Comments on: Science: Women dress more fashionably when fertile

By: Christoph

Christoph — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:31:13 +0000

Yeah, I would say this is pretty old news.

Let me guess… next study is going to say that women are more easily aroused when fertile and more flirtatious when aroused. And this of course will come as a shock to my 9-year old cousin, Ernie, but to no one else.

By: Alabama Liberation Front

Alabama Liberation Front — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:37:24 +0000

Mike Damone: The Attitude…

Allah, you don’t need fancy scientific studies from UCLA to help you make it with chicks. The secret to success is The Attitude. As my friend Mike Damone famously explained to his buddy Mark “Rat” Ratner ……

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:19:00 +0000

They need studies for this? Perhaps the study was done for the benefit of our male friends. The ladies know all this already.

Why not perform a study on something we (males and females) don’t know yet?

For example:

- What good is the U.N. really for?
- What causes BDS to the degree that it does?
- How come Jews were/are blamed for everything?
- Why do Jihadis wish to dwell in the 3-7th centuries?
- Is there a new gene, an antidote to chronic ignorance?
- Will there ever be a cure for hypocrisy? Or at least an instant zapper or something to curb it?
- Why would anyone want to be a communist, outside of the ‘dear’ leader and his/her cronies?
- Why does the MSM insist on calling itself ‘objective’?

Add to the list HA friends – ideas must abound.

By: Kini

Kini — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:45:14 +0000

Heh, he said peacock…

By: Alex K

Alex K — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:19:01 +0000

I really liked looking at that peacock.

By: DaveS

DaveS — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:18:57 +0000

He might not be rich or strong or good-looking…

Speak for yourselves, fellas. I’d IM it.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:09:35 +0000

Granted, that peacock did look unsusually confident, I was surprised Allah would show us that.

He really did. He might not be rich or strong or good-looking, but he had so much confidence.

That’s what attracts the ladies, you know.

By: Alex K

Alex K — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:08:16 +0000

Huh? I thought the male peacock fit right in with all the stuff about how women like physical attractiveness after all… Bring back the bird!

Granted, that peacock did look unsusually confident, I was surprised Allah would show us that.

By: DaveS

DaveS — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:55:47 +0000

Allah, the peacock worked, due. Remember, a lot of us are the same morons who read Ace… we don’t know the diff. Must of us were to busy giggling to ourselves at the word “peacock”.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:49:22 +0000

See what happens? I try to kick up a little dust in the sexual politics arena and end up blowing it with the wrong photo.

The photo is gone.

By: tickleddragon

tickleddragon — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:44:22 +0000

Allah, peahens don’t have the colorful feathers…just the males.

(I was laughing to myself while typing this, thinking of the Dead Parrot sketch… “Beautiful plumage…”)

By: Editor

Editor — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:30:09 +0000

Hmm… didn’t 20/20 do a story on this like 5 years ago? Yeah, i’m pretty sure this is something Babwa pulled out. Gawd, science is alway so far behind.

Of course, it’s sort of like that story they did about the reason co-eds drink so much is so they feel more social. Then proceeded to serve them non-alc beer claiming it was alc. Soon, they co-eds were acting a bit more drunk, er, open, only to be embarassed to be presented with the fact they were drinking unjuiced brew.

Like we need science to tell us this shizzle.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:21:00 +0000

How can you tell?

By: Grouchy Old Yorkie Lady

Grouchy Old Yorkie Lady — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:20:04 +0000

Ummm… so what does it mean that the photo accompanying this post on the main page is a male peacock in all his splendour?