Video: Ford Jr. shows up at Corker event uninvited

posted at 12:19 pm on October 21, 2006 by Ian


We all know that feeling of showing up uninvited:

Harold Ford Jr. showed up uninvited at a campaign event for rival Republican Bob Corker at a private charter airstrip in Memphis this morning. Corker had scheduled the media event earlier this week.

News reporters were surprised when Ford’s tour bus pulled up at the event and, apparently staff at Wilson Air were surprised as well, as they tried to steer media inside the property for the Corker news conference.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

“This MY press conference, not yours.”

.

The Machine on October 21, 2006 at 12:24 PM

Classless move by Ford. Disappointing.

cms on October 21, 2006 at 12:29 PM

ROVE RIPS FORD SUPPORTER SIGNS FROM YARD. BUSH GIGGLES!

(THAT would be he headline in EVERY American newspaper and the lead talking point on EVERY American sunday morning talking heads show)

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 12:33 PM

“What do you think about this Iraq thing?”??????
Did I hear that right? Is that the depth of his poignant inquiry? ” This Iraq thing”?

bbz123 on October 21, 2006 at 12:36 PM

Bwaahhh MSNBC decided to do a very big fluff piece about Nancy Pelosi and what a great speaker she will be.

WASHINGTON – On election night 2004, Nancy Pelosi faced a painful reality: Her party was again a big loser, failing to win the presidency and losing three more House seats. Pundits were suggesting Pelosi should accept her fate as the leader of a permanent House minority.

But the California legislator had a different idea. Instead, she reached out to advertising executives, Internet moguls and language specialists to ask how Democrats could rise from the ashes and challenge President Bush and the Republicans. The advice that came back was unabashed: “You must take him down” and then hammer away at the differences between the two parties, Pelosi recalled.

But then they went and ruined it by adding a poll allowing people to speak their minds

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15355131/

Poll results
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15356041/

If the Democrats win the House in November, do you think Nancy Pelosi would make a good speaker? * 10227 responses
Yes. 45%
No.52%
I’m not sure. 2.8%

William Amos on October 21, 2006 at 12:38 PM

Let me understand something.

If Iraq was not in play (we never invaded); how many seats would the Republicans pick up this cycle? 10-12? More?

It seems to be the only issue the democrats have.

lorien1973 on October 21, 2006 at 12:39 PM

Talk about your shameless attention whoring.

If a Republican did that to a Democrat the media would be raising hell and high water over it, and demanding that the offending Republican be cast into the outer darkness from whence he came for the crime of ruining a Democrat’s photo-op.

Shame on Ford.

MoxArgon on October 21, 2006 at 12:45 PM

I think that this stunt will give the ‘Volunteer’ State a reason to volunteer to rent a U-haul van for Mr. Ford.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 12:46 PM

Let me understand something.

If Iraq was not in play (we never invaded); how many seats would the Republicans pick up this cycle? 10-12? More?

It seems to be the only issue the democrats have.

lorien1973 on October 21, 2006 at 12:39 PM

Typically off year elections yield seats to the out of power party, this is especially true in the 6th year of a presidency. I don’t buy that the war is the only issue the Dems have, but yes, my country being at war is probably my number one concern as a voter. Silly me.

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:49 PM

Shame that the Democrats position on the war is to surrender and torment the men and women of our Arm Servies with witch hunts.

So yeah its a concern but their solution stinks

William Amos on October 21, 2006 at 12:53 PM

Hey I’m thrilled a Republican is having an event open to the public. The innovation!! Bravo!!!!!

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:53 PM

Bwaahhh MSNBC decided to do a very big fluff piece about Nancy Pelosi and what a great speaker she will be.

WASHINGTON – On election night 2004, Nancy Pelosi faced a painful reality: Her party was again a big loser, failing to win the presidency and losing three more House seats. Pundits were suggesting Pelosi should accept her fate as the leader of a permanent House minority.

But the California legislator had a different idea. Instead, she reached out to advertising executives, Internet moguls and language specialists to ask how Democrats could rise from the ashes and challenge President Bush and the Republicans. The advice that came back was unabashed: “You must take him down” and then hammer away at the differences between the two parties, Pelosi recalled.

