<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Were Foley&#8217;s e-mails altered?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzTracker.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-119079</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzTracker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-119079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Featured on BuzzTracker...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Featured on BuzzTracker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passionate America &#187; Foleygate : Mark Foley emails altered</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-79886</link>
		<dc:creator>Passionate America &#187; Foleygate : Mark Foley emails altered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-79886</guid>
		<description>[...] Update #3: Welcome Hot Air readers. I have contacted Allah about some more information that I have that I think needs to be released. Check this post for a hint of what I have and believe needs to be released. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update #3: Welcome Hot Air readers. I have contacted Allah about some more information that I have that I think needs to be released. Check this post for a hint of what I have and believe needs to be released. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passionate America &#187; Foleygate : Mark Foley emails altered</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-79887</link>
		<dc:creator>Passionate America &#187; Foleygate : Mark Foley emails altered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-79887</guid>
		<description>[...] Update #3: Welcome Hot Air readers. I have contacted Allah about some more information that I have that I think needs to be released. Check this post for a hint of what I have and believe needs to be released. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update #3: Welcome Hot Air readers. I have contacted Allah about some more information that I have that I think needs to be released. Check this post for a hint of what I have and believe needs to be released. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggerheads</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-68782</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggerheads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-68782</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Prepare the sick-bags...&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s a lot about the Mark Foley / Congressional page scandal that requires scrutiny and discussion, starting with the initial post on this weblog that led to a series of responses (1, 2, 3) that led to the initial ABC......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Prepare the sick-bags&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot about the Mark Foley / Congressional page scandal that requires scrutiny and discussion, starting with the initial post on this weblog that led to a series of responses (1, 2, 3) that led to the initial ABC&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foley follies: Friday all-purpose thread; Update: Side-by-side document comparison added!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-66990</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foley follies: Friday all-purpose thread; Update: Side-by-side document comparison added!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-66990</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember this post? The discrepancies in the e-mails there were between e-mails posted by CREW and StopSexPredators.com. The fact that ABC&#8217;s version matches CREW&#8217;s exactly would mean that SSP&#8217;s are the anomalous ones, no? Which would in turn, as Strata says, mean that SSP&#8217;s are fakes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember this post? The discrepancies in the e-mails there were between e-mails posted by CREW and StopSexPredators.com. The fact that ABC&#8217;s version matches CREW&#8217;s exactly would mean that SSP&#8217;s are the anomalous ones, no? Which would in turn, as Strata says, mean that SSP&#8217;s are fakes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political Pit Bull</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-65589</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political Pit Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-65589</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;An Act That Shames Us All...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just got back to the computer after watching the season premiere of LOST (which I thought was great, by the way), and saw the dueling Drudge headlines &quot;ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER&quot; and &quot; FEATURED......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>An Act That Shames Us All&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just got back to the computer after watching the season premiere of LOST (which I thought was great, by the way), and saw the dueling Drudge headlines &#8220;ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER&#8221; and &#8221; FEATURED&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63661</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63661</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Foley Scandal Grows...&lt;/strong&gt;

The fallout from the Mark Foley scandal grows in many directions - from the political to the criminal. The Florida GOP has decided upon a replacement for Mark Foley. He&#039;s three-term state legislator Joe Negron. Mark Foley, meanwhile has entered a reh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Foley Scandal Grows&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The fallout from the Mark Foley scandal grows in many directions &#8211; from the political to the criminal. The Florida GOP has decided upon a replacement for Mark Foley. He&#8217;s three-term state legislator Joe Negron. Mark Foley, meanwhile has entered a reh&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LissaKay</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63627</link>
		<dc:creator>LissaKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63627</guid>
		<description>Oh. My. Freakin. Gawd. 

