<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Bush on North Korean nuke test; Update: Equivalent to &#8220;several hundred tons of TNT&#8221; Update: Second blast detected?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:27:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68939</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thunder Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68939</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 10/10/2006...&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 10/10/2006&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68910</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68910</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Individual Thinkers...&lt;/strong&gt;

A person that will stand up for what they believe is right, despite what their party thinks, despite the fact that it may not &quot;look&quot; popular to those that do not have the same information in front of them, yet they stand firm in their decisions, that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Individual Thinkers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A person that will stand up for what they believe is right, despite what their party thinks, despite the fact that it may not &#8220;look&#8221; popular to those that do not have the same information in front of them, yet they stand firm in their decisions, that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Round-up: Kim Jung Il Blows It Big Time &#171; Thespis Journal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68811</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Round-up: Kim Jung Il Blows It Big Time &#171; Thespis Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68811</guid>
		<description>[...] Allah at Hot Air has it all together. Wild Bill has a great look at the situation. More from Bryan at Hot Air. Perish The Thought has a great post! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allah at Hot Air has it all together. Wild Bill has a great look at the situation. More from Bryan at Hot Air. Perish The Thought has a great post! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68657</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68657</guid>
		<description>Where would we be with N.K. (or Iraq, Iran etc?) if in the year 2000 we had said adios to the U.N.?

Would Kimmie be anywhere so brave without the knowledge that he could always count on the protection of the U.N. members who have shafted us every time N.K has escalated the nuke issue to critical? Without the U.N. would Kimmie even have any big friends to play games with? 
Maybe China and Russia would have even ‘changed the situation’ by now. 
Now we are faced with trying to prevent atomic weaponry from leaving N.K. 

With the current diplomatic weenieism at the U.N. perhaps millions (billions?) could die in a cataclysmic nuclear chain reaction. 
 
Disbanding the U.N. could save our lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would we be with N.K. (or Iraq, Iran etc?) if in the year 2000 we had said adios to the U.N.?</p>
<p>Would Kimmie be anywhere so brave without the knowledge that he could always count on the protection of the U.N. members who have shafted us every time N.K has escalated the nuke issue to critical? Without the U.N. would Kimmie even have any big friends to play games with?<br />
Maybe China and Russia would have even ‘changed the situation’ by now.<br />
Now we are faced with trying to prevent atomic weaponry from leaving N.K. </p>
<p>With the current diplomatic weenieism at the U.N. perhaps millions (billions?) could die in a cataclysmic nuclear chain reaction. </p>
<p>Disbanding the U.N. could save our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Report: North Korean nuke test failed?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68655</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Report: North Korean nuke test failed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68655</guid>
		<description>[...] Top of the page right now at Drudge. We were tossing this possibility around last night and then again this morning. Even a small nuclear explosion would yield a blast equivalent to a few thousand tons of TNT. This one was in the ballpark of 500. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top of the page right now at Drudge. We were tossing this possibility around last night and then again this morning. Even a small nuclear explosion would yield a blast equivalent to a few thousand tons of TNT. This one was in the ballpark of 500. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedge Plissken</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68652</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge Plissken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68652</guid>
		<description>Ok, a bit ago on Hannity, Col. North spoke of the Clinton admin in 1994 making a deal to build 2 light water reactors for NK...!?! This was during the time me and the Mrs. were courtin&#039; an sparkin&#039;-I knew I wasn&#039;t paying close attention to anything else at that time, but &lt;em&gt;DAMN!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, a bit ago on Hannity, Col. North spoke of the Clinton admin in 1994 making a deal to build 2 light water reactors for NK&#8230;!?! This was during the time me and the Mrs. were courtin&#8217; an sparkin&#8217;-I knew I wasn&#8217;t paying close attention to anything else at that time, but <em>DAMN!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68585</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68585</guid>
		<description>NPP
&lt;blockquote&gt;This was definitely not an unsuccessful boosted weapon. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Ya wanna rephrase that and hit me with it again? I think I know what you meant . . .

