<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Michelle talks Clinton on O&#8217;Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60731</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60731</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s extremely rare for me to disagree with Michelle, but I have to this time.  I think O&#039;Reilly is right on the money about Clinton&#039;s blow-up being &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; intentional.  

I previously commented on the &quot;Slick Willie’s Day of Rage&quot; page saying:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
A Fox Hit-Piece on Clinton?
No, this was a Clinton Hit-Piece on Fox! 

It’s quite evident that Clinton’s plan was to give a long drawn-out answer, consume more than half the interview time, and then say Chris Wallace “came here under false pretenses”...

Clinton’s intent was clear here:

WALLACE: Would you like to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative?

CLINTON: No, I want to finish this now. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As evidence that this was a premeditated Clinton hit-piece on Fox the following moonbat titles given to clips of the interview on UTube:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=3RLAKArfOe0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clinton smacks down Fox News!&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=7DI7u-TytRU&amp;mode=related&amp;search=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bill Clinton Kicks the Crap out of Fox News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You get the point.  Clinton&#039;s intent was to energize the moonbat base.  

By the way, here&#039;s a reminder of how, during his last days in office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=W8Ep4ss_eaY&amp;mode=related&amp;search=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clinton worked hard to get Bin Laden&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s extremely rare for me to disagree with Michelle, but I have to this time.  I think O&#8217;Reilly is right on the money about Clinton&#8217;s blow-up being <strong>very</strong> intentional.  </p>
<p>I previously commented on the &#8220;Slick Willie’s Day of Rage&#8221; page saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>
A Fox Hit-Piece on Clinton?<br />
No, this was a Clinton Hit-Piece on Fox! </p>
<p>It’s quite evident that Clinton’s plan was to give a long drawn-out answer, consume more than half the interview time, and then say Chris Wallace “came here under false pretenses”&#8230;</p>
<p>Clinton’s intent was clear here:</p>
<p>WALLACE: Would you like to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative?</p>
<p>CLINTON: No, I want to finish this now.
</p></blockquote>
<p>As evidence that this was a premeditated Clinton hit-piece on Fox the following moonbat titles given to clips of the interview on UTube:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=3RLAKArfOe0" rel="nofollow">Clinton smacks down Fox News!</a><br />
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=7DI7u-TytRU&amp;mode=related&amp;search=" rel="nofollow">Bill Clinton Kicks the Crap out of Fox News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>You get the point.  Clinton&#8217;s intent was to energize the moonbat base.  </p>
<p>By the way, here&#8217;s a reminder of how, during his last days in office, <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=W8Ep4ss_eaY&amp;mode=related&amp;search=" rel="nofollow">Clinton worked hard to get Bin Laden</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewels</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60359</guid>
		<description>Wallace to Clinton: &lt;em&gt;Do you feel like you did enough as a president to adress the threat of terrorism?&lt;/em&gt;

Clinton to Wallace: &lt;em&gt;Did I do enough?? Why is always what &lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt; did?? What about &lt;strong&gt;him&lt;/strong&gt;! Why don&#039;t you ask him what &lt;strong&gt;he&lt;/strong&gt; did! You&#039;re trying to trick me! You&#039;re trying to make me look guilty! I did everything!!&lt;/em&gt;

O&#039;Reilly to Clinton: &lt;em&gt;Daaaanng, Billy boy- why not give me some of that? Spread the love, man!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace to Clinton: <em>Do you feel like you did enough as a president to adress the threat of terrorism?</em></p>
<p>Clinton to Wallace: <em>Did I do enough?? Why is always what <strong>I</strong> did?? What about <strong>him</strong>! Why don&#8217;t you ask him what <strong>he</strong> did! You&#8217;re trying to trick me! You&#8217;re trying to make me look guilty! I did everything!!</em></p>
<p>O&#8217;Reilly to Clinton: <em>Daaaanng, Billy boy- why not give me some of that? Spread the love, man!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60252</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60252</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kirsten says; &quot;I think there then, there was this, when, but...&quot;

