<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wonkette smears Michelle again; Update: Gawker piles on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzTracker.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101520</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzTracker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-101520</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Featured on BuzzTracker...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Featured on BuzzTracker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62812</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62812</guid>
		<description>Wankette is in dire need of hip waders as she continues to work in the liberal filth pool that they call ambrosia, but stinks like camel caca.

Perhaps they never had their &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/liberals-document-pest-sufferers-reaction-to-bush-winning-in-04/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PEST&lt;/a&gt; treated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wankette is in dire need of hip waders as she continues to work in the liberal filth pool that they call ambrosia, but stinks like camel caca.</p>
<p>Perhaps they never had their <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/liberals-document-pest-sufferers-reaction-to-bush-winning-in-04/" rel="nofollow">PEST</a> treated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62670</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62670</guid>
		<description>Pablo, le perdono :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo, le perdono :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurius Ligustinus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62646</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurius Ligustinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62646</guid>
		<description>Had to say that when I checked Michelle&#039;s blog at 5:00 this morning my eyes went from half-open to wide open in a fraction of a second - without the aid of my morning coffee.

And for a similar fraction of a second - before I even began looking for evidence of Photoshopping - I thought to myself, &quot;Whoa!  This is too good to be true!&quot;  And then I realized it &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt;.  I mean, anyone who has paid attention to Michelle for any length of time knows that she&#039;d never post an image of herself like that, even if one existed and despite the fact that *some* of us really wouldn&#039;t mind ... ahem.

If that is her head morphed onto that body, though, all I can say is, what a captivating smile.  That said, I hope she sues the bastards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had to say that when I checked Michelle&#8217;s blog at 5:00 this morning my eyes went from half-open to wide open in a fraction of a second &#8211; without the aid of my morning coffee.</p>
<p>And for a similar fraction of a second &#8211; before I even began looking for evidence of Photoshopping &#8211; I thought to myself, &#8220;Whoa!  This is too good to be true!&#8221;  And then I realized it <em>was</em>.  I mean, anyone who has paid attention to Michelle for any length of time knows that she&#8217;d never post an image of herself like that, even if one existed and despite the fact that *some* of us really wouldn&#8217;t mind &#8230; ahem.</p>
<p>If that is her head morphed onto that body, though, all I can say is, what a captivating smile.  That said, I hope she sues the bastards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62639</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62639</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pablo, you and I are getting a ‘divorce’ my friend :) The bikini picture, sin head, could be me (when I was a bit younger), so long as the skin would be darker from lots of sun, the hair dark blond and long, the eyes dark brown, and the bikini yellow-orange. Never mind the ’rounded’ middle. Spagetti-skinni is not ideal. So long as one is still slim!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, hey! It&#039;s no knock on the rest of whatever young lady that is...just pointing out that it there&#039;s considerably more to her than MM walks around with. Everything appears to be in it&#039;s proper place, and I&#039;m sure she&#039;s quite lovely with her own head. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pablo, you and I are getting a ‘divorce’ my friend :) The bikini picture, sin head, could be me (when I was a bit younger), so long as the skin would be darker from lots of sun, the hair dark blond and long, the eyes dark brown, and the bikini yellow-orange. Never mind the ’rounded’ middle. Spagetti-skinni is not ideal. So long as one is still slim!</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, hey! It&#8217;s no knock on the rest of whatever young lady that is&#8230;just pointing out that it there&#8217;s considerably more to her than MM walks around with. Everything appears to be in it&#8217;s proper place, and I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s quite lovely with her own head. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62631</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michelle Malkin: Shamelessly Hypocritical Peddler of Two-Piece, Photoshopped Swim-Smut...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#039;s the playbook.
Throw up a questionable/obviously Photoshopped picture of an allegedly bikini-clad female, conservative pundit.
Put the picture up the same week she writes a column mourning the lost modesty of a formerly admirable teen idol.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michelle Malkin: Shamelessly Hypocritical Peddler of Two-Piece, Photoshopped Swim-Smut&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the playbook.<br />
Throw up a questionable/obviously Photoshopped picture of an allegedly bikini-clad female, conservative pundit.<br />
Put the picture up the same week she writes a column mourning the lost modesty of a formerly admirable teen idol&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConserv</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62595</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62595</guid>
		<description>This is another case of Liberals treating a woman.....the way Liberals treat women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another case of Liberals treating a woman&#8230;..the way Liberals treat women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62566</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62566</guid>
		<description>One last thought.  The left has pretensions to leadership and believes that we should elect them to lead.  This prank illustrates concisely why we shouldn&#039;t:

(1) They lack the maturity.