It all makes sense now! It&#039;s just another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knoxviews.com/node/2344&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rovian Plot&lt;/a&gt;(TM) to divert attention from &lt;em&gt;illegal invasions and torture and murder and no-bid sweetheart contracts and the drowning of a Great American City and whatnot&lt;/em&gt;! (Sadly, it really is not parody ... he really means it)

And the bikini pic of Malkin is really, really real too! Because he says it’s real, so it’s real, by golly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. My. Freakin. Gawd. </p>
<p>It all makes sense now! It&#8217;s just another <a href="http://www.knoxviews.com/node/2344" rel="nofollow">Rovian Plot</a>(TM) to divert attention from <em>illegal invasions and torture and murder and no-bid sweetheart contracts and the drowning of a Great American City and whatnot</em>! (Sadly, it really is not parody &#8230; he really means it)</p>
<p>And the bikini pic of Malkin is really, really real too! Because he says it’s real, so it’s real, by golly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63600</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63600</guid>
		<description>I was going to post this, this AM but figured I&#039;d let this slide. After reading through some of the posts I figured I had to say it. I thought Allah might be implying this too: These bums are giving us alcoholics a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to post this, this AM but figured I&#8217;d let this slide. After reading through some of the posts I figured I had to say it. I thought Allah might be implying this too: These bums are giving us alcoholics a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTWR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63480</link>
		<dc:creator>NTWR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63480</guid>
		<description>Oooooh, this is my favorite part of the blogosphere-sleuthing. 

I love watching and reading as conspiracies twist, turn, falter, or flat out implode. 

Something is definetly fishy here. Keep digging Allah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooooh, this is my favorite part of the blogosphere-sleuthing. </p>
<p>I love watching and reading as conspiracies twist, turn, falter, or flat out implode. </p>
<p>Something is definetly fishy here. Keep digging Allah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63476</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63476</guid>
		<description>honora, have you forgotten how Cigarman used the most powerful office in the World to perpetuate his sluts, and nuts defence? Certainly using the power of the White House to demean, and smear &lt;strong&gt;women&lt;/strong&gt; preyed upon by a sexual predator must be a crime. 

Cover-up, lie, and deny have been tools in the liberal arsenal for decades. Conservatives, when in like situations, get rid of the damaged goods as they respect Americas grandest institution. 

Someone will have to explain to me why democrats have no apparent self respect, and are happy to align themselves with sexual predators, Alcoholics, murderers, Klansmen, and other distasteful people just to assure that they stay in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honora, have you forgotten how Cigarman used the most powerful office in the World to perpetuate his sluts, and nuts defence? Certainly using the power of the White House to demean, and smear <strong>women</strong> preyed upon by a sexual predator must be a crime. </p>
<p>Cover-up, lie, and deny have been tools in the liberal arsenal for decades. Conservatives, when in like situations, get rid of the damaged goods as they respect Americas grandest institution. </p>
<p>Someone will have to explain to me why democrats have no apparent self respect, and are happy to align themselves with sexual predators, Alcoholics, murderers, Klansmen, and other distasteful people just to assure that they stay in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63461</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63461</guid>
		<description>(Botched quote)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Botched quote)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63460</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63460</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alcohol: is there anything it can’t do?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Get the Boss into a 2-piece? 

&lt;strong&gt;DPR,&lt;/strong&gt;

I have gone to the edge of eternal banishment here by AP, for echoing the hated Ann C. But no matter how low I go, I can always count on you to find a new bottom, so to say. 

Here&#039;s to the &lt;strong&gt;Dread Pirate Roberts&lt;/strong&gt;, a pirate&#039;s pirate!&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alcohol: is there anything it can’t do?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Get the Boss into a 2-piece? </p>
<p><strong>DPR,</strong></p>
<p>I have gone to the edge of eternal banishment here by AP, for echoing the hated Ann C. But no matter how low I go, I can always count on you to find a new bottom, so to say. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to the <strong>Dread Pirate Roberts</strong>, a pirate&#8217;s pirate!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Asylum Pundits</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63456</link>
		<dc:creator>The Asylum Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63456</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foley Fallout...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Rep. Mark Foley resigned last week amidst a sex scandal that the liberals are only so happy to jump on. Let me state for all of our readers that we at The Asylum condemn Rep. Foley&#039;s lecherous and illegal actions. Resignation is the easy way out, an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foley Fallout&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Rep. Mark Foley resigned last week amidst a sex scandal that the liberals are only so happy to jump on. Let me state for all of our readers that we at The Asylum condemn Rep. Foley&#8217;s lecherous and illegal actions. Resignation is the easy way out, an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: two or three . net</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63451</link>
		<dc:creator>two or three . net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63451</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Foley resigns over email scandal...&lt;/strong&gt;

