It was only a matter of time. For too long the bellicose agressors of international blog “A list” gangstery — Instanpundit, Blair, NRO, LGF, Ace of Spades, Hewitt, Malkin, Taranto, Allah, and their running-blog puppet lackeys — have sabotaged proge…

So by you, holding opinions dogmatically is a good thing? Interesting. Must save a lot of time.

honora on September 22, 2006 at 10:13 AM

There are times for nuance and there are times which call for decisive decision-making. I have the capacity for both, honora.

You’re intelligent but very snooty. Best to you, anyway,

Their apparent “bipartisanship” appears to be of the circle the wagons against “outsider” atatck variety, but it isn’t.

It’s a belated realization of how bad their party looks now that dictators like Chavez have picked up their rhetoric. Rangel and Pelois “get it,” — the rest of the hate spewing rank and file at DU and KOS, and Hamsher of Firedoglake, DON’T!

The vile hatespewing brownshirts that make up the “base” of the modern Democratic Party and led by Hamsher and KOS have been let loose and will not be called to heel.

When they lose, no doubt they’ll blame Diebold.

honora, that’s what’s wrong with liberals. You place more importance on words than actions.

That explains the liberal puppy-dog love of people like Che, Castro, and Hugo. Hell, if I read Castro and Che’s writings from early in their revolutions when I was 16, I’d probably be persuaded by their passion. But I didn’t. I grew up. I look around today and see failed communism. I see countries that are worse off than when they “transformed” into communism. I see people so poor and afraid of challenging their government, that they would risk their lives by crossing the sea on shanty rafts. I see people murdered by Hugo because they don’t believe in his government. I see tyranny.

Please, please, please, give me a Tarot Card Reading!

How does this fit with your earlier comment that Bush was not the “sharpest knife in the drawer?”

You’re intellectual giant John Kerry (and the rest of the Donkey Party’s leadership) is in total denial that there even IS a Social Security crisis. Yet YOU agree with Bush on both the problem AND the solution.

You waffling?

Rush Limbaugh played the key exerpt of the Harlem speech yesterday, and you can read the transcript of that part at his site.

It was a rascist rant pitting the whites (the Europeans) against the survivors of the massacre of the Americas, referring to the audience as the survivors, the aborigines of America. The audience went wild when Chavez said that.

The speech dripped rascist hatred.

Play that intro in a political ad and Willie Horton is nothing.

The press is cooperating at burying the text of this speech. Try a search. One press release implied that the church speech was about Bush being drunk, walking like John Wayne etc. But those comments were to passersby outside the church.

The U.N. speech is being focused on and the Harlem speech, sponsored by Charles Rangel in his home district, and I think attended by him, is being erased.

Pelosi moved in to add weight to the diversionary tactic.

if Clinton had done his job to kill Bin Laden, when he had the chance – 3,000 Americans would still be alive today & the Twin Towers would still be standing. so if you liberals want to blame someone – blame Bill Clinton!

Starblazer on September 21, 2006 at 6:57 PM

You just can’t help yourself. Holy mother of God.

You know who else sees things in black and white Honora? People with principles.

Really? Here I am thinking that life is complicated and that living life well and being a leader is really complicated, and actually it’s like falling off a log. Sort of makes you wonder why we aren’t up to our necks in strong leadership though.

“I do not support nation building.” G W Bush, 2000.

“Wanted dead or alive” G W Bush 2001; “I’m really not that concerned about him (OBL)” G W Bush 2005

One of Bush’s great moments: his Social Security plan. Problem: SS is on the road to insolvency due to Boomer bubble. Bush solution: private retirement accounts for people in their 30’s and younger.

Now here’s the thing: private accounts are a good idea, unfortunately they don’t address the Boomer shortfall. I’m confused–is the problem here black and Bush’s solution white, or what??

The point being that your boy is as good at blurring the lines as the next guy.

You want to keep on, we can start talking about fiscal responsibility. Black and white, principles? Bring it on buddy.

The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment. -Bertrand Russell
That last part explains the “I voted for it before I voted against it” – get it, you simpletons?

How do you think Mr. Bush would respond to this quote?

Entelechy on September 22, 2006 at 12:44 AM

So by you, holding opinions dogmatically is a good thing? Interesting. Must save a lot of time.

Really, Honora, after the spanking you’ve had here today I’m a little reluctant to pile on. However, I must. Like most liberals, your rampant use of meaningless generalities in arguments, your mis-direction from the subject of the thread when you’re in over your head, and your elitist, oh-so-overeducated snobbery is glaringly transparent – precisely why so many Americans find Kerry, et al so repugnant.

Americans are not nearly as stupid as liberals like you delude yourselves into believing. If they were, they would ALL be voting Democrat.

Benthoven on September 21, 2006 at 9:01 PM

Oh pile on at will. RW has its share of sheep. So I guess by you, only 48% of American voters are stupid. Gosh, it must be hard on you folks who aren’t.

…

The rats are trying to leave the latrine but the slime is pulling them back. So they devided into two camps, the Harkin camp on the one side and the Pelosi one on the ‘high road’. They think we are utterly stupid. Above all they think the independents and sane Democrats are complete morons.

What they haven’t realized yet, or maybe they have, is that Chavez’ speech was a unifier, just not for the Dems.

It elevated the WH to style and elegance and dropped the Chavez simpathizers into a deeper gutter. The decent Americans know this instinctively and no speech or commentary about it can alter that.

John Kerry is a somewhat smart and petulant, long-winded, inflated, aristocratic, prancing-around, arrogant, elitist and nuanced stiff, who “knows history”.

Support material to better understand Liberals:

The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment. -Bertrand Russell

That last part explains the “I voted for it before I voted against it” – get it, you simpletons?

How do you think Mr. Bush would respond to this quote?

Scroll down to the Fox News screencaps. Seriously, it’s worth it.

Also, there’s a link to a thread at Democratic Underground, where the kooks savage Charlie Rangel for chastising Hugo Chavez for ca……

“Chavez might have his faults, but the guy deserves a fucking medal for saying something that all our Democratic leaders would love to say…but don’t have the balls to.”

“LOL,I agree completely with you on this one”

“”George Bush esta El Dipshitto!”

“Exactly correct”

“Harkin defends Venezuelan President’s U-N speech against Bush by Darwin Danielson Iowa Senator Tom Harkin, a Democrat, today defended Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s United Nations speech in which Chavez called President George Bush the devil…”

“Thank you Harkin…I am tired of the House Dems slamming Chavaz ”

“Finally, a DEMOCRAT with balls.”

“Yes, Charlie and Nancy: Bush IS the Devil. Or have you forgotten…”

“Nancy Pelosi has a lot of nerve calling Hugo a “thug”. Shows how ignorant she is about the situation in Venezuela.”

“Chavez rocks, this guy has more heart than most the leaders can dream of…”

And on and on and on.

…