The problem is, without knowing what the device was capable of, we can&#039;t judge the success or failure based on seismic data. Without knowing the intent of the program, we can&#039;t guess the intended capabilities of the device either. 

Broadly speaking, the North Koreans wanted a big bang, and judging from the reaction of &#039;the international community&#039;, they got what they wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPP</p>
<blockquote><p>This was definitely not an unsuccessful boosted weapon. </p></blockquote>
<p>Ya wanna rephrase that and hit me with it again? I think I know what you meant . . .</p>
<p>The problem is, without knowing what the device was capable of, we can&#8217;t judge the success or failure based on seismic data. Without knowing the intent of the program, we can&#8217;t guess the intended capabilities of the device either. </p>
<p>Broadly speaking, the North Koreans wanted a big bang, and judging from the reaction of &#8216;the international community&#8217;, they got what they wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehuster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68578</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68578</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;it does not answer the question of what we are capable on inflicting on them, logistally, militarily, and economicaly. They have no logistics or resoures for sustained combat. It’s not 1950 anymore.&lt;/em&gt;

If the goal is not sustained combat but to deter &quot;casual&quot; airstrikes on North Korea (to decapitate the regime or take out weapons programs) then the artillery is more than adequate for the task.  It really constrains our options if there&#039;s nothing between &quot;all out war&quot; and &quot;do nothing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>it does not answer the question of what we are capable on inflicting on them, logistally, militarily, and economicaly. They have no logistics or resoures for sustained combat. It’s not 1950 anymore.</em></p>
<p>If the goal is not sustained combat but to deter &#8220;casual&#8221; airstrikes on North Korea (to decapitate the regime or take out weapons programs) then the artillery is more than adequate for the task.  It really constrains our options if there&#8217;s nothing between &#8220;all out war&#8221; and &#8220;do nothing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drudge Report Radio</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68575</link>
		<dc:creator>Drudge Report Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68575</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#039;I can smell Nancy Pelosi&#039;s perfume already. How &#039;bout you?&#039;...&lt;/strong&gt;

The October surprises continue. Will they affect the vote of Evangelicals and Conservative women?......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8216;I can smell Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s perfume already. How &#8217;bout you?&#8217;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The October surprises continue. Will they affect the vote of Evangelicals and Conservative women?&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensa Barbie Welcomes You</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68531</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensa Barbie Welcomes You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68531</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;K. Peninsula&#039;s Ring of Fire......&lt;/strong&gt;

Under the leadership of Kim Jong Il, what would be the further impact placed upon this region, in the event of accidental launchings, or hushing the effects of a underground test accident?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>K. Peninsula&#8217;s Ring of Fire&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Under the leadership of Kim Jong Il, what would be the further impact placed upon this region, in the event of accidental launchings, or hushing the effects of a underground test accident?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68517</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68517</guid>
		<description>God, I hope that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20554779-1702,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;second event&lt;/a&gt; was a nuclear weapons test.

I don&#039;t like the North Korean regime or its destabilizing influence in a region of the world where I plan on making my life and where the love of said life lives... but I do like the thought that their weapon design and engineering doesn&#039;t work.

Two 0.5-2KT explosions is not what they were hoping for, methinks.

Another commentator said it best: &lt;em&gt;The North Korean nuclear engineers are now officially the worst ever!&lt;/em&gt;

