<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Napolitano fact-checks the hell out of Clinton&#8217;s legal argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:37:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzTracker.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-73911</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzTracker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-73911</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Featured on BuzzTracker...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Featured on BuzzTracker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60616</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60616</guid>
		<description>honora, Cigarman opened the door. What did you expect?

As far as Bush goes, I have plenty that I criticize him about, but I have yet to catch him in a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honora, Cigarman opened the door. What did you expect?</p>
<p>As far as Bush goes, I have plenty that I criticize him about, but I have yet to catch him in a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60481</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60481</guid>
		<description>james, I certainly wasn&#039;t suggesting that his &quot;fluency&quot; was any good other than just what it was. Of course he&#039;s a liar and actually I think he pathologically deludes himself, as well. Just remarking on his speaking. Only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james, I certainly wasn&#8217;t suggesting that his &#8220;fluency&#8221; was any good other than just what it was. Of course he&#8217;s a liar and actually I think he pathologically deludes himself, as well. Just remarking on his speaking. Only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fogpig</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60349</link>
		<dc:creator>Fogpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60349</guid>
		<description>Ent,

Thank you for the link.

-FFOG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ent,</p>
<p>Thank you for the link.</p>
<p>-FFOG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60077</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60077</guid>
		<description>What strikes me is how the RWPM gives Bush a total pass--you probably all remember the &quot;blame game&quot; mantra following the avalanche of info showing no WMD, no Iraq link to 9/11--all the admin and its apologists could say was, hey--&quot;water under the bridge, let&#039;s not play the blame game&quot;--fair enough.  But that same largess should apply across the board one would think.

The other thought I had watching Gingrich pontificate on O&#039;R last night:  if you are going to attache blame to Clinton for sins of omission, then as Speaker of the House, you have some &#039;splainin to do as well.  Of course, you had all that Monica L stuff to shepherd thru the House.  Important stuff like that certainly had to take precedence.   

What a bunch of clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me is how the RWPM gives Bush a total pass&#8211;you probably all remember the &#8220;blame game&#8221; mantra following the avalanche of info showing no WMD, no Iraq link to 9/11&#8211;all the admin and its apologists could say was, hey&#8211;&#8221;water under the bridge, let&#8217;s not play the blame game&#8221;&#8211;fair enough.  But that same largess should apply across the board one would think.</p>
<p>The other thought I had watching Gingrich pontificate on O&#8217;R last night:  if you are going to attache blame to Clinton for sins of omission, then as Speaker of the House, you have some &#8217;splainin to do as well.  Of course, you had all that Monica L stuff to shepherd thru the House.  Important stuff like that certainly had to take precedence.   </p>
<p>What a bunch of clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60071</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60071</guid>
		<description>&quot;He has becoming a megalodouche of such enourmous size that he’s on the verge collapsing in upon himself to form a quantum douche singularity so dense that not even smegmatronic radiation will be able to escape.&quot;

Classic! ROTFLMAO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He has becoming a megalodouche of such enourmous size that he’s on the verge collapsing in upon himself to form a quantum douche singularity so dense that not even smegmatronic radiation will be able to escape.&#8221;</p>
<p>Classic! ROTFLMAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60065</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60065</guid>
		<description>Fogpig, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Spy-All-Seasons-Life-CIA/dp/0743245369/sr=1-1/qid=1159286690/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1884671-0520105?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;head of the CIA&#039;s Counterterrorist Center&lt;/a&gt;, which he set up in 1986.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fogpig, the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Spy-All-Seasons-Life-CIA/dp/0743245369/sr=1-1/qid=1159286690/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1884671-0520105?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books" rel="nofollow">head of the CIA&#8217;s Counterterrorist Center</a>, which he set up in 1986.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fogpig</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60048</link>
		<dc:creator>Fogpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60048</guid>
		<description>James,
I thought Jesus&#039; middle name was &quot;Horatio&quot;.

Entelechy,
Who published those paragraphs in 1996?