But then they went and ruined it by adding a poll allowing people to speak their minds

Poll results

If the Democrats win the House in November, do you think Nancy Pelosi would make a good speaker? * 10227 responses
Yes. 45%
No.52%
I’m not sure. 2.8%

William Amos on October 21, 2006 at 12:54 PM

Honora,

I agree. #1 issue. It’s the tactic that stinks. Do you really believe that Ford WASN’T pulling a sound bite stunt?
(besides don’t make us neo-cons think….I’m waiting on Game One of the WS to hurry up and get here)

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 12:56 PM

Shame that the Democrats position on the war is to surrender and torment the men and women of our Arm Servies with witch hunts.

So yeah its a concern but their solution stinks

William Amos on October 21, 2006 at 12:53 PM

Well the fact of the matter is, the bar for a solution has been set pretty low by “stay the course” Bush. How’s that working out for ya?

Here’s the thing: one of the prerequisites of finding a solution is admitting there is a problem. Bush is unaware there is a problem–all we need to do keep on keeping on, according to him. He still, incredibly in my view, clings to the notion that there is a military answer to this situation; this in the face of his own military begging for a political solution. And five’ll get you ten this will be the crux of the Baker/Hamilton report. (You know, the one that will be out after the election).

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:57 PM

Honora,

I agree. #1 issue. It’s the tactic that stinks. Do you really believe that Ford WASN’T pulling a sound bite stunt?
(besides don’t make us neo-cons think….I’m waiting on Game One of the WS to hurry up and get here)

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 12:56 PM

The truth? I don’t have any idea, but that would be the smart guess. Put all you have on the Tigers.

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:59 PM

A–hole. True colors. Dems are all the same, sooner or later.

Halley on October 21, 2006 at 1:03 PM

Well the fact of the matter is, the bar for a solution has been set pretty low by “stay the course” Bush. How’s that working out for ya?

Here’s the thing: one of the prerequisites of finding a solution is admitting there is a problem. Bush is unaware there is a problem–all we need to do keep on keeping on, according to him. He still, incredibly in my view, clings to the notion that there is a military answer to this situation; this in the face of his own military begging for a political solution. And five’ll get you ten this will be the crux of the Baker/Hamilton report. (You know, the one that will be out after the election).

Its working out for me far btter than having a democratic retreat and surrender.

The election hasnt been held yet dont count your chickens. In fact is already a slight turn back towards republicans.

Conrad burns has pulled even in Montana. Menendez might lose the Jersey seat held by the dems. Maria Cantrell is barely up in her seat in Washington. Lamont is getting trounced now.

Again dems win polls but not elections. And this election isnt over yet

William Amos on October 21, 2006 at 1:03 PM

What the vid doesn’t show….and I don’t known why….is the Ford workers PULLING UP Corker signs and putting in their own……..that DID happen at the same time…..but that is not important is it?………….

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 1:08 PM

and now the TN TV Station, 5, has pulled the tape from their web site.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 1:11 PM

Ford’s behavior is actually a sign of desperation and is completely without any class.

Honora wrote: “Well the fact of the matter is, the bar for a solution has been set pretty low by “stay the course” Bush. How’s that working out for ya?”

A better question would be: How would “cut and run” work out for the Iraqi people?

georgej on October 21, 2006 at 1:12 PM

Harold Ford is another empty suit representing the best the Democrat Party has to offer. Thanks for another in your face like “Willie on Wallace” moment. This is a party of emptyheaded puppets void of ideas.

This incident reminds me of that awkward moment for AlGore when he shuffled up next to W. during the Presidential Debates in 2000, and received a probing “What’s Up?” and a big Texas nod from Bush. Gore stood there like a mannequin without a retort. Well, not like a mannequin, hehe.

Wimpy behavior. Whadaya expect?

fogw on October 21, 2006 at 1:13 PM

Typically off year elections yield seats to the out of power party, this is especially true in the 6th year of a presidency.

True, but the president bucked trends in both 2002 and 2004. Given an incompetent opponent (democrats), one could have easily seen it happening again.

I don’t buy that the war is the only issue the Dems have, but yes, my country being at war is probably my number one concern as a voter. Silly me.

