<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shays goes nuclear, defends Hastert by citing Chappaquiddick; Update: Rogers to &#8220;out&#8221; one gay a day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70730</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70730</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You get Rahm Emanuel, moveon, KOS, DU, John Aravosis, Mike Rogers, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, et. al. to stop and I promise you, I’ll never refer to the Senator from MA, on this blog, as a “whore mongering, drunken, bloviating, fat, lying, murdering asshole” again. 

“So help me, Fort Knox.” 

georgej on October 12, 2006 at 12:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah but you assume I want you to stop...My side is well served by these tactics.  Keep it up!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You get Rahm Emanuel, moveon, KOS, DU, John Aravosis, Mike Rogers, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, et. al. to stop and I promise you, I’ll never refer to the Senator from MA, on this blog, as a “whore mongering, drunken, bloviating, fat, lying, murdering asshole” again. </p>
<p>“So help me, Fort Knox.” </p>
<p>georgej on October 12, 2006 at 12:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah but you assume I want you to stop&#8230;My side is well served by these tactics.  Keep it up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70728</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70728</guid>
		<description>Honoroa: &quot;This outing business is equally nauseating. This is what passes for leadership in this country.&quot; 

Tell you what, Honora.

You get Rahm Emanuel, moveon, KOS, DU, John Aravosis, Mike Rogers, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, et. al. to stop and I promise you, I&#039;ll never refer to the Senator from MA, on this blog, as a &quot;whore mongering, drunken, bloviating, fat, lying, murdering asshole&quot; again. 

&quot;So help me, Fort Knox.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honoroa: &#8220;This outing business is equally nauseating. This is what passes for leadership in this country.&#8221; </p>
<p>Tell you what, Honora.</p>
<p>You get Rahm Emanuel, moveon, KOS, DU, John Aravosis, Mike Rogers, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, et. al. to stop and I promise you, I&#8217;ll never refer to the Senator from MA, on this blog, as a &#8220;whore mongering, drunken, bloviating, fat, lying, murdering asshole&#8221; again. </p>
<p>&#8220;So help me, Fort Knox.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70650</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70650</guid>
		<description>Q:  How desperate is a political party whose best shot is reference to an incident that occured &lt;strong&gt;37 years ago?&lt;/strong&gt;
A:  Very

This outing business is equally nauseating.  This is what passes for leadership in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q:  How desperate is a political party whose best shot is reference to an incident that occured <strong>37 years ago?</strong><br />
A:  Very</p>
<p>This outing business is equally nauseating.  This is what passes for leadership in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70645</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70645</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Second Time As Farce: The Congressional Page Scandal 14 (October 12, 2006)...&lt;/strong&gt;

The New &quot;News&quot; Cruising in his BMW: A staff supervisor at the dorm for congressional pages intervened when Foley tried to pay the teens a nighttime visit in the summer of 2000. (ABC News) Patting where he shouldn&#039;t: Former page......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Second Time As Farce: The Congressional Page Scandal 14 (October 12, 2006)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The New &#8220;News&#8221; Cruising in his BMW: A staff supervisor at the dorm for congressional pages intervened when Foley tried to pay the teens a nighttime visit in the summer of 2000. (ABC News) Patting where he shouldn&#8217;t: Former page&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAT60A3</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70582</link>
		<dc:creator>DAT60A3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70582</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the threat of publicizing damaging/embarassing information in that manner known as blackmail/extortion?  That is a criminal offense and is punishable by law.  Since the information will be made public, intentionally or &lt;em&gt;accidentally&lt;/em&gt;, go on the offense and take this criminal to court and, for the encouragement of others, prosecute this person to the fullest extent of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the threat of publicizing damaging/embarassing information in that manner known as blackmail/extortion?  That is a criminal offense and is punishable by law.  Since the information will be made public, intentionally or <em>accidentally</em>, go on the offense and take this criminal to court and, for the encouragement of others, prosecute this person to the fullest extent of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techno_barbarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70456</link>
		<dc:creator>techno_barbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70456</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, I’m tired of playing defense. This election is totally winnable. The libs got NOTHIN’. 

Iblis on October 11, 2006 at 1:43 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excellent. The Men showed up tonight. &#039;Bout damn time.

You guys want a fight. I know you do. We all want our Conservative representatives to fight and stand up for us. They read the blogs, and they&#039;re beginning to realize just how pissed off everybody is. They know that no matter how this election goes, the base will be looking to make changes. Hopefully it&#039;ll force their testes descend and we&#039;ll see real Conservatives start standing strong and being bold.

