Aussie Muslim threatens Aussie Muslim who threatened Aussies

posted at 4:12 pm on October 4, 2006 by Allahpundit

Last month he threatened riots over John Howard’s comments that Muslims should do more to assimilate. Now he’s being compared to Salman Rushdie for criticizing Muslims who “blindly” follow their faith.

Steyn has a great passage in his new book about the rings of supporters, apologists, opportunists, and cowards who surround every terrorist incident. It seems what we have here is a little inter-ring friction. Or, if you prefer, one of those underwater food-chain gags you see sometimes in cartoons: a little fish about to be swallowed by a bigger fish, which itself is about to be swallowed by a bigger one.

Here’s what earned him the Rushdie analogy. He’s got his head on straight for the most part, although as Steyn also mentions in his book, even with moderate Muslims there usually comes a moment where they too say something so nutty that you’re left scratching your head and wondering if they can possibly believe it. I’ll leave you to read the full article to find out what that happens to be in Ali’s case:

Dr Ali said the majority of Muslim clerics had for centuries imposed a “literalist” teaching of Islam, telling their followers that deviating from the written message would ultimately lead to their admission into hell.

“The times are changing and with the change of times, you also have to reinterpret the Koran,” he told The Australian…

Dr Ali, who is writing an academic paper entitled “Closing of the Muslim Mind”, said even Mohammed was not the “perfect model” as most Muslims believed. Asked if the prophet had character flaws, he said: “Of course – you must look at him as a human being also.”

And the immediate reply:

Australia’s most senior Islamic cleric has called for a Muslim leader to be ostracised over comments about the prophet Mohammed that he likened to Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses.

Taj Din al-Hilali yesterday accused the chairman of John Howard’s Islamic reference board, Ameer Ali, of selling out his religion to gain the support and financial backing of Muslim critics…

Sheik Hilali, the head of Lakemba Mosque in Sydney’s southwest, said Dr Ali’s “defamatory” remarks were akin to those that in 1989 earned Rushdie a fatwa from Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini.

While Sheik Hilali backed Dr Ali’s call for a reinterpretation of the Koran to fit modern times, he condemned his “dangerous” and “ignorant” comments about the prophet…

“We refuse to have him stand with us at any religious ceremony from now on, unless he revokes what he said about the faith and the prophet.”

Germany’s top cardinal says relations between Catholics and Muslims are “back to square one.” Why? Threats.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The enemy of my enemy is my friend?

SouthernGent on October 4, 2006 at 4:29 PM

Hilali is not your friend.

Allahpundit on October 4, 2006 at 4:31 PM

I think they all have issues

Defector01 on October 4, 2006 at 4:33 PM

Hilali is not your friend.

I know ;-) But the irony is appealing.

SouthernGent on October 4, 2006 at 4:40 PM

This is what we’ve been waiting for- the big fight between “moderates” and fanatics.

It will get interesting. As usual, the Aussies are ahead of the curve.

NTWR on October 4, 2006 at 4:52 PM

They were abused children. Are they trying to out-fundamental each other? A school yard arguement of “I’m more rightous than you!”; “No your not!”; “Yes, I am!”; “No!”…

DAT60A3 on October 4, 2006 at 4:56 PM

From the “Threat” article:

Some accuse him of undoing years of bridge-building by his predecessor. “When John Paul was pope, there was no problem for Muslims,” commented Cemal Usak, a Turkish Muslim activist. “Pope Benedict may not like Islam but he has to respect Muslims.”

No. Nobody has to respect anybody. Respect has to be earned, and why should anyone respect Muslims who–because they are angry that the Pope implied that Islam is a violent religion–burn down churches, threaten to kill the pope, and commit other mindless acts of violence? Violent barbarians who are this dense don’t earn any civilized person’s respect. Why should the Pope have to respect followers of a religion who never take issue with the violent nature of their comrades and who always blame the very victims and targets of Muslim violence?

januarius on October 4, 2006 at 4:58 PM

My God is bigger than your God and he’s gonna kick your ass.

Was this in the Quran?

Kini on October 4, 2006 at 5:14 PM

I am waiting for this and it is going to happen. I hope I live long enough to see the Reformation happen in the Islamic faith. That is the only thing that is going to save them. If they keep raising their children to hate and want to kill more than they want to live and be happy, Islam is doomed.

labwrs on October 4, 2006 at 6:19 PM

If this guy even TRIES to be islam’s Martin Luther, he better pack his bags and move to the U.S. Air Force base with Ayaan Hirsi Ali. They’ll be trying to kill him … in the name of their religeon … the religeon of peace.

Tony737 on October 4, 2006 at 7:50 PM

There can be no ‘Reformation’ in the faith of Islam in the classic sense. I find it quite interesting that people point to the Protestant Reformation when asserting the fact that Islam must/can be reformed. While the Protestant Reformation was initially a return to or a re-focus upon the truths as originally contained in Scripture, asking Muslims to do likewise will not reform their faith, but embolden what they already have (e.g., jihad is principle of their faith). Instead, Islam must experience a revolution where large portions of the Koran must be excised. Friends, that ain’t gonna happen.

BNCurtis on October 5, 2006 at 2:08 PM