Video: Hastert wants to know who had the Foley IMs; Update: Capito says she wasn’t told of e-mails
posted at 2:52 pm on October 2, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
He says the House leadership didn’t know about the sexually explicit instant messages ABC published Friday.
But someone out there did. Someone gave them to ABC. He’s asked the DOJ to find out who that was — and how long they knew about it and said nothing. Can’t wait.
FYI, the clip has been edited slightly and includes some brief comments at the end by Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL), the head of the Congressional page program.
Update: Ace thinks Hastert requesting a DOJ investigation is evidence that he’s telling the truth. After all, why double down on a bad bet? Answer, maybe: because he had no choice politically.
Update: Mary K makes an excellent point:
Figuring out where the IMs came from, who had them, and who held them until five weeks before an election will largely be an exercise for conservative bloggers and will be largely ignored by everyone else. I guess there’s always the chance that a DOJ investigation could bring some interesting things to light, but that will likely be way too late to change the original “Hastert knew” storyline. I mean, how fast does the DOJ move on something like this?
Update: Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), who’s a member of the House page board, says she wasn’t told last year about the e-mails from Foley to a former page requesting a picture of him and that she would have been alarmed if she’d seen them. That could suggest a cover up, i.e., the GOP leadership was playing it so close to the vest that even their own people didn’t know. Or it could suggest no cover up, i.e., Shimkus thought something as innocuous as a picture request wasn’t worth the attention of the whole board and simply decided to have a word with Foley about it.
FYI, Florida state assemblyman Joe Negron will serve out the rest of Foley’s term.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Foley is still dead meat but I am glad the Republicans are throwing this back at the people responsible for manipulating this incident for maximum political carnage,.
bbz123 on October 2, 2006 at 3:20 PM
i’m willing to bet that either it came from one of Pelosi’s people or Harry Reid’s people
Starblazer on October 2, 2006 at 3:34 PM
Libby
RightWinged on October 2, 2006 at 4:04 PM
Exactly. With just those emails, what was he supposed to do? Who was he supposed to tell and what was he supposed to tell them?
But next time, let’s just waterboard any Congresspeople suspected of anything right up front. Just to be sure, and to be fair! I think it’s the tolerant, multicultural thing to do, really.
Pablo on October 2, 2006 at 4:05 PM
It’d be really funny if Brian Ross gets thrown in the pen for protecting his “sources”. Ah irony.
Iblis on October 2, 2006 at 4:05 PM
Mary K is right – it is in no other group’s interest to help bring the truth to light, ahead of the election. It is also unlikely, as mentioned before, that the DoJ will resolve this quick enough. So, where does one begin? This could be very big for the RW bloggers, and MSM-sinking-some-more…
Here another tidbit on hypocrisy…Presidential pardon of convicted Congressman on sex with underaged campaign volunteer…
Entelechy on October 2, 2006 at 4:42 PM
The indignation from the Left is amusing at best on this issue considering their track record.
SouthernGent on October 2, 2006 at 4:48 PM
The e-mail debacle is bad, but it appears to me that no laws were broken, and no physical contact occured. Am I wrong?
This could be another case of liberals shooting blanks. At least I hope it is.
DannoJyd on October 2, 2006 at 5:17 PM
Mr. Hastert claims to not have seen the lurid exchange, rather only the not-so-lurid one…
Entelechy on October 2, 2006 at 7:05 PM
The democrats’ strategy…
Entelechy on October 2, 2006 at 8:44 PM
Bob Beckel just said on H & C that he hopes dems don’t use this as a ‘moral outrage’ as they don’t have a good record on it…but Colmes is ranting against conservative leadership, bla, bla, bla, as if they are all pervs.
Then comes a commercial “President Bush stop the genocide in Darfur now” – how about “U.N. stop the gonocide now”.
Take me to another planet.
Entelechy on October 2, 2006 at 9:20 PM
When You Have No Ideas or Plans, you have to pull these tricks to confuse and baffle the voters as to has the best interest of the country at heart.
LewWaters on October 3, 2006 at 1:13 AM
If the Republicans were smart they’d condemn Foley for having “classic Democrat tendencies”.
Perchant on October 3, 2006 at 1:30 AM
Comment pages: