Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Gracias, Jimmy!

posted at 12:13 am on September 22, 2006 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Jimmy Carter has never met an enemy of the United States that he didn’t want to give a big, wet kiss.

Yeah, he does the noble Habitat for Humanity gig. But the goodness of that is dwarfed by the Habitat for Hugo Jimmy helped restore two years ago.

President Carter will no doubt be on Hugo Chavez’s Christmas card list this December. It was certainly a gift for the Venezuelan leader this year when Mr. Carter certified without reservation an election that opposition newspapers were quick to denounce as a fraud. No sooner had the former American president handed this gift to the Venezuelan Marxist than, as our Eli Lake reported last Thursday, the coalition of labor unions, business groups, and political parties brought forward a list of serious complaints about the process leading up to the elections and how the votes were counted by new electronic machines purchased by the state’s election commission.

Exit polling from the American firm of Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates suggested the inverse of the results Mr. Carter blessed last Monday that showed Mr. Chavez survived the recount referendum by a margin of 59% to 41%. Nor does the list of concerns for the opposition end with rigged voting machines. Many parties say they have names of government employees fired after their names were disclosed on the Internet by a pro-Chavez legislator as signers of a petition calling for the referendum. Some Venezuelan papers even reported that the paper records of the votes were found in rivers and vacant lots. Finally, many Venezuelans question why Mr. Chavez was so quick to issue citizenship to some 2 million persons, many living abroad, in the months and weeks leading up to the vote.

Given such questions, why would the Carter Center so quickly confirm the official vote count of Mr. Chavez’s election commission and recommend that Secretary Powell accept the official results? As Venezuelan journalist Fabiola Zerpa asked, “Why did it rush to back the results? Why couldn’t it wait a day or two until all the results were ready and the auditing process was finished?”

It’s amazing how much lefties will make of that photo showing Don Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam, yet they`will completely ignore Jimmy Carter’s role in saving Hugo Chavez’s political career. Well, other than to note that they like Chavez.

Read the rest of the article to see that the 2004 Venezuelan election was probably rigged from the beginning, the Carter Center accepted pre-election restrictions on monitoring that should have alerted it that the fix was in, yet they not only stayed in the game but rushed to certify the election results as legitimate after the fact. Chavez survived the vote and has been a menace ever since.

That two-bit punk who called the President of the United States “el diablo” on American soil, and who used his country’s natural resources to buy the love of American citizens in Harlem today, kept power through the acquiescence of a former American president. All of the alliances with Iran and China, all of the deals Venezuela has struck with Castro and other US enemies, have Jimmy Carter’s fingerprints on them.

Democrats rushing to condemn Chavez as the thug he is might take a moment to note that one of their own helped Chavez keep the power he’s using as a soapbox to slam Bush.

Yeah, I was dreaming there. Back to reality.

There’s no photo for us on the right to wave around like that pic of Rumsfeld, but the fact is Jimmy Carter’s actions in Venezuela helped an enemy of the US retain power, and probably against the will of the Venezuelan people.

(h/t bWb)

More: How could I forget? Of course there’s a photo we can wave around. But it won’t have the same staying power as that shot of Rummy and Saddam.

carter-chavez


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Carter – the opposite of ne plus ultra

Entelechy on September 22, 2006 at 12:30 AM

Still working to assure his position as “History’s Greatest Monster” .

bbz123 on September 22, 2006 at 12:33 AM

Jimmy Carter has never met an enemy of the United States that he didn’t want to give a big, wet kiss.

I suppose I shouldn’t try to engage in amateur armchair psychological analysis from a distance since I have neither the training or apptitude for it…

Oh heck, why not.

Jimmy Carter seems to have cozied up with so many American hating foreign leaders that it leads me to wonder if he still holds some sort of resentment inside over his electoral defeat. Perhaps consciously or unconsciously this is how he feels like he is getting revenge on the people who snubbed him by voting him out of office.

“They betrayed me, so now I will get them… And my revenge is dish that will be served cold.”

Or maybe he is like the crotchety old man on Scooby-Doo, the one who keeps getting found out at the end, and grumbling “…and I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn’t been for you darn meddling kids!”

EFG on September 22, 2006 at 12:54 AM

“…and I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn’t been for you darn meddling voters!”

EFG on September 22, 2006 at 1:01 AM

How can a President as inept as Carter be even worse 20 years after he is out of office?!?!

I am truly flabbergasted.

Theworldisnotenough on September 22, 2006 at 1:01 AM

No surprises.
Ex pres Jimmy Carter and AG Ramsey Clark
should have charged and tried for
treason years ago.

byteshredder on September 22, 2006 at 1:20 AM

It’s amazing how much lefties will make of that photo showing Don Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam, yet they`will completely ignore Jimmy Carter’s role in saving Hugo Chavez’s political career.