(2) As evidenced by the primitive photoshoping, they also lack the competence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last thought.  The left has pretensions to leadership and believes that we should elect them to lead.  This prank illustrates concisely why we shouldn&#8217;t:</p>
<p>(1) They lack the maturity.</p>
<p>(2) As evidenced by the primitive photoshoping, they also lack the competence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62549</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62549</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Stooping to their level would be amusing, but ultimately pointless. You can’t beat a monkey in a poo-flinging contest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Right.  As Dilbert said, &quot;Never argue with an idiot.  They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Stooping to their level would be amusing, but ultimately pointless. You can’t beat a monkey in a poo-flinging contest.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right.  As Dilbert said, &#8220;Never argue with an idiot.  They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62503</link>
		<dc:creator>redwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62503</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad enough that Wonkette had to smear the first smear, but to have Gawker amplify the smear leads me to the following boycott:  I&#039;m an avid reader of Gizmodo, Jalopnik, and Lifehacker blogs, all owned (among others) by Gawker.  I can&#039;t imagine it&#039;ll make much difference, but on principle I&#039;m removing them from my rss reader account.  I hope others are with me.

*whimper*... at least I still have Engadget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough that Wonkette had to smear the first smear, but to have Gawker amplify the smear leads me to the following boycott:  I&#8217;m an avid reader of Gizmodo, Jalopnik, and Lifehacker blogs, all owned (among others) by Gawker.  I can&#8217;t imagine it&#8217;ll make much difference, but on principle I&#8217;m removing them from my rss reader account.  I hope others are with me.</p>
<p>*whimper*&#8230; at least I still have Engadget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinasour</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62475</link>
		<dc:creator>dinasour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62475</guid>
		<description>DakRoland wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;when will we see a “Conservative Hotties” calendar&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have one in my office right now, and MM is Mrs. September. Really. Alas, no bikini.

It&#039;s from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cblpi.org/index.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DakRoland wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>when will we see a “Conservative Hotties” calendar</p></blockquote>
<p>I have one in my office right now, and MM is Mrs. September. Really. Alas, no bikini.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from the <a href="http://www.cblpi.org/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62386</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Calling out ... uh, Charlotte Church...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ali-Bubba doesn&#039;t mind a little sexual (not to say sexist) humor. ALF, after all, is home to &quot;Hotties for Peace,&quot; the &quot;Miss Open Borders&quot; pageant, and Faith, the Feminist Guest-Blogger. But why villify and slur Michelle Malkin this way? Simple: Sh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calling out &#8230; uh, Charlotte Church&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ali-Bubba doesn&#8217;t mind a little sexual (not to say sexist) humor. ALF, after all, is home to &#8220;Hotties for Peace,&#8221; the &#8220;Miss Open Borders&#8221; pageant, and Faith, the Feminist Guest-Blogger. But why villify and slur Michelle Malkin this way? Simple: Sh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Beltway &#124; OTB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62385</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Beltway &#124; OTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62385</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eric Muller&#8217;s Michelle Malkin Obsession...&lt;/strong&gt;

UNC lawprof Eric Muller posts about Michelle Malkin, a lot, on his blog Is That Legal?  
Yesterday&#8217;s installment is a rather inexplicable rant saying that her recent syndicated column criticizing Charlotte Church&#8217;s transition for Christian ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric Muller&#8217;s Michelle Malkin Obsession&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>UNC lawprof Eric Muller posts about Michelle Malkin, a lot, on his blog Is That Legal?<br />
Yesterday&#8217;s installment is a rather inexplicable rant saying that her recent syndicated column criticizing Charlotte Church&#8217;s transition for Christian &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverStar830</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62380</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverStar830</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62380</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just a small refrigerator, and a low ceiling? Bah... I just want it to be Michelle so I can see her in a bikini. My appreciation for the beauty of Michelle and all the lovely ladies of HotAir and the friends of HotAir... and even KP, is appreciation for their inner beauty as well. Actually, the inner beauty is what&#039;s so appealing to begin with... but the gals being easy on the eyes is a plus too ;)