-FFOG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,<br />
I thought Jesus&#8217; middle name was &#8220;Horatio&#8221;.</p>
<p>Entelechy,<br />
Who published those paragraphs in 1996?</p>
<p>-FFOG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate's Cove</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-60032</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate's Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-60032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;US Safer Despite Iraq Terror...&lt;/strong&gt;

It would be nice if we could see the whole leaked secret intelligence report that says that terror is worse now then before the Iraq war started. Of course, one has to wonder about the timing, but, hey, that is politics. Especially from a party that st...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US Safer Despite Iraq Terror&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It would be nice if we could see the whole leaked secret intelligence report that says that terror is worse now then before the Iraq war started. Of course, one has to wonder about the timing, but, hey, that is politics. Especially from a party that st&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59950</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59950</guid>
		<description>&quot;Here come da judge!&quot;

Wow, he really tore Klinton apart, didn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Here come da judge!&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, he really tore Klinton apart, didn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyrd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59942</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59942</guid>
		<description>Entelechy
Thanks, you are the greatest!

James hit the nail. Clinton is a great orator.  So is John Kerry.  the liberals have no lack of talkers.  What they lack are walkers.  People who say what they mean, and are not afraid to walk the walk, even if the path is hard and dangerouse.

The ability to talk to a crowd of people and get them to believe you is not the sign of greatness.  It is the sign of a shyster, a con man.  What is important is the context, the truthfullness of the talkers points and statements.  Clinton saying he is the first black president is a bald face lie.  But he can say it so people nod their heads and agree.  All clinton is is a third rate JF Keneddy.  both were amoral, rich, horny philanderers.  JFK just had style, courage, and a great obit.  Clintons got his fantasies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entelechy<br />
Thanks, you are the greatest!</p>
<p>James hit the nail. Clinton is a great orator.  So is John Kerry.  the liberals have no lack of talkers.  What they lack are walkers.  People who say what they mean, and are not afraid to walk the walk, even if the path is hard and dangerouse.</p>
<p>The ability to talk to a crowd of people and get them to believe you is not the sign of greatness.  It is the sign of a shyster, a con man.  What is important is the context, the truthfullness of the talkers points and statements.  Clinton saying he is the first black president is a bald face lie.  But he can say it so people nod their heads and agree.  All clinton is is a third rate JF Keneddy.  both were amoral, rich, horny philanderers.  JFK just had style, courage, and a great obit.  Clintons got his fantasies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59917</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59917</guid>
		<description>Ohlberman? Who? Oh, you mean the idiot who calls himself Bloggerman. He should have stayed with his ESPN catchphrases. At least they made sense.

Only in Liberal World does a twit with crap for ratings keep his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohlberman? Who? Oh, you mean the idiot who calls himself Bloggerman. He should have stayed with his ESPN catchphrases. At least they made sense.</p>
<p>Only in Liberal World does a twit with crap for ratings keep his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hening</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59899</link>
		<dc:creator>Hening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59899</guid>
		<description>News Flash:

Water is wet, Clinton is a pathological liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News Flash:</p>
<p>Water is wet, Clinton is a pathological liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hooker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59897</link>
		<dc:creator>james hooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59897</guid>
		<description>Fluent Schmooent!  Granted, GW won&#039;t be giving many readings at the Thespian Society, but Jesus Harold Christ, I at least believe him...nearly ALL THE DAMN TIME!

As for Willie Wanker?  Yes, &quot;great&quot; talker he is.  So was Adolf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fluent Schmooent!  Granted, GW won&#8217;t be giving many readings at the Thespian Society, but Jesus Harold Christ, I at least believe him&#8230;nearly ALL THE DAMN TIME!</p>
<p>As for Willie Wanker?  Yes, &#8220;great&#8221; talker he is.  So was Adolf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59820</guid>
		<description>Entelechy, you&#039;re a treasure.

I have to say, from all this, it&#039;s stunning to be reminded once again how totally fluent the man is, how articulate and yes, persuasive.

And of course he was a total jerk to Wallace.

But still--fluent. More than &quot;able to speak the language&quot; fluent ... the word just seems to fit the quality he has. Alas that he would have used his powers for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entelechy, you&#8217;re a treasure.</p>
<p>I have to say, from all this, it&#8217;s stunning to be reminded once again how totally fluent the man is, how articulate and yes, persuasive.</p>
<p>And of course he was a total jerk to Wallace.</p>
<p>But still&#8211;fluent. More than &#8220;able to speak the language&#8221; fluent &#8230; the word just seems to fit the quality he has. Alas that he would have used his powers for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59819</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59819</guid>
		<description>He has becoming a megalodouche of such enourmous size that he&#039;s on the verge collapsing in upon himself to form a quantum douche singularity so dense that not even smegmatronic radiation will be able to escape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has becoming a megalodouche of such enourmous size that he&#8217;s on the verge collapsing in upon himself to form a quantum douche singularity so dense that not even smegmatronic radiation will be able to escape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59811</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59811</guid>
		<description>The Clinton gang had no respect for the CIA. I posted this before but it&#039;s significant and can&#039;t be ignored.