Or their hero Cindy Sheehan slipping Hugo the tongue, or mugging hugging for the camera. They couldn’t keep their hands off eachother whenever they were in the same room. But I digress…

Jimmy Carter, the former peanut farmer President with a fondness for despots. Whether it’s Kim Jong Il or Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez or the death-cult of Hamas, this ex-President keeps showing up like the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

SilverStar830 on September 22, 2006 at 2:27 AM

Ahhhhh, speaking truth to power never felt so good…. even if you’re an election rigging dictator who kills his own citizens.

Bygones.

Truth is truth, no matter where it comes from.

Viva la Hugo!

natesnake on September 22, 2006 at 9:32 AM

Peggy Noonan has a good editorial on the subject of Hugo Chavez today (linked in the DrudgeReport) about how Chavez is influencial among the “unstable” (unfortunately a large portion of the population) and how the President should respond to his comments instead of being above them.

Everyone knew that Hugo Chavez stole the election and that Jimmy Carter was giving legitimacy to a communist government that was a huge threat to the U.S. Yet Rice and Bush accepted the result. They should have gotten on TV at the time and contested it. Chavez is an extreme threat to our security, and Rice especially should have realized it at the time.

januarius on September 22, 2006 at 9:34 AM

Any list of the scum of the Democrat party surely must have Carter in the top five. He is one sick man.

Jaibones on September 22, 2006 at 10:58 AM

What’s Carter is saying when he’s in good graces with Chavez is that he agrees that Bush is the devil.

Kokonut on September 22, 2006 at 11:00 AM

It’s amazing how much lefties will make of that photo showing Don Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam, yet they`will completely ignore Jimmy Carter’s role in saving Hugo Chavez’s political career.

And that failure to even acknowledge Carter’s role in ensuring Chavez’s political survival is a perfect demonstration of why I don’t believe in the sincerity of Rangel and Pelosi’s statements yesterday.

I’m pretty sure I’m not alone either.

thirteen28 on September 22, 2006 at 12:33 PM

Carter makes Neville Chamberlain look like Napoleon.

Rick on September 22, 2006 at 1:21 PM

Dhimmi’s father died at 59, his mother at 85. Jimmuh is now 82. How much more will we have to endure? His capacity to harm his country over 3 decades is only bested by Castro.

Valiant on September 22, 2006 at 1:34 PM

Bryan, here are some more pictures of Carter colluding with our enemies. His offenses are many!

NTWR on September 22, 2006 at 2:14 PM

Would you all leave Uncle Jimmy alone. I bet you dont remember back in 1979 gas was 88 cents a gallon. It was so cheap people were lining up for miles. And to let Americans 52 Americans have a 444 day vacation in Iran was just so nice of him. And how can we forget Billy Beer. Lip smacking good. So the next time you think about Jimmy Carter, just remember, he’s not only a peanut farmer, he’s a nut.

Long Island Pete on September 22, 2006 at 2:31 PM

see that the 2004 Venezuelan election was probably rigged from the beginning

This is another example of American policy in trying to discredit the validity of a free election. Each time an elected official that does not necessarily reflect the interests of corporate America is chosen, the propaganda machine immediately begins to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the official.

While we champion democratic elections, our hypocrisy shines through time and again.

GregH on September 22, 2006 at 2:32 PM

American policy didn’t restrict the monitors or forbid them from criticizing the results. Chavez did, and Carter acquiesced.

Bryan on September 22, 2006 at 2:38 PM

The United States is not obliged to apply the same standard of judgment to a country whose government is avowedly hostile to the US as for a country like El Salvador, where it is not. These people could bring about a situation in Central America which could pose a threat to US secutiry. That allows us to change our yardstick.

In 1984 it was official policy, as reported by theLASA Report, November 1984.

GregH on September 22, 2006 at 3:00 PM

The Mad Dimwit dances with evil this week at GWU;

Madeleine Albright criticizes Bush, war on terror

Bush’s practice of calling terrorist organizations and governments harboring them “evil” was challenged by Albright, who said that human nature does not lend itself to the absolutes Bush emphasizes.

Evil depends on different perspectives,” said Albright, who was the country’s first female secretary of state. “This does not imply moral relativism, as critics may suggest, but instead acknowledgment that with great evil often comes a conviction of doing great good.”

Remember: 9/11 was just a “different perspective“… and Osama really just had a conviction of doing “great good.”

