Daniel Ellsberg begs “conscientious insiders” to leak Iran war plans
posted at 6:34 pm on September 15, 2006 by Allahpundit
Your only duty is to your own conscience.
Your only duty is to your own conscience.
You must be logged in and have JavaScript enabled to post a comment.
|
|
© 2006-2012 Hot Air | Designed by The Blog Studio | Terms of Use | About | Advertise


Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Also, if you have the time, could you please provide them (use “press” and “Iran” through use of a coin toss, really makes no difference) with the guard locations, hours, shifts, family members, the secret code, the location of the red button, and Bush’s thumb if necessary for launch.
StoutRepublican on September 15, 2006 at 6:41 PM
Openly asking for treason. When will someone finally get the nads to lock these traitors up? I am up to here with these traitors, I have a fmily to protect and they are giving secrets to the enemies that want us all dead.
bbz123 on September 15, 2006 at 6:42 PM
Ummm… if you incite someone to espianage, is this not conspiricy??? and could this not even raise to the level of treason?
Romeo13 on September 15, 2006 at 6:43 PM
For a moment I read the headline as, “Daniel Ellsberg begs “conscientious insiders” to leak Iran war plans concerning Hezbollah, Al-Sadr”.
Silly me.
Niko on September 15, 2006 at 6:50 PM
Somebody should give that bastard Ellisberg to Iran. If the politicians and courts in this country had any balls and good sense this guy would have been jailed years ago. What a sad state we’re in.
rplat on September 15, 2006 at 6:53 PM
Oh. My.
I, too, thought it was directed at people in Iran, asking for them to leak Amadjihads war plans to us.
Did someone drop an acid tab in my rootbeer? What the heck is going on here? Conspiracy, sure, sedition, yes, treason, yes… Lock this madman up!
NTWR on September 15, 2006 at 7:00 PM
Another example of “Freedom of the Press” being used as a method of espionage and sedition.
Perhaps one day the United States will return to more responsible freedoms, such as existed in times of national crisis during WWII, where sedition and treason were considered offenses to be punished.
Of course the United States has contingency plans to engage Iran in anything from Nuclear War to mild proxy conflict. Of course they update those plans by the hour, and of course those plans are secret. Would you expect anything less from a world class superpower than can win any war they put their mind to?
omegaram on September 15, 2006 at 7:02 PM
Well that Ehren Watada (the darling of the anti-war crowd out here in the wacky 50th state) does the same thing. He says that he’s only encouraging those who are in the military to do the right thing (which is do what he did and be a guy who says he’s not going to Iraq but would go to Afgahnistan). I think all these people who advocate treason should be treated in the manner they were by our first President George Washington.
Catie96706 on September 15, 2006 at 8:11 PM
Ellisberg? Ellers? Ellensburg?
I don’t mean to advance this theory, I’m just airing it out. But has anyone ever seen Greenwald and Ellsberg in the same room?
Pablo on September 15, 2006 at 8:12 PM
Typical.
I think that Americans should beg ‘conscientious insiders’ of the MSM to leak their sources names. Heck, if goBernment had the stones they would pass a law forcing the vetting of all sources. That would definitely be in the public interest.
DannoJyd on September 15, 2006 at 9:16 PM
Okay something needs to be cleared up here and now. Liberals are not patriotic – for reasons that go beyond politics.
Ask yourself honestly, how solid is the Patriotism of the average Liberal, the War on Terror and Bush-Hatred notwithstanding?
Honestly it’s not that solid I’m afraid.
Now don’t take that the wrong way. I’m not calling names, or judging, or slandering, or anything like that – but let’s be perfectly honest. When it gets right down to it most Liberals consider Nationalism (along with other traditional social institutions like organized religion) to be a primitive ideology. They consider it to be an archaic method of social organization that we ought to have the “Good Sense” to evolve beyond. Most Liberals see a supreme United Nations (or some sort of Global Federal government) to be the inescapable evolutionary destination of humanity.
As a conservative, while I agree that’s not a totally crazy assumption, I don’t agree at all that it is something that can be achieved while tyranny still runs rampant over half the globe in the form of Middle Eastern Islamism, and Chinese Communism. Nor do I believe that those threats can be appeased, reasoned with, mitigated, or dealt with in any other way than military conflict (or the threat thereof). Beyond that, even if those threats are dealt with one way or the other there still remain huge questions as to whether or not a “One World Government” would even work – just look at the EU for instance.
So in response I would say this:
I trust a Liberal’s love of Freedom and willingness to defend it in their own backyard. But do I trust a Liberal’s patriotism in regards to their own particular Nation, and do I trust them to the see the long-term interest in maintaining the strength of their nation for the purposes of expanding freedom in the face of global tyranny? No, generally speaking for most Liberals I don’t.
Conservatives see the big picture – Liberals don’t.
Put it this way, what do Neo-Nazis have to do with the Ku Klux Klan? Well, according to modern Liberal logic nothing at all. They are two totally separate organizations. But a person who sees the big picture would know better.
What do Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, Abu Sayef, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Saddam Hussein, and Amedinijhad etc. etc. all have in common? Well according to most Liberals they are all disparate regional groups and individuals who seek their own particular demands and can be dealt with separately.
After 40 years of terrorist attacks from every corner of the Muslim world Liberals ought to know better.
What’s more I would argue that the so-called “Moderate Muslim” is a myth. In my mind a “Moderate Muslim” is no better than the “Good People of the South” who wished not to be involved in all the conflict that erupted in the wake of the Civil Rights movement. You’re either for freedom or you’re not in my book.
Apart from Gay Marriage and Abortion as birth control – Liberals are not for freedom, and they sure as hell aren’t patriotic!
venmax on September 15, 2006 at 10:33 PM
Glenn Reynolds summed it up, uhm, a little shorter.
These people are not anti-war. They’re on the other side.
Niko on September 15, 2006 at 11:10 PM
Niko, I find it very hard to believe that the sniveling professor said that. Maybe he quoted an actual conservative saying that…maybe.
Jaibones on September 15, 2006 at 11:33 PM
Pablo, you beat me to it, I’m late today … How would a Patriot Act?!??
Anwyn on September 16, 2006 at 2:28 AM
Ellsberg and his ilk have no conscience, whatsoever, and know, full well, that they can do and say whatever they wish, with impunity. That, my friends, is the “hidden crisis”… that is out in plain view.
Aunt B on September 16, 2006 at 9:18 AM
Would this have happened under FDR during WWII, how about Kennedy during the Cuban Missle Crisis? How diffeent the world would be…..
dallas94 on September 16, 2006 at 9:47 AM
He should have been executed back in 1971.
Kini on September 16, 2006 at 4:51 PM