It&#039;s time for our reps to actually throw the lib&#039;s crap back in their faces. Not dirty. Just honest. All we need is honest. The American Public will see the differences and make the connections. And they&#039;ll side with us. 

Because they&#039;ll realize we&#039;re the only ones even remotely willing to protect and defend them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah, I’m tired of playing defense. This election is totally winnable. The libs got NOTHIN’. </p>
<p>Iblis on October 11, 2006 at 1:43 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent. The Men showed up tonight. &#8216;Bout damn time.</p>
<p>You guys want a fight. I know you do. We all want our Conservative representatives to fight and stand up for us. They read the blogs, and they&#8217;re beginning to realize just how pissed off everybody is. They know that no matter how this election goes, the base will be looking to make changes. Hopefully it&#8217;ll force their testes descend and we&#8217;ll see real Conservatives start standing strong and being bold.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for our reps to actually throw the lib&#8217;s crap back in their faces. Not dirty. Just honest. All we need is honest. The American Public will see the differences and make the connections. And they&#8217;ll side with us. </p>
<p>Because they&#8217;ll realize we&#8217;re the only ones even remotely willing to protect and defend them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70422</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TED KENNEDY&lt;/strong&gt;: Only politician who never crossed that bridge when he came to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TED KENNEDY</strong>: Only politician who never crossed that bridge when he came to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70412</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70412</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here’s what I would do if I was a closeted gay person who was maliciously outed. I would go after the reporter. If he has nothing in his background worth exposing, I would go after his family. His sister has a drug problem her boss doesn’t know about? He will now. His mom fudged her taxes? Hello, IRS? His father had an affair back in ‘86? Make sure his wife finds out, take an ad in their local paper. Destroy their lives. That’s the only way people will learn that there is consequence to outing people. If we just tsk-tsk every time this happens, it will continue to happen. Take it to the kneecaps, and quick.

Karol on October 11, 2006 at 9:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, someone else that speaks my language.... ;)


As Niccolo said:

&lt;blockquote&gt; ... and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; &lt;strong&gt;but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here’s what I would do if I was a closeted gay person who was maliciously outed. I would go after the reporter. If he has nothing in his background worth exposing, I would go after his family. His sister has a drug problem her boss doesn’t know about? He will now. His mom fudged her taxes? Hello, IRS? His father had an affair back in ‘86? Make sure his wife finds out, take an ad in their local paper. Destroy their lives. That’s the only way people will learn that there is consequence to outing people. If we just tsk-tsk every time this happens, it will continue to happen. Take it to the kneecaps, and quick.</p>
<p>Karol on October 11, 2006 at 9:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, someone else that speaks my language&#8230;. ;)</p>
<p>As Niccolo said:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; <strong>but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70346</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70346</guid>
		<description>Oh, you&#039;ve opposed my vengeance thing.  You said I take it too far.  And just because someone does something bad to me doesn&#039;t mean they should be destroyed.  Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you&#8217;ve opposed my vengeance thing.  You said I take it too far.  And just because someone does something bad to me doesn&#8217;t mean they should be destroyed.  Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70336</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70336</guid>
		<description>When have I ever opposed your vengeance thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When have I ever opposed your vengeance thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70335</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70335</guid>
		<description>Allah, I know you oppose my whole vengeance thing but seriously, would there ever be another outing if we followed my policy?

&lt;em&gt;Here&#039;s what I would do if I was a closeted gay person who was maliciously outed. I would go after the reporter. If he has nothing in his background worth exposing, I would go after his family. His sister has a drug problem her boss doesn&#039;t know about? He will now. His mom fudged her taxes? Hello, IRS? His father had an affair back in &#039;86? Make sure his wife finds out, take an ad in their local paper. Destroy their lives. That&#039;s the only way people will learn that there is consequence to outing people. If we just tsk-tsk every time this happens, it will continue to happen. Take it to the kneecaps, and quick.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah, I know you oppose my whole vengeance thing but seriously, would there ever be another outing if we followed my policy?</p>
<p><em>Here&#8217;s what I would do if I was a closeted gay person who was maliciously outed. I would go after the reporter. If he has nothing in his background worth exposing, I would go after his family. His sister has a drug problem her boss doesn&#8217;t know about? He will now. His mom fudged her taxes? Hello, IRS? His father had an affair back in &#8217;86? Make sure his wife finds out, take an ad in their local paper. Destroy their lives. That&#8217;s the only way people will learn that there is consequence to outing people. If we just tsk-tsk every time this happens, it will continue to happen. Take it to the kneecaps, and quick.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrankyNeocon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70297</link>
		<dc:creator>CrankyNeocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70297</guid>
		<description>Out one gay a day? Sounds morbidly like a terrorist taking out one hostage a day until demands are met.