How do you react to something like this? Former Rep. Mark Foley was cruising to reelection one day and then a child sex predator the next....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rep. Foley resigns over email scandal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How do you react to something like this? Former Rep. Mark Foley was cruising to reelection one day and then a child sex predator the next&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63444</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63444</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Foley Follies...&lt;/strong&gt;

When the news first broke I insisted on taking a wait and see attitude because something just didn&#8217;t seem right about it, and too much info was second hand and unsupported.
Granted the guy resigned, which leads one to assume guilt, but scandal an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Foley Follies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When the news first broke I insisted on taking a wait and see attitude because something just didn&#8217;t seem right about it, and too much info was second hand and unsupported.<br />
Granted the guy resigned, which leads one to assume guilt, but scandal an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63433</link>
		<dc:creator>stm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63433</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone would dispute that Foley is a creep and that he has no place in Congress. Were this story a fabrication he would not have resigned as quickly as he did. But given the ease at which any IM can be altered or outright forged, I don&#039;t take any of this &quot;evidence&quot; at face value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone would dispute that Foley is a creep and that he has no place in Congress. Were this story a fabrication he would not have resigned as quickly as he did. But given the ease at which any IM can be altered or outright forged, I don&#8217;t take any of this &#8220;evidence&#8221; at face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63429</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63429</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What striked me is that this appears to be a well-orchestrated attack against the Republican party by nefarious operatives, &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have no doubt that all this is the work of Rep. Rahm Emanuel.  It is the same kind of attack he orchestrated against Kathleen Wiley when he worked for Clinton.  

As for the email descripencies, the words &quot;fake but accurate&quot; come to mind.  

As for the alleged explicit IMs purporting to be from Foley to one of the pages, I&#039;ll believe that they are real or from Foley when the FBI authenticates them, and not before.

And if these IMs are real, &lt;strong&gt;WHAT DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW AND WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT?&lt;/strong&gt;  If she, or Emanuel, knew anything about a pedophilic relationship between Foley and an underage page, they should be prosecuted as accessories after the fact for not informing law enforcement.

Their silence for partisan political purposes means that they could have prevented sexual molestation -- but refused to do it.

If I were Hastert or Boehner, I&#039;d be making this point in a press conference right about now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What striked me is that this appears to be a well-orchestrated attack against the Republican party by nefarious operatives, </p></blockquote>
<p>I have no doubt that all this is the work of Rep. Rahm Emanuel.  It is the same kind of attack he orchestrated against Kathleen Wiley when he worked for Clinton.  </p>
<p>As for the email descripencies, the words &#8220;fake but accurate&#8221; come to mind.  </p>
<p>As for the alleged explicit IMs purporting to be from Foley to one of the pages, I&#8217;ll believe that they are real or from Foley when the FBI authenticates them, and not before.</p>
<p>And if these IMs are real, <strong>WHAT DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW AND WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT?</strong>  If she, or Emanuel, knew anything about a pedophilic relationship between Foley and an underage page, they should be prosecuted as accessories after the fact for not informing law enforcement.</p>
<p>Their silence for partisan political purposes means that they could have prevented sexual molestation &#8212; but refused to do it.</p>
<p>If I were Hastert or Boehner, I&#8217;d be making this point in a press conference right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perchant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63428</link>
		<dc:creator>Perchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63428</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The big surprise here is that sex is supposed to be the Democrats’ sin of choice. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Anyone can call themselves a &quot;Republican&quot; and get elected as one.  Even you or Rosie O&#039;Donnell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The big surprise here is that sex is supposed to be the Democrats’ sin of choice. </p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone can call themselves a &#8220;Republican&#8221; and get elected as one.  Even you or Rosie O&#8217;Donnell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Fun Power Hour</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63417</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Fun Power Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63417</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dem hypocrisy (gasp!) in Mark Foley case....&lt;/strong&gt;

Monday UPDATE: Allah and Tom have raised some questions about the discrepencies that appear in the emails circulated by the various MSM outlets. Yeah, Foley is still a creep, but what kind of hit job is it that took the pedo out?

