And, Montana isn’t looking great. Which means the fate of the Senate may very well be hanging on the Macaca recount. Yikes.
Update: Hope in Montana?
Update: Don’t doubt the deity, y’all. This, from September:

It may well be that the only thing….

Honora, paradromic means to mirror exactly in rise, rate, weight, percentage etc. It’s usually used when comparing two sets of data on a line graph that scale equally.

Alden Pyle on September 28, 2006 at 8:49 PM

Thanks, great word!!!

Wait til Wednesday….

Your observation is very interesting. The Blacks are ‘awakening’ politically and the Left will never be potent again, or at least never take them for granted.

I noticed on the SurveyUSA poll that Allen is receiving 21% of the black vote. That is an extraordinary number considering the smears that have taken place. What, if anything, do y’all think it means?

I hope it’s okay if use “y’all”!!

I predict some very depressed Dems and MSM reporters election day evening.

One poll I liked: The one that has George Allen up 5 points. I predict a landslide for Allen. Most people here in Virginia still don’t know who his challenger is. The “n*****” comments by UVA left-wing professor Sabato were a Democrat meltdown about the possibility of a Republican Senator Steele across the Potomac.

As Allah points out, control of the Senate may well hinge on George Allen’s fate in Virginia. Thus, it is time to rally around the flag (as it were).

Good news came yesterday from a SUSA poll which showed Allen boasting a heady five point lead……

Point 1. Most polls are conducted by agencies with a specific agenda that reflect the person or group who commissioned the agency to take the poll. So, the questions are generally framed in a way that cleverly *lead* those polled to answer in a light most favorable to the conclusion the agency wants to represent to it’s client.

Point 2. Most polls are conducted by phone, during regular working hours. Most conservatives are working (at their first job) during that period, so who is home to answer those polls?…the home-makers, the unemployed, the professional welfare leeches, the ultra wealthy elites…all of whom generally trend liberal.

Point 3. Unless the poll is conducted by Zogby, (who only polls registered voters in political polls), the outcome is already skewed to lean left because of point 1 & point 2.

The upside is that the opinions of those who are not registered to vote matters not. And, until those liberals who ARE registered, actually show up to vote, and do so in percentages that are paradromic to conservatives, we still have a fighting chance at avoiding moonbat governance.

WARNING: Democrats in your mirror are not as close as they appear.

WARNING: November Races May Not Be As Close As They Appear
Thu Sep 28 2006 08:00:56 ET

Democratic pollsters are pushing lots of polls that show second- and third-tier candidates performing surprisingly well. If most of these challengers win, the Democrats will gain 30 or 40 House seats.

Yep! Just as many of us thought. ;o)

Rasmussen has been all over the place with the President’s polling numbers, and he rarely trends as the other polls do. How can that be accurate?

the clinical depression among Republicans was as unjustified as the near-unanimous predictions of an overwhelming Democrat victory in November. The media and the Democrats were giving a stampede but voters were refusing to play the role of the cattle. The good news for Republicans remains diluted, but the Dems are still overplaying their hand.