What other issue do they have? Yes, its a concern, but they offer no solutions? Does anyone know what the democrat plan is?

lorien1973 on October 21, 2006 at 1:15 PM

Apology: my bad…..channel 5 simply moved the vid to another page…….more ROVE misinformation on my part

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 1:16 PM

Typically off year elections yield seats to the out of power party, this is especially true in the 6th year of a presidency. I don’t buy that the war is the only issue the Dems have, but yes, my country being at war is probably my number one concern as a voter. Silly me.

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:49 PM

The Democrats and MSM would be raising hell that Bush had not done anything about Saddam Hussein if we had not ousted Hussein and would still be whining that Bush I had not finished the job. That probably would have led to his defeat in 2004.

Today’s Democrats will whine and whine about Iran and North Korea, but they have no solutions except talking to our enemies. Like a poster said on here about a week ago, Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations are in a quagmire in Iraq, not us. Where would we be killing terrorists if we were not in Iraq or Afghanistan?

So I really don’t understand why the war would be your number one issue.

januarius on October 21, 2006 at 1:17 PM

I support the “Iraq Thing” and all the heroes that are over there in Iraq and Afghanistan (which is part of the “Iraq Thing”). I thought Ford seemed like an honorable person, but he appears to be a true Dhimmicrat. He whines about poor behavior in the race and pulls a cheps trick like that?

Hening on October 21, 2006 at 1:30 PM

There are the Dhimmicrats, Dharmacrats, Douchecrats and Democrats. Unfortunately looks like Ford learned from the first three on the list. It is a cheap trick that LOOKS like a cheap trick. TN voters will see it for what it is.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 1:36 PM

Desperado…

SouthernGent on October 21, 2006 at 1:43 PM

Peggy Noonan recently wrote an outstanding article in the Wall Street Journal entitled: The Politcal Dance. To quote a paragaph in the article:

“The dance is where you see the joy of the joust. It’s a gifted pro making his moves. It’s a moment of humor, wit or merriness on the trail; it’s the clever jab or the unexpected line that flips an argument. It’s a thing in itself and is so much itself, so distinctive, that whether you are left, right or center, red team or blue, you can look at the moves of a guy on the other side and say with honest admiration: Man, that was good.”

FDR and Reagan did it, and what Harold Ford Jr. did was a prime example of what she wrote about.

You can also call it “chutzpah”

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 1:46 PM

What other issue do they have? Yes, its a concern, but they offer no solutions? Does anyone know what the democrat plan is?

They are triangulating… bitch, moan, whine.

SouthernGent on October 21, 2006 at 1:46 PM

You can also call it “chutzpah”

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 1:46 PM

The problem you will have with it poco is the ‘chutzpah’ will only play with the voters he already has. The voters on the fence will see it as the Jerry Springer moment it was.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 1:51 PM

Looks like Ford had his Mark Latham moment. Very stupid move on his part.

Ripclawe on October 21, 2006 at 2:08 PM

Did he picket Corker’s Press Conference after that this move?
What a fool?

Ouabam on October 21, 2006 at 2:12 PM

Harold Junior is guilty of the ultimate sin in the South:
Bad manners.

Ali-Bubba on October 21, 2006 at 2:18 PM

And to think I used to like the guy.

Ian on October 21, 2006 at 2:18 PM

Limerick:

It’s the action not the result that counts. It can be imprompto or planned.

Reagans: “I paid for this microphone” or in the Vice-presidential dedate when one cadidate said to the other: “I know JFK and your not JFK”.

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 2:19 PM

Poco,

Hell even this Republican would never equate Dan wil JFK. Neither will I equate Ford with JFK.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 2:35 PM

Besides, Dan never slept with Marilyn.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 2:37 PM

I used to think Harold Ford, Jr. was a guy with some brains on the Dim side when he’d show up on Fox. He seemed reasonable and even if I didn’t agree with him he still seemed like a person who did respect all sides of an issue. This was pretty low though and somewhat in vien of a middle school student.

Catie96706 on October 21, 2006 at 3:04 PM

pocomoco and the MSM call such a liberal move “chutzpah”, and were it initiated by a conservative, “impertinence”, or as already mentioned “bad manners”.

