Comments on: Ahmadinejad to Iranians: It’s baby-making time

By: We Should Live - Ben Bateman » Michelle Malkin Interviews Mark Steyn

We Should Live - Ben Bateman » Michelle Malkin Interviews Mark Steyn — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:22:22 +0000

[...] His critics in Iran point to the country’s high inflation and unemployment rates. But Allahpundit points out that Ahmadinejad might have some plans on how to channel the restless energy of thousands of unemployed Iranian youths. [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Michelle interviews Mark Steyn

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Michelle interviews Mark Steyn — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:09:40 +0000

[...] Interview with Mark Steyn, Pt. I Buy America Alone Steyn Online French Muslim baggage handlers fired Ahmadinejad: Make babies The veil, Islam, and feminism Download Vent for your iPod Subscribe to Hot Air TV on iTunes [...]

By: Mensa Barbie Welcomes You

Mensa Barbie Welcomes You — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:58:34 +0000

Where Were Today’s Mullahs- in 1979?…

“Nuclear Creeds, Nuclear Prayers”…The wealthy Radical Clerics continue to ‘step-up the centrifuge.’ It’s pretty clear what this ‘radical clergy’(above) was doing in 1979; but, I wonder where Ahmadinejad was? (A Shocking find!) ..Allahpundit po…

By: Baby » A strange cure for the baby blues

Baby » A strange cure for the baby blues — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:53:28 +0000

[...] Ahmadinejad to Iranians: It s baby-making timeHot Air, MD - 19 hours agoMr Ahmadinejad said: I am against saying that two children are enough. Our country has a lot of capacity. It has the capacity … [...]

By: BobK

BobK — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:18:00 +0000

Ahmadinejad to Iranians: It’s baby-making time. A totally anal statement. What are all the young boys going to do while these guys try to figure out how to “do it” with a woman.

By: Morning Round Up 10-24 « jperkblog

Morning Round Up 10-24 « jperkblog — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:21:06 +0000

[...] Baby boom to be in Iran? [...]

By: shooter

shooter — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:08:58 +0000

to be sure, I meant OUR sniper

By: shooter

shooter — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:52:01 +0000

Gives a whole new meaning to the term “baby boom” doesn’t it?
Tony737 on October 23, 2006 at 6:54 PM

Now THAT was funny!

I say, bring out the sniper.

By: esperpento

esperpento — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 04:49:29 +0000

Spengler at Asia Times has a series of posts about Iran and demographics though two in particluar "The demographics of radical Islam" and "Demographics and Iran's imperial design" are very relevant.

By: bloggless

bloggless — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:48:39 +0000

Do you think his head may have been caught in a vice at one time?

By: profitsbeard

profitsbeard — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:40:00 +0000

With a face like Mahmoud's, I think it's time for Muslim women to insist on veils for men. He looks like Yoda and the CGI thing in the Lord of the Rings mated. Poorly.

By: bloggless

bloggless — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:09:54 +0000

I have two questions:

Is that three per wife or just three all together?

Is he wearing his Kramer jacket?

By: tiekitwist

tiekitwist — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:05:12 +0000

let’s hope they are

Oh, duh. Good point. I guess I meant that Ahmadinejad better hope they aren’t.

By: wytammic

wytammic — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:03:00 +0000

Tiekitwist,
Better yet, let’s hope they are :)

By: tiekitwist

tiekitwist — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:59:09 +0000

Better hope the Iranian men aren't using their cell phones too much.

By: seejanemom

seejanemom — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:38:55 +0000

There goes “Man Pleaser Thursdays”…Ask any Iraq vet what that means, and be at the ready with a vomit bag…Mark Foley’s got nothing on those Muslim freak shows.

By: JadeNYU

JadeNYU — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:37:16 +0000

Another original idea from a middle-eastern dictator. I wonder where he got the idea to have more children. It certainly couldn’t have been all the western pundits discussing the declining western fertility rate and wondering if the clash of civilizations would be won through demographics and not through battles.

There’s just one problem – in the west, we have the resources to take care of an increasing population. Iran can’t currently sustain the population that they have. Adding more people into the mix is not going to help him. There are only so many people that can be appeased by shouting “Death to the Great Satan”.

By: Zorro

Zorro — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:29:54 +0000

That photo of him is hysterical! The perfect shot of a moron in heat.

By: EFG

EFG — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:29:14 +0000

France now has the second-highest fertility rate in Europe — 1.94 children born per woman, exceeded slightly by Ireland’s rate of 1.99. The U.S. fertility rate is 2.01 children.

I wonder what the birth rate in France is when you start breaking it down by religeon. What is the birth rate of Muslims in France? What is the birth rate of Christians in France? And what is the birth rate of athiests in France?

By: Kralizec

Kralizec — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:28:31 +0000

I didn’t proofread my comment thoroughly and left a few mistakes in it. Please read “muslim immigration” instead of “the muslim immigration” in lines 2-3. Read “eliminate” instead of “eliminates” in line 6. Read “comes to” instead of “either comes to” in line 7. Thanks.

By: Kralizec

Kralizec — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:21:21 +0000

Subsidize grain exports, subsidize Sharia. By now it seems plain that American price supports for grain farmers tend to support muslim population growth and, therefore, the muslim immigration, Islamic terrorism, and Western submission to imams and Sharia. I’ve lately come to see Americans’ turning grain into ethanol as much more favorable to the Americans’ wellbeing than I did formerly, inasmuch as it appears it would both reduce American payments to muslim nations for oil and reduce or eliminates the American contribution to the muslim baby boom. It seems Americans must see to it that America’s being “Breadbasket to the World” either comes to an end. It appears, though, that Republicans will have to see to it that midwestern, Republican farmers are not harmed; subsidies on ethanol production change their market rather than merely destroy it.

It seems to me that the Americans should re-examine the studies that have deprecated ethanol/gasoline mixtures as not cost-efficient or energy-efficient. Oil-producing, muslim countries with big, growing populations have two reasons to subvert studies of ethanol as a fuel source, in order to make sure Americans keep buying oil and to make sure they keep growing and selling grain to be eaten, rather than fermented.

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:01:51 +0000

Looks like he read Mr. Steyn’s latest book.

By: doingwhatican

doingwhatican — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:59:53 +0000

Bring more children into a world he wants to destroy through Armageddon.

Hitler encouraged the same thing among the blonde and blue-eyed.

By: Tony737

Tony737 — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:54:30 +0000

Gives a whole new meaning to the term “baby boom” doesn’t it?

By: NTWR

NTWR — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:46:01 +0000

Prepare yourselves for terrorist anchor babies! Gotta love that 14 amendment.