<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outrage mounts over Scalia tequila comment; no one quite sure why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:00:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time wonders: Isn&#8217;t Mitt&#8217;s reference to &#8220;Who Let The Dogs Out&#8221; a &#8220;macaca moment&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-900672</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time wonders: Isn&#8217;t Mitt&#8217;s reference to &#8220;Who Let The Dogs Out&#8221; a &#8220;macaca moment&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-900672</guid>
		<description>[...] had all been made. So she&#8217;s trying again. Only the oldest of old-school HA readers will remember this post but the three requirements are all met here: We&#8217;ve got a conservative making an assumption [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had all been made. So she&#8217;s trying again. Only the oldest of old-school HA readers will remember this post but the three requirements are all met here: We&#8217;ve got a conservative making an assumption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 14y old girl blowjob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-502205</link>
		<dc:creator>14y old girl blowjob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-502205</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;14y old girl blowjob...&lt;/strong&gt;

14y old girl blowjob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>14y old girl blowjob&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>14y old girl blowjob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gay redneck blowjobs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-502021</link>
		<dc:creator>gay redneck blowjobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-502021</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;gay redneck blowjobs...&lt;/strong&gt;

gay redneck blowjobs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>gay redneck blowjobs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>gay redneck blowjobs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gay guys big cocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-501386</link>
		<dc:creator>gay guys big cocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-501386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;gay guys big cocks...&lt;/strong&gt;

gay guys big cocks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>gay guys big cocks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>gay guys big cocks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traction Control &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Summaries: Border Security</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-67633</link>
		<dc:creator>Traction Control &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Summaries: Border Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-67633</guid>
		<description>[...] Outrage Mounts over Scalia Tequila Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outrage Mounts over Scalia Tequila Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaltes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-66271</link>
		<dc:creator>kaltes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-66271</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I find it funny that some guy/gal on the internet doesn’t realize Honora is a woman’s name. Gee, get out a little.&lt;/blockquote&gt; I have never in my life heard the name honora. This is not a result of my being ignorant, of my not &quot;getting out a little&quot;, it is the result of honora being an extremely obscure name, not even found among 0.001% of the US population. Check for yourself:
http://www.census.gov/genealogy/www/namesearch.html

I&#039;d wager that far more people know what &quot;kaltes&quot; is, than &quot;honora&quot;, since at least kaltes is a common word in a languauge spoken by over 100 million people in the western world, but I wouldn&#039;t get my panties in a bunch because someone didn&#039;t know what it meant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I find it funny that some guy/gal on the internet doesn’t realize Honora is a woman’s name. Gee, get out a little.</p></blockquote>
<p> I have never in my life heard the name honora. This is not a result of my being ignorant, of my not &#8220;getting out a little&#8221;, it is the result of honora being an extremely obscure name, not even found among 0.001% of the US population. Check for yourself:<br />
<a href="http://www.census.gov/genealogy/www/namesearch.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/genealogy/www/namesearch.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d wager that far more people know what &#8220;kaltes&#8221; is, than &#8220;honora&#8221;, since at least kaltes is a common word in a languauge spoken by over 100 million people in the western world, but I wouldn&#8217;t get my panties in a bunch because someone didn&#8217;t know what it meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTWR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-66023</link>
		<dc:creator>NTWR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-66023</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, where does the worm come in to play here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, where does the worm come in to play here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65995</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65995</guid>
		<description>Scalia did nothing stupid, nothing wrong; 

It is just more of the moonbat smear tactics....that if one throws enough mud some of it is bound to stick. It need not be true, after all they only care about the result, any means is acceptable. Intellectual discourse or debate is beyond them, thus their only recourse is to attack those that stand in their way.

