Video flashback: Wallace sides with Clinton over “Path to 9/11″
posted at 10:56 am on September 25, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
From the Johnny Dollar archives, here’s rabid right-wing conservative-hit-job- perpetrating hatchet man smear artist Chris Wallace behaving rather oddly two weeks ago on “Fox & Friends.” Perhaps he’d already devised his plot to viciously blindside Clinton with a sandbag question about Bin Laden and wanted to create plausible denial for his bias by defending him in advance? That must be it.
Click the image to watch.
Update: The Clintons? Dishonest?
You must be logged in to post a comment.


















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Who’d have thought Mike Wallace would be the one to spawn this rightwing hatchetman?
Unless Rove had something to do with it.
JammieWearingFool on September 25, 2006 at 11:24 AM
Impeach Rove!!
Kokonut on September 25, 2006 at 12:32 PM
Allahpundit…
Go here for more of that “dishonesty” in question about Hillary and gang…
And check out that Sept 06, 2006 blog where “Disney Execs Doctored ABC 20/20 Clinton Fraud Investigative Report To Protect Hillary By Editing Out All References to Her Finance Director David Rosen- Rosen Used Doctored Show to Get Jury to Acquit Him of Election Fraud”. And yet Billy failed to change the crux of the story “Path to 9/11″ and compared that to Hillary’s success on getting ABC to change their story.
Kokonut on September 25, 2006 at 12:40 PM
Ooh, also, irony of ironies. “Path to 9/11″ was aired on ABC and Peter F. Paul notes the difference.
Ain’t that sumthin?
Kokonut on September 25, 2006 at 12:46 PM
Rush was playing the tapes, and I hadn’t noticed it at first, but Slick refers to Path to 9/11 as “Pathway to 9/11″.
Sure, he doesn’t even know the actual title.
JammieWearingFool on September 25, 2006 at 12:51 PM
Perhaps somewhere in that it was a Freudian slip? A subconscious calling out?
Kokonut on September 25, 2006 at 1:11 PM
The Clintons? Dishonest? Lawsuit in the spring of 2007. Dare I say it? Watch for any untimely exits from the earth by entities scheduled to testify against the Clintons.
shooter on September 25, 2006 at 1:28 PM
Comment pages: