<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harper&#8217;s: Dem operative gave us Foley e-mails back in May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:43:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69733</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69733</guid>
		<description>The Democrats in Florida are resorting to gutter politics by trying to pull Charlie Crist into the Foley scandal.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://stuckon-stupid.com/sos/2006/10/florida_democrats_practicing_g_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

The electorate is too smart for this ploy.  This scheme will backfire on the Dems.  Charlie is a good conservative and will be a worthy replacement for JEB Bush.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats in Florida are resorting to gutter politics by trying to pull Charlie Crist into the Foley scandal.<br />
<a href="http://stuckon-stupid.com/sos/2006/10/florida_democrats_practicing_g_1.html" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>The electorate is too smart for this ploy.  This scheme will backfire on the Dems.  Charlie is a good conservative and will be a worthy replacement for JEB Bush.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69717</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69717</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Florida Democrats Practicing Gutter Politics...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#160;&#160;The Florida Democrats are trying to smear Charlie Crist (R) gubernatorial candidate of Florida in an attempt to link him to Mark Foley.&#160;&#160; This from the Sun Sentinal: The Florida Democratic Party on Tuesday asked Attorney General C...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Florida Democrats Practicing Gutter Politics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;The Florida Democrats are trying to smear Charlie Crist (R) gubernatorial candidate of Florida in an attempt to link him to Mark Foley.&nbsp;&nbsp; This from the Sun Sentinal: The Florida Democratic Party on Tuesday asked Attorney General C&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tormod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69654</link>
		<dc:creator>tormod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69654</guid>
		<description>My vote for fingerprints-all-over-the-knife goes to tim mahoney, his name is on the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote for fingerprints-all-over-the-knife goes to tim mahoney, his name is on the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69617</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69617</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think for a moment that Rahm Emanuel&#039;s fingerprints aren&#039;t on this entire thing.  I have no doubt that he is behind the timing, that he is giving the marching orders, that he is overseeing the entire sleeze run, and that he has more to drop before the election.

Rahm Emanuel was THE Clinton war room hitman.  He was the one who orchistrated the media attack on Linda Tripp and Kathleen Willey and who neutralized Juanita Brodrick after she broke her silence.

This entire affair REEKS of Emanual&#039;s touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think for a moment that Rahm Emanuel&#8217;s fingerprints aren&#8217;t on this entire thing.  I have no doubt that he is behind the timing, that he is giving the marching orders, that he is overseeing the entire sleeze run, and that he has more to drop before the election.</p>
<p>Rahm Emanuel was THE Clinton war room hitman.  He was the one who orchistrated the media attack on Linda Tripp and Kathleen Willey and who neutralized Juanita Brodrick after she broke her silence.</p>
<p>This entire affair REEKS of Emanual&#8217;s touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69460</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69460</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If they happen to win, what then? They have to get White House approval since there is no chance they can override a Bush veto. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m stretching for a silver lining if the demagogues win both houses, but if it gets Bush to veto a BUDGET BILL it &quot;might&quot; be worth it...maybe...just maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If they happen to win, what then? They have to get White House approval since there is no chance they can override a Bush veto. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m stretching for a silver lining if the demagogues win both houses, but if it gets Bush to veto a BUDGET BILL it &#8220;might&#8221; be worth it&#8230;maybe&#8230;just maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsparkle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69394</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsparkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69394</guid>
		<description>In an article trying to smear the Republicans, Harpers is admitting it got the info from Democrats (and who cares if it was 5 months ago, it would still do damage) And it seems to be admitting that it was the media who sat on the story to affect the election for the Democrats.

Did they not learn anything from the Dan Rather disaster?

Shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an article trying to smear the Republicans, Harpers is admitting it got the info from Democrats (and who cares if it was 5 months ago, it would still do damage) And it seems to be admitting that it was the media who sat on the story to affect the election for the Democrats.</p>
<p>Did they not learn anything from the Dan Rather disaster?</p>
<p>Shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsparkle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69389</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsparkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69389</guid>
		<description>No Pablo, it isn&#039;t what you &quot;try to do to teenage boys&quot; that gets you re-elected in Massachusetts (not to mention the fact that Pelosi nominates you to head committees) but what you ACTUALLY do to teenage boys that gets you re-elected.