I suggest treating them like the scum they are, apply bleach and disinfectant and return them to the evolutionary cesspool from which they crawled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scalia did nothing stupid, nothing wrong; </p>
<p>It is just more of the moonbat smear tactics&#8230;.that if one throws enough mud some of it is bound to stick. It need not be true, after all they only care about the result, any means is acceptable. Intellectual discourse or debate is beyond them, thus their only recourse is to attack those that stand in their way.</p>
<p>I suggest treating them like the scum they are, apply bleach and disinfectant and return them to the evolutionary cesspool from which they crawled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65915</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65915</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I also find it funny that some guy in internet comments is calling one of the most intelligent men in this country “stupid”. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I find it funny that some guy/gal on the internet doesn&#039;t realize Honora is a woman&#039;s name.  Gee, get out a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I also find it funny that some guy in internet comments is calling one of the most intelligent men in this country “stupid”. </p></blockquote>
<p>I find it funny that some guy/gal on the internet doesn&#8217;t realize Honora is a woman&#8217;s name.  Gee, get out a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65913</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65913</guid>
		<description>Intelligent people do stupid things all the time.  This is news??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent people do stupid things all the time.  This is news??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaltes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65901</link>
		<dc:creator>kaltes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65901</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are a SCOTUS justice. You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS. Right or wrong, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues. This remark gets press, as you could have predicted.

I stand by my statement. Being innocent and being stupid are not mutually exclusive. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Scalia, as you pointed out, is a SCOTUS justice, and as such he ought to be dedicating his considerable mental resources to the cases put before him. It does not make the man &quot;stupid&quot; merely because he does not choose to dedicate a portion of his conscious thought to carefully tip-toeing around anything that might remotely enter the realm of possible manipulation and exploitation by the press. If Scalia did do that, he wouldn&#039;t be able to do his job. You know who DID carefully tip-toe? Harriet Myers. All that indicated to me was that she was spineless and afraid of what people thought of her, which means she would end up voting with the liberals for fear of exactly this kind of ridiculous criticism.

I also find it funny that some guy in internet comments is calling one of the most intelligent men in this country &quot;stupid&quot;. Now, I happen to think the 4 liberals on the USSC are wrong-headed, but I don&#039;t think Id be capable of rising to the level of glass-house arrogance necessary to call them &quot;stupid&quot;.

Lastly, no I do not think that this comment would have been predicted to get press at the time he said it. Even if it was, the right thing to do was to say it and expose the ridiculous bottom-feeding of the press, rather than censor himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are a SCOTUS justice. You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS. Right or wrong, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues. This remark gets press, as you could have predicted.</p>
<p>I stand by my statement. Being innocent and being stupid are not mutually exclusive. </p></blockquote>
<p>Scalia, as you pointed out, is a SCOTUS justice, and as such he ought to be dedicating his considerable mental resources to the cases put before him. It does not make the man &#8220;stupid&#8221; merely because he does not choose to dedicate a portion of his conscious thought to carefully tip-toeing around anything that might remotely enter the realm of possible manipulation and exploitation by the press. If Scalia did do that, he wouldn&#8217;t be able to do his job. You know who DID carefully tip-toe? Harriet Myers. All that indicated to me was that she was spineless and afraid of what people thought of her, which means she would end up voting with the liberals for fear of exactly this kind of ridiculous criticism.</p>
<p>I also find it funny that some guy in internet comments is calling one of the most intelligent men in this country &#8220;stupid&#8221;. Now, I happen to think the 4 liberals on the USSC are wrong-headed, but I don&#8217;t think Id be capable of rising to the level of glass-house arrogance necessary to call them &#8220;stupid&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lastly, no I do not think that this comment would have been predicted to get press at the time he said it. Even if it was, the right thing to do was to say it and expose the ridiculous bottom-feeding of the press, rather than censor himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65898</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65898</guid>
		<description>Allah, &lt;blockquote&gt;But the point is, we should never assume.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unless we&#039;re assuming that a conservative is racist. In that case, carry on. 

honora, &lt;blockquote&gt;You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS. &lt;strong&gt;Right or wrong&lt;/strong&gt;, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And when it&#039;s wrong, we should correct the wrong perception and prevent future occurances instead of attacking a person for making a perfectly valid remark. 