People should know better than to try to pass off some crappy photoshop as the real thing by now, especially some egghead like Professor Twinkletoes. He, and everyone else on Earth, should know better than to eF with Michelle, period. The sad part is, they want to revel in their self-righteous indignation so badly, they don&#039;t have the moral fortitude to take down their slanderous craptastic drivel, or post a retraction... yet. Even their own commenters are telling them it&#039;s all fake. But yet, they keep it there to glean as much sick satisfaction as they can from their lies, and they know it&#039;s all lies. I guess that stands to reason though, their whole lives are based on lies and imagined existence.

More moonbat guano for them and their bedwetting masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just a small refrigerator, and a low ceiling? Bah&#8230; I just want it to be Michelle so I can see her in a bikini. My appreciation for the beauty of Michelle and all the lovely ladies of HotAir and the friends of HotAir&#8230; and even KP, is appreciation for their inner beauty as well. Actually, the inner beauty is what&#8217;s so appealing to begin with&#8230; but the gals being easy on the eyes is a plus too ;)</p>
<p>People should know better than to try to pass off some crappy photoshop as the real thing by now, especially some egghead like Professor Twinkletoes. He, and everyone else on Earth, should know better than to eF with Michelle, period. The sad part is, they want to revel in their self-righteous indignation so badly, they don&#8217;t have the moral fortitude to take down their slanderous craptastic drivel, or post a retraction&#8230; yet. Even their own commenters are telling them it&#8217;s all fake. But yet, they keep it there to glean as much sick satisfaction as they can from their lies, and they know it&#8217;s all lies. I guess that stands to reason though, their whole lives are based on lies and imagined existence.</p>
<p>More moonbat guano for them and their bedwetting masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62373</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62373</guid>
		<description>Blondette has been forever overrated and has &quot;misoverestimated&quot; herself over time.

That aside, I find this hilarious and don&#039;t believe it should be fought, other than with humor and ridicule of the perpetrators and their hypocrisy, even in trivial matters, such as this.

I have no talent in photography, other than to smile in pictures. I only take pictures of anything other-than-people.

However, it is obvious that the bikini-body is of caucasian or European origin. This should not be interpreted as anything, except just that fact. It could also be of Eurasian origin. I don&#039;t believe Michelle is either (not that it would matter one way or another, just so long as we have the facts). Perhaps she&#039;ll confim her background.

The head, of course, looks Asian or Eurasian, or something similar. People of varied backgrounds look interesting and are generally attractive. They, however, look more natural than this picture and more features blend. The head looks too different from the rest of the body.

Pablo, you and I are getting a &#039;divorce&#039; my friend :) The bikini picture, sin head, could be me (when I was a bit younger), so long as the skin would be darker from lots of sun, the hair dark blond and long, the eyes dark brown, and the bikini yellow-orange. Never mind the &#039;rounded&#039; middle. Spagetti-skinni is not ideal. So long as one is still slim!