If true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I hope that <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20554779-1702,00.html" rel="nofollow">second event</a> was a nuclear weapons test.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the North Korean regime or its destabilizing influence in a region of the world where I plan on making my life and where the love of said life lives&#8230; but I do like the thought that their weapon design and engineering doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Two 0.5-2KT explosions is not what they were hoping for, methinks.</p>
<p>Another commentator said it best: <em>The North Korean nuclear engineers are now officially the worst ever!</em></p>
<p>If true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68498</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68498</guid>
		<description>Heh. &quot;No-Dong.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. &#8220;No-Dong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egfrow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68473</link>
		<dc:creator>Egfrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68473</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The artillery alone could be devastating for South Korea. As William C. Triplett II noted in his 2004 book Rogue State, North Korea is capable of firing “between 300,000 and 500,000 artillery shells per hour on the Seoul metropolitan area.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is all find and dandy but it does not answer the question of what we are capable on inflicting on them, logistally, militarily, and economicaly. They have no logistics or resoures for sustained combat. It&#039;s not 1950 anymore.  China would be forced to drop their Charade game with thier little pet cobra and resupply N.K. with logistics and supplies from their incredible network of underground tunnels created between China and N.K. over the past 55 years. These tunnels make the DMZ tunnels to South Korea look like worm holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The artillery alone could be devastating for South Korea. As William C. Triplett II noted in his 2004 book Rogue State, North Korea is capable of firing “between 300,000 and 500,000 artillery shells per hour on the Seoul metropolitan area.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is all find and dandy but it does not answer the question of what we are capable on inflicting on them, logistally, militarily, and economicaly. They have no logistics or resoures for sustained combat. It&#8217;s not 1950 anymore.  China would be forced to drop their Charade game with thier little pet cobra and resupply N.K. with logistics and supplies from their incredible network of underground tunnels created between China and N.K. over the past 55 years. These tunnels make the DMZ tunnels to South Korea look like worm holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoisyRoom.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We are in range; another test coming?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68431</link>
		<dc:creator>NoisyRoom.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We are in range; another test coming?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68431</guid>
		<description>[...] ***update: Bush video and more*** [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ***update: Bush video and more*** [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehuster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68428</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68428</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;That estimate re: the potential artillery shelling of SK is pretty much unfathomable, but isn’t that absent the likelihood that we would be carpetbombing their artillery positions?&lt;/em&gt;

Precision boming them, yes, but they are dug into hardened sites in the sides of mountains, and it would take a while to eliminate them all.  Seoul would eat thousands of shells in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>That estimate re: the potential artillery shelling of SK is pretty much unfathomable, but isn’t that absent the likelihood that we would be carpetbombing their artillery positions?</em></p>
<p>Precision boming them, yes, but they are dug into hardened sites in the sides of mountains, and it would take a while to eliminate them all.  Seoul would eat thousands of shells in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycotte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68407</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68407</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;side note&lt;/em&gt; :Can we please get Post preview or spell check? Just saying....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>side note</em> :Can we please get Post preview or spell check? Just saying&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Asylum Pundits</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68406</link>
		<dc:creator>The Asylum Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68406</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Test Fallout: Where Do We Go Now?...&lt;/strong&gt;

 North Korea tested it&#039;s nuclear weapon over the weekend depite the warning coming from its neighbors, the US and the UN. So much for waiting until the end of the year.The United States said today it will seek U.N. sanctions to curb North Korea&#039;s imp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Test Fallout: Where Do We Go Now?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> North Korea tested it&#8217;s nuclear weapon over the weekend depite the warning coming from its neighbors, the US and the UN. So much for waiting until the end of the year.The United States said today it will seek U.N. sanctions to curb North Korea&#8217;s imp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycotte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68404</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68404</guid>
		<description>The Democrats should really question Kim Jong-Il&#039;s timing.

I find it strange that he would pull a stunt like this that would help the Bush administration. If he lked working with a democratic administration then wouldn&#039;t he have waite to test after the mid-terms? The Dems who worked so hard with Kim must really be peeved that he ruined their current smear of a gay-republican child molester and thrust national security to the front of the agenda agian. Where is the love? That quintessential moment of the toast with Madeline Albright now really seems like he was playing the dems for all they were worth. Could it actually be that Kim Jong-Il is really a sick man that doesn&#039;t much care who is in power or who he bargains with? That would fly in the face of Harry Reid&#039;s call for a different sort of negotiation or any sort of negotiation for that matter. 

Dems: This is a wake up call. SICK REPUGNANT DICTATORS ACTUALLY EXIST!!!

