<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fireworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:29:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwookie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-69320</link>
		<dc:creator>jwookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-69320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;North Korean nuke test a dud? ...&lt;/strong&gt;

[cross posted at the Blogger edition of Cake or Death]As more and more people analyze the effects of the explosion, the evidence seems to be piling up that this might not have been the show that was advertised... so to speak.The North Koreans ought......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>North Korean nuke test a dud? &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[cross posted at the Blogger edition of Cake or Death]As more and more people analyze the effects of the explosion, the evidence seems to be piling up that this might not have been the show that was advertised&#8230; so to speak.The North Koreans ought&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cake or Death</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-69315</link>
		<dc:creator>Cake or Death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-69315</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;North Korean nuke test a dud?...&lt;/strong&gt;

As more and more people analyze the effects of the explosion, the evidence seems to be piling up that this might not have been the show that was advertised... so to speak.
The North Koreans ought to ask for their money back....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>North Korean nuke test a dud?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As more and more people analyze the effects of the explosion, the evidence seems to be piling up that this might not have been the show that was advertised&#8230; so to speak.<br />
The North Koreans ought to ask for their money back&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-69047</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-69047</guid>
		<description>The long-standing agreement with the U.S. which prevents the Japanese from having more than a self-defense force level of military has been obsolete for quite a while now. 

We could virtually wipe out our Chinese trade deficit by selling Japan all the toys it needs to help us be the world&#039;s policemen. Talk about killing two birds with one stone! (Apologies to Bill Maher)

While we&#039;re at it we need to quit playing footsie and tell the world we are 100% behind Taiwan in their desire for unfettered independence. Politics is the art of the compromise, but we haven&#039;t been artistic about it in decades, while our enemies use that fact to hamstring us on every issue. 

The USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is affectionately called &quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tr.surfor.navy.mil/default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Big Stick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;, in rememberance of Teddy R&#039;s foreign policy statement, &quot;Speak softly, but carry a big stick!&quot; We&#039;ve been speaking loudly, and speaking louder, and speaking often, and shaking our finger madly when it comes to North Korea, and it&#039;s about time to limber up that stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long-standing agreement with the U.S. which prevents the Japanese from having more than a self-defense force level of military has been obsolete for quite a while now. </p>
<p>We could virtually wipe out our Chinese trade deficit by selling Japan all the toys it needs to help us be the world&#8217;s policemen. Talk about killing two birds with one stone! (Apologies to Bill Maher)</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re at it we need to quit playing footsie and tell the world we are 100% behind Taiwan in their desire for unfettered independence. Politics is the art of the compromise, but we haven&#8217;t been artistic about it in decades, while our enemies use that fact to hamstring us on every issue. </p>
<p>The USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is affectionately called &#8220;<strong><a href="http://www.tr.surfor.navy.mil/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">The Big Stick</a></strong>&#8220;, in rememberance of Teddy R&#8217;s foreign policy statement, &#8220;Speak softly, but carry a big stick!&#8221; We&#8217;ve been speaking loudly, and speaking louder, and speaking often, and shaking our finger madly when it comes to North Korea, and it&#8217;s about time to limber up that stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68982</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68982</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As for Japan, it will re-arm. I don’t see any logic that leads anywhere but Japan becoming a world power again. It won’t take them long to get back to that position once they decide to do it.

But that’s enough of the serious talk. Forget that North Korean dud for a few minutes and check out some Japanese fireworks. No duds in this batch.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a great illustration of the price of anti-Americanism for its own sake.  One of China&#039;s nightmares is a re-armed Japan, and in particular, a nuclear armed Japan.  Yet by playing the North Korea card they way they have, with the obvious objective of spiting the U.S., they have all but guaranteed the re-armed Japan that they don&#039;t want.  