Maybe we Rightie bloggers ought to all put up a &quot;Gay? So what. we respect you for who you are. -The Republican Party&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out one gay a day? Sounds morbidly like a terrorist taking out one hostage a day until demands are met.</p>
<p>Maybe we Rightie bloggers ought to all put up a &#8220;Gay? So what. we respect you for who you are. -The Republican Party&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMAO</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70283</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70283</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Here&#039;s Some Perspective, Tubby!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Don&#039;t you wish more politicans responded to criticism like this. Almost sounds like a blogger.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Here&#8217;s Some Perspective, Tubby!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you wish more politicans responded to criticism like this. Almost sounds like a blogger&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70179</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70179</guid>
		<description>Danno, in addition, you&#039;d have to put up with that many mothers-in-law :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danno, in addition, you&#8217;d have to put up with that many mothers-in-law :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70163</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70163</guid>
		<description>I just had a thought. Much like the terrorists who would do bodily harm to homosexuals, the democrats have started their own anti-gay movement, thus the comparisons between America&#039;s enemies, and democrats continues to grow by leaps, and bounds. Be proud, Democrats!

Gay marriage is something that I&#039;ll be forever against as my beliefs are that marriage is a Holy Sacrament entered into by a man, and a woman. The Holy Bible is pretty clear on that point. 1 man married to several women is my personal definition of torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had a thought. Much like the terrorists who would do bodily harm to homosexuals, the democrats have started their own anti-gay movement, thus the comparisons between America&#8217;s enemies, and democrats continues to grow by leaps, and bounds. Be proud, Democrats!</p>
<p>Gay marriage is something that I&#8217;ll be forever against as my beliefs are that marriage is a Holy Sacrament entered into by a man, and a woman. The Holy Bible is pretty clear on that point. 1 man married to several women is my personal definition of torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;I know the speaker didn&#8217;t go over a bridge and leave a young person in the water, and then have a press conference the next day,&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70109</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;I know the speaker didn&#8217;t go over a bridge and leave a young person in the water, and then have a press conference the next day,&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70109</guid>
		<description>[...] Linked to HotAir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linked to HotAir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-70001</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-70001</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thus the homosexual witch hunt continues, and the leftists cheer!

Any smart Republican would/could/should build on that fact. 

DannoJyd on October 11, 2006 at 1:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Reps should use this opportunity to embrace gays and point out the difference btw. the Left/Right. 

Gay marriage can and will be debated for years, as it should. This, however, would be a good time to show who respects individuals and their privacy, and who blathers and doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thus the homosexual witch hunt continues, and the leftists cheer!</p>
<p>Any smart Republican would/could/should build on that fact. </p>
<p>DannoJyd on October 11, 2006 at 1:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The Reps should use this opportunity to embrace gays and point out the difference btw. the Left/Right. </p>
<p>Gay marriage can and will be debated for years, as it should. This, however, would be a good time to show who respects individuals and their privacy, and who blathers and doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tormod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69992</link>
		<dc:creator>tormod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69992</guid>
		<description>I apologise for saying you didn&#039;t have any and needed to grow a set.

Thank you for speaking up at &quot;The Swimmer&quot; Kennedy.

Don&#039;t put them back in the glass by the bed, use &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologise for saying you didn&#8217;t have any and needed to grow a set.</p>
<p>Thank you for speaking up at &#8220;The Swimmer&#8221; Kennedy.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t put them back in the glass by the bed, use &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69989</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69989</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of the Clarence Thomas confirmation &lt;strike&gt;fiasco&lt;/strike&gt; hearings. At one point in the circus Orrin Hatch was recounting some of the more specious blather coming from the left side of the committee, and concluded, &quot;And if you believe that, I have a bridge at Chappaquiddick to sell you.&quot;

He later expressed mortification that he said what he had, apologizing and stating that he intended to use the standard line referring to a bridge in Brooklyn, but Sen. Kennedy&#039;s comments were on his mind at the time.

I say he should have never apologized, or at least not until Kennedy did/does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of the Clarence Thomas confirmation <strike>fiasco</strike> hearings. At one point in the circus Orrin Hatch was recounting some of the more specious blather coming from the left side of the committee, and concluded, &#8220;And if you believe that, I have a bridge at Chappaquiddick to sell you.&#8221;</p>
<p>He later expressed mortification that he said what he had, apologizing and stating that he intended to use the standard line referring to a bridge in Brooklyn, but Sen. Kennedy&#8217;s comments were on his mind at the time.</p>
<p>I say he should have never apologized, or at least not until Kennedy did/does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69985</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69985</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And of course George H W Bush honored Kennedy at SMU two years ago……………they are all in bed together to get us. 