**

UPDATE: The s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dem hypocrisy (gasp!) in Mark Foley case&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Monday UPDATE: Allah and Tom have raised some questions about the discrepencies that appear in the emails circulated by the various MSM outlets. Yeah, Foley is still a creep, but what kind of hit job is it that took the pedo out?</p>
<p>**</p>
<p>UPDATE: The s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RationalLady</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63410</link>
		<dc:creator>RationalLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63410</guid>
		<description>Foley has showed massively poor judgment, and rates very high on my &#039;creeped out&#039; meter. However, since the age of consent in DC is 16 (yes, 16), and since we do not even know who these emails (assuming they are legitimate and unaltered--never a good assumption when something smells this badly this soon involving Dems) were to, much less how old the recipient(s) were, it is premature at best to put him in the hoosegow. Let&#039;s face it, it&#039;s not likely that these people were there &lt;strong&gt;under&lt;/strong&gt; the age of 16 (though not impossible).

RL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foley has showed massively poor judgment, and rates very high on my &#8216;creeped out&#8217; meter. However, since the age of consent in DC is 16 (yes, 16), and since we do not even know who these emails (assuming they are legitimate and unaltered&#8211;never a good assumption when something smells this badly this soon involving Dems) were to, much less how old the recipient(s) were, it is premature at best to put him in the hoosegow. Let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s not likely that these people were there <strong>under</strong> the age of 16 (though not impossible).</p>
<p>RL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63397</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63397</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Shameful Democratic Hypocrisy Regarding Foley Situation...&lt;/strong&gt;

*UPDATE 10/2 1:42 - It appears that some of the Foley emails have been altered. Follow this developing twist at Passionate America, HotAir, LGF, and Flopping Aces. First of all, Foley is a sicko and I would be outraged had......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shameful Democratic Hypocrisy Regarding Foley Situation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>*UPDATE 10/2 1:42 &#8211; It appears that some of the Foley emails have been altered. Follow this developing twist at Passionate America, HotAir, LGF, and Flopping Aces. First of all, Foley is a sicko and I would be outraged had&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Gal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63365</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63365</guid>
		<description>I can make anybody pretty
I can make you believe any lie
I can make you pick a fight 
With somebody twice your size

I been known to cause a few break ups
I been known to cause a few births
I can make you new friends 
Or get you fired from Work

[1st Chorus]
And since the day I left Milwaukee 
Lynchburg and Bordeaux France
Been making the bars lots of big money
And helping white people dance
I got you in trouble in high school
But college, now that was a ball
You had some of the best times 
You&#039;ll never remember with me
Alcohol
Alcohol

I got blamed at your wedding reception
For your best man&#039;s embarrassing speech
And also for those
Naked pictures of you at the beach

I&#039;ve influenced kings and world leaders
I helped Hemmingway write like he did
And I&#039;ll bet you a drink or two that I can make you
Put that lampshade on your head

[2nd Chorus]
&#039;Cause since the day I left Milwaukee 
Lynchburg and Bordeaux France
Been making a fool out of folks just like you
And helping white people dance
I&#039;m medicine and I am poison 
I can help you up or make you fall
You had some of the best times 
You&#039;ll never remember with me
Alcohol
Alcohol

[Repeat 1st Chorus]

&quot;Alcohol&quot; by BRAD PAISLEY 

Sorry couldn’t resist … ; )

Seriously though. No doubt Foley is guilty of something or as you point out, he’d be fighting tooth and nail. And I’m not defending anyone, I’m just trying to understand the legal technicalities because the Democrats are spinning this as the Republicans choosing to protect their seat for FIVE years instead of protecting the Pages. So I have a question that I don’t seem to be able to find an answer too. 

Were the emails that have been circulated sent to the Page(s) while they were employed as Pages? And those are the emails that Foley was warned to cease? Which from my understanding would mean they were high schoolers. And the instant messages that are said to be more illicit were between Foley and FORMER Page(s) and therefore they were no longer high schoolers and most likely over the age of 18? 

