I suppose if one did not care about things like facts and accuracy, one could say that she did not win that little debate; thankfully, no one like that hangs around here.

We need more of this on TV. More of liberal idiots being exposed for twisting information or flat making things up. Makes one feel good to see someone swinging around a cluebat like that.

Still amounts to casting your pearls before swine, though. Sad, really.

Johnson, Nixon, Clinton.

First two chose not to run for a 2nd term, last was impeached. No contest.

I see Honora hasn’t educated herself in my absence. She has an unsurprisingly abysmal knowledge of history that is typical for most liberals.

Newsflash, clueless one: Nixon not only ran for a second term, he defeated George McGovern by one of the widest margins in American history.

Is it a standard trait for all liberals to spout off aimlessly knowing their opinions have no basis in fact? When you toss out stinkers like that – do you have the good sense to be embarrassed?

The US has confirmed, it says, that North Korea did in fact detonate a nuke. In a speech, John Kerry claimed that “as Bush turned his back on North Korea, North Korea turned back to developing a nuclear weapon.” He……

I’ve never seen this kind of hatred for a sitting President

Johnson, Nixon, Clinton.

First two chose not to run for a 2nd term, last was impeached. No contest.

Ms Pletka has the right stuff. Three against one with a hostile audience and she did not even break a sweat.

How does Maher get air time? He is a like a stain that keeps coming back. Same old half truth nonesense, but he is aging fast in more ways than one.

I doubt if any ‘progressive’ in the audience learned a single thing [except that Maher is an a$$], but I’m sure they were disappointed by the poor liberal debate offered for their pleasure. Hearing Lou Dobbs bash Clinton, and McCain at the end didn’t please them at all.

I wish that Danielle Pletka was running for office right now.

I have trouble even watching it without tightening up.

It doesn’t matter how accurate her information was, or how inaccurate the other morons were … liberals go away believing that another conservative Bush supporter just got embarrassed on national television.

True story. The crowd was eatting up all the idiocy of Affleck, as if he’s some informed political expert. Without Maher and his Daily Show on steriods crowd, Pletka schooled them, but to a casual viewer who doesn’t already know the deal, they wouldn’t get the same impression from watching that clip as us.

Who’s next? Mr Magoo? Tom and Jerry?

Egads. A clown earning a living memorizing somebody else’s writing being consulted on global issues?

Stop the world. I want off. Too many farking idiots on this ridiculous planet.

Maher argues the cockfight is worse than Iraq under Saddam.

Maher would refrain from describing Saddam as a benevolent dictator but he cleary prefers Saddam’s regime for Iraqis – for their own good – not simply to spare the American fighting man.

Apartheid. It’s not just a a black-white thing. It’s not just a South Africa thing. Maher seems ill-informed enough to believe otherwise. He surely thinks ‘supports apartheid’ is a rhetorical cudgel to which he’s impervious. He’s wrong.

He’s just stated he favors the state of affairs in pre-invasion Iraq to the state of affairs in post-invasion Iraq.

Pre-invasion Iraq was a sectarian apartheid state. It was certainly more internally stable then than it is now. A sectarian minority brutaly ruled over a sectarian majority. And Maher is more sanguine about that state of affairs.

This cockfight Maher deplores is between those who are dying to re-institute apartheid in Iraq and those who are dying to make an apartheid government a nothing but a memory.

It’s an ugly, horrible fight, cruelly and ruthlessly fought. I hope it ends soon. I wish it could have been avoided. But to long for the good old days of apartheid enduced “stability”? That’s Maher’s schtick.

My point? It doesn’t matter how accurate her information was, or how inaccurate the other morons were … liberals go away believing that another conservative Bush supporter just got embarrassed on national television.

Although she was correct and they were wrong … I’m not exactly sure how anyone can conclude that she “schooled them.” She was mobbed not only by two clueless actors, but by the entire audience.

Why was Gigli on there, seriously?

That was my thought initially, and then I realized Maher apparently needed Affleck to defend him. How he can live with himself knowing that is beyond me.

If someone actually NUKED US, do any of you out there think the liberals, the FILTHY fifth column of subversion in this country, would be on board with equivalent retaliation? I think not, “Caller, what say you”?

Soothsayer on October 15, 2006 at 3:27 PM

Well, I suppose that all depends on who is in the white house. If it’s Bush, I’m sure they would first blame the attack on him and then wait to see what his response would be and then oppose it. If Bush were to move to attack, they would condemn it. If Bush were to not move to attack, they would condemn that too. Which is what they are doing right now with Korea.