LZVandy on October 11, 2006 at 2:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While it&#039;s perfectly fine to point out by your example how misguided Bush&#039;s &quot;set a new tone&quot; mantra was, let&#039;s not go overboard and suggest they are in the same bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And of course George H W Bush honored Kennedy at SMU two years ago……………they are all in bed together to get us. </p>
<p>LZVandy on October 11, 2006 at 2:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>While it&#8217;s perfectly fine to point out by your example how misguided Bush&#8217;s &#8220;set a new tone&#8221; mantra was, let&#8217;s not go overboard and suggest they are in the same bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69963</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69963</guid>
		<description>fogw, you mean Mr. Kerry is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissus_(mythology)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in love with Narcissus&lt;/a&gt;?

You make my day, every day - I love your posts!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Radical gay McCornthyite Mike Rogers threatens a march of the pink elephants. &lt;em&gt;Whatever shall we do&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Out yourselves - we don&#039;t love/respect Mary Cheney any less. It&#039;s only in the minds of libs that we&#039;re homophobes and ignorant slobs. Preempt the bastard and get it over with. Then, quit being a hypocrite and let future candidates be more honest, up front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fogw, you mean Mr. Kerry is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissus_(mythology)" rel="nofollow">in love with Narcissus</a>?</p>
<p>You make my day, every day &#8211; I love your posts!</p>
<blockquote><p>Radical gay McCornthyite Mike Rogers threatens a march of the pink elephants. <em>Whatever shall we do</em>?</p></blockquote>
<p>Out yourselves &#8211; we don&#8217;t love/respect Mary Cheney any less. It&#8217;s only in the minds of libs that we&#8217;re homophobes and ignorant slobs. Preempt the bastard and get it over with. Then, quit being a hypocrite and let future candidates be more honest, up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishsquid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69957</link>
		<dc:creator>irishsquid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been waiting for YEARS for a Republican to work up the nerve to retaliate in kind!

Of course Democrats are immune to charges of hypocrisy in much the same way cockroaches are to radiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for YEARS for a Republican to work up the nerve to retaliate in kind!</p>
<p>Of course Democrats are immune to charges of hypocrisy in much the same way cockroaches are to radiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69950</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69950</guid>
		<description>Esthier,
Chappaquiddick was much worse than people think.
This &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy_Chappaquiddick_incident&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wiki&lt;/a&gt; can get you started if you&#039;d like.

First the answer to your question:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Kennedy entered a plea of guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident after causing injury. He received a sentence of two months in jail, which was suspended.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why Chappaquiddick was worse than is widely believed: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;This &lt;strong&gt;clear evidence of foul play indicates she was wounded prior to takeoff and immersion&lt;/strong&gt;, and the bloodstains were washed out by the action of the sea water...”

Whether or not these laboratory findings were clear evidence of &lt;strong&gt;foul play was not a subject for speculation in any major media publications&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esthier,<br />
Chappaquiddick was much worse than people think.<br />
This <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy_Chappaquiddick_incident" rel="nofollow">Wiki</a> can get you started if you&#8217;d like.</p>
<p>First the answer to your question:</p>
<blockquote><p>Kennedy entered a plea of guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident after causing injury. He received a sentence of two months in jail, which was suspended.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why Chappaquiddick was worse than is widely believed: </p>
<blockquote><p>This <strong>clear evidence of foul play indicates she was wounded prior to takeoff and immersion</strong>, and the bloodstains were washed out by the action of the sea water&#8230;”</p>
<p>Whether or not these laboratory findings were clear evidence of <strong>foul play was not a subject for speculation in any major media publications</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LZVandy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69944</link>
		<dc:creator>LZVandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69944</guid>
		<description>And of course George H W Bush honored Kennedy at SMU two years ago...............they are all in bed together to get us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course George H W Bush honored Kennedy at SMU two years ago&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;they are all in bed together to get us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-69937</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/11/shays-goes-nuclear-defends-hastert-by-citing-chappaquiddick/#comment-69937</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kennedy was charged. 

Labamigo on October 11, 2006 at 1:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He was only charged with leaving the scene of an accident and received a two-month suspended sentence.  That doesn&#039;t even rise to the level of a slap on the wrist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kennedy was charged. </p>
<p>Labamigo on October 11, 2006 at 1:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>He was only charged with leaving the scene of an accident and received a two-month suspended sentence.  That doesn&#8217;t even rise to the level of a slap on the wrist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