On the substance of this hypocrisy - how befuddling that the left would even go there - a bikini? Have these folks ever been at a beach in Europe? Ever? I don&#039;t get this at all, especially not from the leftie elite. Well, they only claim to be progressive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blondette has been forever overrated and has &#8220;misoverestimated&#8221; herself over time.</p>
<p>That aside, I find this hilarious and don&#8217;t believe it should be fought, other than with humor and ridicule of the perpetrators and their hypocrisy, even in trivial matters, such as this.</p>
<p>I have no talent in photography, other than to smile in pictures. I only take pictures of anything other-than-people.</p>
<p>However, it is obvious that the bikini-body is of caucasian or European origin. This should not be interpreted as anything, except just that fact. It could also be of Eurasian origin. I don&#8217;t believe Michelle is either (not that it would matter one way or another, just so long as we have the facts). Perhaps she&#8217;ll confim her background.</p>
<p>The head, of course, looks Asian or Eurasian, or something similar. People of varied backgrounds look interesting and are generally attractive. They, however, look more natural than this picture and more features blend. The head looks too different from the rest of the body.</p>
<p>Pablo, you and I are getting a &#8216;divorce&#8217; my friend :) The bikini picture, sin head, could be me (when I was a bit younger), so long as the skin would be darker from lots of sun, the hair dark blond and long, the eyes dark brown, and the bikini yellow-orange. Never mind the &#8217;rounded&#8217; middle. Spagetti-skinni is not ideal. So long as one is still slim!</p>
<p>On the substance of this hypocrisy &#8211; how befuddling that the left would even go there &#8211; a bikini? Have these folks ever been at a beach in Europe? Ever? I don&#8217;t get this at all, especially not from the leftie elite. Well, they only claim to be progressive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn Barber's Corner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62354</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn Barber's Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62354</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Liberal Bloggers Fall For Michelle Malkin Fauxtograph...&lt;/strong&gt;

	In response to her recent column about indecent young women, liberal bloggers rutted for &#8220;you&#8217;re a hypocrite!&#8221; dirt and thought they&#8217;d found some.
	A long-time Michelle Malkin nemesis blogger named Eric L. Muller of Is That Leg...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Liberal Bloggers Fall For Michelle Malkin Fauxtograph&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	In response to her recent column about indecent young women, liberal bloggers rutted for &#8220;you&#8217;re a hypocrite!&#8221; dirt and thought they&#8217;d found some.<br />
	A long-time Michelle Malkin nemesis blogger named Eric L. Muller of Is That Leg&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62320</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62320</guid>
		<description>(by the way, my last comment was in reference to AP&#039;s update and link to Gawker)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(by the way, my last comment was in reference to AP&#8217;s update and link to Gawker)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62319</guid>
		<description>You know what they say:

&quot;Photoshop is the sincerest form of photomanipulative flattery.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what they say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Photoshop is the sincerest form of photomanipulative flattery.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Desert Wanderer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Photo fraud</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62318</link>
		<dc:creator>High Desert Wanderer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Photo fraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62318</guid>
		<description>[...] h/t Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] h/t Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Point Five &#187; Michelle Malkin: Shameless Hussy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62316</link>
		<dc:creator>Point Five &#187; Michelle Malkin: Shameless Hussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62316</guid>
		<description>[...] And as Allah says: &#8220;Women who wear bikinis are whores.&#8221; That&#8217;s a quote, baby. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And as Allah says: &#8220;Women who wear bikinis are whores.&#8221; That&#8217;s a quote, baby. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alden Pyle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62314</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden Pyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62314</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no photoshop pro, but there is NO WAY that body is Ms. Malkin.  

Not that I&#039;m &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/20/jump/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eye balling&lt;/a&gt; Michelle, but the body in the picture is, to be kind, a bit too fluffy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no photoshop pro, but there is NO WAY that body is Ms. Malkin.  </p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/20/jump/" rel="nofollow">eye balling</a> Michelle, but the body in the picture is, to be kind, a bit too fluffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62312</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62312</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this is pretty sad that this thing is spreading even though I think it&#039;s already been debunked.  I think she has to respond on the Factor at least if she&#039;s not going to even threaten legal action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this is pretty sad that this thing is spreading even though I think it&#8217;s already been debunked.  I think she has to respond on the Factor at least if she&#8217;s not going to even threaten legal action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62310</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62310</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bill&#039;s Bites -- 2006.09.29...&lt;/strong&gt;

The webmaster&#039;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support The Phoenix...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill&#8217;s Bites &#8212; 2006.09.29&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The webmaster&#8217;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support The Phoenix&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 186k Per Second</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62307</link>
		<dc:creator>186k Per Second</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michelle Malkin Photo Smear by Nutroot Losers - Debunked!...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michelle Malkin Photo Smear by Nutroot Losers &#8211; Debunked!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/comment-page-1/#comment-62300</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/29/wonkette-smears-michelle-again/#comment-62300</guid>
		<description>Pablo

Agreed. Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo</p>
<p>Agreed. Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
