Fireworks

posted at 11:44 pm on October 9, 2006 by Bryan

It’s looking more and more like the North Korea nuke test was a dud. If it’s true, that’s obviously very good news. We know from the July 4 launches that North Korea’s long-range missiles got no dong–they don’t work. NoKo scientists may have gotten good telemetry data even from the flubbed launches, though, and they’re undoubtedly studying that data to improve the next batch.

Now we see an apparently failed North Korean nuclear test. But like the dud missiles, NoKo scientists will learn from the nuke failure (if that’s what it was). They’ll use the data from this test to improve the next batch. That’s how science works.

We now know that we have a window of time in which to deal with a North Korea that has played its cards before the world: It wants ICBM tech and it wants nuclear weaponry and obviously has the will to use both even in defiance of its allies in Beijing. NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good. But while we know what NoKo will do, we also know what it can’t do, yet, and that’s put a working nuke on a working ICBM and either use that weapon or sell it. NoKo doesn’t have either the working ICBM or the working nuke. But it’s working on both, and has data to point it in the direction of obtaining both.

The window in which we can deal with a non-nuclear, non-ICBM North Korea is probably very short, probably less than a year and no more than 18 months. The US has cards to play, including the Japan card, now the South Korea card and even the Taiwan card in convincing China that it is in its interests to deal with Kim Jong-Il. Since North Korea has shown its hand and how it intends to behave, the US is in a stronger position now than it was in yesterday to get serious international action mustered against Pyongyang. And it may be true now that China may finally see Kim for what he is, which is an uncontrollable menace that sits right on China’s border. With the Chinese ambition to be seen as a real world leader, and with the Olympics coming to Beijing in 2008 and with Taiwan possibly slipping away for good if North Korea isn’t dealt with, China may finally be ready to work its hand. We’ll find out shortly.

As for Japan, it will re-arm. I don’t see any logic that leads anywhere but Japan becoming a world power again. It won’t take them long to get back to that position once they decide to do it.

But that’s enough of the serious talk. Forget that North Korean dud for a few minutes and check out some Japanese fireworks. No duds in this batch.

What’s Keith Olberman got to do with this? Spittle-flecked ranter, frothing at the mouth pseudojournalist who should have stuck to sports, a hero only to the nutroots and a man who’s not exactly building up a TV audience–Olberman is apparently not just a dud in the ratings.

He may find himself as ronery as Lil Kim.

(h/t to Ian for that last link)

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I agree with your analysis lock, stock, and barrel.

Except for the part about Olbermann’s sexual performance. I don’t even want to think about that.

Hard to imagine him being self-centered and boorish though. I thought that was just his on air schtick.

/sarcasm off

Christoph on October 9, 2006 at 11:52 PM

Meaning…do we go back to Foley? uhhhh

Ropera on October 9, 2006 at 11:53 PM

Lil Kim a possible dud, I mean his latest test.

Japanese fireworks, definitely not duds.

Olbermann, possibly a “dud in bed”. The lady should rename her blog from forthisreliefmuchthanks.blogspot.com to forthisreliefmanythanks.blogspot.com, as he says “many thanks” often, very often.

Entelechy on October 10, 2006 at 12:11 AM

We should only refer to him as lbermann from now on. Apparently, he can’t produce the “O.”

Bob Owens on October 10, 2006 at 12:15 AM

It depends. Someone would have to FedEx them over, or they might take out Fiji.

Bob Owens on October 10, 2006 at 12:28 AM

Did you click the link, Bob?

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 12:29 AM

I’ve seen a lot of people who look at an offensively armed and capable Japan as an unwelcome consequence of North Korea’s nuclear achievements. Even as a sign of a cooling relations with the U.S. But if they’re allies of ours, at least for the moment, doesn’t it make us stronger to have allies that are strong?

It almost certainly doesn’t pay to have allies that tie down our military resources to see to their territorial integrity.

Mark V. on October 10, 2006 at 1:03 AM

NoKo’s will to defy should have also awakened South Korea and killed off its misguided “Sunshine” policy for good.