Guess that plan backfired, didn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As for Japan, it will re-arm. I don’t see any logic that leads anywhere but Japan becoming a world power again. It won’t take them long to get back to that position once they decide to do it.</p>
<p>But that’s enough of the serious talk. Forget that North Korean dud for a few minutes and check out some Japanese fireworks. No duds in this batch.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a great illustration of the price of anti-Americanism for its own sake.  One of China&#8217;s nightmares is a re-armed Japan, and in particular, a nuclear armed Japan.  Yet by playing the North Korea card they way they have, with the obvious objective of spiting the U.S., they have all but guaranteed the re-armed Japan that they don&#8217;t want.  </p>
<p>Guess that plan backfired, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68899</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nukes or no-nukes??...&lt;/strong&gt;

There seems to be some debate about whether North Korea&#039;s nuclear test was actually a nuclear explosion...or an unsuccessful one...or a hoax intended to get attention. We are beginning to see a lot of &quot;pooh-poohing&quot; in the press by Dems......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nukes or no-nukes??&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There seems to be some debate about whether North Korea&#8217;s nuclear test was actually a nuclear explosion&#8230;or an unsuccessful one&#8230;or a hoax intended to get attention. We are beginning to see a lot of &#8220;pooh-poohing&#8221; in the press by Dems&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68891</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68891</guid>
		<description>Why are we waiting (begging?) for the U.N. to like us so we can do what we need to do?  Just do it!  Take out the nuke sites in NK (and Iran)!  Do you really think NK is producing electricity with their nuke sites?!?!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio-electronics.cocolog-nifty.com/diary/images/EastAsia-night.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Do you?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we waiting (begging?) for the U.N. to like us so we can do what we need to do?  Just do it!  Take out the nuke sites in NK (and Iran)!  Do you really think NK is producing electricity with their nuke sites?!?!</p>
<p><a href="http://radio-electronics.cocolog-nifty.com/diary/images/EastAsia-night.jpg" rel="nofollow">Do you?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlitos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68861</link>
		<dc:creator>carlitos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68861</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;KEITH GETS LOW RATINGS IN BED&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&quot;Mister Bush&quot; could not be reached for comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>KEITH GETS LOW RATINGS IN BED</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Mister Bush&#8221; could not be reached for comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; Waking up to a New Nuclear Threat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68858</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; Waking up to a New Nuclear Threat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68858</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE ll:According to Captain Ed, the North Korean nuclear test didn&#8217;t produce much of a big bang. Lorie Byrd at Wizbang  has word that Keith Olbermann doesn&#8217;t either. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE ll:According to Captain Ed, the North Korean nuclear test didn&#8217;t produce much of a big bang. Lorie Byrd at Wizbang  has word that Keith Olbermann doesn&#8217;t either. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68842</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68842</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lawrence, duh, click the link.

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 10:01 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know, what you post is an important piece of the puzzle.

My point is that Alaska is small potatoes compared to Tokyo, Honolulu, L.A., Seattle, San Fran, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lawrence, duh, click the link.</p>
<p>Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 10:01 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I know, what you post is an important piece of the puzzle.</p>
<p>My point is that Alaska is small potatoes compared to Tokyo, Honolulu, L.A., Seattle, San Fran, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68837</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68837</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung’s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans).

januarius on October 10, 2006 at 9:45 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, this is mostly true.

And the reasoning is not that complicated.

Lil Kim doesn&#039;t want to obliterate SK, he wants to capture and use the wealth of SK.  SK is worth nothing to him if he radiates it with his nukes.

Furthermore, NK could easily invade and capture SK without nukes.  What stands in his way is Japan and U.S.  If he can range Japan and U.S. with Nukes, he hopes to persuade us to pull our noses out of his business in Korea.

The thing missing in Lil Kim&#039;s plans is that the U.S. has played this cold war game before.  And he seems obivious to the fact that we won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung’s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans).</p>
<p>januarius on October 10, 2006 at 9:45 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, this is mostly true.</p>
<p>And the reasoning is not that complicated.</p>
<p>Lil Kim doesn&#8217;t want to obliterate SK, he wants to capture and use the wealth of SK.  SK is worth nothing to him if he radiates it with his nukes.</p>
<p>Furthermore, NK could easily invade and capture SK without nukes.  What stands in his way is Japan and U.S.  If he can range Japan and U.S. with Nukes, he hopes to persuade us to pull our noses out of his business in Korea.</p>
<p>The thing missing in Lil Kim&#8217;s plans is that the U.S. has played this cold war game before.  And he seems obivious to the fact that we won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68834</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68834</guid>
		<description>Lawrence, duh, click the link.