At issue here is the following, however. Would Mr. Corker have been a bit more ‘aggressive’, the media and pocomoco, also the Ford camp and the DNC would have accused him of racism.

As it was, Mr. Corker handled it assertively and with class and the voters know what happened. They are not super smart but much smarter and intuitive than the media credits them.

Entelechy on October 21, 2006 at 3:54 PM

Jr. is just a better-dressed, slicker version of the rest of his family. Having lived in Memphis for five years, I was treated to the antics of the Fords with great regularity. They have no shame, they have no integrity, they have no morals. Goggle up Harold Ford, but wait at least half an hour after eating to do so.

Freelancer on October 21, 2006 at 3:56 PM

this was calculated to induce clues and spurts of clue goo amongst the nutroots. its like wearing a cowboy hat when out west – it doesn’t reflect anything but a target consitituency’s tastes.

jummy on October 21, 2006 at 4:23 PM

I will bet that Ford just cost himself this election with this move. Its polarizing and childish. I’m giving odds that Corker now wins by 8 percent or more. Pocomoco, only the koolaid drinkers would consider this a positive development. This was Dukakis in the armored personal carrier and Kerry in that labsuit. Shows the worst side of a person and to do it two weeks before this election is bizarre. Its a shockingly stupid thing for an otherwise crafty campaigner to have done.

cms on October 21, 2006 at 4:30 PM

I hate slow news days. All the rep’s are cranking up the BBQs and all the dem’s are slicing cucumbers for their eyes, and I’m stuck here with the no beer, no baseball (until 8), the wife working, and that damned V chip on my TV……go figure………well guess I better do some chores. Its getting hard to be lazy anymore.

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 4:30 PM

So what did think of that 9/11 thing Harold. Or the
cole, U.S. embassy Tanzania bombing, WTC 1994 bombing,
things.

LOSER

Texyank on October 21, 2006 at 5:01 PM

So what did you think of that 9/11 thing Harold. Or the
cole, U.S. embassy Tanzania bombing, WTC 1994 bombing,
things.

LOSER

(I hate it when I don’t check myself before I hit the send botton.)

Texyank on October 21, 2006 at 5:04 PM

WOW! Sorry for the mispells.

You’re all missing the point of the article. Please read it in it’s entirety.

Again, it’s the action itself that counts NOT the result.

Her point is: it is no longer being done thus making the candidates of today look pretty boring – that is until Ford.

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 5:10 PM

PaiseGod!

Ford is a statesman!

common poco…..

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 5:16 PM

Last try.

It has nothing to do with the person or the party – it’s the action itself.

Nuf said.

Good night and good luck.

poco

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 5:23 PM

Another take: Ford is desparate…DNC has put the screws to his campaign and is saying it is a must take. That was the most ignorant political move I have ever seen. I have not one time put my money on these polls. Who do you think is putting it out there that the disgusted Repubs are staying home? MSM
Frankly….I think it’s a red herring, and one designed to make disappointed Conservatives stay home. Well….no lyin, thieven, tax hikin, socialist/pinko is going to fool me into not voting. Its a win. 5:00 somewhere in this Country. Time for a cocktail.

goldenmoment on October 21, 2006 at 7:05 PM

As my beloved Grandma used to say he “may have class, but it’s all low.”

Desperate and embarassing behavior.

Jealous of the drooling adoration the media is giving that Muzzie “Osama” Obama, perhaps?

I despise them both.

doingwhatican on October 21, 2006 at 7:16 PM

I knew it – the Dems are using Jerry Springer as a strategist this year – how low will they go???

iam7545 on October 21, 2006 at 7:27 PM

IAM7545:

When I see the ‘pole’ come out I believe it will give them away…………yeah it was a pretty tacky stunt….

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 7:41 PM

this was calculated to induce clues and spurts of clue goo amongst the nutroots. its like wearing a cowboy hat when out west – it doesn’t reflect anything but a target consitituency’s tastes.

Sort of like waggging your finger at Chris Wallace and turning purple on FOXNews, eh?

SouthernGent on October 21, 2006 at 7:55 PM

We’re up! They’re down! They’re up! We’re down! We’re up! They’re down! They’re up! We’re down! We’re up! They’re down! They’re up! We’re down!

jeez I’m getting dizzy…….between reading the NYT and Barrons, and RCP, and RAW, and Fox, and Sports Illustrated it looks like everyone is going to loose….