Many leftists in SK are actually rooting for NK to get nukes. They have been so brainwashed in the public schools and universities about the “one country-one race,” they are positive that NK would never use nukes on fellow Koreans. I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung’s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans). The comment caused uproar among the conservatives in South Korea. The liberals, though, in Roh’s government (Roh having won on his anti-American credentials) will continue the “sunshine policy.” It will only be a couple of days before Roh’s government complains about sanctions possibly being imposed on NK.

januarius on October 10, 2006 at 9:45 AM

I wonder if North Korean missiles can hit the U.S?

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 12:20 AM

It is possible, assuming their missiles actually work.

See Michelle Malkins blog post yesterday. She posted a map showing missle ranges.

Try this link:
http://www.michellemalkin.com/mt/oct05-tb.cgi/5419

Lawrence on October 10, 2006 at 9:58 AM

Lawrence, duh, click the link.

Seriously, I appreciate you quoting me… but the link was the point of my post!

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 10:01 AM

I still recall (I believe it was 2002) some member in Kim Dae Jung’s cabinet stated that they were not concerned too much about NK getting nukes because SK would not be the target (the implication being that it was OK for NK to have nukes because Japan and the US were the targets not fellow Koreans).

januarius on October 10, 2006 at 9:45 AM

Actually, this is mostly true.

And the reasoning is not that complicated.

Lil Kim doesn’t want to obliterate SK, he wants to capture and use the wealth of SK. SK is worth nothing to him if he radiates it with his nukes.

Furthermore, NK could easily invade and capture SK without nukes. What stands in his way is Japan and U.S. If he can range Japan and U.S. with Nukes, he hopes to persuade us to pull our noses out of his business in Korea.

The thing missing in Lil Kim’s plans is that the U.S. has played this cold war game before. And he seems obivious to the fact that we won.

Lawrence on October 10, 2006 at 10:05 AM

Lawrence, duh, click the link.

Christoph on October 10, 2006 at 10:01 AM

I know, what you post is an important piece of the puzzle.

My point is that Alaska is small potatoes compared to Tokyo, Honolulu, L.A., Seattle, San Fran, etc.

Lawrence on October 10, 2006 at 10:10 AM

KEITH GETS LOW RATINGS IN BED

“Mister Bush” could not be reached for comment.

carlitos on October 10, 2006 at 10:48 AM

Why are we waiting (begging?) for the U.N. to like us so we can do what we need to do? Just do it! Take out the nuke sites in NK (and Iran)! Do you really think NK is producing electricity with their nuke sites?!?!

Do you?

SouthernGent on October 10, 2006 at 11:29 AM

As for Japan, it will re-arm. I don’t see any logic that leads anywhere but Japan becoming a world power again. It won’t take them long to get back to that position once they decide to do it.

But that’s enough of the serious talk. Forget that North Korean dud for a few minutes and check out some Japanese fireworks. No duds in this batch.

This is a great illustration of the price of anti-Americanism for its own sake. One of China’s nightmares is a re-armed Japan, and in particular, a nuclear armed Japan. Yet by playing the North Korea card they way they have, with the obvious objective of spiting the U.S., they have all but guaranteed the re-armed Japan that they don’t want.

Guess that plan backfired, didn’t it?

thirteen28 on October 10, 2006 at 1:18 PM

The long-standing agreement with the U.S. which prevents the Japanese from having more than a self-defense force level of military has been obsolete for quite a while now.

We could virtually wipe out our Chinese trade deficit by selling Japan all the toys it needs to help us be the world’s policemen. Talk about killing two birds with one stone! (Apologies to Bill Maher)

While we’re at it we need to quit playing footsie and tell the world we are 100% behind Taiwan in their desire for unfettered independence. Politics is the art of the compromise, but we haven’t been artistic about it in decades, while our enemies use that fact to hamstring us on every issue.

The USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is affectionately called “The Big Stick“, in rememberance of Teddy R’s foreign policy statement, “Speak softly, but carry a big stick!” We’ve been speaking loudly, and speaking louder, and speaking often, and shaking our finger madly when it comes to North Korea, and it’s about time to limber up that stick.

Freelancer on October 10, 2006 at 2:29 PM