Terp Mole on September 22, 2006 at 3:35 PM

The absolute WORST PRESIDENT EVER. An unabashed ANTI-SEMITE and subtle RACIST. America’s enemies’ MOST USEFUL IDIOT. The self proclaimed spokesman for the majority of the democratic party. WORST COMMANDER IN CHIEF. Despite him continuing to try to earn the respect of our enemies by continuing to try to damage America, they never respected him. Although I am ashamed of him as an American, he is a great POSTER BOY for the REPUBLICANS.

Reality Check on September 22, 2006 at 4:30 PM

this is how he feels like he is getting revenge on the people who snubbed him by voting bitch slapping him out of office.

There, fixed it for you….

ScottG on September 22, 2006 at 5:08 PM

GregH, it seems you have a one-sided education on this subject. entagor did a great summary of the side you missed here.

Democracy under Chavez

1992 Chavez stages failed coup in 1992
1998, 2000 Chavez elected

the following is excerpted to save space, not direct quotes
2004 Frontpage Chavez wins recall
- Chavez) prevented the counting of four million recall petition signatures
- that’s more than a third of the electorate
- Chavez insisted only those who voted in the election that brought him to power be allowed to cast a ballot in the recall. But millions had protested what appeared to be a rigged election by boycotting the polls in 2000
- the Supreme Court had been “enlarged,” that is, stuffed with Chavez loyalists (increased from 20 to 32 judges)
- election day voting hours were moved at the whim of the authorities
- Harvard/MIT report calculates 99 percent likely fraud
- exit polls showed Chavez losing by 59 percent

Frontpage 2002 a march on April 11 to protest Chavez
as marchers approached his palace, thugs began firing guns into the throng… 60 – 70 died… Videotape by local tv showed at least some of the gunmen were Chavistas, Chavez supporters , members of his “Bolivarian Circles,” as he calls his own Marxist militia version of Hitler Youth and SS storm troopers … This private army of ideological thugs and bullies, according to Chavez critics in Venezuela’s National Assembly, has been illegally funded with government money $4 billion of which vanished from the nation’s macroeconomic stabilization fund

Chavez ignored demands to arrest the killers and to this day has stonewalled calls for a “truth commission” to objectively document what happened. As to the media and its videotapes, Chavez has threatened to take away the broadcasti license of any TV station that airs what he decides is anti-government “propaganda

2006 Frontpage Chavez supporters won all 167 seats
in the National Assembly on Dec. 4 after major opposition parties boycotted the election, saying they did not trust Venezuela’s electoral system or the country’s elections council. The opposition has raised doubts about the nation’s electoral registry, an electronic voting system and electoral audits conducted by the council

Some may call this democracy.

with this type of Democracy, Gore would have won in Florida

entagor on September 20, 2006 at 7:06 PM

NTWR on September 22, 2006 at 5:32 PM

NYWR…..way to go….

Jimmah is only the most naive and dangerous man ever to hold the office of president…and ex-president…

robo on September 22, 2006 at 5:50 PM

sorry…. NTWR

robo on September 22, 2006 at 5:50 PM

Carter continues his career noted for extreme incompetence, ignorance, naivette, and just plain stupidity to the detriment of the interests of the United States.

Carter is an excellent example of what the Chamberlain Left has to offer. Unfortunately as soon as Carter (mercifully for the citizens of the United States) passes on there will be another from the Left to take his place.

omegaram on September 22, 2006 at 6:55 PM

Mr. Peanut meets Mr. Bananna Republic

Makes my colin hurt just to watch them shake hands.

Hening on September 22, 2006 at 9:42 PM

Sorry, I meant colon…..

Colon, Carter…..Colon, Carter…..Colon Carter.

Hening on September 22, 2006 at 9:47 PM

I swear, if Carter and his ilk had been around in December 1941 and there had been a republican president, he would have been sucking up to Hitler and Hirohito. Or maybe that “farmers deferment” from battle in WW2 had other connotations? Grad of Annapolis didnt seem to garner him a position on the front lines anyway.

gary on September 23, 2006 at 10:26 AM

Should have said Korean war as Jimmy didnt grad until 46.

gary on September 23, 2006 at 10:31 AM

Here in the South, the real men are a 8-10 on the scale of manliness, but the other extremes are a 1-3 on the Reichter Scale.

Maybe the disparity is because we/they lost the Civil War. And let’s face it, Sherman marched right through south Georgia, burning and pilaging everything in sight, perhaps right near Jimmy’s homeplace. Therefore, maybe it’s in his genes.

Note to country: among other things, don’t elect a president who hasn’t gotten over losing the Civil War or who invented the Internet. More caveats to follow….

Webutante on September 23, 2006 at 2:25 PM

La puta!

(Which is also exactly why Jonathan Swift named his floating city of idiots after the Spanish word for whore: Laputa.)

profitsbeard on September 23, 2006 at 6:53 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.