I need another beer….

Limerick on October 21, 2006 at 8:00 PM

Again, it’s the action itself that counts NOT the result.

Her point is: it is no longer being done thus making the candidates of today look pretty boring – that is until Ford.

pocomoco on October 21, 2006 at 5:10 PM

pocomoco, we know how to read and interpret her articles, as we follow many of them.

There are actions, and then there are actions…that’s the conclusion we draw and you refuse to get or internalize.

P.S. I love your nome de plume.

doingwhatican, I had one of those beloved grandmas myself :)

Entelechy on October 21, 2006 at 8:03 PM

Can’t the demorat get his own camera crew from CBS, NBC, or
ABC without barging in on another candidate?
The word “childish” comes to mind when I see this idiot try
to get in the face of an obviously mature man.
Sickening.

gary on October 21, 2006 at 9:14 PM

Affirmative Action stikes down another promising young black man, placing him in the august University of Michigan Law School, where he was in completely over his head.

Graduate from UM Law and can’t pass the bar? Hell, even lefties like Helen and Glenn Reynolds can pass the bar.

Better run for office in Tennessee! Heh…

Jaibones on October 21, 2006 at 10:21 PM

Flipper children politics. Puhleeeeze.

You people are starting to remind me again that Pfizer plays all 3 sides of the political coin.

Coronagold on October 21, 2006 at 11:13 PM

WTF happened to Ford? I actually used to like the guy. Something happened that he just went Flippo.

WTF man? WTF?

venmax on October 21, 2006 at 11:49 PM

here’s the democrat plan for Iraq – Cut & Run / Surrender / Raise The White Flag, oh yeah – 1 more thing, appease terroists and give them constitutional rights when captured on the battlefield. of course GregH & honora would disagree with this.

Starblazer on October 22, 2006 at 12:54 AM

here’s the democrat plan for Iraq – “Cut & Run” / Surrender / raise the white flag, oh yeah – 1 more thing that democrats will do if they win in November – appease terrorists & give them constitutional rights when capturedby our troops. of course GregH & honora will disagree with this.

Starblazer on October 22, 2006 at 1:01 AM

I’ve often heard growing up an old saying “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”. If thats the case I wonder why the MSM, in their efforts to reamin partial hasn’t reported much on the dealings of the Fords from Memphis. Seems the family of funeral directors turned politicians has quite a history here in Tennessee. If you get time and are bored check out Harold Ford Sr, brother John N Ford, or sister Ophelia Ford. Or here are some interesting facts on Harold Jr and Sr’s special relationship. Bottom line up front if you don’t have time to read. They have a tendency to have a problem with “doing the right thing”. From the land of Bethany, Nashville Tennessee, have a great day.

SPIFF1669 on October 22, 2006 at 10:08 AM

If a Republican did this to a Democrat, the MSM would be ripping him/her a new one. Anderson Cooper would be doing an entire show on guerilla tactics.

americanpundit on October 22, 2006 at 12:30 PM

Typically off year elections yield seats to the out of power party, this is especially true in the 6th year of a presidency. [...]

honora on October 21, 2006 at 12:49 PM

Dunno about that, honora. Last time there was a 6th year of a presidency (1998), there was no change in the Senate and the party in power picked up 5 seats in the House.

Just another useless factoid.

factoid on October 22, 2006 at 7:23 PM

Oy … welcome to my nightmare. I don’t think I can recall an election that got quite this nasty. Or inane. Ya’ll should see the local TV spots running. I refuse to watch TV until after Nov 7.

What about Iraq, Mr Corker? Well, what about it, Mr Ford? You were all about it and all for it yourself, only arguing about the number of troops needed there … until this election got all hetted up. Yup, Mr Ford just didn’t want to get Leiberman’d … a Democrat that is *gasp* FOR the war in Iraq! That simply will not do …

But it appears that Mr Ford and his followers are quite proud of this bit of party crashing …

Please let it be 11/8 when I wake up in the morning …

LissaKay on October 22, 2006 at 9:22 PM

Oh yeah … this is amusing. When this happened, two reporters from the same station were on the scene … one was following Ford for a “behind the scenes look” at a campaign. The other was covering the press conference. The news piece is up at “that video site that shall remain unnamed

LissaKay on October 22, 2006 at 9:35 PM

That’s really disappointing, because Ford is hot.

violet on October 23, 2006 at 4:16 AM

“While he was trying to interrupt Corker, his campaign volunteers were uprooting Corker signs and replacing them with Ford signs.”

