of CNN’s willful submission of its network as a propaganda arm for enemies of the United States, Representative Hunter, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, “asked the Pentagon on Friday to&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Helm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79963</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79963</guid>
		<description>I think Ms. Malkin hit the nail on the head when she continued to stress the point that it was &quot;all about context&quot;.  The CNN video was presented in such a manner that it glorified the terrorists.  The intent was not, as O&#039;Reilly argued, to make Americans &quot;aware of the brutality of the terrorists&quot; or &quot;aware of the war&quot; or to show the terrorists as being the evil slime they are.  Rather, it was to demoralize the population at home, to sow the seeds for further doubt, and to weaken the war effort.  Here CNN &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; serving as a willing propaganda organ for the jihadists and its reporters should be removed from the Iraqi theater until such time as CNN states on the record that it will no longer act as a tool for the jihadis.

As regards O&#039;Reilly: I think here he was acting as a devil&#039;s advocate.  Ms. Powers was opposed to the airing of the video and I think O&#039;Reilly wanted to act as a foil for Ms. Malkin.

As regards the apparent political evolution of Ms. Powers: Since I don&#039;t know her, I can&#039;t really speak for her--all I can do is draw off my own experiences as a Democrat who has become disenchanted and disillusioned with that political party.  When I see the latest stunts pulled by Reid/Pelosi/Rangel/Conyers or the latest bile spewed forth by the Kos Kids or the DU or Code Pink, I have to ask myself, &quot;Is this the party of Harry Truman, Adlai Stevenson, JFK and RFK, Hubert Humphrey, LBJ, Scoop Jackson, and countless other &quot;Old School&quot; Democrats who truly did love their country?&quot;  Again, I can&#039;t speak for Ms. Powers, but I can&#039;t help but wonder if something similar is going through her mind when she reads the email and left wing blogger bile that she does.  The main reason I stay a Democrat, and probably the reason she does as well, is that I hope that those of us who are still reasonable and sane--those of us who hold to the values of Humphrey, Truman, Stevenson, and those other classical Democrats, can retake our party from the lunatic left.  For our country--for democracy--to work, we need a strong, viable two party system.  We need voices of &lt;strong&gt;loyal&lt;/strong&gt; opposition.  Thesis + Antithesis=Synthesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ms. Malkin hit the nail on the head when she continued to stress the point that it was &#8220;all about context&#8221;.  The CNN video was presented in such a manner that it glorified the terrorists.  The intent was not, as O&#8217;Reilly argued, to make Americans &#8220;aware of the brutality of the terrorists&#8221; or &#8220;aware of the war&#8221; or to show the terrorists as being the evil slime they are.  Rather, it was to demoralize the population at home, to sow the seeds for further doubt, and to weaken the war effort.  Here CNN <strong>is</strong> serving as a willing propaganda organ for the jihadists and its reporters should be removed from the Iraqi theater until such time as CNN states on the record that it will no longer act as a tool for the jihadis.</p>
<p>As regards O&#8217;Reilly: I think here he was acting as a devil&#8217;s advocate.  Ms. Powers was opposed to the airing of the video and I think O&#8217;Reilly wanted to act as a foil for Ms. Malkin.</p>
<p>As regards the apparent political evolution of Ms. Powers: Since I don&#8217;t know her, I can&#8217;t really speak for her&#8211;all I can do is draw off my own experiences as a Democrat who has become disenchanted and disillusioned with that political party.  When I see the latest stunts pulled by Reid/Pelosi/Rangel/Conyers or the latest bile spewed forth by the Kos Kids or the DU or Code Pink, I have to ask myself, &#8220;Is this the party of Harry Truman, Adlai Stevenson, JFK and RFK, Hubert Humphrey, LBJ, Scoop Jackson, and countless other &#8220;Old School&#8221; Democrats who truly did love their country?&#8221;  Again, I can&#8217;t speak for Ms. Powers, but I can&#8217;t help but wonder if something similar is going through her mind when she reads the email and left wing blogger bile that she does.  The main reason I stay a Democrat, and probably the reason she does as well, is that I hope that those of us who are still reasonable and sane&#8211;those of us who hold to the values of Humphrey, Truman, Stevenson, and those other classical Democrats, can retake our party from the lunatic left.  For our country&#8211;for democracy&#8211;to work, we need a strong, viable two party system.  We need voices of <strong>loyal</strong> opposition.  Thesis + Antithesis=Synthesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helloyawl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79960</link>
		<dc:creator>Helloyawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79960</guid>
		<description>I quit watching O&#039;Rielly well over a year ago because of his two-faced, wishy-washy, reporting. The only time I watch it is in the clips Michelle post. That man has no credibility with me.

