You have no argument with me, although I think that your numbers are low. 1 in 10 Indonesian Muslim back violent jihad: LittleGreenFootballs

My point is that the ‘true’ Muslims use the masses by continually pointing to those ‘peaceful’ Muslims.

Islam AS A BELIEF SYSTEM must be banned and go-along-to-get-along Muslims must be met with such hostility that they are forced to face the truth and leave Islam or leave the West. Period

Ethelred

The number of potentially militant jihadist members of practicing Islam (which is probably only 1/2 of all Muslims, who, like most ‘religious’ people, simply simulate Mohammedan ‘motions’ -merely from cultural go-along-to-get-along habit- and are essentially indifferent average human beings mouthing the platitudes of their faith) may be about 5 % of all Muslims.

Five percent of 600,000,000 would be an unpleasant 30,000,000 worldwide. But they are not united in a mass, and could not ‘march’ anywhere.

But, since guerrilla warfare (cyber or sniper) is the modern method of the jihad, they do not need to be in one country or massed as one literal ‘army’.

They attack through online hacking, through propaganda media-savvy p.r. tricks, as in the videos (recently released images of coalition soldiers being shot by terrorist rifles and cameras) shown by seditious, suicidally-stupid CNN ‘journalists’, and through photoshopping their war lies to willing tools like Reuters, etc., etc., etc.

The number of that 30,000,000 potential true jihadists who are active fighters is probably no more than 300,000 at one time. But it only took 19 terrorists to cost us 3,000 dead and a trillion dollars or more in economic damage and new funding responses for increased security.

So, if no WMD’s are used by these hardcore Islamic Imperialists, then hunting down the top 300,000 maniacs may put the fear of God in the rest of the Muslim Ummah enough to calm them into some overall sanity.

That’s my hope, at least.

If a WMD is used by jihadists, then Islam may see millions of their members caught up in the enraged reaction by the West.

For their own sake, it would be best of they scoured these homicidal lunatics from their midst themselves.

But true courage* among Muslims is as rare than an original thought in Mohammed’s “Koran”.

(*And I do not mean pathetic excuse for ‘Muslim warrior courage‘ as shown by their suicide bombings or sniper attacks or IED’s or packs of zombie-banshee-psychopaths cutting off the heads of bound prisoners as such jihadi scum screech “Allahu Alkbar!” in a display of collective mindless cowardice)

Whether it is 300,000 -or even 30,000,000- we must do what it takes for our Civilization to survive this 7th century onslaught of terrorist intolerance and tyrannical nescience.

If they had our power, we would already all be dead.

That’s the difference between us.

We try to practice decency and restraint. Even in the face of beheading beasts mesmerized by a pedophile’s vendetta against the natural world.

They have the promise of a Whorehouse Heaven to spur their heartless lunacy.

We have the hope of a free future to stimulate our Resistence to this dismal madness.

I just switched my feed reader from Bloglines to Google Reader. While poking around there, I came across their “feed bundles” … collections of feeds grouped by type.

Lookie here: http://tinyurl.com/uk4xa
(that goes to a jpg on my Flickr site)

Congrats gang!

BTW, thanks for opening up the registeration.

I don’t know if RS has much time to answer emails nowadays (what with his weekly appearances on HotAir ;-), but you could try mailing him asking for info on the Canadian case.
The JihadWatch email address for RS is:
director@jihadwatch.org

PS I seem to recall that the motion to make sharia part of the Canadian legal system failed at the time. I don’t recall any subsequent courtcases or what their outcomes would have been.

PPS Just a thought, but seeing as you’re Canadian, the CCD may have some info for you:
http://canadiancoalition.com/forum/messages/18128.shtml

The CCD President seems to be aware of the islamists and their supremacist ideology.

Alastair Gordon, President
Canadian Coalition for Democracies
Web: http://CanadianCoalition.com
Email: admin@CanadianCoalition.com

Before the appearance of the one who will rise, peace be upon him, the people will be reprimanded for their acts of disobedience by a fire that will appear in the sky and a redness that will cover the sky. It will swallow up Baghdad, and will swallow up Kufa. Their blood will be shed and houses destroyed. Death will occur amid their people and a fear will come over the people of Iraq from which they shall have no rest.”

Ahmadinejad is going to make this happen…
He has said they can bring about the return of the Mahdi….He has said he was chosen for this cause.

The DVD is out and for sale on Amazon.
I received mine a few days after ordering and it’s a very interesting and IMHO important documentary to watch and share with friends and colleagues who are interested in trying to understand what islam and its followers are up to.

What the West Needs to Know is a more academic piece than the recently released Obsession, and is certainly more acurate e.g. it doesn’t make unfounded claims about “vast majorities of muslims being peaceful” and other such often-mouthed platitudes.
It’s also the first filmed documentary, of which I know, that takes an indepth look at islamic history; from the days of its warlord founder mahomed and the first major period of islamic conquest of the middle-east, Northern Africa, Spain and parts of France (ending at the battle of Poitiers), through to the genocide perpetrated against the Hindus (some 60 to 80 million Hindus were murdered by the mohamedan hordes), and the siege of Vienna in 1683.

Get it. It’ll be worth your time to watch it.

PS the official site is:
http://www.whatthewestneedstoknow.com/

Although I have a feeling I might get a little worked up reading the dhimmi directory.

“Observant” is another good word. The “Observant Muslim” is the throat cutter.

Jihad Watch has been a great addition and this one is first class, thanks Robert.

Probably worth searching on LGF as well:
http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

A year ago in May 2005, a Muslim lawyer named Kamal Nawash tried to organize a Muslim American “March Against Terrorism” here in Washington, DC. He was opposed by CAIR and the local mosques. Nawash said the local imams did not support the demonstration because they shared the terrorists’ goal of a Sharia state, though not their violent methods. Only fifty people showed up.

Think about that. Fifty Muslims show up for a demonstration against Islamic terror. Five thousand plus show up to demonstrate for an Islamic terror group, Hezbollah. In other words, Islamic terror gets one hundred times as much support from Muslims in America as efforts to reject it. One hundred times.

After comparing the turnout for those two events, it’s pretty obvious what is important to Muslims and what is not. They voted for terror with their feet.

Glenn Beck is on CNN Headline News 7 & 9PM weekdays with repeats weekends.

If he would finally say, “I have been reading up on Islam, rather than just going to a mosque, and have found the most disturbing things that make me come to but one conclusion – Islam is evil,” then millions of people each night would begin to know the truth.

Then I would go with Glenn Beck, who has said some outrageous (for the MSM) things and whom I feel would tell the truth if he were really convinced of it.

E

I remember when the the push for Sharia Law happened in my country of Canada, at first there were reports in the newspapers that there was a lawsuit, I’d like to explain first.

A university professer declared one of them a “blasphemer” I don’t remember if it was the woman or the man. The lawsuit was against the professor, for at least reckless endangerment.

Apparently not only does that make assassins hunt you but if she/he ever stepped foot in a muslim country he/she could be jailed or killed on the spot.

Anyways sorry for the blah blah context I was digressing, there is no info on the court case anywhere, google or otherwise. If anything happened it would set a precedent, and Canada would become the only country where “moderates” could speak.