You&#039;re right, honora. He&#039;s a Supreme Court Justice. Which means his job is to review and decided important legal cases, not to scour his every utterance to insure that nothing could possibly be construed as offensive by the left wing and their bedwetting media friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah,<br />
<blockquote>But the point is, we should never assume.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless we&#8217;re assuming that a conservative is racist. In that case, carry on. </p>
<p>honora,<br />
<blockquote>You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS. <strong>Right or wrong</strong>, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>And when it&#8217;s wrong, we should correct the wrong perception and prevent future occurances instead of attacking a person for making a perfectly valid remark. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, honora. He&#8217;s a Supreme Court Justice. Which means his job is to review and decided important legal cases, not to scour his every utterance to insure that nothing could possibly be construed as offensive by the left wing and their bedwetting media friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65814</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65814</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He shouldn’t use the word “niggardly” either, then. Morons might get confused!

Please. Let’s not blame Scalia for the media’ bottom-feeding. 

Allahpundit on October 5, 2006 at 10:44 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are a SCOTUS justice.  You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS.  Right or wrong, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues.  This remark gets press, as you could have predicted.

I stand by my statement.  Being innocent and being stupid are not mutually exclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He shouldn’t use the word “niggardly” either, then. Morons might get confused!</p>
<p>Please. Let’s not blame Scalia for the media’ bottom-feeding. </p>
<p>Allahpundit on October 5, 2006 at 10:44 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You are a SCOTUS justice.  You are the intellectual bulwark of the right wing of the SCOTUS.  Right or wrong, there is a perception that the RW is less than open to minority issues.  This remark gets press, as you could have predicted.</p>
<p>I stand by my statement.  Being innocent and being stupid are not mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65804</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65804</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not a matter of being racist or insensitive. It’s a matter of being stupid. He couldn’t foresee this? Please, the media lives for this stuff and Scalia should be more savvy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He shouldn&#039;t use the word &quot;niggardly&quot; either, then.  Morons might get confused!

Please.  Let&#039;s not blame Scalia for the media&#039; bottom-feeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s not a matter of being racist or insensitive. It’s a matter of being stupid. He couldn’t foresee this? Please, the media lives for this stuff and Scalia should be more savvy.</p></blockquote>
<p>He shouldn&#8217;t use the word &#8220;niggardly&#8221; either, then.  Morons might get confused!</p>
<p>Please.  Let&#8217;s not blame Scalia for the media&#8217; bottom-feeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65802</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65802</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a matter of being racist or insensitive.  It&#039;s a matter of being stupid.  He couldn&#039;t foresee this?  Please, the media lives for this stuff and Scalia should be more savvy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of being racist or insensitive.  It&#8217;s a matter of being stupid.  He couldn&#8217;t foresee this?  Please, the media lives for this stuff and Scalia should be more savvy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65743</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65743</guid>
		<description>You are all worthless and weak...now drop and give me twenty.  I have been rotflmao since I opened HotAir this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all worthless and weak&#8230;now drop and give me twenty.  I have been rotflmao since I opened HotAir this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apologist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65677</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65677</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hispanic National &lt;strong&gt;Bar&lt;/strong&gt; Association&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nobody? Am I wrong here? Was it too easy?

Whatever. I snickered when I read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hispanic National <strong>Bar</strong> Association</p></blockquote>
<p>Nobody? Am I wrong here? Was it too easy?</p>
<p>Whatever. I snickered when I read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doingwhatican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65655</link>
		<dc:creator>doingwhatican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65655</guid>
		<description>Tequila makes me allergic to my clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tequila makes me allergic to my clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65602</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65602</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You forgot the chupacabra...And maybe one of those masked wrestlers.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
D&#039;oh!  Of course!

Well, come on, those are just &lt;em&gt;understood&lt;/em&gt;.  Goateating monsters are regularly cited in SCOTUS arguments, it&#039;s a tradition that goes back to John Marshall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You forgot the chupacabra&#8230;And maybe one of those masked wrestlers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>D&#8217;oh!  Of course!</p>
<p>Well, come on, those are just <em>understood</em>.  Goateating monsters are regularly cited in SCOTUS arguments, it&#8217;s a tradition that goes back to John Marshall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65575</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65575</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s funny is that if Scalia had asked if the guy would abstain from &quot;Budweiser while in Mexico&quot;, he could have been painted as the &quot;&lt;em&gt;stereotypical arrogant American for not knowing that Mexicans take great pride in their own legendary tequila, and don&#039;t need your stinking American alcohol... how arrogant ARE you to assume that they&#039;re all drinking American beer you dirty gringo?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;.