This was very prescient, long before 9/11 happened. I live close from one of the biggest spies this country is fortunate to have. In 1996 this was authored/published, having been vetted by the CIA, in desperation at the demise of the CIA during the Clinton Admin.
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Therefore, I conclude that the Clandestine Services is finished as a really effective intelligence service. It will be reinvented or restored to competency only after some appalling catastrophe befalls us, such as the explosion of a nuclear device or a biological attack or the like by some rogue group or nation-state, and the following investigation demonstrates that the act was undetectable by our national technical means.
 
Then, when it becomes apparent that only a human resource, an agent, could have provided forewarning, someone will ask why we don&#039;t have any agents and the answer will force the issue. Unfortunately this is the American way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Several administrations failed - it&#039;s just that Mr. Clinton is furious that we can&#039;t ignore his failures and instead forget Lewinski and focus on his magnanimous heart/mind, and until now disposition. And, surely, Mrs. Clinton reminds him frequently of the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clinton gang had no respect for the CIA. I posted this before but it&#8217;s significant and can&#8217;t be ignored.</p>
<p>This was very prescient, long before 9/11 happened. I live close from one of the biggest spies this country is fortunate to have. In 1996 this was authored/published, having been vetted by the CIA, in desperation at the demise of the CIA during the Clinton Admin.</p>
<blockquote><p>Therefore, I conclude that the Clandestine Services is finished as a really effective intelligence service. It will be reinvented or restored to competency only after some appalling catastrophe befalls us, such as the explosion of a nuclear device or a biological attack or the like by some rogue group or nation-state, and the following investigation demonstrates that the act was undetectable by our national technical means.</p>
<p>Then, when it becomes apparent that only a human resource, an agent, could have provided forewarning, someone will ask why we don&#8217;t have any agents and the answer will force the issue. Unfortunately this is the American way.</p></blockquote>
<p>Several administrations failed &#8211; it&#8217;s just that Mr. Clinton is furious that we can&#8217;t ignore his failures and instead forget Lewinski and focus on his magnanimous heart/mind, and until now disposition. And, surely, Mrs. Clinton reminds him frequently of the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59785</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59785</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)...&lt;/strong&gt;

	I think one caller into Sean Hannity&#8217;s show said it best, when they mentioned that Clinton&#8217;s emotional ranting with Chris Wallace, looked similar to his &#8220;I did not have sexual relations with that woman&#8221; plea, back when he was P...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	I think one caller into Sean Hannity&#8217;s show said it best, when they mentioned that Clinton&#8217;s emotional ranting with Chris Wallace, looked similar to his &#8220;I did not have sexual relations with that woman&#8221; plea, back when he was P&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59777</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59777</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Setting Clinton Straight...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yowza.  And I thought the blogosphere was quick to react to Clinton&#039;s attempt to rewrite history yesterday!

GOP.com does a pretty handy job at slapping down all the myths and Democratic talking points that Clinton tried to pass off as facts yesterd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Setting Clinton Straight&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yowza.  And I thought the blogosphere was quick to react to Clinton&#8217;s attempt to rewrite history yesterday!</p>
<p>GOP.com does a pretty handy job at slapping down all the myths and Democratic talking points that Clinton tried to pass off as facts yesterd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Gal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59774</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59774</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The CIA and FBI refused to certify&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I almost choked on my scotch when I heard him say that!

Did they &lt;em&gt;refuse&lt;/em&gt; to certify because they didn’t have the intel? Now, why wouldn’t they have the intel? Wouldn’t have anything to do with not having enough HUMAN BEINGS on the ground to collect intel would it?

OTOH, I can’t wait to see the clip of &lt;strong&gt;“I tried and failed”&lt;/strong&gt; running in the GOP commercials!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The CIA and FBI refused to certify</p></blockquote>
<p>I almost choked on my scotch when I heard him say that!</p>
<p>Did they <em>refuse</em> to certify because they didn’t have the intel? Now, why wouldn’t they have the intel? Wouldn’t have anything to do with not having enough HUMAN BEINGS on the ground to collect intel would it?</p>
<p>OTOH, I can’t wait to see the clip of <strong>“I tried and failed”</strong> running in the GOP commercials!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59739</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59739</guid>
		<description>Speed647 - wins on &#039;clever&#039; :)

Olberdouche = jellyfish

Wyrd, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14576012/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here is the link&lt;/a&gt;, and an excerpt...