Also, I’ve not heard anything about the other side of the conversation in the instant messages. I find it hard to believe that Foley entered into a one-way conversation about masturbation and such things on an instant message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can make anybody pretty<br />
I can make you believe any lie<br />
I can make you pick a fight<br />
With somebody twice your size</p>
<p>I been known to cause a few break ups<br />
I been known to cause a few births<br />
I can make you new friends<br />
Or get you fired from Work</p>
<p>[1st Chorus]<br />
And since the day I left Milwaukee<br />
Lynchburg and Bordeaux France<br />
Been making the bars lots of big money<br />
And helping white people dance<br />
I got you in trouble in high school<br />
But college, now that was a ball<br />
You had some of the best times<br />
You&#8217;ll never remember with me<br />
Alcohol<br />
Alcohol</p>
<p>I got blamed at your wedding reception<br />
For your best man&#8217;s embarrassing speech<br />
And also for those<br />
Naked pictures of you at the beach</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve influenced kings and world leaders<br />
I helped Hemmingway write like he did<br />
And I&#8217;ll bet you a drink or two that I can make you<br />
Put that lampshade on your head</p>
<p>[2nd Chorus]<br />
&#8216;Cause since the day I left Milwaukee<br />
Lynchburg and Bordeaux France<br />
Been making a fool out of folks just like you<br />
And helping white people dance<br />
I&#8217;m medicine and I am poison<br />
I can help you up or make you fall<br />
You had some of the best times<br />
You&#8217;ll never remember with me<br />
Alcohol<br />
Alcohol</p>
<p>[Repeat 1st Chorus]</p>
<p>&#8220;Alcohol&#8221; by BRAD PAISLEY </p>
<p>Sorry couldn’t resist … ; )</p>
<p>Seriously though. No doubt Foley is guilty of something or as you point out, he’d be fighting tooth and nail. And I’m not defending anyone, I’m just trying to understand the legal technicalities because the Democrats are spinning this as the Republicans choosing to protect their seat for FIVE years instead of protecting the Pages. So I have a question that I don’t seem to be able to find an answer too. </p>
<p>Were the emails that have been circulated sent to the Page(s) while they were employed as Pages? And those are the emails that Foley was warned to cease? Which from my understanding would mean they were high schoolers. And the instant messages that are said to be more illicit were between Foley and FORMER Page(s) and therefore they were no longer high schoolers and most likely over the age of 18? </p>
<p>Also, I’ve not heard anything about the other side of the conversation in the instant messages. I find it hard to believe that Foley entered into a one-way conversation about masturbation and such things on an instant message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63364</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63364</guid>
		<description>Based on how quickly Foley resigned after the ABC revelations is that there is a whole lot more of this coming.  What&#039;s so unsettling about this is that from all accounts this guy was an exceptionally fine man in all other respects.  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on how quickly Foley resigned after the ABC revelations is that there is a whole lot more of this coming.  What&#8217;s so unsettling about this is that from all accounts this guy was an exceptionally fine man in all other respects.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/comment-page-1/#comment-63347</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/02/were-foleys-e-mails-altered/#comment-63347</guid>
		<description>Creepy??? yes.... illegal??? whole nother kettle of fish.

It seems that the Instant messeges, which are the truly daming ones, are from an unamed source.. and in fact have been altered before release to change the name of the recipient... doesn&#039;t quite rise to the level of legal evidence, and, if the recipient was over 18, as it sounds to me from a quick read, there is nothing illegal about it...

Creepy, weird??? Yes... illegal??? uh... no...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creepy??? yes&#8230;. illegal??? whole nother kettle of fish.</p>
<p>It seems that the Instant messeges, which are the truly daming ones, are from an unamed source.. and in fact have been altered before release to change the name of the recipient&#8230; doesn&#8217;t quite rise to the level of legal evidence, and, if the recipient was over 18, as it sounds to me from a quick read, there is nothing illegal about it&#8230;</p>
<p>Creepy, weird??? Yes&#8230; illegal??? uh&#8230; no&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