Michelle: McAfee Site Advisor blocked Americansniper.org and warned it made Brower Setting Changes when they tested it. Please have someone check it. You don&#039;t want to subject your readers to possible Malware infections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quit watching O&#8217;Rielly well over a year ago because of his two-faced, wishy-washy, reporting. The only time I watch it is in the clips Michelle post. That man has no credibility with me.</p>
<p>Michelle: McAfee Site Advisor blocked Americansniper.org and warned it made Brower Setting Changes when they tested it. Please have someone check it. You don&#8217;t want to subject your readers to possible Malware infections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 84rules</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79947</link>
		<dc:creator>84rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79947</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Support American Snipers...&lt;/strong&gt;

 

Michelle Malkin has a great blog entry today. I can&#039;t come up with anything that even comes close to this:
As you can tell from my O&#039;Reilly appearance tonight, I am not in a good mood.I
am not in the mood to hear about how CNN is justified in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Support American Snipers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin has a great blog entry today. I can&#8217;t come up with anything that even comes close to this:<br />
As you can tell from my O&#8217;Reilly appearance tonight, I am not in a good mood.I<br />
am not in the mood to hear about how CNN is justified in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79914</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79914</guid>
		<description>x95, yes, Michelle is beautiful, but K.P. didn&#039;t look as pretty as she normally does. And yes. intelligent, conservative women are much more attractive than pinhead liberal hollywood type morons who happen to look nice but have nothin&#039; upstairs. Michelle has the looks, the brains and the worldview that makes her the ideal woman for any red blooded, conservative American male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x95, yes, Michelle is beautiful, but K.P. didn&#8217;t look as pretty as she normally does. And yes. intelligent, conservative women are much more attractive than pinhead liberal hollywood type morons who happen to look nice but have nothin&#8217; upstairs. Michelle has the looks, the brains and the worldview that makes her the ideal woman for any red blooded, conservative American male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79906</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79906</guid>
		<description>Michelle, glad you called out those rats at CNN last night, made me proud to be a reader. I was given Oreilly&#039;s book by a friend but after his position on this last night I think Ill give it to the dog to play with, as the family member of a US servicmen I have to say I found that video more than upsetting, that couldve been my brother being shot and how would you know? how would you know? when you get the call and they tell you we&#039;re sorry to inform you but your family member has made the ultimate sacrifice in the finest traditions of the service, by the way if youd like you can catch a video of it on CNN... 

I&#039;m sick to my stomach over this and they should remove ALL CNN embeds, though Im quite sure some of them are certainly finding themselves unwelcome amongst the troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, glad you called out those rats at CNN last night, made me proud to be a reader. I was given Oreilly&#8217;s book by a friend but after his position on this last night I think Ill give it to the dog to play with, as the family member of a US servicmen I have to say I found that video more than upsetting, that couldve been my brother being shot and how would you know? how would you know? when you get the call and they tell you we&#8217;re sorry to inform you but your family member has made the ultimate sacrifice in the finest traditions of the service, by the way if youd like you can catch a video of it on CNN&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick to my stomach over this and they should remove ALL CNN embeds, though Im quite sure some of them are certainly finding themselves unwelcome amongst the troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-79885</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/23/video-michelle-blasts-cnn-for-sniper-video-on-oreilly/#comment-79885</guid>
		<description>What the hell is wrong with O&#039;Reilly? Normally he can figure this kind of thing out. Where does he find the gall to get on to Michelle for pointing out the eight hundred pound gorrila in the room?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell is wrong with O&#8217;Reilly? Normally he can figure this kind of thing out. Where does he find the gall to get on to Michelle for pointing out the eight hundred pound gorrila in the room?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