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BUSH:&lt;/strong&gt; First of all, there&#039;s no such thing as short-term history as far as I’m concerned. I think that you can&#039;t judge a presidency based upon a moment’s notice. I believe you have to take -- eventually my standing in history will be judged by people 30 or 40 years from now who will be able to take an objective look, at whether the decisions I made led to peace and prosperity. You know, this is a job where you make decisions. And you, you do what you think is right. And you let people recognize, and the people are gonna say what&#039;s on their mind at the moment. But I read three histories of George Washington last year. The first President of the United States is still being analyzed by historians, which oughtta say to this president and future president: &quot;Do what you think is right and eventually historians will figure out whether it made sense or not.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed647 &#8211; wins on &#8216;clever&#8217; :)</p>
<p>Olberdouche = jellyfish</p>
<p>Wyrd, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14576012/" rel="nofollow">here is the link</a>, and an excerpt&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>BUSH:</strong> First of all, there&#8217;s no such thing as short-term history as far as I’m concerned. I think that you can&#8217;t judge a presidency based upon a moment’s notice. I believe you have to take &#8212; eventually my standing in history will be judged by people 30 or 40 years from now who will be able to take an objective look, at whether the decisions I made led to peace and prosperity. You know, this is a job where you make decisions. And you, you do what you think is right. And you let people recognize, and the people are gonna say what&#8217;s on their mind at the moment. But I read three histories of George Washington last year. The first President of the United States is still being analyzed by historians, which oughtta say to this president and future president: &#8220;Do what you think is right and eventually historians will figure out whether it made sense or not.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyrd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59734</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59734</guid>
		<description>Anyone remember that buchered quote from Bush a few months back? It went something like &quot;I have been reading a book on George Washington... You know...He was  the... first President...&quot;
I think Allah posted the actual comment, or maybe LGF.  The actual comment was about half a page long.  It was about George Bush commenting on how, according to the book he was reading, George Washington did what he felt had to be done for the country.  he did not care about a legacy, or about what future generations would say about hs decisions.  he did what he felt was right for the country with the information that he had.  Bush went on to say that thats all he could do, is to do what he feels is right, and let the historians figure out if it is right or wrong.  He said that a legacy is decided long after you die, so don&#039;t worry about it, do the best you can.  Its a great bit of wisdom from our President. if anyone finds the link please post it.  It is something Clinton needs to read. That is another differnece between Bush and Clinton.  Clinton (like most liberals) did what he felt was best for him.  Bush does what he thinks is right for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember that buchered quote from Bush a few months back? It went something like &#8220;I have been reading a book on George Washington&#8230; You know&#8230;He was  the&#8230; first President&#8230;&#8221;<br />
I think Allah posted the actual comment, or maybe LGF.  The actual comment was about half a page long.  It was about George Bush commenting on how, according to the book he was reading, George Washington did what he felt had to be done for the country.  he did not care about a legacy, or about what future generations would say about hs decisions.  he did what he felt was right for the country with the information that he had.  Bush went on to say that thats all he could do, is to do what he feels is right, and let the historians figure out if it is right or wrong.  He said that a legacy is decided long after you die, so don&#8217;t worry about it, do the best you can.  Its a great bit of wisdom from our President. if anyone finds the link please post it.  It is something Clinton needs to read. That is another differnece between Bush and Clinton.  Clinton (like most liberals) did what he felt was best for him.  Bush does what he thinks is right for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59732</guid>
		<description>Oh, man...I&#039;m killin&#039; myself over here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, man&#8230;I&#8217;m killin&#8217; myself over here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59731</guid>
		<description>You know, I was going to start this post off &quot;Hey, what&#039;s Bill Clinton doing with that douchebag?!&quot;, but I knew you would all take it the wrong way.

So let&#039;s go with &quot;Wow, Judge Napolitano just shoved a really big cigar up Clinton&#039;s ass!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was going to start this post off &#8220;Hey, what&#8217;s Bill Clinton doing with that douchebag?!&#8221;, but I knew you would all take it the wrong way.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s go with &#8220;Wow, Judge Napolitano just shoved a really big cigar up Clinton&#8217;s ass!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Republican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-59716</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-napolitano-fact-checks-the-hell-out-of-clintons-legal-argument/#comment-59716</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michael Scheuer Rebuts Clinton...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michael Scheuer Rebuts Clinton&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