Seriously, I appreciate you quoting me... but the &lt;a href=&quot;http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; was the point of my post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence, duh, click the link.</p>
<p>Seriously, I appreciate you quoting me&#8230; but the <a href="http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm" rel="nofollow">link</a> was the point of my post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68833</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if North Korean missiles can hit the U.S? 

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 12:20 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is possible, assuming their missiles actually work.

See Michelle Malkins blog post yesterday.  She posted a map showing missle ranges.

Try this link:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419 &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419 &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder if North Korean missiles can hit the U.S? </p>
<p>Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 12:20 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>It is possible, assuming their missiles actually work.</p>
<p>See Michelle Malkins blog post yesterday.  She posted a map showing missle ranges.</p>
<p>Try this link:<br />
<a href="http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419 " rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419" rel="nofollow">http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: januarius</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68827</link>
		<dc:creator>januarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Many leftists in SK are actually rooting for NK to get nukes.  They have been so brainwashed in the public schools and universities about the &quot;one country-one race,&quot; they are positive that NK would never use nukes on fellow Koreans.  I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung&#039;s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans).  The comment caused uproar among the conservatives in South Korea.  The liberals, though, in Roh&#039;s government (Roh having won on his anti-American credentials) will continue the &quot;sunshine policy.&quot;  It will only be a couple of days before Roh&#039;s government complains about sanctions possibly being imposed on NK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good. </p></blockquote>
<p>Many leftists in SK are actually rooting for NK to get nukes.  They have been so brainwashed in the public schools and universities about the &#8220;one country-one race,&#8221; they are positive that NK would never use nukes on fellow Koreans.  I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung&#8217;s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans).  The comment caused uproar among the conservatives in South Korea.  The liberals, though, in Roh&#8217;s government (Roh having won on his anti-American credentials) will continue the &#8220;sunshine policy.&#8221;  It will only be a couple of days before Roh&#8217;s government complains about sanctions possibly being imposed on NK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68819</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68819</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;North Korean Crisis, 4 (October 10, 2006)...&lt;/strong&gt;