or something to that effect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Spin Kirsten, Spin.  Your makin&#039; me dizzy.  However, it is quite entertaining watching you dance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kirsten says; &#8220;I think there then, there was this, when, but&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>or something to that effect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Spin Kirsten, Spin.  Your makin&#8217; me dizzy.  However, it is quite entertaining watching you dance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60244</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60244</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Michelle says; &quot;He [Clinton] melted down like my 2 year old at bed time.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Zinnngggggg!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Michelle says; &#8220;He [Clinton] melted down like my 2 year old at bed time.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Zinnngggggg!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60226</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60226</guid>
		<description>I did notice that the more Kirsten has to be on with Michelle, the lower and wider her neckline.  I think KP is just a bit jelous of MM, and probably a bit intimidated as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did notice that the more Kirsten has to be on with Michelle, the lower and wider her neckline.  I think KP is just a bit jelous of MM, and probably a bit intimidated as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60224</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60224</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She pulled it together, though, and knifed him with a smile.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And what a wonderful smile it is...
{sigh}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She pulled it together, though, and knifed him with a smile.</p></blockquote>
<p>And what a wonderful smile it is&#8230;<br />
{sigh}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drtuddle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60142</link>
		<dc:creator>Drtuddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60142</guid>
		<description>O&#039; Reilly was baiting for an interview with slick willie during the Baba WaWa interview.  Now he tells MM to take it easy on Bubba so Bubba might look O&#039;Reilly&#039;s way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217; Reilly was baiting for an interview with slick willie during the Baba WaWa interview.  Now he tells MM to take it easy on Bubba so Bubba might look O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60102</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60102</guid>
		<description>I think Bill O&#039;Reilly has the appropriate take on the Clinton Wallace encounter.
It all comes down to politics and protecting what he believes is his legacy.
Pathetic but nevertheless planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bill O&#8217;Reilly has the appropriate take on the Clinton Wallace encounter.<br />
It all comes down to politics and protecting what he believes is his legacy.<br />
Pathetic but nevertheless planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid from Brooklyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60094</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid from Brooklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60094</guid>
		<description>When I read these Allah KP posts, I&#039;m reminded of the &quot;thunderbolt&quot; scene in &quot;The Godfather&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read these Allah KP posts, I&#8217;m reminded of the &#8220;thunderbolt&#8221; scene in &#8220;The Godfather&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalewalt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60044</link>
		<dc:creator>dalewalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60044</guid>
		<description>Take it from one w/experience, AP.  My former fiancee was violently liberal (yes, &lt;strong&gt;violently&lt;/strong&gt;, but that&#039;s another story), and I&#039;m definitely conservative.  KP may be easy on the eyes, but the rest of it just isn&#039;t worth it.  My fiancee and I finally broke it off in the months leading up to the 2004 election; she wanted to know why I was so against Kerry.

&quot;He&#039;s pro-abortion.&quot;

&quot;So?&quot;

&quot;So I don&#039;t believe abortion is right.&quot;

&quot;Why not?&quot;

&quot;It&#039;s killing a innocent life.&quot;

&quot;Before we met, *I* had an abortion.&quot;

&quot;Well, you may have had your reasons, but I still don&#039;t agree with abortion being legal.  It doesn&#039;t change the way I feel about you, or how I look at you, but just because you had an abortion doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m suddenly going to think it should be legal, either&quot;

&quot;So I&#039;m a baby-killer?&quot;  