Goes to show that there are some people for whom talk is truly cheap. Kim Jong-Il is one of those people. It is time to stop negotiating and show him that we are not a weak nation and that we are not crippled by our own ridiculous politics. Kim Jong-Il, by testing a nuclear weapon, has called us to arms and action. We need to respond in a meaningful way and I dont mean in a UN meaningful way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats should really question Kim Jong-Il&#8217;s timing.</p>
<p>I find it strange that he would pull a stunt like this that would help the Bush administration. If he lked working with a democratic administration then wouldn&#8217;t he have waite to test after the mid-terms? The Dems who worked so hard with Kim must really be peeved that he ruined their current smear of a gay-republican child molester and thrust national security to the front of the agenda agian. Where is the love? That quintessential moment of the toast with Madeline Albright now really seems like he was playing the dems for all they were worth. Could it actually be that Kim Jong-Il is really a sick man that doesn&#8217;t much care who is in power or who he bargains with? That would fly in the face of Harry Reid&#8217;s call for a different sort of negotiation or any sort of negotiation for that matter. </p>
<p>Dems: This is a wake up call. SICK REPUGNANT DICTATORS ACTUALLY EXIST!!!</p>
<p>Goes to show that there are some people for whom talk is truly cheap. Kim Jong-Il is one of those people. It is time to stop negotiating and show him that we are not a weak nation and that we are not crippled by our own ridiculous politics. Kim Jong-Il, by testing a nuclear weapon, has called us to arms and action. We need to respond in a meaningful way and I dont mean in a UN meaningful way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NPP</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68394</link>
		<dc:creator>NPP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68394</guid>
		<description>Rockhauler,

This was definitely not an unsuccessful boosted weapon.  The NK&#039;s won&#039;t be able to make, much less test, boosted weapons until they have a working implosion design, which it appears they do not.

I mentioned before that it&#039;s technically possible to make a fission device with a low yield (below 1kt), but it requires a technical capability the NK&#039;s don&#039;t have.

If this was indeed a dud, it probably means a failed implosion device.  It makes me wonder why they wouldn&#039;t use a much simpler gun device for an initial test.  Perhaps that is yet to come.

CP,

Carpetbombing does little against artillery in bunkers.  Precision strikes would be necessary, but there are so many targets that it would take a lot of time.  This isn&#039;t even considering the time needed to dismantle the air defense network to allow such strikes.  By the time we got to the point in the target list where we can attack the emplaced artillery en-mass - well, let&#039;s just say there would be a lot of rubble in Seoul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rockhauler,</p>
<p>This was definitely not an unsuccessful boosted weapon.  The NK&#8217;s won&#8217;t be able to make, much less test, boosted weapons until they have a working implosion design, which it appears they do not.</p>
<p>I mentioned before that it&#8217;s technically possible to make a fission device with a low yield (below 1kt), but it requires a technical capability the NK&#8217;s don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>If this was indeed a dud, it probably means a failed implosion device.  It makes me wonder why they wouldn&#8217;t use a much simpler gun device for an initial test.  Perhaps that is yet to come.</p>
<p>CP,</p>
<p>Carpetbombing does little against artillery in bunkers.  Precision strikes would be necessary, but there are so many targets that it would take a lot of time.  This isn&#8217;t even considering the time needed to dismantle the air defense network to allow such strikes.  By the time we got to the point in the target list where we can attack the emplaced artillery en-mass &#8211; well, let&#8217;s just say there would be a lot of rubble in Seoul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68393</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68393</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BOMB SHELTER&lt;/strong&gt;: Best cellar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BOMB SHELTER</strong>: Best cellar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68378</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68378</guid>
		<description>That estimate re: the potential artillery shelling of SK is pretty much unfathomable, but isn&#039;t that absent the likelihood that we would be carpetbombing their artillery positions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That estimate re: the potential artillery shelling of SK is pretty much unfathomable, but isn&#8217;t that absent the likelihood that we would be carpetbombing their artillery positions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehuster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68363</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68363</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Pakistani missle test would have been an Air or surface burst…

N. Korean test was subsurface…&lt;/em&gt;

No, the 1998 Pakistani tests were underground, just like the recent North Korean test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Pakistani missle test would have been an Air or surface burst…</p>
<p>N. Korean test was subsurface…</em></p>
<p>No, the 1998 Pakistani tests were underground, just like the recent North Korean test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68348</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68348</guid>
		<description>A comment By AZPatriot on another thread makes a good point, 
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/08/report-north-korea-tests-nuke/
that the Oct 8th  nuke test  might well have been the nuclear trigger that detonates ‘the big one’, the hydrogen fusion device. Proof of that conjecture would be a second nuke test in the megaton range. Absent that second megaton blast does not disproof the conjecture, however. 