Well, pulling up your opponents signs is illegal political activity where I live, I wonder if TN is the same.

Coastian on October 23, 2006 at 9:24 AM

Its working out for me far btter than having a democratic retreat and surrender.

Explain something to me: why is any suggestion that the current strategy is gravely flawed immediately reduced to “retreat and surrender”? Other than it allows you the comfort of feeling you are supporting the better of only two possible solutions?

You cannot be that simplistic in your thinking. Can you?

honora on October 23, 2006 at 10:19 AM

The Democrats and MSM would be raising hell that Bush had not done anything about Saddam Hussein if we had not ousted Hussein and would still be whining that Bush I had not finished the job. That probably would have led to his defeat in 2004.

Today’s Democrats will whine and whine about Iran and North Korea, but they have no solutions except talking to our enemies. Like a poster said on here about a week ago, Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations are in a quagmire in Iraq, not us. Where would we be killing terrorists if we were not in Iraq or Afghanistan?

So I really don’t understand why the war would be your number one issue.
januarius on October 21, 2006 at 1:17 PM

You seem strangely able to make assumptions about what the entire Democratic party would have done, what the electorate would then have done, but are somehow stymied on the issue of why I feel the war is the number one issue. Selective ESP, interesting.

Did you by any chance catch Chris Wallace yesterday? Had the top leaders of the Senate Armed Forces and Foreign Policy (may have the nomenclatures off a bit)–Luger, Biden, Warner, Levin. It was probably the most adult conservation I have heard from politicos in a long, long time. No Dems rehashing the march of folly this whole war has been, no Reps accusing Dems of being soft on terror. No talking points. It’s clear these guys–three of whom are in the twilight of their careers–are deadly serious about the risks facing us, and also are ready to work together on not just Iraq, but other pressing problems.

I was actually optimistic, what an odd feeling that is!!

honora on October 23, 2006 at 10:26 AM

I don’t think this will kill Ford’s campaign. I would think alot of the left would love this and start chanting “truth to power…blah,blah,blah”………

vcferlita on October 23, 2006 at 2:17 PM

When speaking of Harold Ford, Jr., you need to remember that his father is Harold Ford, Sr. If you know anything about Memphis politics, you know about him.

He was the long-time US Representative from Memphis. His last campaign was in 1994. The night after the election, he made the statement in an interview, “I have driven around East Memphis and I made a note of the houses of you white devils who had my opponents sign in your yards. You better not come and ask me for any help.” Needless to say, he decided not to run for re-election, instead annointing his son (who had never held a real job of any kind) to be his replacement. Since Memphis was 60% black at the time, Ford, Jr. won in a landslide.

The elder Ford’s brother is no choirboy either. He was a state representative and was the clerk of the circuit court in Shelby County. He found himself in hot water for fathering two children out of wedlock with two different women. People gave him a pass on that. What got him ihn trouble was the child support. In both cases, he convinced the judges to not impose mandatory child support. He swore he would do the right thing aand take care of it himself. He did. He gave both women high-paying jobs in the circuit court office for which they were totally and completely unqualified. The women showed up, did no work, and collected a fat paycheck. When he was caught doing this, he actually tried to act surprised that there might have been something wrong with it.

Harold Ford, Jr. is an apple that didn’t fall far from the tree.

Steve L. on October 23, 2006 at 3:50 PM

I live in Memphis, TN and I can tell you this is standard Ford family MOD.

Jr is upset that all of Corker’s ads of late use clips from his own ads saying “here’s what Jr says” and follows with “here’s how he voted in congress” with records and Bill numbers supplied.

Ford is a typical liberal – tell everyone how conservative you are and vote liberal when you get there. Like Father Like son.

Welcome to Memphis Politics.

5Cent on October 23, 2006 at 4:02 PM