Let&#039;s be specific here....;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Pablo, it isn&#8217;t what you &#8220;try to do to teenage boys&#8221; that gets you re-elected in Massachusetts (not to mention the fact that Pelosi nominates you to head committees) but what you ACTUALLY do to teenage boys that gets you re-elected.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be specific here&#8230;.;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69380</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69380</guid>
		<description>That is the most poorly written article, not to mention a desperate attempt to cover the rears of the left that is involved.  He says the reps are lying but in the next breath says he was presented the info by dems? HUH?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogactive.com/2006/10/call-them-out.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Still don&#039;t think Mark Rogers had anything to do with it?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the most poorly written article, not to mention a desperate attempt to cover the rears of the left that is involved.  He says the reps are lying but in the next breath says he was presented the info by dems? HUH?  <a href="http://www.blogactive.com/2006/10/call-them-out.html" rel="nofollow">Still don&#8217;t think Mark Rogers had anything to do with it?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foley Setup? - Part XXII - Edmund at the Bureau</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69329</link>
		<dc:creator>Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foley Setup? - Part XXII - Edmund at the Bureau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69329</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE II: Allah Pundit: &#8220;The smoking gun here isn’t the creepy e-mails, it’s the overtly sexual “take off your pants” IMs. Who provided those to ABC, and more importantly, to CREW?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE II: Allah Pundit: &#8220;The smoking gun here isn’t the creepy e-mails, it’s the overtly sexual “take off your pants” IMs. Who provided those to ABC, and more importantly, to CREW?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69316</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69316</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You can spin this howver you want, but it will never change the fact that a “conservative” Republican tried to do teenage boys.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That gets you reelected in Massachusetts. 

No wait, you have to be a Democrat. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You can spin this howver you want, but it will never change the fact that a “conservative” Republican tried to do teenage boys.</p></blockquote>
<p>That gets you reelected in Massachusetts. </p>
<p>No wait, you have to be a Democrat. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69304</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69304</guid>
		<description>Shackler, if your beloved Godless liberals happen to screw up [again], and lose in November, what then? Emmigrate to Canada? Mexico? Pluto?

If they happen to win, what then? They have to get White House approval since there is no chance they can override a Bush veto. Impeach Bush? OK, then you are stuck with Cheney. What then?

Caution! I think I hear Rove approaching. :oP~~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shackler, if your beloved Godless liberals happen to screw up [again], and lose in November, what then? Emmigrate to Canada? Mexico? Pluto?</p>
<p>If they happen to win, what then? They have to get White House approval since there is no chance they can override a Bush veto. Impeach Bush? OK, then you are stuck with Cheney. What then?</p>
<p>Caution! I think I hear Rove approaching. :oP~~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69278</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69278</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And when we do, we are going to destroy this country as fast as we can, just to piss the Republicans off. I CAN’T WAIT!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Can&#039;t wait to destroy the country. You&#039;ll go far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And when we do, we are going to destroy this country as fast as we can, just to piss the Republicans off. I CAN’T WAIT!!!</p></blockquote>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to destroy the country. You&#8217;ll go far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog-o-Fascists</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69268</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog-o-Fascists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69268</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foley: There&#039;s Really Only One Worthwhile Question...&lt;/strong&gt;

Riehl World View

I&#039;m fast losing interest in all this. You can read updates at Hot Air, Gateway Pundit and MacsMind. But there is one serious question I haven&#039;t heard anyone ask directly.

Now Harpers, along with several newspapers and at least one ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foley: There&#8217;s Really Only One Worthwhile Question&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Riehl World View</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fast losing interest in all this. You can read updates at Hot Air, Gateway Pundit and MacsMind. But there is one serious question I haven&#8217;t heard anyone ask directly.</p>
<p>Now Harpers, along with several newspapers and at least one &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69262</link>
		<dc:creator>shackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69262</guid>
		<description>You can spin this howver you want, but it will never change the fact that a &quot;conservative&quot; Republican tried to do teenage boys. It also won&#039;t change the fact that Democrats are going to take over in November. And when we do, we are going to destroy this country as fast as we can, just to piss the Republicans off. I CAN&#039;T WAIT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can spin this howver you want, but it will never change the fact that a &#8220;conservative&#8221; Republican tried to do teenage boys. It also won&#8217;t change the fact that Democrats are going to take over in November. And when we do, we are going to destroy this country as fast as we can, just to piss the Republicans off. I CAN&#8217;T WAIT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69253</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69253</guid>
		<description>McCarthyism? To me it looks like &#039;someone&#039; is &lt;strong&gt;exploiting homophobia&lt;/strong&gt;, and I continue to believe that will backfire on liberals as they keep pushing the issue. It is not a good time to be a homosexual, and that cannot be blamed on the republicans. Not at all. 