And, it went downhill from there.  So trust me on this one AP.  Remember the good times (or thoughts) you&#039;ve shared, and move on.  It&#039;s just. not. worth. it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it from one w/experience, AP.  My former fiancee was violently liberal (yes, <strong>violently</strong>, but that&#8217;s another story), and I&#8217;m definitely conservative.  KP may be easy on the eyes, but the rest of it just isn&#8217;t worth it.  My fiancee and I finally broke it off in the months leading up to the 2004 election; she wanted to know why I was so against Kerry.</p>
<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s pro-abortion.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So I don&#8217;t believe abortion is right.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Why not?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s killing a innocent life.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Before we met, *I* had an abortion.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, you may have had your reasons, but I still don&#8217;t agree with abortion being legal.  It doesn&#8217;t change the way I feel about you, or how I look at you, but just because you had an abortion doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m suddenly going to think it should be legal, either&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So I&#8217;m a baby-killer?&#8221;  </p>
<p>And, it went downhill from there.  So trust me on this one AP.  Remember the good times (or thoughts) you&#8217;ve shared, and move on.  It&#8217;s just. not. worth. it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tormod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60038</link>
		<dc:creator>tormod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60038</guid>
		<description>In blue jeans or a dress, Michelle ALWAYS looks scrumptious.
Keeps getting better every time I see her. 

Sorry, AP, I just don&#039;t see how you can go for a left-leaning woman.  I learned that heartbreak lesson long ago.  

&quot;Life&#039;s a banquet and most leftists are starving to death&quot;

IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In blue jeans or a dress, Michelle ALWAYS looks scrumptious.<br />
Keeps getting better every time I see her. </p>
<p>Sorry, AP, I just don&#8217;t see how you can go for a left-leaning woman.  I learned that heartbreak lesson long ago.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Life&#8217;s a banquet and most leftists are starving to death&#8221;</p>
<p>IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-60037</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-60037</guid>
		<description>I have said it before and I&#039;ll say it again...Ms. Malkin doen&#039;t need to go on this programme. She is at a different level. Someone above said that she was trying to keep the segment together, and that is dead on. She had the only substantive comments about the Clinton meltdown.

Admittedly, O&#039;Reilly&#039;s show is a success, but he is in danger of letting his ego blow it for him. It seemed that half of every segment was a repeat of his mantra that &quot;Clinton&#039;s a good man; he is devastated by not getting Osama, blah blah blah blah blah...&quot; He wasted half of Gingrich&#039;s appearance going on with his own theories (I swear that at one point I saw Gingrich wince). 

Frankly, if Fox had a programme with Gingrich and Malkin as commentators, they would have a dynamite...no ATOMIC...no NEWTLEAR hit...it would make O&#039;Reilly look like dog food. (To make Allah happy throw in Ms. Powers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230;Ms. Malkin doen&#8217;t need to go on this programme. She is at a different level. Someone above said that she was trying to keep the segment together, and that is dead on. She had the only substantive comments about the Clinton meltdown.</p>
<p>Admittedly, O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s show is a success, but he is in danger of letting his ego blow it for him. It seemed that half of every segment was a repeat of his mantra that &#8220;Clinton&#8217;s a good man; he is devastated by not getting Osama, blah blah blah blah blah&#8230;&#8221; He wasted half of Gingrich&#8217;s appearance going on with his own theories (I swear that at one point I saw Gingrich wince). </p>
<p>Frankly, if Fox had a programme with Gingrich and Malkin as commentators, they would have a dynamite&#8230;no ATOMIC&#8230;no NEWTLEAR hit&#8230;it would make O&#8217;Reilly look like dog food. (To make Allah happy throw in Ms. Powers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59966</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59966</guid>
		<description>Tony737-Hot Air is doing fine. It&#039;s #1 with me, at least.
BClinton is over and done with, and lacks the grace to admit that his day was last millenium;the world has moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony737-Hot Air is doing fine. It&#8217;s #1 with me, at least.<br />
BClinton is over and done with, and lacks the grace to admit that his day was last millenium;the world has moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59896</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59896</guid>
		<description>How does anyone slobber over Kirsten when Michelle is right next to her? I wouldn&#039;t even NOTICE Kirsten is she were in the same room with Michelle! And doesn&#039;t she get tired of gettin&#039; her butt kicked every week in these debates? Smarter and better looking, Michelle wins the beauty and brains contest over and over again.

