Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


War Bulletins Updated: Not the right bad guy

posted at 10:23 am on September 12, 2006 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view

Afghanistan: Bad guy bagged.

On the day of the fifth anniversary of the 9-11 attack, Coalition forces score a high value target in Afghanistan. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the commander of Hezb-i-Islami and ally of al-Qaeda and the Taliban, has been captured during a joint U.S. and Afghan Army raid in “eastern Afghanistan.” Hekmatyar, contrary to his rhetoric gave up to the Coalition forces without a fight. Hekmatyar’s arrest is said to be part of an ‘ongoing operation.’

Update: Wrong bad guy. The real Hekmatyar is still on the loose.

Afghanistan: NATO allies balk.

Five years after the world stood “shoulder to shoulder” with America in the aftermath of 9/11, The Times has learnt that many of the countries that pledged support then have now ignored an urgent request for more help in fighting a resurgent Taleban and its al-Qaeda allies.

Turkey, Germany, Spain and Italy have all effectively ruled out sending more troops. France has not committed itself either way, but the military sources in Kabul said that there were no expectations that the French would contribute to a new battlegroup, especially now that they were providing a substantial force in Lebanon.

They have rejected an appeal from General James Jones, the American Supreme Allied Commander Europe, for 2,500 more troops to fight alongside American, British, Canadian and Dutch soldiers. The 26-nation alliance has not volunteered a single extra combat soldier.

What’s needed are combat troops that can fight right alongside US and British combat troops, and that seems to be part of the problem: The countries named don’t have many combat units capable of fighting alongside US and British troops. What they do have, they don’t want to commit. Multilateralism does have its limits.

Denmark: According to a Qatari paper, explosives found last week resemble explosives used in London’s 7/7 attack.

Chemical explosives seized during a raid in Denmark last week are of the same type as those used in the July 2005 London bombings, known by the acronym TATP, tabloid B.T. reported yesterday.

A phial seized on September 5 at the home of one of the suspects held in an anti-terror swoop in Odense contains “a clear liquid consisting of a synthetic mix for the production of triacetone triperoxyde (TATP) and crystals consisting of TATP,” the paper said, quoting a laboratory analysis report.

The lab report was found on Saturday in the street outside the Copenhagen laboratory by a passerby, B.T. said.

Neither the Danish intelligence service PET nor the Odense police would comment on the newspaper report.

Six Danes and a foreigner aged 18 to 33, all Muslims, were arrested in a raid on September 5 suspected of planning terrorist bombings.

In addition to the TATP, police seized chemical fertilizers, bottles of natural gas and pieces of shrapnel, B.T. said.

TATP is relatively easy to make and has surfaced in a number of recent terrorism investigations, including bombings in the Middle East and the London bombings in July 2005.

And Syria: Terrorists killed attacking the US embassy.

Islamic militants attempted to storm the U.S. Embassy in Damascus on Tuesday using automatic rifles, hand grenades and at least one van rigged with explosives, the government said. Four people were killed in the brazen attack, including three of the assailants.

No Americans were hurt, and the attackers apparently did not breach the high walls surrounding the embassy’s white compound in the city’s diplomatic neighborhood.

But one of Syria’s anti-terrorism forces was killed and at least 11 others were injured, the country’s official news agency reported. The wounded including a police officer, two Iraqis and seven people employed at nearby technical workshop.

They attacked shouting “Allahu Ackbar,” in case anyone suspected these might be Episcopalean extremists.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Coalition forces score a high value target in Afghanistan. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar

Holy Freakin’[explicative deleted]!!!! We got that [explicative deleted]!!! Awesome!!! That guy was one of the biggest HVT in Afghanistan. Sweeeeeet!

EFG on September 12, 2006 at 10:45 AM

there were no expectations that the French would contribute to a new battlegroup, especially now that they were providing a substantial force in Lebanon.

Giggle

student on September 12, 2006 at 10:55 AM

Brilliant about bagging another dirtball. Isn’t it funny how these jerks exhort their followers to fight to the last and die for Islam, yet when when the good guys show up, they cave without a fight and sing like canaries after?

At least Saddam had to be dragged out of his hidey-hole. Their motto should be ‘hide to the end.’

Jezla on September 12, 2006 at 11:00 AM

I would favor a complete pull out of the entire middle east just to hear the Europeans collectively cut the cheese!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on September 12, 2006 at 11:04 AM

I would like to see OBL strap one on and martyr himself.

When he is captured, he will cry about his kidneys.

Or conjugal visits.

tormod on September 12, 2006 at 11:37 AM

The Canadians seem to be thinking that, if no one else is going to supply more troops, they will have to do it themselves. It is all over the Canadian news this week that a force of tanks will be sent maybe before then end of the month. Apparently, the Taliban are trying to fight from fixed positions rather than hit and run as previously expected.

Blaise on September 12, 2006 at 12:10 PM

According to my sources inside NATO, the French are having trouble getting enough white flags to equip their forces in Lebanon and so cannot afford to send more troops to Afghanistan until they can be properly equipped. Italy is on holiday this month, as is Spain, and Germany is deploying a task force to help Iran re-evaluate the truth of the holocaust.
Canada, to it’s credit, is expected to send more soldiers and equipment.

old_dawg on September 12, 2006 at 12:18 PM

EFG IS RIGHT
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar is a BIG HVT..WOW!

Turkey, Germany, Spain and Italy have all effectively ruled out sending more troops. France has not committed itself either way, but the military sources in Kabul said that there were no expectations that the French would contribute to a new battlegroup, especially now that they were providing a substantial force in Lebanon.

Euroweenie with Turkish coward sauce for lunch anyone?

labwrs on September 12, 2006 at 12:32 PM

…especially now that they were providing a substantial force in Lebanon.

What is the multicultural meaning of substantial theses days?

Entelechy on September 12, 2006 at 4:01 PM

France has not committed itself either way

As if they know how to commit to anything.

Rick on September 12, 2006 at 4:07 PM

Syria assisting the United States? So many thoughts come across after reading that, but none that believe Syria is our friend. My foremost thought is that they have turned on their terrorist comrades, and I wish I knew the reason for that.

I”ll be looking for more information.

DannoJyd on September 12, 2006 at 4:58 PM

Danno asks:

My foremost thought is that they have turned on their terrorist comrades, and I wish I knew the reason for that.

1. They are obligated under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations to protect foreign embassies. As are we.

2. George W. Bush is no Jimmy Carter. And we have over 138,000 troops next door.

georgej on September 13, 2006 at 10:43 AM

boo hoo, poor little America under GWB. This pres only wants to cry for victims, instead of protecting Americans. GWB is worse than Jimmy Carter. And someday in Crawford he will see all the armless. legless troops he sacrificed so that the Iraqi pres could visit one of the the axis of evil, Iran. Watch him kiss the cheek of the man who invaded our embassy in Iran. He will lose his mind like LBJ. When the souls of real men visit him in his cowardly sleep. We should immediately bomb Syria, or at least throw a spit wad at them. But no, boo hoo we are poor little America.

LZVandy on September 13, 2006 at 3:32 PM

LZVandy, worse than Carter? Even Cigarman cannot be compared with that totally ineffectual leader democrat.

Georgej, your latter point makes sense, but it must go deeper than that. IMHO, Iran was involved in the decision.

Syrian Dies of Wounds After Embassy Raid

How convenient.

DannoJyd on September 13, 2006 at 10:28 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.