I believe that a list of homosexual liberals working in Congress will soon appear. I&#039;ll cite an unnamed source for my preponderance, and my hint as to the identity of that source is he is the same one who let it leak that Rove was about to be indicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCarthyism? To me it looks like &#8217;someone&#8217; is <strong>exploiting homophobia</strong>, and I continue to believe that will backfire on liberals as they keep pushing the issue. It is not a good time to be a homosexual, and that cannot be blamed on the republicans. Not at all. </p>
<p>I believe that a list of homosexual liberals working in Congress will soon appear. I&#8217;ll cite an unnamed source for my preponderance, and my hint as to the identity of that source is he is the same one who let it leak that Rove was about to be indicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69249</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bill&#039;s Bites -- 2006.10.10...&lt;/strong&gt;

The webmaster&#039;s blog-within-a-blog.Continuously updated, newest items at the top. The Blog Of War, Blackfive&#039;s new Best From the MilBlogs book,is now available for free download to enlisted military personnel. Destitute Dog -- Please read this and he...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill&#8217;s Bites &#8212; 2006.10.10&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The webmaster&#8217;s blog-within-a-blog.Continuously updated, newest items at the top. The Blog Of War, Blackfive&#8217;s new Best From the MilBlogs book,is now available for free download to enlisted military personnel. Destitute Dog &#8212; Please read this and he&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defector01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69240</link>
		<dc:creator>Defector01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69240</guid>
		<description>this is starting to get worse and worse for the Dems
If someone can find this information even a week before the midterms then the GOP can take the hammer used by the Dems are return the favor. But that&#039;s a big if even if things are starting to point more towards that. 
Still even if we do find who did this and about the timing, there must be a strong attempt to seperate foley&#039;s crimes (horrendous as they are) from the democrats silence on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is starting to get worse and worse for the Dems<br />
If someone can find this information even a week before the midterms then the GOP can take the hammer used by the Dems are return the favor. But that&#8217;s a big if even if things are starting to point more towards that.<br />
Still even if we do find who did this and about the timing, there must be a strong attempt to seperate foley&#8217;s crimes (horrendous as they are) from the democrats silence on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69233</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69233</guid>
		<description>McCornthyism indeed, but also a callous indifference to those pages who have had to deal with the Foleys, Studds, and other page turners within Congress.  If any underage (below 16 in DC) page was harassed or worse while the MSM sat on the story, would that not make them accessory to the acts?

chsw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCornthyism indeed, but also a callous indifference to those pages who have had to deal with the Foleys, Studds, and other page turners within Congress.  If any underage (below 16 in DC) page was harassed or worse while the MSM sat on the story, would that not make them accessory to the acts?</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69227</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69227</guid>
		<description>Do you &lt;strong&gt;really&lt;/strong&gt; think they would out any Dems???  Rather naive of you, don&#039;t you think?  
It sound like it was the &lt;strong&gt;MSM itself&lt;/strong&gt; who set this up deliberately as an October surprise.  Full blown desctruction of even the sham of impartiality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you <strong>really</strong> think they would out any Dems???  Rather naive of you, don&#8217;t you think?<br />
It sound like it was the <strong>MSM itself</strong> who set this up deliberately as an October surprise.  Full blown desctruction of even the sham of impartiality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69209</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69209</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope they do start their little “gay” witch hunt. I will undoubtedly hurt the Democrats much more than the Republicans.

McCarthyism???

stenwin77 on October 10, 2006 at 3:42 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To use a term coined by John Podhoretz - McCornthyism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hope they do start their little “gay” witch hunt. I will undoubtedly hurt the Democrats much more than the Republicans.</p>
<p>McCarthyism???</p>
<p>stenwin77 on October 10, 2006 at 3:42 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>To use a term coined by John Podhoretz &#8211; McCornthyism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stenwin77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69158</link>
		<dc:creator>stenwin77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69158</guid>
		<description>I hope they do start their little &quot;gay&quot; witch hunt.  I will undoubtedly hurt the Democrats much more than the Republicans. 

McCarthyism???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do start their little &#8220;gay&#8221; witch hunt.  I will undoubtedly hurt the Democrats much more than the Republicans. </p>
<p>McCarthyism???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bopbottle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69153</link>
		<dc:creator>bopbottle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69153</guid>
		<description>Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think Mike Rogers, on his blog, was strongly suggesting that Dennis Hastert was gay.  I can&#039;t believe O&#039;Reilly had him on.  I don&#039;t consider him to be a credible anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think Mike Rogers, on his blog, was strongly suggesting that Dennis Hastert was gay.  I can&#8217;t believe O&#8217;Reilly had him on.  I don&#8217;t consider him to be a credible anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/comment-page-1/#comment-69138</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/harpers-dem-operative-gave-us-foley-e-mails-back-in-may/#comment-69138</guid>
		<description>AP, that loathesome creature O&#039;Reilly had on last night, Mike Rogers I believe his name was. Wasn&#039;t he behind much of this?

He was saying he&#039;d be revealing more GOP names over the next month.

A very oily character, he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP, that loathesome creature O&#8217;Reilly had on last night, Mike Rogers I believe his name was. Wasn&#8217;t he behind much of this?</p>
<p>He was saying he&#8217;d be revealing more GOP names over the next month.</p>
<p>A very oily character, he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