Without knowing the intent of the program, it would be impossible to know if these tests were ‘duds’, or were intentionally small devices, given the small quantity of plutonium available to North Korea,  to prove the validity of the design. Multiple, small detonations could well signal a methodical approach to a sophisticated research and development program. 

The most frightening aspect is not that North Korea has apparently developed a working design, but that North Korea would be willing to sell the engineering details to the highest bidder. As difficult as it would be to embargo shipments of hardware, it would be impossible to contain transfers of engineering blueprints.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-06/04/content_448644.htm

Obviously, nuclear non-proliferation is a dead horse, starting with Pakistan, then North Korea, and soon Iran having nuclear weapons. 

Nti.org is a 501(c)3 organization founded by Ted Turner, Sam Nunn, and others, but this historical summary appears to be a reasonable representation. 
http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/NK/Nuclear/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment By AZPatriot on another thread makes a good point,<br />
<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/08/report-north-korea-tests-nuke/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/08/report-north-korea-tests-nuke/</a><br />
that the Oct 8th  nuke test  might well have been the nuclear trigger that detonates ‘the big one’, the hydrogen fusion device. Proof of that conjecture would be a second nuke test in the megaton range. Absent that second megaton blast does not disproof the conjecture, however. </p>
<p>Without knowing the intent of the program, it would be impossible to know if these tests were ‘duds’, or were intentionally small devices, given the small quantity of plutonium available to North Korea,  to prove the validity of the design. Multiple, small detonations could well signal a methodical approach to a sophisticated research and development program. </p>
<p>The most frightening aspect is not that North Korea has apparently developed a working design, but that North Korea would be willing to sell the engineering details to the highest bidder. As difficult as it would be to embargo shipments of hardware, it would be impossible to contain transfers of engineering blueprints.<br />
<a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-06/04/content_448644.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-06/04/content_448644.htm</a></p>
<p>Obviously, nuclear non-proliferation is a dead horse, starting with Pakistan, then North Korea, and soon Iran having nuclear weapons. </p>
<p>Nti.org is a 501(c)3 organization founded by Ted Turner, Sam Nunn, and others, but this historical summary appears to be a reasonable representation.<br />
<a href="http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/NK/Nuclear/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/NK/Nuclear/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68281</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68281</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that we are still working to confirm that the explosions were in fact nuclear. 

Iran and NorK are trying their best to provoke 1) our country into an attack or 2) the American people into civil violence. If the explosions turn out to be a bluff, we can all give thanks for the restraint of the Bush Administration.

If it turns out the explosions were nuclear, well, Iranians were present at the July 4th North Korean missile test. North Korea had to test a nuke before Iran would take delivery and pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that we are still working to confirm that the explosions were in fact nuclear. </p>
<p>Iran and NorK are trying their best to provoke 1) our country into an attack or 2) the American people into civil violence. If the explosions turn out to be a bluff, we can all give thanks for the restraint of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>If it turns out the explosions were nuclear, well, Iranians were present at the July 4th North Korean missile test. North Korea had to test a nuke before Iran would take delivery and pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-68273</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/video-bush-on-north-korean-nuke-test/#comment-68273</guid>
		<description>GregH wrote: &quot;Maybe we should try talking to the North Koreans now??&quot;

How about we send you?  

Need a ride to the airport, bub?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GregH wrote: &#8220;Maybe we should try talking to the North Koreans now??&#8221;</p>
<p>How about we send you?  </p>
<p>Need a ride to the airport, bub?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