Or something along those lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s funny is that if Scalia had asked if the guy would abstain from &#8220;Budweiser while in Mexico&#8221;, he could have been painted as the &#8220;<em>stereotypical arrogant American for not knowing that Mexicans take great pride in their own legendary tequila, and don&#8217;t need your stinking American alcohol&#8230; how arrogant ARE you to assume that they&#8217;re all drinking American beer you dirty gringo?</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Or something along those lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65556</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65556</guid>
		<description>Hilarious!  I&#039;m offended that they&#039;re offended... whomever, about whatever.  Outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious!  I&#8217;m offended that they&#8217;re offended&#8230; whomever, about whatever.  Outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean M.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65541</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65541</guid>
		<description>You forgot the &lt;em&gt;chupacabra&lt;/em&gt;, Alex.  There really ought to be a &lt;em&gt;chupacabra&lt;/em&gt; in there somewhere.

And maybe one of those masked wrestlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the <em>chupacabra</em>, Alex.  There really ought to be a <em>chupacabra</em> in there somewhere.</p>
<p>And maybe one of those masked wrestlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65497</guid>
		<description>&quot;And maybe there&#039;s one of those cool Day-of-the-Dead skelletons hanging somewhere.  

&quot;And small children run by kicking a soccer ball and eating chicklets, as a mariachi band grimly sell their instruments to pay for the arms with which they will lead a people&#039;s revolution based out of the ancient Mayan city of Yaxchilan.

&quot;And of course a pinata.  There&#039;s a pinata in there.

&quot;&lt;em&gt;Nobody&lt;/em&gt; thinks your client is doing that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And maybe there&#8217;s one of those cool Day-of-the-Dead skelletons hanging somewhere.  </p>
<p>&#8220;And small children run by kicking a soccer ball and eating chicklets, as a mariachi band grimly sell their instruments to pay for the arms with which they will lead a people&#8217;s revolution based out of the ancient Mayan city of Yaxchilan.</p>
<p>&#8220;And of course a pinata.  There&#8217;s a pinata in there.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Nobody</em> thinks your client is doing that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65493</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65493</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Soft Bites (Bill&#039;s Bites, Page 2)  -- 2006.10.04...&lt;/strong&gt;

Stuff that didn&#039;t quite make Bill&#039;s Bites. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. I&#039;m backdating this post for today only. Beginning tomorrow Soft Bites will carry an early AM timestamp, just prior to Bill&#039;s Bites. Gonna try a little...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soft Bites (Bill&#8217;s Bites, Page 2)  &#8212; 2006.10.04&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Stuff that didn&#8217;t quite make Bill&#8217;s Bites. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. I&#8217;m backdating this post for today only. Beginning tomorrow Soft Bites will carry an early AM timestamp, just prior to Bill&#8217;s Bites. Gonna try a little&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-65492</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/04/outrage-mounts-over-scalia-tequila-comment-no-one-quite-sure-why/#comment-65492</guid>
		<description>I think Scalia should have just said:

&quot;Nobody thinks your client is really, you know, abstaining from Jose Cuervo as he finishes the last of his burrito and leans back, his sombrero nestled over his brow, for a early evening siesta--to prepare for that night&#039;s fiesta, which is well-deserved after a hard-day&#039;s drywalling--ready to dream of the Virgin Mary, as the sun sets over the Aztec ruins that frame the dusty clay pueblo by the glittering white sanded beach on which a coyote howls because he is on supervised release in the United States.  Nobody thinks that.&quot;  

That would have avoided all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Scalia should have just said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nobody thinks your client is really, you know, abstaining from Jose Cuervo as he finishes the last of his burrito and leans back, his sombrero nestled over his brow, for a early evening siesta&#8211;to prepare for that night&#8217;s fiesta, which is well-deserved after a hard-day&#8217;s drywalling&#8211;ready to dream of the Virgin Mary, as the sun sets over the Aztec ruins that frame the dusty clay pueblo by the glittering white sanded beach on which a coyote howls because he is on supervised release in the United States.  Nobody thinks that.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That would have avoided all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