[This constantly updated post is bumped up; scroll down for more stories -- ed.] News Anger in Beijing: &quot;China responded with rare fury to neighbouring North Korea’s nuclear test, resorting to language generally reserved for imperialist opponents ra...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>North Korean Crisis, 4 (October 10, 2006)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[This constantly updated post is bumped up; scroll down for more stories -- ed.] News Anger in Beijing: &#8220;China responded with rare fury to neighbouring North Korea’s nuclear test, resorting to language generally reserved for imperialist opponents ra&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Round-up: Kim Jung Il Blows It Big Time &#171; Thespis Journal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68812</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Round-up: Kim Jung Il Blows It Big Time &#171; Thespis Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68812</guid>
		<description>[...] Allah at Hot Air has it all together. Wild Bill has a great look at the situation. More from Bryan at Hot Air. Perish The Thought has a great post! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allah at Hot Air has it all together. Wild Bill has a great look at the situation. More from Bryan at Hot Air. Perish The Thought has a great post! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin - Blog Archive &#187; Nuclear Explosion, Nuclear Dud or Not Nuclear at All&#63;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68765</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin - Blog Archive &#187; Nuclear Explosion, Nuclear Dud or Not Nuclear at All&#63;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68765</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air: Fireworks  Share This Article With Others:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air: Fireworks  Share This Article With Others:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68756</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68756</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The end of the GOP?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#039;t want to turn on my TV Nov. 7 and see Rahm Emanuel high-fiving George Stephanopoulos. I don&#039;t want to see a smile on Keith Olbermann&#039;s face. Yeah, we&#039;re down now, and the liberals are riding high. But if somehow we can figure out a way to wi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The end of the GOP?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to turn on my TV Nov. 7 and see Rahm Emanuel high-fiving George Stephanopoulos. I don&#8217;t want to see a smile on Keith Olbermann&#8217;s face. Yeah, we&#8217;re down now, and the liberals are riding high. But if somehow we can figure out a way to wi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; North Korea Tests A Nuke&#8230;.Or Maybe Not</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68729</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; North Korea Tests A Nuke&#8230;.Or Maybe Not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68729</guid>
		<description>[...] Bryan at Hot Air believes this dud of a blast gave the world time to get something done: We now know that we have a window of time in which to deal with a North Korea that has played its cards before the world: It wants ICBM tech and it wants nuclear weaponry and obviously has the will to use both even in defiance of its allies in Beijing. NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good. But while we know what NoKo will do, we also know what it can’t do, yet, and that’s put a working nuke on a working ICBM and either use that weapon or sell it. NoKo doesn’t have either the working ICBM or the working nuke. But it’s working on both, and has data to point it in the direction of obtaining both. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bryan at Hot Air believes this dud of a blast gave the world time to get something done: We now know that we have a window of time in which to deal with a North Korea that has played its cards before the world: It wants ICBM tech and it wants nuclear weaponry and obviously has the will to use both even in defiance of its allies in Beijing. NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good. But while we know what NoKo will do, we also know what it can’t do, yet, and that’s put a working nuke on a working ICBM and either use that weapon or sell it. NoKo doesn’t have either the working ICBM or the working nuke. But it’s working on both, and has data to point it in the direction of obtaining both. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68725</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68725</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s da bomb -- Last update 2006.10.10.00:15...&lt;/strong&gt;

2006.10.10.00.39Report: North Korean nuke test failed?Allahpundit Top of the page right now at Drudge. We were tossing this possibility around last night and then again this morning. Even a small nuclear explosion would yield a blast equivalent to a fe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s da bomb &#8212; Last update 2006.10.10.00:15&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>2006.10.10.00.39Report: North Korean nuke test failed?Allahpundit Top of the page right now at Drudge. We were tossing this possibility around last night and then again this morning. Even a small nuclear explosion would yield a blast equivalent to a fe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68723</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68723</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Was it a Bluff?????...&lt;/strong&gt;

Was Kim Jong IL&#039;s &quot;nuclear test&quot; a bluff????...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Was it a Bluff?????&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Was Kim Jong IL&#8217;s &#8220;nuclear test&#8221; a bluff????&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark V.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68711</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68711</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen a lot of people who look at an offensively armed and capable Japan as an unwelcome consequence of North Korea&#039;s nuclear achievements.  Even as a sign of a cooling relations with the U.S.  But if they&#039;re allies of ours, at least for the moment, doesn&#039;t it make us stronger to have allies that are strong?

It almost certainly doesn&#039;t pay to have allies that tie down our military resources to see to their territorial integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of people who look at an offensively armed and capable Japan as an unwelcome consequence of North Korea&#8217;s nuclear achievements.  Even as a sign of a cooling relations with the U.S.  But if they&#8217;re allies of ours, at least for the moment, doesn&#8217;t it make us stronger to have allies that are strong?</p>
<p>It almost certainly doesn&#8217;t pay to have allies that tie down our military resources to see to their territorial integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68697</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68697</guid>
		<description>Did you click the link, Bob?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you click the link, Bob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Owens</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68696</guid>
		<description>It depends. Someone would have to FedEx them over, or they might take out Fiji.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends. Someone would have to FedEx them over, or they might take out Fiji.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68692</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68692</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I wonder if North Korean missiles can hit the U.S?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm" rel="nofollow">I wonder if North Korean missiles can hit the U.S?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Owens</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-68689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/09/fireworks/#comment-68689</guid>
		<description>We should only refer to him as lbermann from now on. Apparently, he can&#039;t produce the &quot;O.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should only refer to him as lbermann from now on. Apparently, he can&#8217;t produce the &#8220;O.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