Anyway, I think HotAir would go up to #1 if Michelle just combined her other website to this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does anyone slobber over Kirsten when Michelle is right next to her? I wouldn&#8217;t even NOTICE Kirsten is she were in the same room with Michelle! And doesn&#8217;t she get tired of gettin&#8217; her butt kicked every week in these debates? Smarter and better looking, Michelle wins the beauty and brains contest over and over again.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think HotAir would go up to #1 if Michelle just combined her other website to this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coronagold</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59890</link>
		<dc:creator>Coronagold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59890</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t I hear that KP wanted to quit blogging because there was no gain in reaching moderate liberals? Then why does she still take that same old stance on TV? I guess it&#039;s ingrained. Maybe hanging out with Michelle will rub off on her, eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t I hear that KP wanted to quit blogging because there was no gain in reaching moderate liberals? Then why does she still take that same old stance on TV? I guess it&#8217;s ingrained. Maybe hanging out with Michelle will rub off on her, eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59879</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59879</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it Allah, why the obsession with KP?

Of course I also don&#039;t get the obsession people have with Ann Coulter either. Frankly, they just aren&#039;t all that. Maybe it&#039;s because I don&#039;t like blondes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it Allah, why the obsession with KP?</p>
<p>Of course I also don&#8217;t get the obsession people have with Ann Coulter either. Frankly, they just aren&#8217;t all that. Maybe it&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t like blondes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59875</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59875</guid>
		<description>&quot;He melted down like my two year old at bedtime.&quot;  *SLAP*

That was hilarious :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He melted down like my two year old at bedtime.&#8221;  *SLAP*</p>
<p>That was hilarious :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59814</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bill&#039;s Bites -- 2006.09.26...&lt;/strong&gt;

The webmaster&#039;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support The Phoenix...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill&#8217;s Bites &#8212; 2006.09.26&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The webmaster&#8217;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support The Phoenix&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59807</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59807</guid>
		<description>Allah&#039;s funniest when he&#039;s funny in the pants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah&#8217;s funniest when he&#8217;s funny in the pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycotte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59804</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59804</guid>
		<description>Allah, You really need to work through the KP thing. You can do better man....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah, You really need to work through the KP thing. You can do better man&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realVerse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59776</link>
		<dc:creator>realVerse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59776</guid>
		<description>Good job ladies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job ladies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauraw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59766</link>
		<dc:creator>lauraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59766</guid>
		<description>Allah, pls check out Geezer&#039;s top post on Ace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah, pls check out Geezer&#8217;s top post on Ace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speed647</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59753</link>
		<dc:creator>speed647</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think that Ms. Powers is more of a distraction than a contribution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
She definitely contributes to my distraction.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think that Ms. Powers is more of a distraction than a contribution.</p></blockquote>
<p>She definitely contributes to my distraction.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAT60A3</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59750</link>
		<dc:creator>DAT60A3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59750</guid>
		<description>Ms. Malkin compared President Clinton&#039;s outburst to a tantrum from her 2 year old carpet commando.  I bet that the 2 year old is much more mature than the former President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Malkin compared President Clinton&#8217;s outburst to a tantrum from her 2 year old carpet commando.  I bet that the 2 year old is much more mature than the former President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAT60A3</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-59747</link>
		<dc:creator>DAT60A3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/25/video-michelle-talks-clinton-on-oreilly/#comment-59747</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what O&#039;Reilly is trying to do.  I think that he is trying to be an entertainer more than a commentator.  He is starting to lose it.  He is missing the point more and more.  Ms. Malkin is working hard to bring a serious note back to the show.  I think that Ms. Powers is more of a distraction than a contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what O&#8217;Reilly is trying to do.  I think that he is trying to be an entertainer more than a commentator.  He is starting to lose it.  He is missing the point more and more.  Ms. Malkin is working hard to bring a serious note back to the show.  I think that Ms. Powers is more of a distraction than a contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
